| rbasak | infinity: any progress on mysql-5.7 NEW please? | 11:38 |
|---|---|---|
| Odd_Bloke | Anyone around who could ACK gce-utils 1.3.3-0ubuntu2~15.10.0 in to partner proposed, and gce-utils 1.3.3-0ubuntu2 in to xenial's partner? | 12:53 |
| flocculant | infinity: hey there :) what sort of timescale are you looking at for getting the ball rolling with Final Beta? | 13:59 |
| flocculant | cyphermox: just so you know following our discussions re Xubuntu, I 'did' get xubuntu to upgrade from 14.04 in kvm and vbox (no time to look at hardware) but they all needed me to fiddle about with dpkg --configure after they all hung | 15:09 |
| cyphermox | err ok | 15:09 |
| cyphermox | I'll try again later then | 15:09 |
| flocculant | cyphermox: just thought I would let you know - seems a bit daft to do so in 'our' channel when it's a global thing :) | 15:10 |
| flocculant | cyphermox: what I couldn't quite get my head around was - they all appeared to hang in the terminal you can see at the /etc/gnome/defaults.list - but above each one was showing a different thing (the gui bit) not really sure which is the real current item there | 15:12 |
| cyphermox | ok, but did the mouse cursor still move? | 15:16 |
| rharper | Hi, could someone look at this FFE for tgt, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tgt/+bug/1555700 | 15:19 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1555700 in tgt (Ubuntu) "[FFE] Please merge tgt 1.0.63 from Debian (unstable)" [Undecided,New] | 15:19 |
| flocculant | cyphermox: nope - nothing at all - and it wasn't waiting for anything - I went to the market when one hung ... | 15:22 |
| cyphermox | ok | 15:28 |
| flocculant | rebooting I could either get to a recovery menu and dpkg fix from there, or let it boot then do that from a vt | 15:30 |
| flocculant | this *is* just the lts to lts from update-manager, wily works as does from the image | 15:31 |
| flocculant | just to be completely sure we're talking about the same thing :) | 15:32 |
| infinity | rharper: So, the only upstream change is that bugfix in tgtd.c? | 15:37 |
| infinity | rharper: I guess the FFe is for enabling the aio backend? | 15:37 |
| rharper | infinity: sync a fix (drop patch) and enable AIO; yes | 15:42 |
| infinity | rharper: Right, no FFe needed for the patchy bit, nor the upstream bugfix. | 15:44 |
| infinity | rharper: As for the AIO thing, as you understand the code, what are the odds this could have a negative impact on users of other backends if the AIO stuff is broken? | 15:44 |
| infinity | rharper: If you're 99% confident that the change is meaningless for people who don't use the feature, then I'm fine with adding it. | 15:45 |
| rharper | infinity: ok; re aio; let me look a bit to be certain, libaio is standard stuff; the question is has tgt had aio for quite some time and just not enabled it (and why); debian recently added it | 15:46 |
| infinity | rharper: Right, it's obviously been there longer upstream than in Debian, the question is how long and, more importantly, is it isolated enough to not blow up the world for non-AIO users if it sucks. | 15:47 |
| infinity | rharper: The latter question being the interesting one. I don't care if the feature it experimental and added last week if it has zero impact on people who don't use it. | 15:47 |
| infinity | s/feature it/feature is/ | 15:47 |
| rharper | understood | 15:48 |
| infinity | rharper: Feel free to copy and paste any of the above to the bug, FWIW, and if your conclusion is "yeah, it looks safe enough", no need to round-trip to me again, FFe approved if your best judgement says it's safe. | 16:22 |
| rharper | infinity: will do; I need to confirm aio is only enabled via user choice (ie not default); if so then I'd say it's out of the way for anyone except those whom request it; | 16:22 |
| infinity | rharper: And if you're less sure, a commitment of "we'll actively watch for explosions and either fix the issues or revert the aio addition", then also approved. :P | 16:23 |
| infinity | rharper: With a caveat that "revert the aio addition" can only be a solution pre-release. Once xenial is out the door, you're stuck supporting whatever features we released with. | 16:24 |
| infinity | rharper: If you're okay with the above, go nuts. | 16:24 |
