[01:36] Logan: Bootstrapping. === juliank is now known as Guest71144 === juliank_ is now known as juliank [04:54] pitti: hi, so we're seeing some test failures on the amd64 and i386 autopkgtest runners for glibc revdeps where gtk is failing consistently; it's not a problem on other archs, I can't reproduce it locally, and the error points to a problem related to selecting a mir backend instead of an X backend. Have there been any testbed config changes recently that could be to blame? [05:02] could be a side effect of the pocket pinning logic in adt [05:03] which would explain why a plain adt-run using the whole proposed pocket would succeed but the autopkgtest.ubuntu.com wouldn't as it's only pulling some packages from proposed [05:36] stgraber: I didn't do an adt-run using the whole proposed pocket. === zequence_ is now known as zequence [07:33] Logan: Well, sbcl bootstrap attempted, anyway. It failed. [07:36] * infinity tries it on a newer kernel. === shuduo is now known as shuduo-afk === shuduo-afk is now known as shuduo [18:26] infinity: bitlbee had a new release, not entirely bugfix (https://www.bitlbee.org/main.php/changelog.html) but mainly. It's had a good amount of testing I'm told, I take it an FFe is still needed? [18:27] Unit193: Assuming the release is somewhat featureful, yeah. [18:27] Bummer. Thanks. [18:31] Unit193: Oh, but it's not seeded anywhere, so meh. [18:31] Unit193: JFDI, IMO. [18:31] Unit193: Here's your verbal FFe. [18:32] Woohoo! If you feel specifically like uploading: https://launchpad.net/~unit193/+archive/ubuntu/staging/+files/bitlbee_3.4.2-0ubuntu1.dsc, otherwise I'll go find someone. [18:33] Unit193: It is just a straight uupdate with a new orig, basically? [18:33] * infinity looks. [18:34] It needs more updating, but on Debian's side. [18:35] Looks like a uupdate job to me. No changes in debian/ except for the changelog. [18:35] Mhmm. [18:36] Kay. Source tarball looks sane, etc. [18:36] Want a slightly more verbose changelog? :P [18:37] * infinity shrugs and uploads. [18:37] Oh dear, I'm too concise again. :3 [18:37] Unit193: Too late, it's uploaded. [18:38] Yey! Thank you very much, infinity! [18:38] I'll pass it along to who poked me. [18:42] ♥ [20:20] doko: why did libnih need a rebuild for the new libc? the versioned dep seems to have been resolved some time ago [20:31] pitti: Could we generate a stronger key for ddebs.u.c? [20:32] slangasek: It doesn't, I assume he was just working from an old list. [20:33] pitti: Also needs --digest-algo SHA384 or similar, but probably not much point until we have something better than 1024-bit DSA === damascene is now known as az === az is now known as damascene [21:42] doko: do you know anything about valgrind compatibility with glibc 2.23? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/c/colord/xenial/amd64/ (or is this a toolchain regression somehow?) [21:44] infinity: did i ask you to look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang/+bug/1555856 at all yet? [21:44] Launchpad bug 1555856 in golang (Ubuntu) "move to per-Go-major version coinstallable packages" [Undecided,New] [21:44] (i asked stgraber to look at it and he asked if you'd seen it...) [22:52] slangasek, just looked at the debian transition issue. the armhf build issue is not caused by the libc update. also seen in the test rebuilds [23:25] slangasek: will update my automated file, as i was using apt-cache redepends, which includes breaks and others, while reverse-depends does not. will provide an updated list first thing tmrw