| === Saviq_ is now known as Saviq | ||
| tsdgeos | Mirv: ping | 08:51 |
|---|---|---|
| tsdgeos | pstolowski: rebuild silo! | 09:00 |
| Mirv | tsdgeos: pong | 09:02 |
| tsdgeos | Mirv: how convincing do i have to be to get https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/151559/ into our packages? | 09:03 |
| Mirv | tsdgeos: filing a Launchpad bug would be enough | 09:10 |
| pstolowski | tsdgeos, 71? | 09:12 |
| tsdgeos | pstolowski: filters, 54? | 09:13 |
| tsdgeos | Mirv: ok, doing | 09:13 |
| pstolowski | tsdgeos, ok, I can, just remember Saviq has a new one with filters in it and plethora of other unity8 stuff (silo 41) | 09:23 |
| tsdgeos | ah yeah | 09:23 |
| tsdgeos | i just was going to tell you that | 09:23 |
| tsdgeos | i was just reading his email :D | 09:23 |
| tsdgeos | https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1105 | 09:23 |
| pstolowski | tsdgeos, do you need silo 54 still for any testing? | 09:23 |
| tsdgeos | guess not | 09:23 |
| tsdgeos | can anyone retrigger that silo or has to be mzanetti? | 09:23 |
| mzanetti | I'm here | 09:24 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: can you rebuild https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1105 ? | 09:24 |
| pstolowski | tsdgeos, i could but don't want to get in the way, not sure what's happening to that silo | 09:24 |
| tsdgeos | just merged a few branches | 09:24 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, fwiw, everyone that has approved lander status can. so you can do too | 09:24 |
| mzanetti | but no prob. I'll do | 09:24 |
| pstolowski | tsdgeos, will keep 54 around for a while just in case we need to test/fix something quickly | 09:24 |
| tsdgeos | pstolowski: k | 09:24 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: k | 09:25 |
| tsdgeos | man Saviq goes away for a day and the CI already broke :D | 09:30 |
| * tsdgeos retriggers all jobs | 09:30 | |
| mzanetti | haha | 09:33 |
| tsdgeos | Mirv: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtdeclarative-opensource-src/+bug/1556842 | 09:35 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1556842 in qtdeclarative-opensource-src (Ubuntu) "Backport patch so that forceLayout calls layout on more occasions" [Undecided,New] | 09:35 |
| Mirv | tsdgeos: thank you | 09:37 |
| === shuduo is now known as shuduo-afk | ||
| pstolowski | mzanetti, please let me know when you guys sort out the issues Saviq mentioned in the email & silo 41 is ready for proper testing (i'd like to check filters once again in this silo) | 10:52 |
| mzanetti | pstolowski, ack | 10:53 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: do you know who are we supposed to tell about all those errors on our CI? they seem like network unstability | 11:10 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, if it's something in the surrounding network, I guess opening a ticket is way to go. | 11:11 |
| mzanetti | however, there's a #jenaas irc channel | 11:11 |
| mzanetti | try asking there if others have the same issues | 11:11 |
| mzanetti | #jenkaas | 11:11 |
| mzanetti | pstolowski, that dependency issue is not fixed yet, however, the silo is built and the code should be the final edition. you can test the scopes stuff | 12:12 |
| pstolowski | mzanetti, k thanks | 12:14 |
| dandrader | So qtmir got infected again "799 tag(s) updated" | 12:26 |
| * dandrader runs script on it | 12:26 | |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, pstolowski, is there anything from a user point of view to be tested in regard to filters? | 13:14 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: not *strictly* filters, but it comes with a new department navigation | 13:16 |
| tsdgeos | so the click scope navigation is different | 13:17 |
| tsdgeos | s/navigation/departmnet navigation/ | 13:17 |
| mzanetti | right... departments vanished | 13:17 |
| tsdgeos | they did not | 13:17 |
| tsdgeos | they are on the serach popup | 13:17 |