| rbasak | infinity: any progress on mysql-5.7 NEW please? Note that I'm out from Friday through Wednesday next week (back on Thursday) so I'd really like to get things done before I go if possible. | 17:21 |
| rbasak | infinity: I didn't think it'd take much NEW review because it's a version bump of an existing package (except for the soname bumping bits). | 17:21 |
| infinity | rbasak: Yeah, it shouldn't be a hard review, I've just been dreadfully ENOTIME. | 17:55 |
| rbasak | You and me both. | 17:56 |
| rbasak | infinity: do you want to pass the review to someone else if available? | 17:57 |
| rbasak | I can ask jgrimm to find me someone. | 17:57 |
| infinity | rbasak: Any AA should do if, as you say, the debian/* delta is minimal and obviously correct. | 17:57 |
| rbasak | The debian/* delta is unfortunately extensive, but I have broken it down for easy review if someone wants to follow along. | 17:58 |
| infinity | rbasak: Ahh, well I'm hip-deep in glibc (and then the beta freeze) today, so if you find another AA willing to follow along, go for it. It shouldn't block on me, that's for sure. | 17:59 |
| rbasak | slangasek: ^^ available for a NEW review of src:mysql-5.7 please? | 18:07 |
| mapreri | cjwatson: can I push for a couple of RM? #1556229 #1556226 | 18:39 |
| cjwatson | mapreri: not today, just finishing up | 18:40 |
| mapreri | ok | 18:40 |
| flexiondotorg | When will the archive freeze for final beta testing? | 22:23 |
| infinity | flexiondotorg: Tonight. | 22:24 |
| flexiondotorg | infinity, Oh, cool. | 22:24 |
| flexiondotorg | Your tonight? | 22:24 |
| flexiondotorg | How many hours from now? | 22:24 |
| infinity | flexiondotorg: Yes, and not sure. | 22:28 |
| flexiondotorg | OK | 22:28 |
| yofel | could someone please try to hint breeze and breeze-icons together? breeze-icons takes over the old breeze-icon-theme package from breeze | 23:08 |
| infinity | yofel: They should go together automatically if the package deps are correct. | 23:15 |
| doko | meh, mysql-5.7 accepted despite the build failures? | 23:16 |
| infinity | doko: Blame your manager. | 23:17 |
| infinity | armhf and s390x should be a matter of fixing the libnuma-dev build-dep. | 23:18 |
| infinity | The arm64 failure looks more fun. | 23:18 |
| slangasek | doko: well, someone accepted the source package that rbasak pinged me about earlier, so my queue accept command accepted binaries instead | 23:19 |
| slangasek | also, why should the build failures stop the successful ones from being accepted? | 23:19 |
| infinity | slangasek: So we don't get half a transition skewed across arches. | 23:20 |
| infinity | slangasek: (SOVER bump in libmysqlclient) | 23:20 |
| doko | slangasek, I looked at it, and found nothing wrong. however maybe I didn't look for FFe's | 23:20 |
| slangasek | infinity: ah | 23:20 |
| infinity | doko: They had an FFe, it was just waiting a source review, so if you were happy with it, all the ducks are in a row. | 23:21 |
| infinity | But we need to fix the FTBFSes now. :P | 23:21 |
| yofel | infinity: yeah, but I see no auto-hint... the old breeze has an exact version dep on breeze-icon-theme which was from the same source, the new one an unversioned one on the external same binary from breeze-icons. | 23:23 |
| yofel | That installs fine, but the autohinter doesn't seem to see the connection | 23:23 |
| yofel | or something else is going on that I'm not seeing | 23:23 |
| infinity | yofel: Ahh, so no files moved between binary packages, it's just that the binary package migrated between sources? | 23:25 |
| yofel | exactly | 23:25 |
| infinity | Kay, it's possible britney's being a bit stupid about that. | 23:25 |
| infinity | yofel: Hinted. | 23:28 |
| yofel | thanks | 23:28 |
| === s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 | ||
| slangasek | heh, Arch: all pixfrogger build-depends: fenix-plugins-system, which only builds on 32-bit archs. I wonder if I should fix the package's arch affinity? | 23:41 |
| infinity | slangasek: Seems like a good use for that header. | 23:45 |
| infinity | Alright, so mysql/powerpc wants -latomic, s390x/armhf want fixed build-deps, arm64... I dunno. | 23:47 |
| infinity | Maybe I'll delete the binaries from proposed while we sort this. | 23:47 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!