[05:34] <Mirv> robru: ok, thanks for revealing jibel's evil hack so that I can do the same in the future! :)
[05:36] <robru> Mirv: yw
[05:59] <ToyKeeper> charles_: Question for you or dbarth on https://trello.com/c/S0yjk9mW/2892-893-ubuntu-landing-003-indicator-datetime-dbarth
[08:42] <pstolowski> sil2100, hey, silo 41 is complaining about missing  1.0.3+16.04.20160209-0ubuntu2 changelog entry, but i don't see it in the current src deb; is this a manual change again in the packaging which hasn't landed in distro yet?
[08:44] <sil2100> pstolowski: let me check
[08:44] <sil2100> pstolowski: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-scopes-api/1.0.3+16.04.20160209-0ubuntu2
[08:45] <sil2100> pstolowski: doko just poked me about it
[08:45] <sil2100> pstolowski: I guess you can override it, as if you release your changes then a no-change rebuild will happen anyway
[08:46] <pstolowski> sil2100, uh, ok. so it's enough to just comment on the silo that it's safe to land &override?
[08:46] <pstolowski> ah, i need to bump to 0ubuntu2 i guess
[08:51] <pstolowski> sil2100, ty
[11:37] <Mirv> err, what
[11:37] <sil2100> huh
[11:37] <sil2100> https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/publishable <- ?
[11:37] <Mirv> sil2100: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-069 vs https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-069-2-publish/5/console
[11:37] <sil2100> Yeah, I looked at the same thing just now
[11:37] <Mirv> vs https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1111
[11:37] <sil2100> Big WTF
[11:39] <Mirv> ok it seems to be what was landed earlier from that silo https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1083
[11:39] <Mirv> but it's as if some data has been resetted
[11:39] <Mirv> trying diff only rebuild
[11:39] <sil2100> Mirv: maybe do a diff-only build?
[11:39] <Mirv> :)
[11:39] <sil2100> Strange anyway!
[11:40] <sil2100> Since the train seems to have the state right, as bileto shows the correct packages
[11:40] <sil2100> But the publish job still went crazy
[11:41] <bzoltan_> Mirv:  do we need an ack for the pakaging changes in this https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1107
[11:50] <Mirv> bzoltan_: no, it's already published (and I'd have the rights too, there are no new binary packages in that)
[11:51] <bzoltan_> Mirv:  cool, tahnks
[14:11] <rvr> oSoMoN: alex-abreu: ping
[14:12] <rvr> oSoMoN: alex-abreu: In the ebay webapp, while trying to save an image, the context menu pop ups, I select the Gallery app, but then nothing happens. I see this in the logs: file:///usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/qt5/qml/Ubuntu/Content/ContentPeerPicker13.qml:194: TypeError: Cannot read property 'peers' of null
[14:12] <alex-abreu> rvr, with a specific silo?
[14:13] <rvr> alex-abreu: Silo 55, oxide-qt, haven't tried without it
[14:14] <alex-abreu> rvr, ok, it shouldn't be oxide specific, I'll try after my meeting
[14:14] <alex-abreu> in a meeting now
[14:14] <rvr> alex-abreu: Ack
[14:14] <rvr> alex-abreu: webbrowser app works fine in that regard
[14:15] <alex-abreu> ok
[14:16] <oSoMoN> rvr, fwiw, that error that you’re seeing in the logs is unrelated
[14:17] <oSoMoN> not sure what’s happening with the ebay app
[14:29] <rvr> oSoMoN: Also happens in twitter app, this is the dbus.log http://paste.ubuntu.com/15391947/
[14:33] <oSoMoN> rvr, huh, that doesn’t look good, can you file a bug with this log at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webbrowser-app/+filebug ?
[14:34] <alex-abreu> rvr, indeed,
[14:36] <charles> ToyKeeper, 9-hours-later pong :)
[14:37] <rvr> oSoMoN: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1557566
[14:40] <boiko> robru: -1 ERROR, This error was not anticipated by robru. You should definitely let him know immediately.