| mzanetti | ah | 13:17 |
| mzanetti | ack. all clear | 13:17 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: filters there's a test scope that pstolowski has around that can be usde for testing | 13:18 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, there seems to be sonething odd in the pressed highlight | 13:18 |
| tsdgeos | but afaik there's no "real" scope using them yet | 13:18 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, sent you a pic via telegram | 13:20 |
| mzanetti | lol | 13:20 |
| mzanetti | PEBKAC | 13:20 |
| mzanetti | or maybe not | 13:21 |
| mzanetti | I'm totally confused | 13:21 |
| tsdgeos | i'll flash and try to reproduce | 13:21 |
| pstolowski | mzanetti, yeah, as tsdgeos says. atm we should check if we haven't regressed. only my test scope uses filters | 13:24 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: silo 41, right? | 13:24 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, yes | 13:27 |
| pstolowski | what is 'pressed highlight? i guess it's not ubuntu store highlight? | 13:32 |
| mzanetti | pstolowski, http://imgur.com/BOGFJ2G | 13:33 |
| pstolowski | mzanetti, hmm how did you do that? | 13:34 |
| mzanetti | pstolowski, press, drag a little and release | 13:35 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, cimi, pstolowski: I believe this is a bug of the old ListItems. Have seen this in other places too | 13:35 |
| mzanetti | we might want to consider moving to the new ListItem? | 13:36 |
| pstolowski | mzanetti, ok, got it. yeah, i don't think it's related to our changes | 13:36 |
| tsdgeos | i can't repro :/ | 13:37 |
| tsdgeos | now | 13:37 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, big effort to move to the new ListItem? | 13:38 |
| mzanetti | I'm afraid the old ListItems won't ever get fixed any more | 13:38 |
| mzanetti | which one are you using? ListItems.Standard ? | 13:38 |
| pstolowski | mzanetti, tsdgeos if this is a lot of work then i suggest we log a bug and fix that separately | 13:39 |
| pstolowski | mzanetti, i found one minor issue with music scope, will try to fix that | 13:41 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: i object to blocking on that, that code is the same it was before this, so the bug already existed | 13:42 |
| * tsdgeos reflashes without the silo to try to reproduce | 13:42 | |
| mzanetti | odd, I can't repro on my dogfooding (rc-proposed) phone | 13:43 |
| mzanetti | but I figure the code of the actual list should not have changed | 13:44 |
| mzanetti | weird thing is, once I have an item in that state, I can't even click it any more | 13:44 |
| mzanetti | and not recover from it | 13:44 |
| tsdgeos | actually | 13:45 |
| tsdgeos | i think i changed from ListItem.Standard to ListItem | 13:45 |
| mzanetti | well, I can recover by clicking the cancel button | 13:45 |
| tsdgeos | so it's the new one that regresses it seems | 13:45 |
| mzanetti | oh really | 13:45 |
| mzanetti | well, not denying that | 13:45 |
| tsdgeos | yep | 13:46 |
| tsdgeos | see https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/optionselector_filter_visual_improvements/+merge/277138 | 13:46 |
| tsdgeos | line 128 | 13:46 |
| tsdgeos | meh | 13:46 |
| tsdgeos | so can't object now | 13:46 |
| tsdgeos | should not have trusted the sdk people :D | 13:46 |
| tsdgeos | or whoever convinced me to use the new stuff | 13:46 |
| mzanetti | lol | 13:48 |
| mzanetti | well, usually the new ListItem is quite a lot better than the old ones | 13:48 |
| mzanetti | just tried to create a standalone testcase | 13:48 |
| mzanetti | it doesn't seem to have a pressed highlight | 13:48 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: yeah no idea where that highlight comes from euther | 13:55 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: seems to be a default behaviour | 13:56 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, yeah, but I just created a standalone example at doesn't do it... | 13:57 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: did you set a color: ? | 13:58 |
