[09:53] <jamespage> if there are any release team members around I'd love to get https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-django-compressor/+bug/1554134 reviewed today if possible
[09:53] <jamespage> new main dependencies all reviewed by the MIR team
[09:54] <jamespage> so just pending a release team +1.. thanks!
[10:10] <infinity> jamespage: +1
[10:10] <jamespage> infinity, ta
[10:10] <infinity> jamespage: Close the bug in the upload, SVP.
[10:10] <jamespage> infinity, will do
[10:11] <infinity> jamespage: I've lost track this cycle.  How do we align for Openstack this time 'round?  Will be have final before release?
[10:11] <jamespage> infinity, two weeks before :-)
[10:11] <infinity> jamespage: \o/
[10:11] <jamespage> which is awesome
[10:13] <infinity> jamespage: If anything OS-related gets stuck on process, be sure to escalate.  It would be novel to get it all landed and well-tested before release for once.
[10:13] <jamespage> infinity, will do and I agree it will be nice
[10:21] <rbasak> infinity: while you're here, bug 1528583 is ready, but later than expected. Please you you re-review and re-ack the FFe? Oracle have done some extensive testing on my request, as I said that would help with the later FFe. They've written it up at http://paste.ubuntu.com/15346508/. We haven't transferred to the bug yet, and I was going to ask more about conclusion point 2 as I think we have a mitigat
[10:21] <rbasak> ion path if that doesn't work. But I thought I'd ask you now as you're online?
[10:23] <rbasak> I also plan to do one more change, which is to move a bunch of binaries from server to server-core and client to client-core, which is their intended place. But I need to check for clash with MariaDB first.
[10:23] <rbasak> Since server depends on server-core, as long as I get the B/R right it shouldn't invalidate any of the testing.
[13:49] <coreycb> infinity, hi, can we get python(3)-positional promoted to main?   the MIR bug 1552384 has been approved
[14:05] <flexiondotorg> infinity, Where in the world are you today? :-)
[14:23] <tjaalton> can someone poke x11-xserver-utils out of proposed? it's been a valid candidate for two weeks
[14:25] <rbasak> tjaalton: doing so would make arandr uninstallable: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_output.txt
[14:25] <rbasak> That's why it's held.
[14:26] <tjaalton> rbasak: yeah..
[14:26] <tjaalton> I'll check
[14:26] <tjaalton> debian
[14:27] <tjaalton> arandr synced
[15:05] <infinity> coreycb: Done.
[15:05] <coreycb> infinity, thanks
[15:05] <infinity> flexiondotorg: Still in Bangkok.  Beijing tomorrow, and Calgary half a day after that.
[15:07] <ogra_> infinity, can we look deeper into fakechroot next week (once you are out of your jetlag) ... i'm a bit stuck with that one
[15:07] <infinity> ogra_: Yup.
[15:07] <ogra_> thx :)
[15:18] <flexiondotorg> infinity, Is there anything more I can do to help progress "Base"?
[15:20] <infinity> flexiondotorg: Not unless you feel the urge to read my mind and make the changes I'll suggest (or JFDI) after I'm done reviewing.
[15:21] <apw> (or perhaps create some extra hours in the day, that always helps)
[15:21] <infinity> I'm about to go back in time, that might help a bit.
[15:21]  * flexiondotorg focuses on infinity's mind
[15:21]  * flexiondotorg can't get a lock, infinity is too far away.
[15:21] <flexiondotorg> infinity, I tried.
[15:22] <ogra_> but he is going back in time, so he can fix it last week !
[15:22] <infinity> ogra_: Sadly, the plane's not that fast.
[15:23] <ogra_> damn
[16:17] <Trevinho> Laney: hey... So, can we get the go for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1552630?
[16:18] <Laney> Don't know, didn't look yet I'm afraid
[16:18] <Laney> Someone else might have though
[16:19] <Trevinho> Ok..
[16:19] <Laney> I'm not extremely keen in general though - Unity doesn't have the best record on FFes
[16:19] <Trevinho> It would be nice to get it on it... You know that community really pushed for that
[16:20] <Trevinho> Laney: well, that is really not affecting normal usage... Most of changes are only applying on if (launcher_position == BOTTOM)... Thus, old code is not touched
[16:20] <Laney> What's normal usage?
[16:20] <Laney> You add a new configuration option and now it is part of the code and so you get to support it
[16:21] <Trevinho> But even the new one is quite stable and there for some weeks... It has been delayed only because of other causes...
[16:21] <Trevinho> Yeah, indeed we support it.
[16:21] <Trevinho> And we get support also from kylin comunity
[16:21] <Trevinho> It's just that it's not regression prone
[16:23] <Laney> It'll be you that ends up fixing it when bugs are found in release week
[16:23] <Laney> When omgubuntu publishes an article about it and lots of people decide to try it out
[16:25] <Laney> Probably do a pass of the outstanding FFes on Monday morning
[16:47] <infinity> Trevinho: Can I make accepting that FFe conditional on someone investigating and fixing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1521302 ?
[16:47] <infinity> Trevinho: Cause holy crap that irks me. :P
[16:51] <Trevinho> infinity: ok.. It can be a good deal
[17:35] <coreycb> infinity, could we also get python(3)-sphinx-argparse promoted to main for openstack?  it's MIR is approved in bug 1551311
[17:36] <infinity> coreycb: Done.
[17:37] <coreycb> infinity, thanks
[18:01] <cyphermox> anyone could review libcxl in the xenial NEW queue?