[00:07] back [00:08] welcome back Sean :) [00:08] thanks [00:08] slideshow is looking good [00:09] knome is just off working magic for the contribute one we think :) [00:11] cool [00:11] noticed the astrerisk stars went away [00:11] not sure which version is working on, though [00:12] the words replace snow I think slickymaster :) [00:12] as bluesabre noticed - no snow in Xubuntu land currently [00:12] or the words piling up into an X [00:12] oh, it was snow? [00:12] :D [00:12] lol [00:12] bluesabre: no - I think it was stars :p [00:13] but I saw snow - then couldn't see stars :( [00:13] bluesabre: Anything I need to look at? [00:13] though I would if he thumped me in the eye :p [00:13] Unit193: core merge? [00:13] :p [00:13] No. [00:13] :P [00:13] :) [00:13] * flocculant adds it to agenda [00:13] poor core :( [00:14] no love [00:14] Unit193: last 2 commits here look good to you? https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~xubuntu-art/xubuntu-artwork/xenial/changes [00:14] slickymaster: core was bad - he was core first [00:15] last cigarette of the day [00:15] * flocculant patiently reads these changes things waiting for the day [00:15] slickymaster: it's tomorrow ... [00:16] sorry and all that [00:16] only technically, flocculant :P [00:16] Big commit. :( [00:16] * flocculant doesn't patiently read the second one - assume it's all Greek anyway [00:19] Unit193: mostly a bunch of deleted files [00:19] Mhmm. [01:06] knome slickymaster - dragging the discussion back here [01:07] consider me dragged flocculant [01:07] nothing that I can see - I would really like to see what it looks like when installing in SSD [01:07] you rich you [01:08] well I'm obviously loaded ... [01:08] :p [01:08] :) [01:10] not sure about slowing down slide #1 - looks procactive to me [01:10] there is a distinct wait for the 'words' [01:10] my point is that the icons came too fast [01:10] slickymaster: all at once? [01:10] and then just sit there until the transition to the next slide [01:11] not sure that is an issue [01:11] not much an issue [01:11] don't you get words a bit later? [01:11] so [01:11] rather makes it unbalanced [01:11] slide starts with left panel [01:11] get icons [01:11] get words [01:11] is what I see [01:12] but after the words showing up, noting happens [01:12] for a period longer than it took them to appear [01:12] not sure if I'm making myself clear :P [01:13] slickymaster: so what you'd like to see is the slide itself finish quicker? [01:14] no, no that [01:14] slickymaster: so just a real general slowdown? [01:15] I'd like to have a proportional amount of time between the two distinct phases os the slide [01:15] not sure tbh [01:15] it was quite quick > ubuntu +xfce= xubuntu [01:15] x time until the icons first start to appear proportinal to all icons and words there [01:16] we're advertising xubuntu here I guess [01:16] well, yeah [01:16] we're not [01:16] they are already installing xubuntu [01:16] true [01:16] they could be just trying knome [01:17] not yet convinced [01:17] but we're not overworrrying about them doing anythign but Xubuntu [01:17] surely [01:17] yep, they are trying our product out; if they like it, they'll keep it [01:17] no need for cheesy marketing [01:17] does what I'm saying about the time makes any sense to you two? [01:17] so - if this slide is quick - then the rest give them the reason to stay [01:18] slickymaster: I know what you mean - I've installed on a vm too - but I've installed on SSD and it is quick [01:18] so - slide too quick - don't restart and read things you missed [01:18] yeah, I can only imagine that [01:19] is my position [01:19] personally [01:19] I'l happily go with the consnsus on this one [01:20] * consensus [01:20] I'd look for an arrow or something - I already know what Xubuntu is - and you'd have to be a bit slow to not know it's some sort of X with ubuntu :) [01:20] is my position [01:20] :) [01:20] twice :D [01:20] lol [01:20] knome, what's your position? [01:21] sofa [01:21] hah [01:21] same here [01:21] i can look to make that first slide faster [01:22] can't you just change the icons fading time? [01:22] i can, but what does that ultimately fix [01:22] that way there wouldn't be no need to change the slide time [01:23] then