=== Guest28469 is now known as devil_ === console is now known as Guest2127 [17:09] hey kyrofa [17:09] kyrofa: what about adding redis to the owncloud snap, would that be possible? [17:44] Hey guys. Is the RasPi 3 supported in the latest upstream images? [17:44] not yet, no [17:44] ogra_ :( [17:45] we rely heavily on u-boot ... thats not 100% done yet foor the pi3 [17:45] ogra_ Should be relatively easy to do by pulling in the latest kernel, no? [17:45] ah ok [17:45] it is on my TODO and we'll definitely have images once it is ready [17:46] well, it will be the same image, won't it? [17:47] not sure yet ... it might need a different devicetree [17:48] (which means differennt gadget snap in our current design) [17:48] (which in turn means separate image) [17:48] hmm that would make our life a lot more painful as a vendor [17:48] as we'd need to maintain twice as many images [17:49] The upstream Raspbian images works fine with both RasPi3 and RasPi 2 fwiw [17:49] well, after all i'd be shooting for a 64bit image in the long term [17:50] which would mean separate image in any case [17:50] yeah, i guess that's a good point [17:50] i'l try my best to get a single image for us ... but no promises :) [17:51] (for 32bit) [17:51] Thanks, ogra_ [17:52] It would be *very* cool to have a single image and then have the system auto-detect the 64 bit and pull down the 64 bit system as a system upgrade for the next a/b system. :) [17:52] not sure how viable that would be [17:53] that would need quite some work [17:53] (it is likely that you need a specific kernel for aarch64 ... we dont support switching kernels at all on installed images) [17:54] i.e. it would only work if you hade two kernels in the same kernel package so it could be switched [17:54] IIRC, Raspbian uses the same kernel, but I'm not sure if it's fully 64 enabled yet [17:54] it isnt [17:54] oh ok [17:54] pi3 isnt 64bit capable yet ... [17:56] Wasn't that one of the major things in the Pi3? [17:56] the SoC is 64bit ... bt afaik neither th bootlloader can initialize it in that mode yet nor are all kernel patches there [17:56] and i'm rather doubtful that you can have a single kernel that does both [17:57] Interesting. Well, sounds like you're far more on top of this stuff than me. ;) [17:57] just by trial and error ;) [17:58] Hahah [17:58] I just rebuilt my 4x RasPi cluster today with 3 RasPi 3s hoping to do some more QA/testing on Snappy. Didn't even think about that it wasn't supported. [18:02] yeah, I have a pi3 on my desk which is waiting for snappy too :( [18:21] ogra_: yeah you're right. Looking at /proc/cpuinfo on Raspbian, I can confirm that the RasPi 3 is running as an ARMv7 and not ARMv8. [19:05] ogra_: did you get the writable partition resize thing fixed? [19:06] also someone got a 64 bit kernel to boot on the pi 3. but no communication between the videocore and arm [19:16] ali1234, the GPT resizing is fixed since a while in the cdimage snaps [19:17] cdimage.ubuntu.com? [19:17] it only has 15.04? [19:18] http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-core/daily-preinstalled/current/ [19:18] oh, you renamed it again? [19:18] has kernel and os snaps (i'm working on auto-upload to the store atm) [19:18] i can't keep up with all this [19:18] renamd ? [19:18] * ogra_ didnt rename anything [19:18] what is http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-snappy/ [19:19] officially released img files [19:19] what is ubuntu-core then? [19:19] the prodcut [19:19] *product [19:19] what is the difference? [19:19] no difference [19:19] different stages of the build [19:20] in 15.04 we used to use a system-image server that pulled the tarballs from cdimage daily builds [19:20] in 16.04 everything was switched to be snaps from the store (withou system-image server) [19:20] so the interim step switched from tarball to snap [19:20] has it ever occurred to you that all of this might be so complicated that hardly anyone will be able to understand it? [19:20] and that this might hamper adoption? [19:20] why would anyone need to understand it [19:21] if i didn't need to understand the software i am running i would just use microcoft [19:21] you will use ubuntu-device-flash to build an image (and later ubuntu-image) [19:21] or you download a per-made image from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-snappy/ [19:21] nothing has changed there [19:21] (just the backend process has) [19:21] let's say i have to do disaster recovery on a snappy drive [19:22] where do i even look for "the files"? [19:22] stuff like this [19:22] that's just a hypothetical question [19:22] in /writable [19:22] that should be the front facing website, not cdimage though [19:22] nothing changed there [19:22] sergiusens, well, the downloads will come from cdimage [19:22] /writable isnt mounted, the disk is dead [19:22] and if you want the 'os' you'd probably go to the vendor's website [19:23] right [19:23] ogra_, only under dev; we also plan to put these under releases.ubuntu.com [19:23] well ... s/"os"/"img"/ [19:23] well infinity does [19:23] yeah img [19:23] crazy canadians :) [19:23] but yeah, might be under release.u.c [19:23] * sergiusens continues to fight python mocking [19:24] in ayn case fro the enduser nothing really changed [19:24] you either use u-d-f or dd a downloaded img file [19:24] for the developer it is interesting to doownload the artefacts from cdimage to get the latest stuff atm though [19:25] in case you want to try something thats not in the released img files yet [19:25] which is why i pointed ali1234 there [19:25] (like the fixed GT resizing) [19:25] *GPT [19:26] (though on the rpi that doesnt kick in anyway, since it uses an msdos table ... and that has not been broken to my knowledge) [19:27] huh? [19:28] huh ? huh ? [19:28] :) [19:28] so why doesn't /writable get resized on rpi? [19:28] i havent heard of it not being resized ... nobody filed a bug [19:28] two days ago you said you were fixing it [19:29] (and i have personally not touched rpi in a while ... only tired the pi3 for a quick test) [19:29] ali1234, hmm, not on the pi though ... the GPT resizing on dragonboards is known to be broken ... thats what i fixed ... (about aa week ago thouh) [19:30] (well, GPT on dragonboard and amd64 in fact) [19:30] ali1234, soory, that might have been some miscommunication ... [19:31] it's broken on the pi [19:31] with the all-snaps image [19:31] i'll check that on monday then ... shouldnt be broken ... the code hasnt changed in ages [19:31] http://people.canonical.com/~mvo/all-snaps/rpi2-all-snap.img.xz [19:31] (it simply calls parted resizepart ... pretty dumb code) [19:39] i'll test it again just to make sure [19:41] then i'll try building my own image with ubuntu-device-flash and test that [20:15] ogra_: confirmed that http://people.canonical.com/~mvo/all-snaps/rpi2-all-snap.img.xz does not resize /writable. i built an image with ubuntu-device-flash and make-rpi2-all-snap.sh and it does not boot at all.