[02:10] <bluesabre> knome: I missed where this came up, [xubuntu-dev] Remove xfce4-volumed from the seed: TODO
[02:16] <knome> bluesabre, the package is removed from debian because gst0.10; we're not using it either (aiui), so no need not to remove from our seed
[02:16] <knome> bluesabre, ...tell me if i'm wrong
[02:18] <bluesabre> knome: ok, just missed the conversation about it
[02:18] <bluesabre> removing it will not break keyboard media keys I'd hope
[02:19] <bluesabre> I'll test it out
[02:19] <knome> yeah
[02:33] <bluesabre> looks like volume keys don't work without it
[02:33] <bluesabre> unless you're using xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin
[02:34] <bluesabre> which we're not.....
[02:38] <bluesabre> knome: tracker still has issues in chrome, applying any filters just resets to the main page
[02:38] <bluesabre> couple js errors
[02:39] <bluesabre> oh wait
[02:39] <bluesabre> should I be looking at tracker. or dev.
[02:39] <bluesabre> dev works
[02:54] <knome> :)
[02:55] <knome> got to go to bed, ttyl
[03:26] <pavlushka> Hi every1`!!!
[03:27] <pavlushka> knome, flocculant , krytarik ??? anyone??
[03:28] <pavlushka> hi dkessel !!!!
[03:28] <pavlushka> I am from UTC+6, anyone there???
[03:33] <pavlushka> need some help
[09:25] <ochosi> bluesabre: i guess it's too late to switch to xfpm 1.6.0 (just released). do we have that leaky patch for xfpm 1.4 yet?
[09:45] <ali1234> my screen is locking even though i don't want it to and have disabled it in the prefs
[09:45] <ali1234> also, when i unlock it i have a dialog that says "Authentication is required to change your own user data"
[09:45] <ali1234> and i have to click cancel on it about 100 times to make it go away
[09:45] <ali1234> do you think these are two separate bugs?
[09:45] <ali1234> they both started happening at the same time
[09:46] <ali1234> but i never locked my screen before this bug, so they might be unrelated
[09:46] <ali1234> i'll report them separately, can always mark duplicate
[09:52] <krytarik> ali1234: LP bug 1512002.
[09:52] <ali1234> ah thanks
[09:52] <ali1234> that's the one
[09:53] <ali1234> every few days? lol no, it happens every single time the screen is locked for any length of time more than a few minutes
[09:53] <krytarik> Yep, the description is kind of misleading at that.
[09:54] <ali1234> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-locker/+bug/1556575 is the other one i just reported
[09:56] <ali1234> my guess would be it's related to lightdm-gtk-greeter asking for the user's wallpaper somehow (or a similar setting)
[10:14] <ali1234> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-messages/+bug/1192300
[10:14] <ali1234> except that there is no network authentication in my case
[10:58] <flocculant> ochosi: yep - it still is - I didn't get around to changing it back 
[11:39] <flocculant> ochosi: don't know what you did with greybird ... 
[11:39] <flocculant> but it works :p
[11:52] <ochosi> ali1234: for me it was indicator-messages (i had the same issues with polkit dialogs spawning all over the place)
[11:53] <ali1234> yeah, it's definitely messages
[11:53] <ali1234> i added it to the bug, maybe someone will see it
[11:53] <ali1234> if not i will ask #ud tomorrow
[11:55] <ali1234> there was an old bug where it happens if you use a remote login server and your local UID does not match the remote UID, but i am not using anything like that
[11:56] <ochosi> yeah
[11:56] <ochosi> i had that setup, fixed the uid locally and the issue persisted
[11:56] <ochosi> so yeah, different/new bug
[12:05] <cosimo> hello
[12:05] <cosimo> Daniel Kessel, thanks for directing me here!
