/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/03/28/#ubuntu-release.txt

jcastroCan someone lend us a hand with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/charm-tools/+bug/154677614:06
ubot5Launchpad bug 1546776 in charm-tools (Ubuntu) "[FFe] charm-tools 2.0" [Undecided,New]14:06
jcastroand https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/154711514:06
ubot5Launchpad bug 1547115 in Ubuntu "[FFe] charm 2.0" [Undecided,New]14:06
cyphermoxslangasek: ^ was that you?17:10
cyphermox(libcxl)17:10
slangasekcyphermox: yes17:10
cyphermoxmkay17:10
slangasekwhy? are you going to tell me there was something wrong with it? ;)17:10
cyphermoxit made infinity cry last time17:11
slangasekoh?  the packaging looked straightforward to me17:11
cyphermoxit's not terribly bad, just not great either. I gave frediz feedback17:11
cyphermoxno, it's more about the upstream build system17:11
cyphermoxit is pretty straightforward, yes17:12
jdstrandfyi, ubuntu-core-launcher adds a feature (devpts newinstance handling), but I thought Ubuntu Core had a freeze exception? let me know if I need to do all the paperwork17:20
slangasekinfinity: oh neat, this dep-wait will be clearable soon. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wings3d/1.4.1-5ubuntu120:36
slangasekinfinity: so, gcc-5 is blocked in -proposed because of the linux autopkgtest failures (-proposed vs. xenial mismatch).  What's the policy on those?  Just force it through?20:37
infinityslangasek: If you're positive the test failure isn't GCC's fault, just skiptest gcc-5.20:44
slangasekinfinity: oh, actually I was assuming that this was the usual problem of linux autopkgtests failing when there's a new version in -proposed; looks like this might actually be some sort of kernel regression.  Even more clearly not gcc-5's fault!20:58
infinityslangasek: Either a kernel regression or a test regression (the tests aren't in the package, but pulled from git at test time).21:12
* slangasek nods21:12
jdstrandslangasek: hey, I just uploaded ubuntu-core-launcher 1.0.22. it has a critical bug fix (1.0.22) but also a feature (newinstance of devpts in 1.0.21 that hadn't been approved yet)21:31
jdstrandslangasek: I didn't do FFe stuff since I thought snappy stuff had a standing exception. I can do so if needed, or we can talk about it21:32
slangasekjdstrand: do you have a bug # for the standing exception?  that seems like something we /should/ do but I'm not sure we went through the process21:32
jdstrandslangasek: I don't know of one. I just remember I asked about and people agreed and I thought they went off to do it21:33
slangasekheh21:33
jdstrandthis was some time ago21:33
infinityjdstrand: Your changelog is syntactically broken.21:34
jdstrandinfinity: in what way? lintian is happy enough...21:34
slangasekaaaaaand why is my chroot missing /dev/shm21:35
infinity+ubuntu-core-launcher (1.0.21) xenial; urgency=medium21:35
infinity+  * src/main.c: setup private /dev/pts21:35
infinityjdstrand: ^-- Missing a newline.21:35
jdstrandoh, weird, so it is..21:35
* jdstrand fixes21:36
jdstrandok, as you can see I rejected my own upload, and now I just uploaded a new one21:38
jdstrandslangasek (and infinity, not sure who is looking at this): to ease your review, this is the pts change: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~snappy-dev/ubuntu-core-launcher/trunk/revision/100. it was reviewed by the security team. tested in varous snappy configurations including docker and lxc running under it21:44
slangasekjdstrand: I don't see any FFe bugs for ubuntu-core.  Can you (pester someone to) open one and provide a list of packages that should be covered?21:44
jdstrandslangasek: yes. I'll be in a meeting tomorrow and in a position to do that21:45
slangasekjdstrand: ta21:45
jdstrandI'll also note that the pts changes got signoff from sarnold and the profile changes in 1.0.22 were reviewed by tyhicks21:46
jdstrandI'm going to stop away but I'll keep an eye on backscroll22:10

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!