[11:38] infinity: any progress on mysql-5.7 NEW please? [12:53] Anyone around who could ACK gce-utils 1.3.3-0ubuntu2~15.10.0 in to partner proposed, and gce-utils 1.3.3-0ubuntu2 in to xenial's partner? [13:59] infinity: hey there :) what sort of timescale are you looking at for getting the ball rolling with Final Beta? [15:09] cyphermox: just so you know following our discussions re Xubuntu, I 'did' get xubuntu to upgrade from 14.04 in kvm and vbox (no time to look at hardware) but they all needed me to fiddle about with dpkg --configure after they all hung [15:09] err ok [15:09] I'll try again later then [15:10] cyphermox: just thought I would let you know - seems a bit daft to do so in 'our' channel when it's a global thing :) [15:12] cyphermox: what I couldn't quite get my head around was - they all appeared to hang in the terminal you can see at the /etc/gnome/defaults.list - but above each one was showing a different thing (the gui bit) not really sure which is the real current item there [15:16] ok, but did the mouse cursor still move? [15:19] Hi, could someone look at this FFE for tgt, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tgt/+bug/1555700 [15:19] Launchpad bug 1555700 in tgt (Ubuntu) "[FFE] Please merge tgt 1.0.63 from Debian (unstable)" [Undecided,New] [15:22] cyphermox: nope - nothing at all - and it wasn't waiting for anything - I went to the market when one hung ... [15:28] ok [15:30] rebooting I could either get to a recovery menu and dpkg fix from there, or let it boot then do that from a vt [15:31] this *is* just the lts to lts from update-manager, wily works as does from the image [15:32] just to be completely sure we're talking about the same thing :) [15:37] rharper: So, the only upstream change is that bugfix in tgtd.c? [15:37] rharper: I guess the FFe is for enabling the aio backend? [15:42] infinity: sync a fix (drop patch) and enable AIO; yes [15:44] rharper: Right, no FFe needed for the patchy bit, nor the upstream bugfix. [15:44] rharper: As for the AIO thing, as you understand the code, what are the odds this could have a negative impact on users of other backends if the AIO stuff is broken? [15:45] rharper: If you're 99% confident that the change is meaningless for people who don't use the feature, then I'm fine with adding it. [15:46] infinity: ok; re aio; let me look a bit to be certain, libaio is standard stuff; the question is has tgt had aio for quite some time and just not enabled it (and why); debian recently added it [15:47] rharper: Right, it's obviously been there longer upstream than in Debian, the question is how long and, more importantly, is it isolated enough to not blow up the world for non-AIO users if it sucks. [15:47] rharper: The latter question being the interesting one. I don't care if the feature it experimental and added last week if it has zero impact on people who don't use it. [15:47] s/feature it/feature is/ [15:48] understood [16:22] rharper: Feel free to copy and paste any of the above to the bug, FWIW, and if your conclusion is "yeah, it looks safe enough", no need to round-trip to me again, FFe approved if your best judgement says it's safe. [16:22] infinity: will do; I need to confirm aio is only enabled via user choice (ie not default); if so then I'd say it's out of the way for anyone except those whom request it; [16:23] rharper: And if you're less sure, a commitment of "we'll actively watch for explosions and either fix the issues or revert the aio addition", then also approved. :P [16:24] rharper: With a caveat that "revert the aio addition" can only be a solution pre-release. Once xenial is out the door, you're stuck supporting whatever features we released with. [16:24] rharper: If you're okay with the above, go nuts. [17:21] infinity: any progress on mysql-5.7 NEW please? Note that I'm out from Friday through Wednesday next week (back on Thursday) so I'd really like to get things done before I go if possible. [17:21] infinity: I didn't think it'd take much NEW review because it's a version bump of an existing package (except for the soname bumping bits). [17:55] rbasak: Yeah, it shouldn't be a hard review, I've just been dreadfully ENOTIME. [17:56] You and me both. [17:57] infinity: do you want to pass the review to someone else if available? [17:57] I can ask jgrimm to find me someone. [17:57] rbasak: Any AA should do if, as you say, the debian/* delta is minimal and obviously correct. [17:58] The debian/* delta is unfortunately extensive, but I have broken it down for easy review if someone wants to follow along. [17:59] rbasak: Ahh, well I'm hip-deep in glibc (and then the beta freeze) today, so if you find another AA willing to follow along, go for it. It shouldn't block on me, that's for sure. [18:07] slangasek: ^^ available for a NEW review of src:mysql-5.7 please? [18:39] cjwatson: can I push for a couple of RM? #1556229 #1556226 [18:40] mapreri: not today, just finishing up [18:40] ok [22:23] When will the archive freeze for final beta testing? [22:24] flexiondotorg: Tonight. [22:24] infinity, Oh, cool. [22:24] Your tonight? [22:24] How many hours from now? [22:28] flexiondotorg: Yes, and not sure. [22:28] OK [23:08] could someone please try to hint breeze and breeze-icons together? breeze-icons takes over the old breeze-icon-theme package from breeze [23:15] yofel: They should go together automatically if the package deps are correct. [23:16] meh, mysql-5.7 accepted despite the build failures? [23:17] doko: Blame your manager. [23:18] armhf and s390x should be a matter of fixing the libnuma-dev build-dep. [23:18] The arm64 failure looks more fun. [23:19] doko: well, someone accepted the source package that rbasak pinged me about earlier, so my queue accept command accepted binaries instead [23:19] also, why should the build failures stop the successful ones from being accepted? [23:20] slangasek: So we don't get half a transition skewed across arches. [23:20] slangasek: (SOVER bump in libmysqlclient) [23:20] slangasek, I looked at it, and found nothing wrong. however maybe I didn't look for FFe's [23:20] infinity: ah [23:21] doko: They had an FFe, it was just waiting a source review, so if you were happy with it, all the ducks are in a row. [23:21] But we need to fix the FTBFSes now. :P [23:23] infinity: yeah, but I see no auto-hint... the old breeze has an exact version dep on breeze-icon-theme which was from the same source, the new one an unversioned one on the external same binary from breeze-icons. [23:23] That installs fine, but the autohinter doesn't seem to see the connection [23:23] or something else is going on that I'm not seeing [23:25] yofel: Ahh, so no files moved between binary packages, it's just that the binary package migrated between sources? [23:25] exactly [23:25] Kay, it's possible britney's being a bit stupid about that. [23:28] yofel: Hinted. [23:28] thanks === s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 [23:41] heh, Arch: all pixfrogger build-depends: fenix-plugins-system, which only builds on 32-bit archs. I wonder if I should fix the package's arch affinity? [23:45] slangasek: Seems like a good use for that header. [23:47] Alright, so mysql/powerpc wants -latomic, s390x/armhf want fixed build-deps, arm64... I dunno. [23:47] Maybe I'll delete the binaries from proposed while we sort this.