[12:06] <cosimo> I followed your link in the Xubuntu mailing list that leads to the translation 
[12:07] <flocculant> hi cosimo - nice to see you turn up :)
[12:08] <cosimo> Hi there! This is my first time getting involved in a project like this. My nanme is Cosimo, I am italian, living in Catalonia for many years. I have a computer company (service, selling and repair computers)
[12:08] <cosimo> I do install Linux in many of my customer's pc (Especially in those who come with obsolete unlicensed pc`s)
[12:09] <cosimo> First started with Ubuntu, then moved to Lubuntu, and now I am testing Xubuntu 16.04 in order to offer it to all my customers
[12:09] <flocculant> sounds great :)
[12:09] <cosimo> I noticed that many strings aren't translated to Catalan yet, so I decided to get involved and help the community to translate from English to Catalan
[12:10] <flocculant> yea I saw the mail
[12:10] <cosimo> so... Hello all :)
[12:11] <flocculant> there are a few who'll be able to help you out with translating - but it is the weekend and it's a bit quiet 
[12:11] <flocculant> I'm not one who'd be able to though ;) I'd just point you were Daniel did 
[12:11] <cosimo> No problem, I can show up frequently to try to meet them up
[12:12] <flocculant> awesome :)
[12:12] <cosimo> I am already reading all the steps and documentation, so, thanks to all!
[12:12] <flocculant> a lot of us are European time
[12:12] <cosimo> great
[12:26] <bluesabre> ochosi: is the leak fixed in 1.6, I though the report said it was discovered in 1.5.2 and also in 1.4.4
[12:29] <bluesabre> ochosi, ali1234: I think that screen locking issue is specifically in light-locker. I use xfpm + xflock + gnome-screensaver and it does not auto-lock
[12:38] <ochosi> bluesabre: two different leaks. the one in 1.6 is not in xfpm and the one in 1.4 has a fix
[12:38] <bluesabre> oh goodie
[12:38] <bluesabre> link? I'll package it up today
[12:38] <flocculant> hi bluesabre 
[12:38] <ochosi> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12367
[12:39] <ochosi> that's the one with the bug in gdbus
[12:39] <ochosi> affecting 1.6
[12:39] <ochosi> 1.4 doesn't use gdbus yet
[12:47] <bluesabre> hey flocculant
[12:47] <bluesabre> ochosi: and link for the 1.4 fix?
[12:49] <knome> pavlushka, if you need help with something, it's better to just ask the question
[12:51] <knome> bluesabre, sidi: luisbg said there's a mixer interface in gst1.0, and that he might look into xfce4-volumed
[12:51] <pavlushka> knome, copy that.
[12:51] <bluesabre> knome: alrighty
[12:52] <bluesabre> knome: we could potentially abandon the sound indicator for the pulseaudio plugin, but it does not have much testing and we're late in the cycle
[12:53] <knome> mh
[12:53] <knome> you also should likely talk about your test and media keys not working with sakrecoer on #us-d
[12:55] <bluesabre> for a bit of background, does sakrecoer believe them to work without volumed?
[12:55] <knome> yeah, he tested that and said it works
[12:56] <bluesabre> yay
[13:00] <bluesabre> knome: commented
[13:00] <bluesabre> we'll see where it goes from here :)
[13:02] <knome> yep
[13:04] <bluesabre> flocculant: got some volume keys on a keyboard?
[13:04] <knome> works for me on laptop
[13:05] <knome> but do you need desktop testing?
[13:05] <bluesabre> knome: as in, removed xfce4-volumed, logged out, back in
[13:05] <bluesabre> ?
[13:05] <knome> no
[13:05] <knome> :P
[13:05] <knome> wait a sen
[13:05] <knome> sec
[13:05] <bluesabre> :D
[13:05] <flocculant> bluesabre: nope - sorry
[13:06] <bluesabre> (and no xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin in the panel)
[13:09] <knome> bluesabre, ..no, not worky without
[13:10] <flocculant> bluesabre: I lied ... can try with the laptop - but looks like it's not needed 
[13:18] <sakrecoer> greetings! regarding xfce4-volumed removal, it does work here and if i might provide with any log or anything just let me know. meanwhile i'll park my irc user here ! looking forward to read you
[13:18] <bluesabre> thanks sakrecoer
[13:21] <bluesabre> not really sure where or how to debug that
[13:22] <bluesabre> tried using xev to see keypresses, but they're not picked up it seems if something is listening to them https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgmUvrAWvRE&feature=youtu.be
[13:23] <sakrecoer> bluesabre: my bad, volume keys are NOT working... :/ i checked with all the sliders and didn't focus enough on what you wrote
[13:23] <bluesabre> ah, good to know :D
[13:29] <flocculant> bluesabre: so I completely lost focus on this - why the worry about xfce4-volumed ? 
