[03:07] any ubuntu-backport'ers in here? [03:26] yes [03:31] hi micahg are you a backporter? [03:33] yes :) [03:33] would you be willing to backport #1561837 and #1562434 [03:34] karstensrage: I can, but likely not tonight, is this urgent? [03:34] no not at all [03:34] but anything i can do to help or assist [03:35] they both have been very well tested on trusty and precise [03:35] ok, I should have some time wed evening for backports, it looks like you did all the requisite testing for that, thanks! [03:35] if I forget, please ping me [03:35] all my initial launchpad efforts were with ppa installs and it was realy well tested [03:35] ok sure [03:36] thank you [03:36] is it evening now btw for you? [03:41] yes [03:41] and still working :( [04:07] Fun... [05:07] im sorry, maybe some soothing music ?? https://soundcloud.com/whitemorning/eddies-song [06:43] good morning [11:28] hello [11:29] where can I request a program to be added ? [12:16] I've uploaded irssi 0.8.19 to xenial, is there something more that I would/could/should need add somewhere so it helps to get it approved? I have PPU for irssi, and 0.8.19 is a bugfix release for 0.8.18 currently in xenial. === inaddy_ is now known as inaddy [14:53] Hi, I'm getting started with this whole MOTU business, I wanted to give back to the community. I was looking at working on a bug (In LP it's #1442873) and I wanted to ask a few questions. When working on a bug, do you carry out the fix on all of the separate branches (ie: Precise & Trusty) or am I overlooking something? The other thing is whether I should set myself as an assignee for the packages or something el [14:54] welcome jbayfield - looks like your question got cut off [14:54] if the fix is important enough, you might want to backport it [14:54] http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates has some guidance on that [14:54] Hi dholbach, sorry about that. Where did the question get cut off? [14:54] "whether I should set myself as an assignee for the packages or something e..." [14:55] "The other thing is whether I should set myself as an assignee for the packages or something else. Sorry for the (probably) stupid questions." [14:55] just assign the one bug to you [14:55] no need to sign up for all the bugs of the given package [14:55] and feel free to ask more questions [14:55] they weren't stupid at all [14:55] Alright. [14:57] So you work on the particular bug one distro release at a time, and then create a separate merge proposal for each affected release? [14:57] yes, if the bug is important enough [14:58] And how are bugs considered "important enough"? At what point does a bug go from "not important" to "important"? [14:59] have a look at the link I posted earlier [14:59] it has some decision making help [14:59] ah. Okay, thanks. [15:39] Thought I'd ask - am I meant to be working on the package in "trusty" or "trusty-proposed"? [15:40] Looks like trusty - sorry about that [16:45] Hello again - when running bzr lp-propose, what should be left in the text editor that opens? A changelog? [16:49] I'm hoping this is all correct: https://code.launchpad.net/~jbayfield/ubuntu/trusty/gnome-do-plugins/bug-1442873/+merge/290337 [16:58] Looking at it, I think I might have issued a merge request to the wrong place [17:00] Is it supposed to merge into trusty-proposed or trusty? === ubott2 is now known as ubottu === mfisch is now known as Guest28049 === FourDollars_ is now known as FourDollars === jrgifford_ is now known as jrgifford === lfaraone_ is now known as lfaraone === Pici` is now known as Pici === Guest28049 is now known as mfisch === mfisch is now known as Guest82454 === Guest82454 is now known as mfisch [21:43] hexchat 2.12.0-1 ftbfs on xenial. using pbuilder with variant=buildd. http://paste.debian.net/422634/ error at line 104. [21:44] it's fine on debian testing/sid and also on wily [22:14] bah m4/glib-gettext.m4 isn't even in my source tree, the build system installs it and then gripes that it's trying to overwrite macros. explicitly delete it via d/rules and now we build normally. [22:44] That sounds just fantastic... [22:45] it is wonderful