the user would just sit looking at the slower than snail fadein [01:23] no, if it wasn't an abrupt change [01:23] we could go on for hours about this - personally I'd like to see all of the slides fade really quick till the contribute one :p [01:24] a small change won't make the waiting time with the fully animated stuff much shorter [01:24] essentially, the first slide is boring, but it has to be there [01:24] yes === daxcat is now known as dax [01:24] so we could just make it progress faster [01:25] works for me [01:25] helps with the "slideshow too slow" issue as well [01:25] yes [01:26] so just change the time slide# takes to do stuff? [01:26] holy moly, this channel got busy [01:26] flocculant, for that single slide, yeah [01:26] bluesabre: well UI freeze in less than 24 hours and suddenly the slideshow is really important :p [01:26] flocculant, keep the animation the same, but show the animated stuff for less time tbe [01:26] knome: ack [01:26] yes, the others don't need to be changed [01:27] bluesabre: I'm running QA like this next cycle :p [01:27] flocculant: great :D [01:27] \o/ [01:27] that's not fair, the slideshow branch was there to look for quite some time :P [01:27] knome: working on the -artwork upload now [01:28] knome: ha ha ha [01:28] knome, re. the contributors slide you went with the fading words option? [01:28] knome: serious point now [01:28] besides, it doesn't make sense to finish the slideshow at the beginning of a cycle because we need to make sure it's current [01:28] flocculant, mhm? [01:28] slickymaster, no, the *sliding* words, but i'll have to finish that tomorrow [01:29] ok [01:29] bluesabre, goodie [01:29] knome: given I can't get branch to work on livesession - can we push this out so it lands - if so Friday or Saturday in the iso? [01:29] yes, my intention is to get it ready tomorrow for bluesabre to upload [01:29] then I can quickly do a real install and see if we need to tweak time [01:29] err [01:29] bluesabre can't upload [01:29] for somebody to upload [01:30] ok [01:30] i'll work on it tomorrow, don't worry [01:30] I'd really like us to have a slideshow that can be seen for people installing to SSD [01:30] yes [01:30] especially given it's got to be good for 3 years [01:31] :) [01:31] I'll have to be up in 5 hours, so bed time for me [01:31] nighty slickymaster [01:31] I don't have the quickest - but I do have one that's not a platter :p [01:31] night slickymaster [01:31] flocculant, will you take a look at the docs during the day? [01:32] slickymaster: I'm all up to date now :) [01:32] flocculant, we already went from 50000 to 25000, that should be twice as fast :) [01:32] I won't be able to log to the channel until after dinner [01:32] knome: or half as slow [01:32] and as i said, 20000 should be okay as well [01:32] yep [01:32] nope, less is faster [01:32] let's see what I get [01:32] yeah [01:33] see you all later [01:33] nighty slickymaster [01:33] night slickymaster :) [01:34] knome: if the installer is going to be faster, maybe we could have a link for the -offtopic channel on that last slide (we already mention it) [01:34] "Still around, want to chat?" [01:34] heh [01:34] maybe [01:34] just a thought [01:35] bluesabre: good point [01:35] an unofficial, don't really consider it too hard, thought [01:35] though then the expectation is that there is always somebody waiting to chat... [01:35] that's true too [01:35] but on the other hand - someone might be [01:35] sure [01:36] bluesabre: currently the last slide shows the link - but doesn't link [01:37] we could maybe fiddle words [01:40] http://pad.ubuntu.com/xubuntu-1604-slideshow [01:40] at the bottom [01:42] knome: actually on the other hand given that the interwebs decided that we were 1 up from Lubuntu - people probably will be :) [01:42] heh [01:43] :) [01:43] that kind of takes care of people installing quickly - and those installing slowly, everyone else is kind of where they were [01:44] I think I'm mostly done with words now :p [01:44] mostly... [01:45] well [01:45] I could drone on - but it'll be a drone in my head too :) [01:45] ;) [02:00] forgot to bump that version number to 16.04 [02:00] I'll do another upload in the morning, probably a typo in there somewhere or