[13:29] <bluesabre> flocculant: I asked the same thing to knome yesterday
[13:29] <bluesabre> 21:10	<bluesabre>	knome: I missed where this came up, [xubuntu-dev] Remove xfce4-volumed from the seed: TODO
[13:30] <bluesabre> apparently its getting dropped in debian since its gst0.10, so we were investigating that
[13:30] <bluesabre> but I believe its getting dropped in debian because the pulseaudio plugin is a suitable replacement there
[13:43] <flocculant> aah right
[13:44] <ochosi> bluesabre: this one would have to be backported: http://git.xfce.org/xfce/xfce4-power-manager/commit/?id=6eaf8f868ed9ed8018385e16a92eaacef3c32a9d 
[13:45] <ochosi> eric_the_idiot: correct me if i'm wrong ;)
[13:45] <bluesabre> ochosi: yay
[14:02] <flocculant> bluesabre: ... and I've been reading this thread https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-desktop/2016-March/004790.html 
[14:03] <flocculant> obviously not very proactively 
[14:03] <flocculant> cos I completely forgot I'd read it :D
[14:51] <bluesabre> flocculant: aha
[14:52] <bluesabre> knome: so, is luisbg going to look into the port?
[14:53] <bluesabre> knome: or should we strongly consider moving the the pulseaudio plugin if we are the only gst0.10 blocker?
[15:28] <krytarik> knome: Just noticed, can you please update the two 'wiki.ubuntu.com/Xubuntu' links here to point to the Contributor Docs instead now?: http://xubuntu.org/contribute/documentation  (yes, they are being redirected already)
[16:09] <pjotter> knome: For what it's worth.. This is what I was working on: http://i.imgur.com/TtlXHnr.png?1
[16:10] <pjotter> If there still is a need (and time) for it, just let me know
[17:10] <pjotter> Here's another impression/scetch: http://i.imgur.com/wdhbPNW.png?1
[18:12] <ochosi> bluesabre: why does volumed need gst0.10? isn't it using pulseaudio instead of gst..?
[18:14] <ochosi> bluesabre: maybe this is a packaging mistake or didn't mr:pouit port it to use pulseaudio at some point..? (or am i completely mixing things up now?)
[18:27] <pjot_downstairs> knome: Are you online?
[20:01] <knome> bluesabre, luisbg is on #us-d... or at least was, you should talk to him ther
[20:01] <knome> bluesabre, +e
[20:01] <pjotter> hi knome
[20:01] <knome> hey pjotter 
[20:01] <pjotter> I posted some of my scribbling here a while ago. Did you get them?
[20:02] <knome> pjotter, re: your question, as i said before, i already drew the xerus; the UI freeze was last thursdat
[20:02] <knome> *thursday
[20:02] <knome> let me dig that up
[20:02] <pjotter> Oh I see
[20:02] <pjotter> Too bad... better luck next time then
[20:03] <knome> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubiquity-slideshow/ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu/html/download/head:/xerus_art.png-20160310140738-p8t66o10hnqfrs8g-20/xerus_art.png
[20:03] <pjotter> Its cool :)
[20:03] <knome> happy to hear you like it
[20:03] <knome> and now i also checked the #xubuntu backlog
[20:04] <knome> on satisfaction, it's good enough
[20:04] <knome> the tail could be more realistic looking and the limbs could have gotten more attention
[20:04] <pjotter> It's a pity... I really didn't have much time I'm afraid.
[20:05] <knome> that is, if one really had a lot of time to spend on it
[20:05] <pjotter> I am just learning how to draw in vectors. I'm guessing that is what you used too?
[20:06] <knome> yep
[20:06] <pjotter> Maybe I can contribute for a future release. Losts of funny animals coming up.
[20:06] <knome> yes, by all means
[20:07] <pjotter> What did you think about the scetches. These were just some rough ideas I had.
[20:08] <pjotter> I wanted to do something with semi-transparent overlapping swirly lines. 
[20:09] <knome> krytarik, done
[20:10] <knome> pjotter, i like the style, though i'm not sure how well that would fit in the slideshow context
[20:11] <knome> pjotter, and personally, i'm not sure if i like the "look the xerus from below" POV
[20:11] <pjotter> What's pov?