[14:43] <sil2100> hmm
[14:43] <sil2100> Bileto is dead, I get the same error
[14:44] <sil2100> Now I can't open requests
[14:44] <sil2100> Anyone else having the same issues?
[14:44] <sil2100> Internal IRC seems to be dead too
[14:46] <boiko> sil2100: yep, same here
[14:47] <charles> ToyKeeper, responded in-card
[14:47] <sil2100> (since jenkins down as well)
[15:00] <xavigarcia> charles: I joined the standup HO call
[15:01] <xavigarcia> charles: I can't connect to Canonical's IRC server :/
[15:01] <charles> xavigarcia, will join in a minute
[15:01] <xavigarcia> charles: cool
[15:01] <charles> xavigarcia, I was about to ask. irc.canonical.com isn't responding for me either
[15:01] <jibel> charles, xavigarcia multiple services are unreachable including irc server
[15:01] <robru> I also can't reach irc.canonical.com
[15:01] <robru> or bileto
[15:02] <jibel> robru, known, IS is on it
[15:02] <robru> jibel: thanks
[15:02] <Mirv> uh oh, "mako not found on server https://system-image.ubuntu.com channel ubuntu-touch/rc-proposed/ubuntu" ?
[15:03] <Mirv> sil2100: ^ ?
[15:03]  * Mirv checks if he has missed some e-mail
[15:04]  * Mirv does not find e-mail
[15:05] <sil2100> uh oh?
[15:05] <sil2100> mako should just work
[15:05] <Mirv> it does not
[15:05] <Mirv> I was trying to start autopilot tests with a flash with the command I always use, ubuntu-device-flash touch --channel=ubuntu-touch/rc-proposed/ubuntu --developer-mode --password=0000 --wipe
[15:05] <sil2100> https://system-image.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-touch/rc-proposed/ubuntu/mako/version-388.json <- should be, but maybe hmm somewhere else?
[15:06] <charles> jibel, ack, thanks for confirmation
[15:06] <Mirv> sil2100: there's probably some weird tool issue or such.
[15:07] <Mirv> lol
[15:07] <Mirv> sil2100: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/15392273/
[15:07] <Mirv> I wonder what's up
[15:07] <Mirv> so, --device=mako it is...
[15:08] <Mirv> so yes, it says "mako not found on server", but before that there are a couple of lines of other things in the same string :)
[15:09] <sil2100> ugh, internet issues
[15:10] <sil2100> bfiller, jibel: can't connect to hangouts, not sure why
[15:10] <mzanetti> robru, :) http://imgur.com/jNbgKkI
[15:10] <bfiller> sil2100: happened to me earlier, had to reboot
[15:11] <sil2100> uh
[15:11] <sil2100> Yeah, and now I need to kill my firefox
[15:11] <Mirv> sil2100: there's also general net breakage, not just yours
[15:11] <Mirv> so might be confusing :)
[15:17] <Mirv> and now I just found my mako didn't boot after a fresh flash :( has anyone flashed mako today after the android got updated yesterday?
[15:17] <Mirv> doing bootstrap flash now
[15:20] <robru> looks like bileto & IRC are back, for me at least
[15:35] <Mirv> ok booted after bootstrap at lesa
[15:35] <Mirv> least
[15:59] <pstolowski> sil2100, hey, may i ask you to remove unity-scope-mediascanner packages from ppa of silo 41? it won't be included there after all
[16:00] <sil2100> pstolowski: sure, on it now
[16:00] <pstolowski> sil2100, thanks!
[17:14] <dobey> why does it seem like other cards keep getting moved in front of mine on the qa sheet :-/
[17:15] <seb128> you need to pay more beers to jibel at the next sprint ;-)
[17:16] <rvr> seb128: sil2100: Any update on the problem with system settings strings?
[17:16] <sil2100> rvr: just poked seb128 about it, he's on it ;)
[17:17] <rvr> Ah, great!
