| superm1 | can someone accept fwupdate* out of unapproved? the uefi binaries don't appear to be landing at http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-proposed/main/uefi/fwupdate-amd64/ | 07:12 |
|---|---|---|
| apw | superm1, cirtainly if it is in unapproved for uefi bits they will not be in dists till they are approved | 09:29 |
| cjwatson | superm1: done | 09:45 |
| superm1 | Thanks | 09:49 |
| ginggs | would someone look at firmware-extract in NEW please? it's not really new, it was temporarily removed while python-support was being removed. | 10:04 |
| zequence | Hi. We did a rename of a meta package recently, which is unfortunately keeping our ISOs from building. Could someone please replace ubuntustudio-font-meta with ubuntustudio-fonts in the live-build config for us? | 10:39 |
| zequence | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/livecd-rootfs/trunk/view/head:/live-build/auto/config#L350 | 10:39 |
| cjwatson | zequence: done | 10:47 |
| zequence | cjwatson: Big thanks | 10:50 |
| sakrecoer | thank you very much cjwatson ! :) | 10:54 |
| sakrecoer | and also, hi all! as of now i wont say much since i'm still learning, but i will stick arround and try absorbe as much info as possible | 10:55 |
| sakrecoer | sorry also perhaps i should write i'm the next ubuntu studio project-lead, holding the flame after zequence. doing my best to catch up on everything :) | 11:00 |
| cyphermox | could someone please review libcxl in xenial NEW ? it's been sitting there for a month ;) | 14:33 |
| seb128 | cyphermox, so go stuff are sitting since decembre, you are lucky ;-) | 14:34 |
| cyphermox | haha ;) | 14:34 |
| seb128 | cyphermox, how is the n-m ffe going btw? | 14:34 |
| cyphermox | I review go if you review libcxl? | 14:34 |
| cyphermox | moving forward, at least the testing is getting done, it looks real solid so far | 14:35 |
| cyphermox | last night I ported the dnsmasq patch to work again, I needed some alcohol to get that done | 14:35 |
| cyphermox | down to fixing typos here and there, but the annoying part is done, so I'll get back to it tonight, or over lunch | 14:36 |
| seb128 | cyphermox, I can try to have a look once I'm done with the nautilus changes I'm working on (if nobody beats me to it) | 14:37 |
| cyphermox | seb128: i wouldn't be able to ack go anyway | 14:38 |
| seb128 | cyphermox, don't bother about those, I was just pointing it out | 14:38 |
| seb128 | seems like we lack archive admin reviews this cycle (and probably not only that) | 14:38 |
| infinity | cyphermox: I'll look at libwhosit. | 14:41 |
| infinity | seb128: Yeah, doko and I had a chat about that at Connect. Might be time to reinstate AA day rotations to at least make sure some people are sometimes processing the queue. | 14:42 |
| seb128 | unsure how well the rotations work with everybody been too busy, but people doing some work every now and then would be nice | 14:43 |
| infinity | cyphermox: I'm surprised that in all this time, you didn't get it into Debian and just sync. :P | 14:43 |
| seb128 | I've been mostly trying to unblock people who asked about things/needed them to land features or other xenial work | 14:43 |
| cyphermox | infinity: not my call, it's in mentors waiting for review, and I'm not a DD | 14:43 |
| infinity | seb128: Rotations tend to lead to some people still slacking when super busy, but you get a bit more consistency (and a tiny bit of guilt). | 14:43 |
| infinity | cyphermox: Oh. But you'd be maintaining it in Debian? | 14:44 |
| seb128 | right | 14:44 |
| infinity | cyphermox: You could have asked me to sponsor it there. :) | 14:44 |
| cyphermox | infinity: no, frediz would, IIRC | 14:44 |
| infinity | (Or did you, and I failed?) | 14:44 |
| cyphermox | I may have | 14:44 |
| cyphermox | or I foolishly thought that since it was in mentors already it would get sponsored sooner | 14:45 |
| infinity | cyphermox: Yeah, mentors seems to be where a lot of packages go to die if you don't actively seek a sponsor. | 14:45 |
| infinity | make VERS_SONAME=$(VERS_SONAME) VERS_LIB=$(VERS_LIB) | 14:46 |
| infinity | You're kidding me. | 14:46 |
| cyphermox | infinity: I remember telling frediz he should ask around, I know he probably knows one or two DDs who could sponsor it | 14:46 |
| infinity | That's not baked into the upstream makefiles? | 14:46 |
| cyphermox | nope :/ | 14:46 |
| infinity | If I were you, I'd push back on them to fix that. "make && make install" should Just Work. | 14:47 |
| infinity | Having every distro declare the SOVER is asking for trouble. :P | 14:47 |
| infinity | (And, indeed, if you're declaring SOVER=1, how do you know that's "right"?) | 14:47 |
| ogra_ | because ABIs are always backwards compatible indeed :P | 14:48 |
| infinity | * Removed libcxl.a from files to ship. | 14:48 |
| infinity | cyphermox: ^-- Why? | 14:48 |
| infinity | cyphermox: Nothing wrong with shipping a static lib in -dev | 14:48 |
| seb128 | hum | 14:49 |
| seb128 | the "current" daily image is from the 07 | 14:49 |