something [02:00] :P [02:01] it's too bad that folks that can upload to the archive can't auto-cancel their own uploads [02:01] heh [02:02] ẗhat'd be chaotic [02:03] :D [02:03] suppose so [03:01] flocculant: So, -pa-plug was taking 40%cpu... === tsimonq2alt is now known as tsimonq2- === tsimonq2- is now known as tsimonq2 === pavlushka_ is now known as pavlushka [06:24] * Unit193 wonders if bluesabre was drunk uploading again... [07:01] Hi there!! [07:01] flocculant, Hi [08:37] pavlushka: hi :) [08:55] flocculant, Hi [09:13] knome: in the user docs, what-is-xubuntu calls ~&last-lts-version and -codename - where are they? can't find them - but they both point to 14.04 in 16.04 docs - or does that change automatically? [09:50] flocculant: Do http://paste.openstack.org/show/584pGWSgPJGTisilLp1Y [10:04] Unit193: just forgetful [10:05] Because of the weird version, and '16.o4' :) [10:08] Wait, elementary-icon-theme is arch 'any' not arch 'all'? [10:09] holy crap, did I type 16.o4? [10:09] Unit193: so confused now - what user.ent is that? [10:10] oh wow [10:10] I don't deserve to upload anymore [10:10] 0h 0h :( [10:10] That's not under your name, though. :P [10:10] there's the typo I wanted so I can re-upload [10:10] :D [10:10] ha ha ha [10:11] got it sorted? [10:13] knome: me? I think so - just not sure where Unit193 gets 16.04 from :p [10:13] :) [10:14] nowhere [10:14] it should be updated on http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-doc/xubuntu-docs/xenial/view/head:/user-docs/libs/xubuntu-user.ent [10:16] and done [10:17] Unit193: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xubuntu-artwork/16.04.0 :) [10:17] knome: ok [10:17] krytarik: ↑ [10:17] bluesabre, have you coordinated a -docs upload with slickymaster before the next beta? [10:17] bluesabre: Nice. [10:17] slickymaster: let me know when you're ready to upload -docs [10:18] knome: yes [10:18] good [10:18] :D [10:18] slickymaster, make sure the translation templates are updated... [10:18] :) [10:19] slickymaster: this will need to be before March 21, for b2 freeze [10:20] Hoho, and fop is actually in universe, so everything should build even. :D [10:20] :o [10:22] Unit193: well I have fop - I have no fop upgradable - pdf's don't build :) [10:22] rather I have the same version locally as at universe [10:22] dun dun dunnnn [10:23] but [10:23] Unit193, maybe you should look why it doesn't work..... [10:27] Well I'll check if I can confirm it. [10:42] knome: Font issues, droid stuff. [10:42] "nice" [10:43] i should likely look at that [10:44] flocculant, look at the slideshow! :) [10:44] lunch --> [10:47] knome: that's \o/ [10:47] assuming it'll be more than artwork and documentation :) [10:47] and pretty much exactly what I had in mind eventually ;) [11:05] flocculant, the slide can show about 6 and a half items, and if we have less, it'll wrap [11:23] knome: so, I can contribute to artwork or documentation? [11:27] yes. [11:27] i need to fix that [11:27] try going back to that slide :X [11:28] :D [11:28] or switching back and forth between them [11:29] yes, or that [11:29] i've used more time in making sure the effects die graciously than making sure they look good [11:29] >__< [11:31] https://youtu.be/rN6A9S4kKQo [11:31] :D [11:31] * bluesabre is a monster [11:32] haha [11:32] there's a "Noto Sans UI" [11:32] ... [11:32] * knome looks [11:33] hmm, it isn't visible in the font list [11:33] so let's not use it [11:33] le sigh [11:40] bluesabre, can you confirm something for me? [11:40] does the documentation package depend on droid now? [11:40] if yes, can we get it to depend on noto? [11:40] and since noto doesn't have a mono variant, i'm going to have to drop in dejavu sans too [11:41] so maybe we should depend on that too [11:41] or i think recommend [11:41] because of course we have fallbacks [11:42] actually the PDF's do require those fonts [11:42] ... [11:53] Unit193, can you check if the docs build on xenial with the latest revision? [11:59] the font issues should be fixed now [12:00] don't we use something else than dejavu for mono? [12:00] the terminal is dejavu [12:00] liberation mono [12:00] no? [12:01] we changed dejavu to liberation a few cycles ago [12:01] sigh... [12:01] (it was your request at the