| === maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
| ginggs | Would someone look at an FFE for me please? LP: #1555586 | 08:46 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1555586 in lazarus (Ubuntu) "FFe: Sync lazarus 1.6+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1555586 | 08:46 |
| doko | ginggs, done. please close the issue once built | 08:49 |
| ginggs | doko: danke | 08:50 |
| doko | when I'm looking at http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/Contents-amd64.gz searching for vendor_ruby/2.2, I still see a lot of matches, while most of these packages were updated. why? | 09:06 |
| ginggs | Would someone please look at another FFe to fix FTBFS please? LP: #1557527 | 14:19 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1557527 in doublecmd (Ubuntu) "FFe: Sync doublecmd 0.7.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1557527 | 14:19 |
| mdeslaur | can someone please denew lynx? it's lynx-cur that got renamed | 16:14 |
| mdeslaur | jdstrand: perhaps you? ^ | 16:14 |
| jdstrand | mdeslaur: looking | 16:36 |
| mdeslaur | jdstrand: thanks | 16:36 |
| jdstrand | mdeslaur: ok it is building in xenial-proposed: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lynx/2.8.9dev8-4. I also moved it so main since lynx-cur was in main in wily | 16:39 |
| mdeslaur | jdstrand: great, thanks | 16:39 |
| jdstrand | idr if the binaries will have to be moved to main if the source already is. need to keep an eye on that. will need a binNEW as well | 16:39 |
| jdstrand | mdeslaur: hmm, it seems to be ftbfs | 16:40 |
| mdeslaur | jdstrand: ah crud, I'll take a look, thanks | 16:40 |
| jdstrand | np | 16:41 |
| seb128 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wxwidgets3.0/+bug/1329779 needs a ffe right? | 18:06 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1329779 in wxwidgets3.0 (Ubuntu) "[ffe] Sync from Debian Unstable | Migrate to gstreamer 1.0" [High,Confirmed] | 18:06 |
| seb128 | it's about migrating wxwidgets3 from gstreamer 0.10 to 1.0 | 18:06 |
| seb128 | which is a non trivial change | 18:06 |
| seb128 | Bryan Quigley argued on the bug that it's a "bugfix" change but it doesn't really sounds like one | 18:07 |
| slangasek | seb128: I would agree that it's FFe material | 18:23 |
| seb128 | slangasek, thanks | 18:23 |
| seb128 | I've updated it to be one | 18:25 |
| teward | so, i've got a pending nginx bug that needs FFe review before I upload; it's been there for about a month, and appears stuck somewhere in the queue, can anyone look at it? | 20:12 |
| infinity | teward: #? | 20:13 |
| teward | it'd help if i weren't putting all my RAM to pending sbuild runs, standby | 20:13 |
| teward | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/1549347 | 20:13 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1549347 in nginx (Ubuntu) "[FFe Requested] Please update nginx to 1.9.12" [Undecided,New] | 20:13 |
| teward | upload is ready to go, but i didn't want to upload without a review done (to avoid getting yelled at). WOuld have asked earlier, but was ill the past week or so, which prevented it, | 20:13 |
| infinity | teward: Commented. | 20:15 |
| teward | infinity: thanks, as soon as the three workflow scripts which are running sbuilds for other things here are done, and extra cycles and RAM released back to the system, i'll upload. :) | 20:16 |
| teward | hmm, that's new, infinity can you take a peek at this and give insights? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/248257573/buildlog_ubuntu-xenial-s390x.nginx_1.9.12-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz | 20:25 |
| * infinity raises his eyebrow. | 20:25 | |
| * teward has never seen a "cannot fork" error in any nginx build on any arch, even in Debian archs | 20:26 | |
| cjwatson | I'd guess accidental forkbomb. | 20:26 |
| teward | hmm | 20:26 |
| infinity | Indeed, but curious that it would accidentally bomb only one arch. | 20:26 |
| infinity | The machine looks fine, though. | 20:26 |
| cjwatson | Logic error in configure? | 20:27 |
| infinity | Ima give it another try and hope for random luck. | 20:27 |
| * teward starts scanning upstream redmine for weird arch config issues, just in case | 20:27 | |
| teward | s/redmine/trac/ | 20:27 |
| infinity | cjwatson: CANNOT UTIME. | 20:28 |
| infinity | I'm afraid that error message has forever ruined the word "cannot" for me. At least, when it comes from a computer. | 20:29 |
| infinity | teward: Looks fine on a second pass, so whatever accidental bomb is in there, it's nondeterministic (and probably not arch-specific). | 20:31 |
| infinity | Whee. | 20:31 |
| * teward shrugs | 20:32 | |
| teward | infinity: it's odd, every other upload appears to get a nondeterministic failure for some odd reason | 20:32 |
| teward | and it's never the same arch :/ | 20:32 |
| infinity | The sign of a quality upstream. | 20:32 |
| teward | the nondeterministic failures I've seen are all ddeb related :/ | 20:32 |
| teward | never had it blow up in the configure stages | 20:32 |
| infinity | Oh. The sign of a quality distro? :) | 20:33 |
| infinity | (or you have improper recipe dependencies in your debian/rules, which is more likely) | 20:33 |
| teward | possibly, though it seems to be a recurring issue. The debian/rules is essentially verbatim from Debian, minus http2 stuff per sec team request | 20:34 |
| infinity | Oh look, that issue just hit your armhf build. | 20:34 |
| teward | indeed | 20:34 |
| * infinity doesn't retry it. | 20:34 | |
| teward | heheh | 20:34 |
| infinity | Not yet anyway. | 20:34 |
| teward | i'm going to let the others finish first :) | 20:34 |
| teward | they'll either blow up, or succeed, then retry :) | 20:35 |
| * teward appears to have a 'retry build' button :) | 20:35 | |
| infinity | Yeah, I'm intentionally not retrying, so I can sucker pitti into looking at it. | 20:36 |
| infinity | It could well be a race in pkg-create-dbgsym. Or it could be your fault. | 20:36 |
| teward | I wonder if it's a race, or if it's in the way the system runs - at one point I think you said it may be a result of how the rules define how the build should run, but that was long enough ago I lost logs | 20:36 |
| infinity | teward: See #-devel. It's a bug in pkg-create-dbgsym that it doesn't have better locking, but could be worked around by not attempting to be so agressively parallel. *shrug* | 20:42 |
| teward | infinity: splitting time across five windows, standbly | 20:42 |
| teward | infinity: ack | 20:42 |
| teward | I'm curious why Debian is being aggressive with parallel builds, that part's from them | 20:43 |
| teward | i think I'll poke them, and see if there's a specific reason they did it that way, before adding to the delta further | 20:43 |
| infinity | teward: Nah, I wouldn't worry about it. I think I'm getting a handle on why out tooling sucks. | 20:52 |
| infinity | s/out/our/ | 20:52 |
| teward | indeed. *is watching #-devel himself* | 20:52 |
| === Guest93664 is now known as med_ | ||
| flexiondotorg | infinity, Any news on Base? | 23:10 |
| infinity | flexiondotorg: Not yet. Patience (and slightly less pinging). | 23:11 |
| flexiondotorg | infinity, OK. I was only pinging because I thought that was the instruction. I'll back off. | 23:11 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!