| mzanetti | ah... it only does when a onClicked handler is assigned | 13:58 |
| tsdgeos | ah wait i'm not either | 13:58 |
| mzanetti | and I can reproduce the bug | 13:59 |
| mzanetti | with this: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15384113/ | 13:59 |
| mzanetti | ok... definitely an SDK issue then | 13:59 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, we might want to try to use ListItems.Empty for now then as I don't believe the SDK will manage to do another landing before OTA-10 | 14:00 |
| mzanetti | lemme talk to zsombi | 14:00 |
| mzanetti | oh, he's here in this channel | 14:00 |
| zsombi | mzanetti: ? | 14:00 |
| mzanetti | found a bug in ListItem | 14:00 |
| mzanetti | zsombi, this snippet: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15384113/ | 14:01 |
| mzanetti | (the onClicked handler is the important bit) | 14:01 |
| mzanetti | zsombi, when that's around, it will have some onPressed highlight | 14:01 |
| mzanetti | that gets stuck and makes the item not interactive any more | 14:01 |
| mzanetti | reproducible with the above snippet | 14:01 |
| zsombi | mzanetti: with touch or mouse? | 14:02 |
| mzanetti | both | 14:02 |
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| mzanetti | just run the above in qmlscene, then start dragging the list with mouse/touch but only for a tiny bit and release it again | 14:02 |
| mzanetti | eventually the pressed highlight will get stuck | 14:02 |
| mzanetti | it is considerably easier to trigger it with thouch | 14:03 |
| mzanetti | but I've managed with mouse too | 14:03 |
| zsombi | mzanetti: ok, so I have to start dragging it a bit... | 14:04 |
| mzanetti | yes | 14:05 |
| mzanetti | zsombi, easier if you longpress and then drag a bit | 14:06 |
| zsombi | mzanetti: ok, then the long press messes it in | 14:07 |
| mzanetti | not sure what the exact trigger is | 14:07 |
| mzanetti | but with the new scopes departments in silo 41 I am triggering all the time when trying to naviage through it | 14:07 |
| === dandrader_ is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: so do i go back to listitem.standard ? | 14:12 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, this fixes it for me: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15384174/ | 14:13 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, maybe add a fixme. lemme report a bug for the sdk | 14:14 |
| mzanetti | zsombi, tsdgeos: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1556971 | 14:17 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1556971 in ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) "ListItem pressed highlight gets stuck when scrolling" [Undecided,New] | 14:17 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: is it ok if i make it a new branch on top? | 14:17 |
| mzanetti | yeah, I guess | 14:19 |
| * mzanetti contiues with silo testing | 14:20 | |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, please test that patch too... not sure if it breaks other things or so... | 14:20 |
| tsdgeos | yes | 14:20 |
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/listitemworkaround/+merge/288933 | 14:38 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, thanks | 14:50 |
| dandrader | mzanetti, similar to your findings on mock issues: https://code.launchpad.net/~dandrader/unity8/duplicateMirSurfaceSignals/+merge/288938 | 15:18 |
| mzanetti | dandrader, heh, yeah... those hit in the darkest moments | 15:19 |
| === maxb_ is now known as maxb | ||
| mzanetti | pstolowski, hey, would you confirm that the OSK is a bit odd with silo 41? | 15:26 |
| mzanetti | I frequently hit the key above the one I try to press | 15:26 |
| mzanetti | hmm... went away after a reboot now.. but it was hitting me on 2 boots already | 15:27 |
| mzanetti | have it again | 15:28 |
| mzanetti | dafuq | 15:28 |