time) [12:01] okay? [12:01] okay! [12:01] * knome shrugs [12:01] i'll go put the pieces back then... [12:01] but i think it was your request [12:02] i still use dejavu sans, so i can't think why i would have proposed liberation [12:02] i'm sure i was "okay" with it [12:05] i should make all commands replace "xubutnu" with "xubuntu" [12:09] knome, ochosi: definitely dejavu https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/xubuntu-default-settings/trunk/view/head:/etc/xdg/xdg-xubuntu/xfce4/terminal/terminalrc [12:10] and https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/xubuntu-default-settings/trunk/view/head:/debian/xubuntu-default-settings.gsettings-override#L18 [12:10] knome: the package itself has no font depends http://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/xubuntu-docs [12:13] and the mandatory okay with different punctuation... [12:13] okay. [12:14] and knome: http://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/fonts-noto-mono [12:18] odd, i wonder why i have liberation then [12:18] i don't remember deliberately changing this (ever) [12:26] ochosi, sigh :) [12:26] bluesabre, what would you think about recommends? [12:27] the pdf's look a bit crappy without the font (eg. fallback to fallback serif) [12:29] i'll revert the revert to liberation commit then... [12:32] sry bout that then [12:32] i switched to inconsolata now to make it clear that i'm not using the default ;) [12:32] hah [12:33] and crap, is noto big [12:33] still dl-ing that piece of work [12:33] yeah.... [12:33] too big really [12:33] :P [12:33] ridiculous considering it's "only a font" [12:33] yes [12:36] ok, revert done [12:36] * knome slaps ochosi gently [12:36] :< [12:36] :D [12:37] knome: recommends means it will pull it normally, but since that's the default font, seems reasonable to me [12:37] yes, i'm aware, and exactly [12:37] and it makes the documentation branded with the unified look === yofel_ is now known as yofel [12:37] or integrated, or whatever you want to call it [12:38] * knome goes fixing the slideshow [12:38] so bluesabre can't troll more [12:39] oh wow [12:39] the jquery function returns the right value now [12:39] good god [12:39] how nice of it [12:40] js, love it or hate it, usually the latter [12:40] though js !== jquery [12:40] yes [12:41] jquery further expands the love/hate relationship [12:41] haha [12:41] well it makes things so easy [12:41] yup [12:41] and it's sometimes shameful to use it [12:41] when there's a pure js alternative [12:41] i'm just too lazy for that most of the time [12:41] ease of use/readability almost always wins out for me [12:42] yeah [12:43] so what are the keywords we want to use on the contribute slide? [12:44] ochosi, you think noto is big? [12:44] !info fonts-noto-hinted xenial [12:44] fonts-noto-hinted (source: fonts-noto): "No Tofu" font families with large Unicode coverage (hinted). In component universe, is optional. Version 20160116-1 (xenial), package size 4725 kB, installed size 15581 kB [12:44] !info fonts-noto-cjk xenial [12:44] fonts-noto-cjk (source: fonts-noto-cjk): "No Tofu" font families with large Unicode coverage (CJK). In component main, is optional. Version 1:1.004+repack1-1 (xenial), package size 72656 kB, installed size 112297 kB [12:53] knome: ok - 6 is more than enough I guess :) [12:54] yes [12:54] but what do we have in them? [12:54] i don't think we want the current 4 [12:54] which are [12:54] artwork, documentation, testing [12:54] and [12:54] xxx [12:54] I didn't mean use 6 :D [12:55] web? [12:55] maybe social media [12:55] mmm [12:55] do we want them alphabetically? [12:55] no [12:55] or from easiest to hardest [12:55] so in that case probably [12:55] sm, t, d, a [12:56] or am happy with t, sm, d, a too [12:56] bugs? dev? [12:56] anything but alphapathetic and I'll be happy :p [12:56] bugs is good [12:56] bug triage? [12:56] "bugs and other animals like cats" [12:57] triage perhaps [12:57]
testing
[12:57]
social media
[12:57]
documentation
[12:57]
bug triage
[12:57]
artwork
[12:57] best add dev for bluesabre :p [12:57]
development for bluesabre
[12:58] \o/ [12:58]
bUg triage
