[04:56] <Mirv> lpotter: robru: vivid only landing could be ok at this point, there's another "something changed in xenial, an unit test fails" preventing my next qtbase dual landing. of course, xenial would need the same fix eventually.
[05:00] <robru> Mirv: best to keep it in sync imho, but it's your call
[05:03] <Mirv> robru: yeah it's best. sometimes I deviate if I'm waiting for the real upstream fix to backport to xenial while doing a special patch for vivid. I think lpotter's upstreaming of latest vivid changes is in progress and there's not yet something merged to backport to xenial/5.5
[05:04] <Mirv> depends on the deadlines too. if this would be OTA-10 at the moment, then definitely vivid only since simply running double autopkgtests take time.
[05:04] <robru> We're past the deadline for ota10 unless this has some kind of exception
[05:09] <Mirv> then there's no hurry
[05:09] <lpotter> ya this is OTA-11.
[05:10] <lpotter> I've added qtbase-opensource-src-gles to my ppa
[06:22] <abeato> Mirv, hi, quick question, is there any candidate image for ota-10 already? if not, should I assume that all we have now in rc-proposed will be included in OTA-10?
[06:30] <Mirv> abeato: my understanding is that rc-proposed is OTA-10 still, until it's announced that OTA-11 work starts (at which point a OTA-10 specific snapshot PPA is made)
[06:30] <abeato> Mirv, great, I wanted to be sure, thanks
[09:18] <rvr> morphis: ping
[11:12] <rvr> mardy: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1563007
[11:13] <rvr> mardy: Not sure whether it is related to unity-scope-click or to Online Accounts. The account is created.
[11:14] <mardy> rvr: can you please paste the output of OAU_LOGGING_LEVEL=2 OAU_DAEMON_TIMEOUT=9999 online-accounts-service ?
[11:15] <rvr> mardy: On it
[11:47] <rvr> mardy: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15551027/
[11:49] <mardy> rvr: thanks, do you ming adding it to the bug report as well?
[11:50] <mardy> rvr: do you have something under /var/crash/?
[11:51] <rvr> Hmm
[11:51] <rvr> _usr_lib_arm-linux-gnueabihf_unity-scopes_scoperunner.32011.crash
[11:51] <rvr>  #3  0xb38da05a in click::web::Response::replyFinished() () from /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/unity-scopes/clickstore/com.canonical.scopes.clickstore.so
[14:02] <pstolowski> sil2100, hey, there?
[14:06] <sil2100> Hey
[14:07] <sil2100> Yea
[14:10] <pstolowski> sil2100, we need a no-change rebuild of cmake-extras, the new cmake in xenial-proposed breaks it; shall i go the normal route of empty MP via citrain?
[14:39] <mterry> pstolowski: I uploaded a no-change rebuild to xenial.  Waiting for it to be approved
[14:39] <pstolowski> mterry, awesome, thanks!
[14:54] <sil2100> pstolowski: sorry, had meeting-after-meeting
[14:59] <pstolowski> sil2100, np, mterry did the rebuild
[15:04] <Saviq> trainguards, can you please add josharenson to ~ci-train-users? thanks :)
[15:04] <sil2100> Saviq: on it (slowly as in a meeting)
[15:04] <Saviq> nw
[15:04] <Saviq> hanks
[15:04] <Saviq> t
[15:04] <Saviq> om
[15:12] <sil2100> ;)
[15:15] <sil2100> yw!
[16:08] <jhodapp> sil2100, hey any idea why this silo keeps having a dependency wait issue for media-hub on vivid? My MR doesn't change how the build works and media-hub has been dual landable for months now
[17:24] <john-mcaleely> ondra, sil2100 jibel - if you need it, an approved device tarball for landing adb changes
[17:24] <john-mcaleely> https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1197
[17:24] <john-mcaleely> just needs QA +1, and for ondra to have u-d-f ready :-)
[17:25] <ondra> john-mcaleely I'm stacked with u-d-f
[17:26] <ondra> john-mcaleely mvo is  not around, u-d-f needs some special magic that only mvo and sergio have. I tested mvo's own branch, but that still errros on me
[17:26] <ondra> john-mcaleely so I can't really test change in u-d-f
[17:26] <ondra> john-mcaleely otherwise I hand created ubuntu_command it things do work
[17:37] <robru> jhodapp: what silo?
[17:38] <jhodapp> robru, silo 51
[17:42] <robru> jhodapp: not sure what to tell you, you depend on dbus-cpp >5 http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/media-hub/fix-1538703/view/head:/debian/control#L23
[17:42] <robru> jhodapp: but overlay PPA only has 4.3: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/stable-phone-overlay/+sourcepub/5964064/+listing-archive-extra
[17:42] <jhodapp> robru, yeah but in debian/control.in it's 4.3 or above
[17:43] <jhodapp> robru, and debian/control is supposed to be autogenerated from the control.in file
[17:43] <jhodapp> maybe the person to talk to is tvoss since he set this all up
[17:43] <robru> jhodapp: oh, well control.in answers everything. train changed the way this is handled
[17:44] <robru> jhodapp: hang on I'll throw together a branch that fixes this.