| pstolowski | mzanetti, doh, you're right. doesn't happen too often | 15:28 |
| pstolowski | but i just reproduced | 15:28 |
| dandrader | mterry, did "make tryTutorial" ever worked? | 15:40 |
| mterry | dandrader, I think so? | 15:40 |
| dandrader | mterry, crashes with a mysterious error now. no idea what's going on... | 15:41 |
| mterry | dandrader, in trunk or tutorial-redesign? | 15:42 |
| dandrader | mterry, trunk. hold a sec, something likely wrong with my build. am rebuilding from scratch | 15:42 |
| mterry | dandrader, you see a crash in trunk or tutorial-redesign? | 15:50 |
| dandrader | mterry, there's something wrong... "make tryShell" is also crashing with trunk. Can you reproduce it? | 15:51 |
| mterry | dandrader, yeah... "ASSERT failure in QList<T>::operator[]: "index out of range", file /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtCore/qlist.h, line 518 | 15:51 |
| mterry | Aborted | 15:51 |
| mterry | " | 15:51 |
| dandrader | mterry, yes, that's what I get | 15:52 |
| dandrader | so something broke a number of tryFoo targets in the latest release I suppose | 15:52 |
| mzanetti | pstolowski, I'm afraid I can't repro that issue with trunk | 15:55 |
| pstolowski | tsdgeos, ^ | 15:55 |
| mzanetti | pstolowski, but I've really no clue atm which branch could be the culprit | 15:55 |
| dandrader | mterry, got a backtrace. there's MirSurfaceItem::setSurface in it. weill keep digging | 15:55 |
| tsdgeos | dandrader: mterry: that's fixed by me | 15:55 |
| tsdgeos | dandrader: mterry: https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/makeMakeTryOrientedShellWork | 15:55 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, ah, great! will try that | 15:56 |
| pstolowski | mzanetti, we have various 'kbdLayout' MPs in that silo..? | 15:56 |
| mzanetti | pstolowski, they should only affect the physical keyboard | 15:56 |
| mzanetti | "should" | 15:57 |
| tsdgeos | pstolowski: mzanetti: yeah osk weird, sure it's silo 41? | 15:57 |
| pstolowski | yeah.. i don't see have filters could affect osk | 15:57 |
| pstolowski | * how | 15:57 |
| * tsdgeos reflashes withous silo 41 | 15:57 | |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, so far I haven't managed to repro with trunk | 15:57 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, eek. huge prereq | 15:57 |
| * dandrader cherry-picks | 15:58 | |
| tsdgeos | dandrader: the prereq has landed ;) | 15:58 |
| mzanetti | dandrader, that prereq has landed | 15:58 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, can you repro the weird OSK too? | 15:58 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: yes | 15:59 |
| mzanetti | darn | 15:59 |
| tsdgeos | a gave me q | 15:59 |
| mzanetti | or well... | 15:59 |
| mzanetti | better easy to repro | 15:59 |
| tsdgeos | on places it seemed to me should give me a | 15:59 |
| mzanetti | yep | 15:59 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, mzanetti right :) | 15:59 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: we should add https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/makeMakeTryOrientedShellWork/+merge/288743 to https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1105 | 15:59 |
| mzanetti | ok | 16:00 |
| mzanetti | so... now we need to figure what's wrong with the OSK tho | 16:00 |
| mzanetti | ltinkl, ^ | 16:02 |
| mzanetti | you might have an idea? | 16:02 |
| mzanetti | don't see how the physical kbd layout would affect it either, but atm I'm still in the dark | 16:02 |
| tsdgeos | yep defenitely seems silo 41 related | 16:03 |
| mzanetti | I wonder if the shell_chrome stuff might do something... it seems to move surfaces between fullscreen and not | 16:03 |
| pstolowski | wow this silo is massive | 16:03 |
| mzanetti | pstolowski, no... 64 was massive... this is just biggish | 16:03 |
| pstolowski | :D | 16:03 |
| tsdgeos | i'm going to random point to the shell-chrome branches :D | 16:03 |
| * pstolowski too scared to ask what was in silo 64 | 16:03 | |