[20:11] <bluesabre> ochosi: actually, yes, you're right
[20:11] <bluesabre> http://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/xfce4-volumed
[20:11] <bluesabre> https://packages.debian.org/sid/xfce4-volumed
[20:11]  * ochosi bows
[20:12] <knome> pjotter, point of view
[20:12] <pjotter> Ah ok! :D
[20:12] <pjotter> I thought it made it look more tough.
[20:12] <knome> the xubuntu brand isn't very tough generally
[20:13] <knome> our mascot is a mouse
[20:13] <pjotter> Well...
[20:13] <pjotter> I can draw a tough mouse
[20:13] <knome> hah :D
[20:13] <ochosi> mice == cute != qt
[20:13] <knome> what i mean is that we aren't actually pursuing a very "tough" brand
[20:13] <pjotter> I understand
[20:14] <bluesabre> oh, thats annoying, how much archive conversation happens on the ubuntu-desktop ML instead of ubuntu-devel https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-desktop/2016-March/004790.html
[20:14] <knome> though "not tough" doesn't mean we can't be elegant..
[20:14] <pjotter> How would you describe Xubuntu in relation to the other brands of Ubuntu?
[20:14] <bluesabre> not subscribed to desktop
[20:15] <knome> pjotter, i think many of the flavors are aiming for a "professional" brand, and if there is any flavor (no pun intended) to it, it usually leans more towards "playful" than "tough"
[20:18] <knome> pjotter, for example, see the kubuntu website: http://kubuntu.org/
[20:19] <knome> that's a bit more playful than we are aiming for, but i think it fits well with the colorful plasma stuff
[20:22] <knome> pjotter, talking of websites, the xubuntu website could do with some illustrations...
[20:22] <pjotter> Alright
[20:22] <pjotter> What kind?
[20:22] <knome> pjotter, for some kind of general direction (which totally isn't set to stone though), see the front page and the "get involved" page
[20:22] <pjotter> yes
[20:23] <pjotter> The two talking heads?
[20:23] <knome> that, and on the front page, the desktop/laptop
[20:23] <pjotter> Are these the only illustrations on Xubuntu.org?
[20:23] <knome> yse
[20:24] <knome> i haven't had much time to think about more illustrations
[20:24] <knome> one place where we could totally use some of them is the feature tour
[20:24] <pjotter> Well, I certainly could do that. What kind of look/feel would be appropriate?
[20:24]  * ochosi likes the talking heads (the band)
[20:25] <pjotter> Great band, ochosi. Me too :)
[20:25] <ochosi> bluesabre, knome: would you consider it worth a UIFe to get some refreshed mimetype icons for elementary-xfce?
[20:25] <knome> pjotter, trying to limit this is little as possible, i think a clean look (like the current one, eg. no "chalk" texture for strokes) would be good
[20:25] <knome> pjotter, also, if possible, since these are used on the website, it would be great that they didn't need to be in a "container"
[20:26] <knome> pjotter, eg. all lines end up naturally "inside" the illustration
[20:26] <knome> pjotter, do you understand what i'm trying to say?
[20:26] <pjotter> Not 100%
[20:27] <pjotter> What do you mean by container?
[20:27] <ochosi> a visual frame
[20:27] <ochosi> that holds the animal
[20:27] <pjotter> A right
[20:27] <ochosi> a "cage" ;)
[20:27] <pjotter> No lines around it
[20:28] <pjotter> I could take the mouse as a startingpont and work from there?
[20:28] <knome> well, the thing is
[20:28] <knome> we likely want the illustrations to have something to do with the content
[20:28] <bluesabre> ochosi: I'm not opposed, slickymaster and knome would be the ones most likely to complain
[20:29] <knome> but yeah, you can totally copy the mouse, i'll even send you the svg
[20:29] <bluesabre> knome, flocculant, ochosi: responded, https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-desktop/2016-March/004793.html
[20:29] <bluesabre> ochosi: thanks for the tip
[20:29] <knome> ochosi, and yeah, not opposing to land the icon stuff
[20:29] <pjotter> No need. Maybe I can come up with my own version of the Xubuntu mouse. I mean... the thing isn't set in stone, right?
[20:31] <knome> exactly
[20:31] <knome> i'm open to anything
[20:32] <ochosi> bluesabre: which tip again?