[17:17] <sil2100> rvr: I'm working on the gd translations now
[17:17] <seb128> rvr, sil2100, was there a bug about that?
[17:17] <rvr> dobey: We have feature freeze exceptions with high priority for OTA10
[17:18] <rvr> seb128: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1555623
[17:18] <seb128> thanks
[17:19] <jibel> dobey, we are prioritizing features that should have landed a week ago and showstoppers for other products
[17:20] <jibel> nothing personal :)
[17:21] <jibel> but really feature freeze exists for a purpose :/
[17:21] <ogra_> where is that written down ?
[17:21] <ogra_> :P
[17:22] <dobey> jibel: yes and my silo was there by feature feeze point
[17:22] <jibel> dobey, I know, I'm sorry
[17:22] <dobey> and i was told on friday it would be fine and i wouldn't need an FFE; not that everything that does have an FFE will take priority over it
[17:27] <seb128> rvr, sil2100, dobey broke it in http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~system-settings-touch/ubuntu-system-settings/trunk/revision/1602/po/CMakeLists.txt
[17:27] <seb128> unsure what is wrong with the change
[17:27] <seb128> but reverting it fixes it
[17:27] <seb128> ${SETTINGSJSFILE} seems empty
[17:28] <seb128> it's not showing a settings.js at the end of that call in the build log or locally
[17:28] <dobey> what?
[17:28] <rvr> Aha
[17:28] <seb128> dobey, kenvandine, ^ can you have a look? I don't see anything wrong at a first glance
[17:28] <seb128> dobey, that change created https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-rtm/+source/ubuntu-system-settings/+bug/1555623
[17:29] <seb128> dobey, seems like ${SETTINGSJSFILE} is empty for some reason
[17:29] <seb128> so the settings.js strings are missing from the template
[17:29] <seb128> reverting
[17:29] <seb128> 47
[17:29] <seb128>  
[17:29] <seb128>                             ${QMLFILES} "${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/settings.js"
[17:29] <seb128>  
[17:29] <seb128> 49
[17:29] <seb128>                             ${QMLFILES} ${SETTINGSJSFILE}
[17:30] <seb128> files it
[17:30] <dobey> that makes no sense though
[17:30] <seb128> dunno, but that's how it is, I just tried
[17:31] <seb128> the pot-qml target in https://launchpadlibrarian.net/247981456/buildlog_ubuntu-xenial-armhf.ubuntu-system-settings_0.3+16.04.20160314-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz doesn't have the settingsjs
[17:31] <dobey> well in the same merge the pot file clearly still has "Rotation Lock" msgid in it
[17:32] <bfiller> robru: can you please mark this ticket ready for QA? it has manual download urls in it https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1096
[17:32] <robru> bfiller: can you not set it?
[17:32] <seb128> dobey, I don't know how that was update, but using the current package I can confirm that "make -C obj..../po pot" leads to a template without those strings
[17:33] <seb128> dobey, and reverting the cmake change fixes it
[17:33] <seb128> my cmake foo is weak though
[17:33] <seb128> so no idea how to debug it more
[17:33] <robru> bfiller: anyways, set
[17:33] <dobey> i'm looking
[17:34] <seb128> dobey, thanks, let me know if you can reproduce
[17:34] <bfiller> robru: no I can't
[17:34] <robru> ah right
[17:36] <dobey> seb128: ok, i'll try to build trunk here and see what happens
[17:37] <seb128> dobey, you don't need a full build, just the initial cmake and make pot
[17:37] <seb128> but full build works as well if you like to use you cpu a bit ;-)
[17:50] <rvr> oSoMoN: Silo 55 approved
[17:50] <dobey> seb128: i know that :)
[17:51] <dobey> seb128: https://code.launchpad.net/~dobey/ubuntu-system-settings/fix-settings-i18n/+merge/289079
[17:52] <seb128> sil2100, rvr; ^
[17:52] <seb128> dobey, what was wrong? I don't know enough about cmake to understand the change
[17:52] <seb128> why did it work at the time you did the change and not anymore?