| mzanetti | pstolowski, 60+ branches | 16:04 |
| pstolowski | phew | 16:04 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: can we create a second silo and add group of features until we found otu what's the one that seems to cause it? | 16:05 |
| ltinkl | mzanetti, OSK broken in that silo? pff but the keymapSwitching stuff has (almost) definitely nothing to do with it | 16:05 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, you mean a bisecting silo? | 16:06 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: yeah | 16:06 |
| mzanetti | yeah, I guess we could... not sure if that's really faster tho | 16:06 |
| mzanetti | dednick, hey, you did the most work of the shell_chrome branches, right= | 16:07 |
| dednick | mzanetti: yes | 16:07 |
| dednick | right=true | 16:07 |
| mzanetti | dednick, could you imagine them having affect on the OSK surface? it seems input is a few grid units lower than it should be | 16:08 |
| mzanetti | dednick, i.e. pressing "a" gives us "q" | 16:08 |
| mzanetti | those branches mess with fullscreen. and the offset seems pretty much the panel height | 16:08 |
| tsdgeos | interesting point, it only happens the second time the OSK shows | 16:09 |
| tsdgeos | the first time it's fine | 16:09 |
| tsdgeos | i.e. adb reboot -> trigger OSK -> good -> hide and show OSK -> bad | 16:10 |
| dednick | mzanetti: um, it could do maybe. | 16:10 |
| dednick | mzanetti: the panel hint hack. | 16:10 |
| * mterry is now on irccloud, hopefully this is more reliable | 16:11 | |
| dednick | mzanetti: is there a silo for it? | 16:12 |
| mzanetti | dednick, 41 | 16:12 |
| mzanetti | this totally explains why the heck I have not been able to enter 2 identical passwords testing the OOBE before :D | 16:12 |
| dednick | :) | 16:12 |
| dednick | didnt seem to be a problem at mwc though... :/ | 16:13 |
| dednick | that i heard about anyway | 16:13 |
| mzanetti | dednick, I'm not saying it is those branches... atm I'm still in the dark and those look like the most suspicious ones to me... | 16:13 |
| dednick | mzanetti: phone mode? | 16:14 |
| dednick | staged | 16:14 |
| mzanetti | dednick, yeah, tested on nexus4 | 16:14 |
| mzanetti | mterry, ltinkl, Mirv could fix the 8.13 bump in the silo. should we or are you relying on the fact that it's bumped to 8.13 already? | 16:16 |
| mterry | mzanetti: hrm, "could fix?" -- I bumped in that branch because we moved files, so needed a version for debian/control | 16:18 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: dandrader: happens on arale here too fwiw | 16:19 |
| ltinkl | mterry, what version are we reyling now on with the breaks/replaces? | 16:19 |
| mzanetti | mterry, so you manually bump it to 8.13 somewhere now? | 16:19 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, what? | 16:20 |
| ltinkl | mzanetti, to 8.12 | 16:20 |
| tsdgeos | dandrader: meh, that was for dednick | 16:20 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: dednick: happens on arale here too fwiw | 16:20 |
| mzanetti | ltinkl, mterry, right, but the silo builds 8.13, not 8.12 | 16:20 |
| mterry | mzanetti: I manually bumped in https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity8/sessionIndicatorForDevices/+merge/288940 | 16:20 |
| mzanetti | mterry, still 8.12 :D | 16:21 |
| mzanetti | mterry, the silo would give us 8.13 | 16:21 |
| mterry | mzanetti: oh sorry. I meant 8.12 | 16:21 |
| mterry | mzanetti: did anyone bump to 8.13? | 16:21 |
| mzanetti | so I ask Mirv to clear the packages and we do a clean rebuild. that would give us 8.12 | 16:21 |
| mterry | mzanetti: sure? You mean clear the silo of packages? my changes shouldn't need that, but ok | 16:22 |
| mzanetti | mterry, the OOBE branches did have a 8.13 but it was reverted. however, PPAs reject lower versions and silos seem to be clever enough to just bump it on their own in that case | 16:22 |
| mterry | ah | 16:22 |