| seb128 | is anyone looking at that? | 14:49 |
| xnox | infinity, until broken cmake fails to use a perfect .so and goes into staticly linking all the things. | 14:49 |
| infinity | seb128: I guess smoketesting exploded again. Poke jibel, perhaps? | 14:49 |
| seb128 | jibel, ^ | 14:49 |
| infinity | xnox: cmake sucking won't stop me from shipping static libc. :P | 14:50 |
| xnox | #rebelheart | 14:50 |
| infinity | cyphermox: debian/outfile looks like a copy of debian/source/format for no discernable reason. | 14:51 |
| cyphermox | outfile would be wrong, I may have messed up the building + rebuilding | 14:51 |
| infinity | cyphermox: And yell at frediz for the license on debian/* not matching /*, the implied license that places on patches makes things awkward. | 14:52 |
| xnox | infinity, "debian/outfile" is dh_make bug i think. | 14:53 |
| cyphermox | well, it's a catch I didn't notice, anyway | 14:54 |
| infinity | xnox: Might be, but dh_make also tells you to look through debian/ and delete what you don't need. ;) | 14:54 |
| infinity | cyphermox: If he really cares about the license on debian/* (despite it being mostly uncopyrightable) being GPL-2+, he should probably also have a stanza for debian/patches/* as Apache-2.0, IMO. | 14:55 |
| infinity | But that's nitpicking. | 14:55 |
| infinity | Hah. And no working "make install" either? | 14:56 |
| infinity | Man, you need to kick IBM for the state of this project upstream being terribad. | 14:56 |
| * cyphermox updates the bug | 14:57 | |
| cyphermox | infinity: thanks for the review | 14:58 |
| infinity | cyphermox: So, other than all the above rant, the one thing I might insist on changing would be that they set the VER/SOVER to 0.3/0 until upstream actually bakes a proper SONAME in and agrees to track ABI properly. | 14:58 |
| infinity | cyphermox: Cause SOVER 1 implies tracking and consistency across distros, and if we have to set it externally, I don't see how we can promise that. | 14:58 |
| cyphermox | infinity: mind if I copy-pasta this verbatim? | 14:59 |
| infinity | cyphermox: By all means. | 14:59 |
| jibel | seb128, cyphermox was looking into it with max | 15:01 |
| seb128 | jibel, thanks | 15:01 |
| infinity | jibel: current/ seems to break a lot. Is it that we're producing a crappy distro for you to test, or is the infra a bit brittle and needs someone to actually give it some love? | 15:04 |
| infinity | (Willing to believe either, or a mix of both, but I'm betting it's mostly the latter) | 15:04 |
| cyphermox | infinity: it oscillates between the two. sometimes it's that we make a crappy distro, sometimes it's that the infra fails in marvelous ways | 15:13 |
| cyphermox | this time it looks like it's the latter, and we're looking into it | 15:13 |
| infinity | cyphermox: Ta. | 15:13 |
| cyphermox | fwiw, I played with the image enough yesterday to know it probably should have automatically transitioned | 15:14 |
| cyphermox | and I'm about to start with today's | 15:14 |
| infinity | Right, the smoketests aren't particularly deep IIRC, so if it boots/installs/reboots, the fault is in the infra. | 15:14 |
| cyphermox | there are also some limited LVM tests IIRC | 15:16 |
| cyphermox | but I installed with LVM anyway ;) | 15:16 |
| lamont | infinity: (et al): I'm planning (unless you scream) on uploading postfix-3.1.0 as part of my postifx 3 cleanup, since it's (1) minor changes from a very cautious upstream, that (2) we want all of which (3) has had a blanket approval for such things before it loosened up to be general | 21:47 |
| lamont | infinity: in other news, bind 9.10.3-P2 ==> -P4 sometime soonish | 21:47 |
| lamont | but first Imma fix 1556175 | 21:48 |
| infinity | LP: #1556175 | 21:48 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1556175 in isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) "networking.service hangs on shutdown -- killing dhclient has no effect any more" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1556175 | 21:48 |
| infinity | lamont: Oh, yes. Please fix that. :P | 21:48 |
| lamont | infinity: you do not want to read what I did to fix it. | 21:48 |
| lamont | upstream dropped the --enable-exportlib support from configure, since you know, dhcp is going to be "just fin"e | 21:48 |
| lamont | just fine™, only dhcp isn't there yet. | 21:49 |
| infinity | lamont: I don't know postfix upstream well enough to know what I'd expect 3.0.4->3.1.0 to contain, but if it's not featureful and you're sure it's all things we really, really want, I'll trust your judgement. Be prepared to fix it if it sucks. | 21:49 |
| lamont | infinity: yep | 21:49 |
| lamont | that won't be before mid-next week though. | 21:50 |
| * lamont consults the schedule | 21:50 | |
| * lamont cries a little. I guess it'll be Sunday afternoon | 21:50 | |
| lamont | once I review it more | 21:50 |
| lamont | infinity: bind9 is building now (locally) at which point I'm tossing it at a PPA and getting isc-dhcp behind it, and then it'll hit xenial | 21:51 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!