[00:24] <redir> sigh
[00:25] <redir> ericsnow: you still around?
[10:00] <deanman> Hi, i would like to write a docker charm utilising the layer-docker charm but it is not clear to me what's the best way to do this. Do i simply clone layer-docker or can i use something from charm-tools to pass this as an argument?
[11:43] <mup> Bug #1561959 opened: juju kill-controller fails with latest admin/default model changes <conjure> <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1561959>
[12:35]  * fwereade is feeling a growing sense of dread that the dummy provider is somehow involved in the insanity I've seen since merging master
[12:42] <fwereade> ...yes, it is. destruction of a *hosted* environ is resetting the mgo server
[12:42] <fwereade> f7u12
[13:28] <bogdanteleaga> anybody using go1.6 yet?
[13:29] <natefinch> bogdanteleaga: yeah, many people are building with it
[13:31] <bogdanteleaga> natefinch, ever seen provider/openstack/firewaller.go:434: arg cfg.UUID() for printf verb %s of wrong type: (string, bool) when running go vet on pushes?
[13:32] <bogdanteleaga> cfg.UUID returns only string, but this seems to happen since I got 1.6
[13:33] <natefinch> bogdanteleaga: you may want to delete your $GOPATH/pkg directory... could have an outdated library in there
[13:34] <natefinch> bogdanteleaga: sometimes that happens when you switch go version, and it'll try to build with an outdated library, which can result in the signature that is in the code not reflecting the signature of what is being linked, which is what this sounds like
[13:34] <bogdanteleaga> natefinch, right, I forgot about that one
[13:35] <bogdanteleaga> natefinch, seems to work, thanks
[13:36] <natefinch> bogdanteleaga: sweet
[13:55] <alexisb> morning all, happy friday
[13:56] <natefinch> alexisb: morning :)
[14:50] <natefinch> how the heck do I have jujud running from a binary that doesn't exist on disk?
[15:46] <mup> Bug #1562052 opened: juju bootstrap doesn't create secgroups when there are environment naming conflicts <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1562052>
[16:03] <redir> morning:)
[16:04] <natefinch> redir: morning :)
[16:06] <natefinch> ericsnow: lol - from cmd/juju/charmcmd: // Command is the top-level command wrapping all backups functionality.
[16:07] <natefinch> ericsnow: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B3rqN7EIMAEFdJ-.jpg
[16:16] <bogdanteleaga> cmars, I addressed the comments, overall I'm not sure what's preferred for the CLI
[16:16] <bogdanteleaga> cmars, I'm slightly in favor of just waiting, but people had concerns with that
[16:17] <cmars> bogdanteleaga, thanks for the changes.. what's the targeted release for this change? is it intended for juju 2.0 or after?
[16:19] <bogdanteleaga> cmars, 2.0
[16:25] <redir> speaking of commands
[16:25] <redir> you around cherylj ?
[16:25] <cherylj> redir: yep, whatps?
[16:25] <cherylj> ha
[16:25] <cherylj> what's up
[16:26] <redir> got a minute to chat about those usage text bugs?
[16:26] <cherylj> sure.  hangout?
[16:26] <cherylj> or irc?
[16:27] <redir> HO
[16:27] <cherylj> let me grab my headset
[16:27] <redir> voice would prlly be much quicker
[16:27] <redir> k
[16:28] <cherylj> redir: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/canonical.com/cheryl-reed?authuser=0
[16:35] <mup> Bug # changed: 1319890, 1472711, 1490865, 1520247, 1524064, 1524297, 1536792, 1542206, 1545057, 1547898, 1551857, 1553915, 1554044, 1554721, 1555430, 1555585, 1557714, 1558191, 1559233, 1560237, 1561023, 1561088, 1561555, 1561611
[17:02] <ericsnow> natefinch-afk: ha, backups
[17:29] <mup> Bug #1562088 opened: flexible /etc/rsyslogd.d/25-juju.conf configuration <canonical-bootstack> <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1562088>
[17:59] <natefinch> oh man...  charmrevisionupdater imports juju/testing, which imports provider/dummy, which imports apiserver, which imports apiserver/charmrevisionupdater
[17:59] <natefinch> I just can't even
[18:27] <voidspace> g'night all
[18:27] <voidspace> happy easter
[18:27] <natefinch> man, I really hate it when a test in one file depends on hard-coded values defined in another file.  Like... how am I supposed to know where this magic value comes from?
[18:55] <redir> How does one typically mark a bug in lp? I don't see a way to add tags. Should I just add a comment? Something else?
[18:57] <natefinch> redir: there are tags down at the bottom
[18:57] <natefinch> redir: depends on how you're marking it, though...
[18:57] <redir> natefinch: thanks.
[18:58] <redir> natefinch: good point, needs update, needs review
[18:59] <redir> needs edit
[18:59] <redir> What is the equivalent of @mentioning someone?
[18:59] <natefinch> redir: that's probably more just a comment.  tags are generally used for permanent or semi-permanent categorization
[18:59] <natefinch> redir: lol... uh, email them a link?
[18:59] <redir> k, comment it is.
[19:00] <redir> and emailing a link to the bug it is
[19:00] <redir> tx natefinch
[19:00] <natefinch> redir: lp is still pretty oldschool, though people will get emailed who have already indicated an interest (forget exactly what gets you subscribed to a bug)
[19:01] <natefinch> redir: no problem.  LP is an... interesting piece of software
[19:28] <redir> How do I manully destroy-controller. Seems I updated before killing a controller and now it can't destroy it.
[19:29] <redir> it is lxd
[19:29] <natefinch> redir: easiest way might be to de-update and rebuild to kill it.  certainly that's the most reliable way to make sure everything is cleaned up correctly.
[19:31] <natefinch> redir: we should probably figure out a more manual solution, since it's not always possible to know what code to revert to.... I have an LXD environment running that's been around for a few weeks that I don't yet know how to clean up
[20:01] <redir> natefinch: I see. I don't know what version to back out to either as I was on tip...
[20:02] <redir> thanks
[20:06] <natefinch> ericsnow: you around? I could use some help with these charmrevisionupdater tests
[20:25] <ericsnow> natefinch: sure
[20:26] <ericsnow> natefinch: in moontstone
[22:03] <mup> Bug #1560203 changed: stringForwarderSuite.TestRace sometimes fails <blocker> <ci> <intermittent-failure> <test-failure> <juju-core:Fix Released by natefinch> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1560203>
[22:03] <mup> Bug #1560525 changed: Juju 2.0-beta3 stabilization  <juju-core:Invalid> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1560525>
[22:47] <alexisb> natefinch, you still on by chance?