[01:45] <mwhudson> um i'm confused
[01:45] <mwhudson> i uploaded golang-1.6_1.6-0ubuntu3_source.changes a while ago but it seems to have disappeared
[01:45] <mwhudson> about 25 mins ago i think
[02:01] <slangasek> mwhudson: I see one in the unapproved queue that arrived 9 minutes after your last comment
[02:01] <mwhudson> slangasek: yes, that's the one that arrived when i just gave up waiting and tried again :/
[02:03] <slangasek> ok
[02:06] <mwhudson> slangasek: should the bot that auto accepts non-seeded uploads still be running?
[02:06] <slangasek> mwhudson: yes, it should
[02:18] <mwhudson> ah there it is
[02:21] <stgraber> golang doesn't get auto-accepted as it's in the supported seed
[02:21] <stgraber> I manually reviewed it
[02:22] <stgraber> slangasek: if you have a minute, can you review that lxc upload?
[02:23] <slangasek> stgraber: yeah... and I guess you just accepted squid3, which is buggy
[02:23] <slangasek> queue needs proper locking. :P
[02:25] <stgraber> there a bunch of things the LP queue implementation needs before locking :)
[02:26] <stgraber> *are
[02:26] <mwhudson> stgraber: oh ok
[02:26] <mwhudson> stgraber: thanks
[02:30] <stgraber> slangasek: I'm taking a look at maas
[02:31] <slangasek> stgraber: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1473691/comments/26
[02:31] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1473691 in squid3 (Ubuntu) "[FFe] squid: Update to latest upstream release (3.5)" [Critical,Fix committed]
[02:35] <stgraber> slangasek: shouldn't the new squid package preinst also nuke the old /etc/init.d/squid3 as it does the upstart job?
[02:42] <slangasek> stgraber: yes, it probably should
[02:42] <slangasek> but it doesn't, so that upload is buggy
[02:44] <slangasek> stgraber: alright, this lxc upload doesn't look like something that wants me to do a line-by-line review on it.  Is this bugfix only? what upstream testing has been done?
[02:47] <stgraber> slangasek: bugfix only ran through all of adt upstream as we do for every commit, has been in our ppa (as a git snapshot) for a few days
[02:47] <stgraber> and yeah, those rcs are bugfix only
[02:47] <slangasek> stgraber: ok, approved on the grounds that there are no /obvious/ bugs
[02:48] <stgraber> yeah, that's been the case for the past 13 rcs, hopefully we'll soon be done catching the non-obvious ones :)
[02:51] <stgraber> slangasek: ^ revert of previous upload + added conffile removal for /etc/init.d/squid3
[02:57] <slangasek> stgraber: dpkg-maintscript-helper has bits that are supposed to be called from other scripts besides the preinst; see the postinst and postrm
[02:57] <slangasek> ...which is a lot easier to keep track of if the maintainer were using .maintscript instead of trying to do this by hand
[03:01] <stgraber> wow, wtf, that's not going to be fragile at all
[03:04] <stgraber> grep tells me I've got the same number of those as there was for squid3.conf, that's about as much testing as this got
[03:04] <slangasek> heh
[08:06] <jamespage> hi release team - for some reason I thought I had already raised a FFe for the next Ceph stable release runup for 16.04
[08:06] <jamespage> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1563714
[08:06] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1563714 in ceph (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Ceph Jewel stable release" [Undecided,New]
[08:06] <jamespage> apparently not so here it is....
[12:02] <rtg> infinity, pitti approved the FFE in bug #1558535. Could you also accept linux-snapdragon (and -meta) in the NEW queue ?
[12:02] <ubot5`> bug 1558535 in Ubuntu "FFE: linux-snapdragon" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1558535
[12:08] <doko> rtg, done
[12:08] <rtg> doko, thanks
[12:18] <doko> cjwatson, infinity: what can we do about the migration of gcc-5-cross-ports / gcc-defaults-ports. gcc-5-cross-ports isn't mentioned in update_excuses at all
[12:19] <cjwatson> will have to leave that question to somebody else, sorry
[12:59] <stokachu> doko: mind rejecting conjure, i need to update it from the results around the juju discussions
[13:00] <doko> stokachu, done
[13:00] <stokachu> doko: thanks man
[16:33] <infinity> doko: Did you review that new kernel you accepted at all?