[17:53] <seb128> kenvandine, hey! you have some cmake foo? want to review https://code.launchpad.net/~dobey/ubuntu-system-settings/fix-settings-i18n/+merge/289079 (it's small enough) ? ;-)
[17:54] <dobey> seb128: i think because the settings.js was generated by a custom_command, and as i was making other changes before, i did "make -j8 && make pot" to build and update the pot, which caused the file to exist, but for some reason currently, settings.js doesn't get generated when just running make pot, so the GLOB wasn't finding the file
[17:54] <oSoMoN> rvr, awesome, thanks!
[17:54] <seb128> dobey, I see, thanks
[17:55] <dobey> seb128: so making it an actual build target, which is depended on, and changing the variable to use RELATIVE_PATH instead of GLOB (since we aren't globbing files anyway) should ensure it's always there for pot-qml
[17:55] <oSoMoN> Mirv, is https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1085 ok to publish? can your comments from yesterday be safely ignored now?
[17:55] <seb128> dobey, that makes sense
[17:56] <dobey> seb128: sorry we didn't catch that earlier. bloody cmake oddities :)
[17:56] <seb128> no worry!
[17:57] <dobey> anyway, stick that MP in the silo, approve it, rebuild, and it should be good to go, assuming the .pot file update doesn't result in conflicts
[17:59] <kenvandine> seb128, dobey: looking
[17:59] <seb128> kenvandine, thanks
[17:59] <seb128> kenvandine, cf what dobey just explained for some context
[18:00] <kenvandine> makes sense
[18:00] <Mirv> oSoMoN: yes they can now be ignored
[18:00] <Mirv> oSoMoN: it was just train problem and QA hadn't checked the silo yet
[18:01] <kenvandine> we probably don't want the updated pot file in the branch though
[18:01] <kenvandine> dobey, ^^
[18:01] <kenvandine> seb128, dobey: i can include this in silo 66 which I plan to land right after silo 38
[18:02] <seb128> kenvandine, great!
[18:02] <dobey> kenvandine: why no update to the pot file?
[18:02] <seb128> rvr, ^
[18:02] <kenvandine> we do that automatically at build
[18:02] <kenvandine> it's not a big problem
[18:02] <oSoMoN> Mirv, ok, mind publishing it yourself?
[18:03] <kenvandine> shouldn't conflict or anything
[18:03] <dobey> ok
[18:06] <Mirv> oSoMoN: I'm not core-dev yet since DMB stopped existing temporarily 3 days before the meeting I could have become one :(
[18:06] <Mirv> oSoMoN: also, I have PPU to oxide-qt already but that applies to _xenial_, so I can't publish to vivid
[18:07] <Mirv> technically I could copy-package but I'll just let someone else publish it
[18:07] <oSoMoN> Mirv, no worries, thanks!
[18:07] <oSoMoN> sil2100, could you please publish silo 55 ?
[18:16] <sil2100> oSoMoN: on it in a moment :)
[18:16] <oSoMoN> cheers
[18:16] <dobey> would be nice if autopkgtests of click packages in the image got run for silos and proposed-migration too
[18:28] <sil2100> oSoMoN: did the package get binNEWed by some archive admin?
[18:28]  * sil2100 checks oxide in xenial
[18:29] <oSoMoN> sil2100, I suppose, given that that version is already in xenial
[18:29] <sil2100> oSoMoN: ok, nvm, I see the same change got approved in xenial
[18:29] <sil2100> I trust the xenial core-devs, publishing
[20:28] <robru> slangasek: we on for the 1:1?
[20:29] <slangasek> robru: ayup!
[20:29] <robru> alright
[20:30] <slangasek> robru: assuming I can get this version of FF to let me load hangouts
[20:31] <robru> slangasek: we can mumble if that's easier for you
[20:34] <robru> slangasek: I don't see you
[20:36] <slangasek> robru: yeah looks like it's going to need to be mumble today
[20:36] <robru> slangasek: ok