[09:00] <tjaalton> regression fixes for xserver pushed to ppa:canonical-x/x-staging, please test
[09:01] <tjaalton> we're in beta freeze, so 1.18.2 will have to wait until next week
[09:01] <tjaalton> mesa as well
[14:44] <tseliot> ricotz: so, to answer your question: yes, nvidia-drm depends on nvidia-modeset
[14:45] <jjjoooeee> tjaalton: would https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1555434 be included in the "regression fixes"?  
[14:46] <tseliot> ricotz: and nothing else loads nvidia-drm, so we load it manually (udev rule) after nvidia-modeset
[14:48] <tjaalton> jjjoooeee: if you mean the staging upload, why not just try it?
[14:49] <ricotz> tseliot, it is the other way around
[14:50] <tseliot> ricotz: you said that nvidia-modeset depends on nvidia-drm but it's the other way around
[14:50] <tseliot> don't ask me why
[14:50] <tseliot> ;)
[14:50] <ricotz> nvidia_uvm            688128  0
[14:50] <ricotz> nvidia_drm             45056  2
[14:50] <ricotz> nvidia_modeset        753664  8 nvidia_drm
[14:50] <ricotz> nvidia              10268672  139 nvidia_modeset,nvidia_uvm
[14:51] <tseliot> ricotz: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/15472463/
[14:53] <ricotz> huh, I see
[14:53] <tseliot> I'm rebuilding with that build-dep, (I didn't care about wayland when I first built the packages)
[14:54] <ricotz> tseliot, and drop the transitions
[14:54] <ricotz> tseliot, and you know my opinion about the changelog! :)
[14:55] <tseliot> ricotz: oh, right, I keep forgetting about that. What should be in the changelog? Stuff from the xenial 361 release?
[14:55] <ricotz> (remember it is still a beta release)
[14:55] <ricotz> tseliot, the whole changelog from the base package
[14:56] <tseliot> which base package? I based mine on what we currently have in xenial
[14:56] <ricotz> so this would be 361 here (which already dropped it too :\)
[14:56] <tseliot> ok, I can do that
[14:57] <ricotz> tseliot, you are not rewriting the whole packaging out of thin air, so keep the changelog from the previous releases
[14:57] <tseliot> ricotz: they are all git branches, usually based on the latest driver in our Ubuntu development release
[14:59] <ricotz> tseliot, the changelog is still the user-visible part of the package, and should be preserved imo
[14:59] <ricotz> might be good to removed obsolete files too e.g. dkms.conf
[15:00]  * ricotz is going to have some late lunch
[15:01] <tseliot> ricotz: I can do that. The reason why I don't change those things is that it makes it easier for me to cherry-pick fixes from one branch to the other.
[15:11] <ricotz> tseliot, thanks!
[15:12] <mamarley> tseliot: I'm pretty sure you have upload rights to the PPA too, so as far as I am concerned you can just upload straight there if you want.
[15:12] <tseliot> mamarley: ok :)
[15:14] <mamarley> And I also have nvidia-settings 364 packages ready in ppa:mamarley/staging.  Unlike the last few releases, this one actually has some changes.
[15:15] <tseliot> good
[15:16] <tseliot> I think I'll rebase on your work when the time comes for Xenial (SRU, I suppose)
[15:18]  * mamarley already has several users contacting him asking for fresh NVIDIA crack ;).  That and complaining about the APT 1.2.7 changes that cause the PPA to throw a warning about insufficient signing.
[15:31] <tseliot> :)
[15:33] <tseliot> all right, uploading for xenial. The upload for trusty should be much quicker
[15:44] <ricotz> tseliot, and wily ;)
[15:44] <tseliot> ricotz: ok
[15:44] <ricotz> thanks
[16:07] <jjjoooeee> tjaalton: will do, thanks
[16:36] <mamarley> tseliot: Don't forget to get rid of the EGL alternatives for Trusty and Wily. :)
[16:36] <tseliot> mamarley: good point
[16:37] <mamarley> Also, should I go ahead and copy nvidia-settings to the main PPA?
[16:50] <tseliot> mamarley: if it works, then why not?
[16:51] <mamarley> No reason in particular.  I just wanted to get approval first.
[16:52] <tseliot> I've just uploaded for wily and trusty
[16:52] <tseliot> no EGL
[17:07]  * tseliot -> EOD