[09:55] <Laney> Is thing-which-updates-the-view-of-Debian's-archive sad?
[09:55] <Laney> https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/glib2.0 <- no 2.47.92-1 (experimental)
[10:00] <Laney> Suspiciously coincides with https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/03/msg00006.html
[10:00] <Laney> sounds like newer debmirrors fix things in this area
[10:01] <Laney> so I'm going to guess "yes, but known"
[10:03] <cjwatson> Laney: We've upgraded debmirror, but gina itself may still be sad.  I'll look at logs shortly.
[10:03] <Laney> cjwatson: 'k, thanks
[11:24] <cjwatson> Laney: Right, so there's both a follow-up problem with debmirror (needs newer debian-archive-keyring; RTed) and some problems with gina itself
[11:24] <cjwatson> Laney: Trying to deal with this as quickly as possible, but it's been one thing after another this week, it's possible it will be broken until early next week :-/
[11:25] <Laney> cjwatson: Ack, nae bother for me to just upload it, wouldn't stress too much
[11:25] <cjwatson> Laney: It's effectively an outage, I don't have the option of saying it doesn't matter :)
[11:30] <Laney> cjwatson: Oh yeah, it matters - just easy enough to get around :)
[11:30]  * Laney receives a council tax bill
[11:30] <cjwatson> Also in category: can't really ignore
[11:35] <Faux> Hee hee.
[11:48] <mapreri> we're lucky ganneff didn't do it Wednesday evening of the Easter week :>
[16:12] <kyrofa> So I have a script that I use to check if someone has signed the CLA via the python launchpadlib. I'd like to also check if that person is a member of the Canonical group (because I figure being an employee is equivalent to the CLA), but that group is private. Is there any way to do this?
[16:16] <kyrofa> I guess I can give it a token from my own account, but I don't want that in CI
[16:29] <kyrofa> cjwatson, you helped me with that initial script. Any ideas?
[16:58] <dobey> kyrofa: you can't
[17:00] <dobey> kyrofa: well, you can't do it with a bot account you own. script would have to be run either by yourself, or by a bot which only IS has access to, is my understanding
[17:00] <kyrofa> dobey, sad. I'm not even sure why the group is private (e.g. the github one isn't)
[17:01] <dobey> kyrofa: because privacy; we don't want to publish a list of all our current employees, basically.
[17:01] <kyrofa> dobey, I guess I can just check if one of the email address on the account is a canonical email
[17:02] <kyrofa> And make assumptions from there
[17:02] <dobey> kyrofa: workaround is to use other teams that your bot can see or is a member of, with all the key personnel in the team
[17:02] <dobey> kyrofa: you can't, because the e-mail might not be visible to your bot :)
[17:02] <kyrofa> Argh :
[17:02] <kyrofa> :P
[17:03] <dobey> what are you doing that chacks that?
[17:04] <kyrofa> We get PRs to Snapcraft from the community, so we want to make sure they signed the CLA before we accept
[17:04] <kyrofa> But I'll just continue running my script manually
[17:05] <dobey> is snapcraft hosted on github?
[17:05] <dobey> or on lp?
[17:06] <kyrofa> dobey, github
[17:08] <dobey> yeah, that complicates things
[17:17] <cjwatson> kyrofa: It might be best to do something like exporting a list of addresses to the CI bot periodically.
[20:07] <rbanffy_> cjwatson, sorry to take this long, but I made the fix you suggested to https://code.launchpad.net/~rbanffy/launchpad/highlight_listing_tr/+merge/258766. Would you like to take a look?
[20:19] <caraka> Greetings. I'm getting a clean build locally, but a 'failed to upload' on LP. Am I missing some glaring message in this log? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/248645822/buildlog.txt.gz
[20:22] <dobey> caraka: you're looking at the wrong log; i presume this is for a recipe build? there should be an "upload log" link for an upload failure
[20:23] <caraka> thank you, I'll look again
[20:23] <caraka> and yes, it's a recipe
[20:24] <caraka> dobey: Thank you - and of course that log answers my question.  :P
[20:24] <dobey> i suspect it probably complains about same version with different contents