[17:44] <robru> (sorry just waking up)
[17:44] <jhodapp> robru, ah perfect! no worries, thanks man
[17:45] <robru> yw
[17:45] <jhodapp> robru, did this change with your recent large updates?
[17:45] <robru> jhodapp: yep, this is that 'ACTION REQUIRED' email from last week
[17:46] <jhodapp> robru, ok I'll give it another read since I have related context now
[17:54] <jhodapp> robru, makes much more sense now, didn't realize media-hub was doing this for its package
[17:54] <robru> jhodapp: yeah unfortunately there's no index of what packages are doing this so I just have to wait until they explode and fix them as they come
[17:55] <jhodapp> robru, makes sense...maybe start a list as they come in so you can keep track going forward?
[17:56]  * jhodapp brb
[17:56] <robru> jhodapp: dunno, back in the bad old days train kept a list of what packages it managed and it was quite the hassle to keep it updated. beter if things are more independant
[18:16] <robru> jhodapp: hm so I ran a build with my branch but it didn't work, it's using the xenial SOVERSION in vivid. will poke a bit more
[18:22] <jhodapp> robru, ok
[18:26] <robru> jhodapp: huh this is really weird, I put in some debug logging and it says it's using the right $soversion but then the file magically comes out with the wrong name.
[18:27] <jhodapp> robru, wrong name because of the version or a different part of the name?
[18:29] <robru> jhodapp: I'm expecting the script to create debian/libmedia-hub-{client,common}4.install but instead it's creating ...5.install, eg, wrong $soversion
[18:30] <jhodapp> yeah that is odd...has to come from the script though right?
[18:31] <jhodapp> robru, I mean this was working before the train update
[18:34] <robru> jhodapp: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~robru/media-hub/pre_release_hook/view/181/debian/bileto_pre_release_hook#L67 this echoes "soversion: 4" and then creates files named ...5.install, you can't explain that.
[18:35] <jhodapp> robru, so are you replacing the gen-debian-files.sh script in media-hub/debian/ or does the new hook just simply call this?
[18:35] <jhodapp> ah I see
[18:35] <jhodapp> rewriting it basically
[18:36] <jhodapp> that's bizarre indeed
[18:36] <robru> jhodapp: this is gen-debian-files.sh, just renamed to a well-known name that the train will run if it exists, and also fixing it to honor $SERIES env var because it no longer runs ina  chroot, so 'lsb_release -c -s' won't give correct values anymore.
[18:37] <robru> jhodapp: hm actually it looks like the PPA contents are correct, it's just the silo diff that's wrong somehow...
[18:37] <jhodapp> robru, could that be some cached silo cruft?
[18:38] <robru> jhodapp: no I think debdiff is doing something funny...
[18:38] <jhodapp> hmm ok
[18:39] <robru> jhodapp: ok well anyway the build should be working now in vivid.
[18:39] <jhodapp> robru, awesome thanks, so I'll merge your branch into mine then
[18:39] <robru> despite debdiff reporting a wrong diff, sigh
[18:39] <jhodapp> robru, is that problematic?
[18:39] <robru> jhodapp: why? both branches are in the silo.
[18:40] <jhodapp> oh didn't see you added it, nm then
[18:40] <robru> jhodapp: well whoever reviews your packaging diff will likely be confused by the 5 in the dif when it should be a 4, but you'll just have to explain to them that the diff is wrong and the ppa contents are correct I guess.
[18:40] <jhodapp> robru, ok thanks and I guess I'll keep an eye on it as well
[18:41] <robru> jhodapp: alright you're welcome
[20:30] <robru> slangasek: we on for the meeting?
[23:09] <lpotter> robru: did you ever copy those packages for silo 60 for me?
[23:10] <robru> lpotter: no i was waiting for you to do the gles one.
[23:11] <lpotter> ok. it's there now
[23:11] <robru> lpotter: OK what's your ppa again? And what silo did you get?
[23:11] <lpotter> ppa:lorn-potter/servicenetworkppa silo 060
[23:14] <robru> lpotter: so those are just vivid packages there, your silo is configured for xenial+vivid. Are you doing xenial or should i switch it to just vivid?
[23:14] <lpotter> not sure. lets just do vivid for now
[23:15] <robru> OK
[23:16] <robru> lpotter: OK copied, build should start soon
[23:16] <lpotter> thank you
[23:17] <robru> You're welcome