[20:32] <knome> just remember that it's not worth to make completely final sketches before showing stuff to others, ochosi is the worst pixel pusher
[20:32] <knome> ochosi, of the iceberg
[20:32] <bluesabre> ochosi: re xfce4-volumed pulseaudio
[20:33] <ochosi> bluesabre: ah sure, np. i'm happy i still remember stuff ;)
[20:33] <bluesabre> :D
[20:44] <pjotter> Et voila: http://i.imgur.com/3VDwlqV.png
[20:44] <pjotter> :D
[20:45] <flocculant> bluesabre: cheers
[20:46] <knome> pjotter, not bad!
[20:46] <knome> the mouse looks a bit sick though...
[20:46] <knome> being so blue and all
[20:46] <pjotter> He ate some bad cheese, I guess
[20:46] <knome> but we could definitely go with something like that for the help slide
[20:46] <knome> is this drawn in vector?
[20:47] <pjotter> No, just by hand, scanned and coloured on the comp
[20:47] <knome> awwh :(
[20:47] <pjotter> I can make it into vector
[20:48] <knome> yeah, i think that would be the best for future considerations
[20:48] <knome> but don't mind doing that yet
[20:48] <knome> (unless you want the challenge)
[20:48] <knome> i think the mouse could be gray
[20:48] <knome> as mouses often are
[20:49] <ochosi> pjotter: not bad, that mouse!
[20:49] <knome> that's a more subtle color anyway and thus i'd think it'd work better for the website
[20:49] <knome> yep, i'm imagining this on the help and support page
[20:49] <ochosi> knome: what? mouses?!
[20:49] <knome> flipped horizontally maybe
[20:49] <pjotter> But Xubuntu mostly has a blueish theme?
[20:49]  * ochosi calls the language police on knome 
[20:50] <knome> hm??
[20:50] <knome> pjotter, yeah, but not everything has to be blue :)
[20:50] <ochosi> knome: ehrm, mice? :)
[20:50] <pjotter> But it's THE Xubuntu mouse. It HAS to be blue!!! :S
[20:51] <knome> ochosi, there's only one mouse in the image...
[20:51] <knome> pjotter, gray with a blue hint?
[20:51] <knome> or: a hint of blue
[20:51] <pjotter> Maybe I can draw a little phrygian white hat on his head?
[20:52] <knome> i'm imagining a hat on the head, but that makes me think the mouse has woken up at the middle of the night
[20:53] <knome> a blue bow tied to the tail?
[20:53] <knome> if we want something blue...
[20:57] <knome> pjotter, re: bitmap/vector, one thing vector is so much better is naturally scaling; but not only in the most obvious sense; sometimes we might want to change the image size but keep the same stroke width, and the vector image allows for that easily
[21:07] <pjotter> Maybe this will explain the blueish color a bit better: http://i.imgur.com/1Hu5tl4.png
[21:07] <knome> omg
[21:08] <knome> xubuntu is a family-friendly distro :P
[21:08] <pjotter> right
[21:08] <pjotter> :p
[21:08] <knome> you should join #xubuntu-offtopic though
[21:08] <knome> (it's family-friendly too, but i can copy-paste you a discussion there)
[21:08] <ochosi> harhar, nice one pjotter 
[21:08] <pjotter> No, it's fine.
[21:09] <ochosi> knome: obviously that mouse is drnking juice!
[21:09] <pjotter> Yeah... applejuice.
[21:09] <knome> clearly
[21:09] <ochosi> it's just a very happy mouse
[21:09] <ochosi> happy and sleepy
[21:09] <knome> hmm...
[21:09] <pjotter> :D
[21:10] <knome> not sure i'd buy apple juice that made me that "happy"
[21:10] <knome> i like this artwork direction though
[21:10] <ochosi> +1
[21:10] <pjotter> This is just a bit of fun ofcourse. I can think about a more serious mouse for the Xubuntu website.
[21:11] <knome> yep
[21:11] <knome> :)
[21:11] <knome> the first one is pretty close i think
[21:11] <knome> just the color...
[21:11] <knome> and would be nice to have it in real vector of course
[21:11] <ochosi> we can always use this "drunken" mouse for mails we reject from the -devel ml
[21:11] <pjotter> Although I am pretty happy with it;s shape as it is. It kind of resembles the offical xubuntu logo, only in cartoonish kind of way.
[21:12] <knome> yeah, the shape is good
[21:13] <ochosi> pjotter: re: tail do mice really have those rings on the tail? i thought only rats have those (not that it matters too much for a cartoon representation)
[21:14] <pjotter> I don't know. What are they anyway? Rimples in the skin? Maybe both mice and rats have them but it;s probably more profound in rats.