| mterry | mzanetti: got it. So no, not relying on 8.13 | 16:22 |
| mterry | mzanetti: only relying on 8.12 | 16:22 |
| ltinkl | mterry, should be still fine right to rely on << 8.12? | 16:24 |
| ltinkl | even if we "skip" it | 16:24 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, bisecting silo 35 building | 16:24 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, so far only with the chrome branches | 16:25 |
| mterry | ltinkl: yeah | 16:25 |
| dednick | mzanetti: dash is all white on 41 :( | 16:26 |
| mterry | mzanetti: you had started reviewing https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity8/tutorial-redesign/+merge/288839 back in the day. Do you want to finish that, or shall I pass that off to dednick? | 16:27 |
| Mirv | mzanetti: so sounds like "go ahead"? | 16:27 |
| Mirv | to remove unity8 packages temporarily from the silo and rebuild in half an hour to see what happens | 16:27 |
| tsdgeos | dednick: what? | 16:28 |
| dednick | tsdgeos: hang on, i'm cleaning device and will check again. | 16:29 |
| dednick | might have had some of my code on there. | 16:29 |
| dednick | could have had some occlusion stuff still on it. | 16:29 |
| Mirv | mzanetti: I did that, so please try rebuilding unity8 in 041 in around 30 mins to give LP a bit of time to update whatever it might want to update. I also removed it from train's packages (it will come back since there are MP:s for it). if that doesn't help, then only silo switch would help. | 16:35 |
| mzanetti | mterry, if dednick has the time, please | 16:36 |
| mzanetti | Mirv, ack | 16:36 |
| === francisco is now known as Guest95587 | ||
| === pstolowski is now known as pstolowski|bbl | ||
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| mzanetti | pstolowski|bbl, about the fix for filters you mentioned, did you push that somewhere? what do I need to rebuild? | 16:45 |
| mterry | dednick: ^ got time for tutorial-redesign when done with geonames? | 16:50 |
| dednick | mterry: i've got to look at problem mzanetti is seeing with osk, but after that yes | 16:51 |
| mterry | dednick: cool thanks | 16:51 |
| mzanetti | dednick, silo41 is not installable atm... we had to delete the unity8 packages. but will be there in a bit. I can upload them somewhere to if you want to test now | 16:52 |
| mzanetti | or not... apt cache is cleared | 16:52 |
| dednick | mzanetti: seemed to install for me. | 16:53 |
| mzanetti | really | 16:53 |
| dednick | mzanetti: and can confirm shift. | 16:53 |
| mzanetti | ok... you might installed it before we nuked the packages then. great | 16:53 |
| dednick | perhaps | 16:53 |
| mzanetti | dednick, ok. cool | 16:53 |
| mterry | ltinkl: do you have review cycles? https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/phablet-tools/tutorial-redesign/+merge/277764 is a relatively small one in our silo that isn't approved yet | 17:12 |
| ltinkl | mterry, sure, can do after I've finished the keymapSwitching stuff | 17:13 |
| mterry | mzanetti: tsgeos snuck lp:~aacid/unity8/listitemworkaround into silo 41. Was that expected? | 17:18 |
| mterry | mzanetti: just want to make sure if I should review it or not | 17:18 |
| mterry | greyback: and same for lp:~nick-dedekind/qtubuntu/shell_chrome -- looks like it just needs final stamp | 17:23 |
| greyback | yep | 17:23 |
| mterry | oh and u8 too. OK, you must know all this :) | 17:24 |
| mterry | greyback: hey are your eyes fully restored now? | 17:24 |
| mzanetti | mterry, yeah, it fixes an issue that I found in silo testing | 17:24 |
| mterry | mzanetti: ok cool, will review then | 17:25 |
| mzanetti | mterry, read the linked bug report, it should be clear from that | 17:25 |
| greyback | mterry: things a little blurry still - text not sharp for example. As day goes on, eyes tire more so it gets worse. But am still able to get most things done | 17:25 |
| mterry | mzanetti: only 11 unapproved branches by my count now | 17:26 |
| mzanetti | haha | 17:26 |