[12:58] bug tirage [12:58] :D [12:58] bug rage [12:58] I win :p [12:58] yes [12:58] that's clearly what we want new contributors to help with... [12:58] rage? [12:59] yes [12:59] adding to? [12:59] * knome shrugs [12:59] pushed new revision [12:59] bluesabre: last night my thinking was ' should we put dev in there, I would have expected that anyone who could code would know where to start anyway' [12:59] are we happy to land this for beta (we will have time for fixes after that) [13:00] flocculant, last night you had all of your beer too [13:00] I've gotta run out now, but I've been good with the current direction [13:00] :X [13:00] * flocculant waits for bzr to catch up [13:00] bluesabre: have a good one - cya later [13:00] knome: ha ha [13:00] think i'm going to push this to the main branch soon [13:00] ...in one commit [13:01] not pulling anything new here [13:01] hmm [13:01] helps if i push i guess [13:01] might do :p [13:01] and done, rev 748 [13:02] * knome goes cleaning for a bit, when i get back and there are no loud whines, i'll push to the main branch [13:02] :) [13:02] and yes - I'm happy to land this for beta :D [13:02] same here [13:02] looks good to me - thanks for the work on it knome :) [13:02] knome: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shimmer-themes/+bug/1555046 if you want to nudge today [13:02] Launchpad bug 1555046 in shimmer-themes (Ubuntu) "Please upload shimmer-themes-2.1.1-0ubuntu1 to xenial" [Undecided,Confirmed] [13:03] -> [13:09] bluesabre, just waiting to flocculant's hawk eyes to review the -docs for spelling and grammar errors, which he'll do today [13:09] so everything will be ready tonight [13:09] I'll make sure Grandpa knome :P [13:10] hi slickymaster :) [13:10] going to branch now the slideshow knome, so I'll be able to have a look at it this afternoon at work [13:10] hey flocculant [13:10] saw you already started to review the docs [13:11] yep [13:11] will you be done tonight? [13:11] yea for sure [13:11] slickymaster: I need to fiddle with contrib too - shall I do that seperately or all together? [13:12] do it all together flocculant, I'll have one single merge to do [13:12] okey doke [13:12] after that I'll coordinate with bluesabre in order to upload [13:12] yup [13:13] knome, will the font issue (regarding the PDFs build) be fixed by then [13:13] ? [13:13] ok, got lunch now and head on to work [13:13] see you later [13:13] -> [13:14] the font stuff should be fixed now, but i'm waiting for Unit193 to confirm it works for him too [13:14] ...or you should be waiting [13:16] flocculant, one more thing... now that we have the keywords rolling on the slide, shoudl we reconsider the banner content? [13:19] knome: how about losing the middle paragraph completely then add the contributor docs to the last paragraph [13:19] the middle one isn't really any different than the keywords [13:19] I'll move to pad [13:20] sure [13:30] back to reading the docs for a while [14:02] for anyone who can answer ... [14:03] docs for dvd points to gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly - should that be gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly [14:06] flocculant, new draft for contrib slide on pad [14:07] yep - that works [14:07] ok, dropping that in [14:07] cool [14:19] knome: got a moment? [14:21] yes [14:21] a short one :) [14:21] http://docs.xubuntu.org/1510/C/managing-applications.html [14:21] that has warning about 2 package managers [14:21] right [14:21] that's not the case with gs [14:22] so reword the warning to " ... you may receive an error message" [14:22] yes [14:22] sounds good to me [14:22] "In most cases, you can only use one package..." [14:22] or sth like that might be good too [14:22] and add a note about gs in it's preamble? [14:22] yea - wfm [14:23] i don't think we specifically need to mention that gs doesn't care about that [14:23] then not bother with a gs note? [14:23] it's minutiae [14:23] yep - that wfm as well :) [14:23] thanks :) [14:23] most people can't even name two package managers [14:23] ha ha ha [14:23] (even if we just listed those for them...) [14:23] lol [14:24] ok, xubuntu slides are at the main branch, and have requested for an upload [14:25] \o/ [14:26] did you add the whim wham for grinding smoke? [14:26] ...what? :D [14:26] :d [14:57] ground to a halt on the docs re dvd's [14:58] pretty sure it