[21:15] <ochosi> yeah, plus the pink color for the tail of a white lab-rat
[21:15] <knome> pjotter, i told you ochosi is a pixel pusher
[21:16] <ochosi> yup, that's me o/
[21:17] <knome> though props for that, i would say without such a tight "opponent" as ochosi, the artwork and general looks in xubutnu wouldn't be as good as it is now
[21:28] <bluesabre> ochosi, flocculant: since clutter is pretty broken in parole right now, going to disable the clutter video output and change default back to xv
[21:29] <bluesabre> I don't imagine I'll be changing it back for the duration of the LTS
[21:37] <ochosi> bluesabre: yeah, i guess that's the only reasonable thing to do
[21:37] <ochosi> what about mugshot though?
[21:37] <knome> lazy bluesabre 
[21:37] <bluesabre> ochosi: not got a solution there yet...
[21:37] <ochosi> ali1234: since you upgraded from 15.04 to 15.10, what version of xfpm were you using in 15.04? maybe there are some left-over settings from light-locker-settings?
[21:37] <bluesabre> knome: gstreamer/clutter is hard :(
[21:38] <ali1234> ochosi: the default one
[21:38] <ali1234> i did a clean install about 2 weeks before 15.10 was released, and then upgraded
[21:38] <ochosi> ali1234: iirc 15.10 was the first with xfpm with light locker's settings integrated
[21:38] <knome> bluesabre, yeah right! (:
[21:41] <flocculant> bluesabre: that makes sense
[21:44] <bluesabre> flocculant: yup, just giving you a heads up
[21:45] <ochosi> no more reasonable  testing parole video in vbox then
[21:45] <bluesabre> ochosi: yup
[21:45] <bluesabre> it was good for a short while
[21:45] <bluesabre> :)
[21:46] <ochosi> :'(
[21:46] <knome> ochosi, btw, i should poke you again about the media manager article serie
[21:46] <bluesabre> Unit193: figured out the answer to a question I asked you forever ago... "gpg-agent --daemon --sh"
[21:47] <bluesabre> (saw it running on my work computer which I upgraded from trusty)
[21:49] <ochosi> knome: yeah, then again there are so many other important things to do
[21:52] <knome> ochosi, this is important; we will not ship any media manager and it's sensible to talk about the alternatives the team uses
[21:52] <knome> tbh, it likely takes 10-15 mins of your time
[21:54] <bluesabre> just like being back at university, right?
[21:55] <knome> hah
[22:40] <bluesabre> ochosi: if you want to merge in the new icons for 16.04, just update the xubuntu-artwork bzr and let me know, we'll work on the UIFe
[22:42] <ochosi> bluesabre: that's awesome
[22:42] <ochosi> i'll review and merge tomorrow
[22:42] <bluesabre> great, thanks
[22:42] <bluesabre> we'll also confirm with slickymaster
[22:42] <bluesabre> :D
[22:42] <bluesabre> but mimetypes should be few and far between in the docs
[22:42] <ochosi> do we have any mimetype icons in the docs?
[22:43] <ochosi> yeah :)
[22:44] <knome> no
[22:53] <bluesabre> ochosi: guessing you'd probably have to so some redraws for small sizes though, right?
[22:54] <bluesabre> or, the sizes that are used outside of elementary
[23:21] <cosimo> Hello. Anyone knows how long does it take for a translation team/mailing list, to answer an admission request?
[23:22] <knome> depends on the team
[23:22] <knome> hopefully not too long
[23:22] <bluesabre> ochosi: portions of the patch that apply for 1.4.4: https://paste.ubuntu.com/15379748/
[23:23] <cosimo> thanks knome, I'm waiting for about 20 hours ;)
[23:23] <cosimo> too impatient maybe...
[23:23] <knome> cosimo, i wouldn't be surprised if it took days, even weeks
[23:23] <knome> ...unfortunately...
[23:23] <bluesabre> cosimo: progress slows to a grinding halt particularly on weekends
[23:23] <cosimo> thanks guys, is waiting time for me then. 
[23:27] <bluesabre> ochosi: so, what's the plan for xfce4-power-manager 1.6.x, is that going to be the stable, supported series for a while?