| mzanetti | mterry, well, most of them have been looked at, tested well before | 17:26 |
| mterry | greyback: good! Do you love not needing glasses so far? | 17:26 |
| mterry | mzanetti: yeah some for sure have | 17:27 |
| mzanetti | mterry, like all the OOBE, I would just skim over them to see if lukas fixed the things I mentioned in the last review | 17:27 |
| greyback | mterry: yeah, it's a small thing, but it is nice | 17:27 |
| mterry | greyback: I can feel my eyes slipping. I'm guessing I'll eventually need glasses / get some laser work done myself | 17:28 |
| mzanetti | so far everyone I've been talking to has said that the laser thing has been the best thing ever | 17:29 |
| greyback | I'll not be that encouraging, there's nothing wrong with wearing glasses. They can make you look more dignified/sophisticated | 17:31 |
| mterry | greyback: I don't know if my face could stand being any more dignified | 17:31 |
| greyback | mterry: indeed. They'll be carving it into a mountain fairly soon | 17:32 |
| greyback | you Americans like doing that | 17:32 |
| mterry | greyback: I've known Mt Rushmore as a done-thing all my life. But how fricking nuts of an idea that must have been originally. Shocked they went through with it | 17:33 |
| greyback | yeah. Have always found it a bit much | 17:33 |
| greyback | but then, why not | 17:33 |
| greyback | they did it in lord of the rings universe at lot too | 17:34 |
| mterry | greyback: because it's a beautiful mountain as is! :) | 17:34 |
| greyback | will give people thousands of years from now puzzlement | 17:34 |
| dednick | mzanetti: i've fixed that bug with osk. not sure why it was working previously and not now though. It was something specific i added to get it not to do that same issue! | 17:38 |
| dednick | but seems to have backfired now. | 17:38 |
| mzanetti | dednick, oh, cool! | 17:38 |
| mzanetti | I was still prepping the bisecting silo to confirm it's really those branches | 17:38 |
| mzanetti | I guess I can throw that away then | 17:39 |
| mzanetti | dednick, which packages to rebuild? | 17:39 |
| dednick | mzanetti: qtubuntu | 17:39 |
| mzanetti | ta | 17:39 |
| * mzanetti does | 17:39 | |
| dednick | there must have been a change elsewhere in the mwc code which required it... :/ | 17:39 |
| dednick | so it'll probably come back! | 17:40 |
| mzanetti | ltinkl, mterry, 8.13 it'll be... not going to completely destroy and re-setup the silo | 17:45 |
| mzanetti | ltinkl, mterry, your code should still work with that, right? | 17:46 |
| mterry | yeah | 17:46 |
| mterry | mzanetti: ^ | 17:46 |
| mzanetti | ok... unity8, indicator-session and qtubuntu builds on the way... | 17:47 |
| mzanetti | actually. Mirv's hack helped! | 17:51 |
| === jhodapp is now known as jhodapp|errand | ||
| mterry | ltinkl: indicator-session built in silo, nice | 18:04 |
| === pstolowski|bbl is now known as pstolowski | ||
| pstolowski | mzanetti, still there? | 19:00 |
| === jhodapp|errand is now known as jhodapp | ||
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| mterry | Mirv: you did something to clear out the 8.13 version of unity8 from the silo 41 ppa? | 19:17 |
| mterry | It still seems to be in the ppa (though isn't showing up in LP) | 19:17 |
| mterry | specifically, only for unity8-common and unity8-schemas packages | 19:18 |
| mterry | ltinkl: ^ u8 in the silo isn't even building unity8-common and unity8-schemas... | 19:20 |
| ltinkl | mterry, no idea why is that happening... | 19:20 |
| mterry | ltinkl: ah... because those are built by the amd64 build | 19:20 |
| mterry | ltinkl: which failed to upload because 8.13 packages are still somehow in the silo? | 19:20 |
| mterry | Mirv: so I guess back to you -- do you know why the 8.13 packages are still in the silo? What did you do besides press "delete packages" in the LP ui? | 19:22 |
| mzanetti | pstolowski, hey | 19:42 |
| === boiko_ is now known as boiko | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!