can be a lot simpler now - but don't have the hardware to check it out :) [15:34] any real reason we warble on about 13.04 and 13.10 on the printer page? [15:44] flocculant, nope [15:46] knome: ta :) [16:08] since the old documentation is kept intact, i don't see any reason to mention anything in the docs that it at least not supported any more [16:10] bbl [16:57] Hello all - waves. [17:01] o7 [17:16] ok, slideshow is in order (cyphermox will take care of that - thanks again) [17:16] not sure what code to take though [17:21] slickymaster: all done [17:21] well that's a bare faced lie ... [17:23] all is done except the dvd and encryption bit - which needs looking at - we tell people to install a gstreamer 0.10 package - afaik they're on the bus out of town > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-desktop/2016-January/004780.html [17:24] also we can point to libdvd-pkg for libdvdcss2 [17:24] I've added something to the docs blueprint for this so it doesn't get forgotten [17:27] nice [17:27] http://dev.xubuntu.org/#tab-timeline tells me i't been a productive week [17:27] it's [17:29] * knome goes hacky-hack on the dev. website [17:41] hurrah, looks totally broken [17:41] * knome proceeds to fixing things [17:43] Hey I'm looking to make a portable xubuntu derivative. When I unzip the .iso to my flash drive, boot and remove the specified packages (see: xubuntu-derivateives), I cannot generate a bootable image of the live session using dd [17:43] dd if=/dev/sdx of=path/to/isogenerated.iso [17:46] so dev.xubuntu.org has now the tabs visible at all times, not under the menu [17:52] knome: is there actually a difference between dev.x and the tracker? [17:52] good question [17:52] for the data, no [17:52] for the looks, yes [17:53] at some point i will redirect tracker to dev [17:53] well yea I understood there was a visual difference - even I can see that :p [17:54] hehe [17:54] i was just answering your question though... [17:54] :) [17:54] so technically they both connect to the same database [17:55] so there will be no difference in the data [17:55] right [17:55] the dev. code might be slightly improved for something more than just the "main" looks, but not much [17:55] (or in other words once i set up dev., i haven't updated the tracker code any morE) [17:56] that said, there aren't any "bugs" on the tracker [17:56] it's just not that sleek code [17:56] I see gaps between people's names if I look at tab-details/assignees [17:57] in dev or traker? [17:57] +c [17:57] dev [17:57] (have you noticed my C key is not working correctly?) [17:57] not really notied that [17:57] i have >__< [17:57] :) [17:58] oh right [17:58] yeah [17:58] that's broooken [17:58] that's because the latest updates [17:58] I lost q once - password had q in it - that was fun [17:58] so back to fixing stuff [17:58] ok - just wanted to make sure you knew :) [17:58] i didn't - thanks [17:58] oh right - your welcome :p [18:04] flocculant, can you confirm there's no gaps or other wonkyness in there now? [18:04] that looks better :) [18:05] good [18:05] :) [18:06] didn't realise search box ... [18:06] useful :) [18:06] :D [18:06] it's been there FOREVER [18:07] and yeah, it's really useful when you are looking for a specific work item [18:07] especially as it autoupdates live [18:11] HEYY, the artwork blueprint is the first one to be complete again! [18:12] * knome high fives ochosi [18:12] Hey I'm looking to make a portable xubuntu derivative. When I unzip the .iso to my flash drive, boot and remove the specified packages (see: xubuntu-derivateives), I cannot generate a bootable image of the live session using dd [17:43] dd if=/dev/sdx of=path/to/isogenerated.iso [18:13] xubuntu49w, it sounds like you are having trouble with remastering rather than xubuntu itself; you might get better results asking somewhere else (maybe #ubuntu-devel?) on those issues [18:13] ty [18:19] Hey I'm looking to make a portable xubuntu derivative. When I unzip the .iso to my flash drive, boot and remove the specified packages (see: xubuntu-derivateives), I cannot generate a bootable image of the live session using dd if=/dev/sdx of=path/to/isogenerated.iso [18:19] ...but you just asked that question [18:19] sry messed up channels [18:19] forgive me [18:20] no problem [18:30] what do you guys know about the packages that need to be removed to create a xubuntu derivative? are any of them essential to boot, or to recreation of an .iso from a live session? [18:45] none of the packages that need to be removed are essential in booting; they are all practically related to the xubuntu brand and artwork [19:06] knome: I'll check slideshow speed tomorrow :) [19:06] goodie [19:06] great, i filled up my vbox HDD [19:07] ha ha [19:07] resize it :p [19:07] maybe i should [19:10] bbiab [19:40] knome: Having looked through all your font changes for the docs earlier today, you thinking of updating the build depends too? [19:41] i leave thinking for others... [19:41] so maybe a MP? ;) [19:41] Gah, no. :P [19:41] oh yeah! [19:41] you set yourself up... [19:41] not my fault that [20:35] so... [20:35] i can get the PDF's to build on xenial [20:35] there are a few caveats to that though [20:36] krytarik, you available for a little chat? [20:36] your upside down in the corner of the room ? [20:36] boy that sounded harsh... [20:36] no, i have to export one env variable and create one symlink [20:36] knome: what's it failing on then? [20:37] oh right ok :) [20:37] first one is that fop doesn't find the java env [20:37] so export JAVA_CMD=/usr/bin/java [20:37] and actually one more thing; [20:37] need to install the non-headless java, even if we don't run GUI app [20:37] once that's done, it doesn't find some common files [20:37] so, [20:38] "ln -s ../libs-common libs-common" in both user-docs and contributor-docs [20:38] after that, make works [20:38] i'll test something that should fix the last part [20:39] yep, that works [20:41] duct tape and spit then [20:46] knome: A bit busy picking up with today's things still - but it seems you got it figured anyway. :P [20:46] still wondering about the headless stuff [20:46] and what the best way to use the env var is, or if there's a way to avoid that [20:58] i would really want to avoid pulling the non-headless java in at least. [20:59] Unit193, your input please [21:05] how did I manage that ... [21:08] /part [21:08] yes [21:08] :) [21:08] but I didn't [21:09] yeah sure [21:09] not saying it didn't happen [21:12] knome: I would, but nothing to say on the subject really. Just that setting the env var and fop not pulling in the deps it needs seems crappy. [21:12] yeah, fop explicitly asks for headless [21:13] and tbh, i think that should be enough [21:13] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50062 [21:13] bz.apache.org bug 50062 in general "fop steals focus from GUI applications even though it is a CLI application" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] [21:13] -> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50062#c9 [21:17] right, so the problem seems to be that after one runs fop in a headless mode, it can't find some accessibility stuff [21:24] hmm. [21:24] the JAVA_CMD env var isn't needed when the non-headless stuff is installed, it seesm [21:24] seems too... [22:30] * ochosi high-fives knome back [22:30] we almost fixed the burndown this week ;) [22:33] :) [22:44] evening all [22:50] 'lo [22:50] evening ochosi slickymaster [22:50] hi flocculant, knome, ochosi [22:54] slickymaster, did you notice i resolved the PDF building failure for docs? [22:54] yeaps, I did [22:54] so where's the thanks?! [22:54] saw the changes in the blueprint [22:54] :P [22:54] one thing at a time [22:55] right, rum first, thanks then [22:55] ;) [22:55] right now, seeing flocculant's hard labour [23:00] btw knome, great work on the slides [23:01] * slickymaster bows [23:01] glad you enjoy it after all the whining :P [23:01] if I don't whine you take your graphical design skills as granted :P [23:04] :P [23:20] flocculant, going to move you up, to keep the alphabetic consistency, in the contributors list [23:20] in user-docs/C/index.xml [23:37] night all [23:37] nighty flocculant [23:39] have a good one flocculant [23:39] and thanks [23:43] y [23:55] bluesabre, -docs all ready for upload [23:55] \o/ [23:56] knome, dkessel, krytarik, lots of news strings to be translated :P [23:57] knome, a warm and huge THANKS for solving the PDF building failures in the -docs [23:58] ;) [23:58] :P