[16:57] <doko> infinity, only from a packaging point of view
[16:59] <infinity> doko: A license review tends to be a good thing on BSP kernels like that.
[16:59] <infinity> (it's not all upstream code from Linus's tree)
[16:59]  * infinity grabs it to do a quick once-over.
[17:12] <infinity> rtg: Alright, did a post-accept license review of linux-snapdragon, all looks sane.
[17:38] <teward> infinity: mind if I poke/bother you about nginx for a bit, off-channel in PM, surrounding FinalFreeze?
[17:39] <teward> s/surrounding/regarding/
[18:12] <xnox> i wonder how bad is it that germinate says
[18:12] <xnox> ? Missing source package: golang (for golang-github-gosexy-gettext-dev)
[18:12] <xnox> ? Missing source package: golang (for golang-dbus-dev)
[18:12] <xnox> ? Missing source package: golang (for golang-github-coreos-go-systemd-dev)
[18:12] <xnox> ? Missing source package: golang (for golang-github-pborman-uuid-dev)
[18:12] <xnox> ? Missing source package: golang (for golang-gopkg-tomb.v2-dev)
[18:12] <xnox> ? Missing source package: golang (for golang-github-gorilla-mux-dev)
[18:13] <infinity> xnox: Those should all be rebuilt against golang-1.6
[18:13] <infinity> If we're about to start enforcing Built-Using.
[18:14] <xnox> ah
[18:14] <xnox> so this is legit =)
[18:14] <infinity> Oh.  This is also broken. :(
[18:14]  * xnox is like surely golang is not gone
[18:14] <infinity> mwhudson: I found some lolz.
[18:15] <infinity> (base)adconrad@nosferatu:/var/lib/apt/lists$ grep '^Built-Using: golang ' *Packages | wc -l
[18:15] <infinity> 357
[18:15] <infinity> (base)adconrad@nosferatu:/var/lib/apt/lists$ grep '^Built-Using: golang-1.6 ' *Packages | wc -l
[18:15] <infinity> 0
[18:15] <infinity> (base)adconrad@nosferatu:/var/lib/apt/lists$ grep '^Built-Using: golang-defaults ' *Packages | wc -l
[18:15] <infinity> 12
[18:16] <infinity> mwhudson: Note that last one.  I'm guessing there's something that does a Package->Source resolution for "golang-go" and fills in the wrong bits, when it should actually be hunting down the compiler used (golang-1.6 or gccgo-6)
[18:18] <infinity> xnox: Anyhow, rebuilding all of those would probably turn "golang" into "golang-defaults" which, for the purpose of component-mismatches, will DTRT.  It's less ideal for actually tracking static compiling, though, and should be as above. :P
[18:35] <cjwatson> xnox,infinity: incidentally, per our conversation the other day, I realised that we also need to check for cases where sources in main b-d on virtual packages without a preferred real alternative, since those could end up being resolved differently
[19:55] <doko> does openstack still has a freeze exception?
[19:56] <infinity> yes.
[19:56] <infinity> doko: ^
[19:56] <doko> ta
[19:58] <teward> infinity: any chance you can review nginx (bug #1563393) for a freeze exception?  We're in the home stretch - keeping us as close to what upstream has for 1.10.x is still the goal.  which also reminds me, do you have any issues with me bouncing a couple of questions off you regarding nginx as we approach the final stretches of development?  (I'm keeping an eye on that FinalFreeze date, hence the need for a discussion)
[19:58] <ubot5`> bug 1563393 in nginx (Ubuntu) "[FreezeException Needed] Update nginx to 1.9.13." [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1563393
[19:58] <teward> the discussion is more important than ^ that getting a review today, though
[19:59] <infinity> teward: Discuss away.  I'm only doing IRC in small batches while I try to ignore blinky things to get other work done, but I'll get to you.
[19:59] <teward> infinity: OK, the discussion has to occur off-channel, though, mind a PM for that?
[19:59] <teward> given the info being shared
[19:59] <teward> (E:NotForChannel)
[20:05] <mwhudson> infinity: ah haha
[20:05] <mwhudson> infinity: file a bug?
[20:05] <infinity> mwhudson: Is that not what I did, via the IRC interface? :P
[20:05] <teward> heh
[20:06] <slangasek> mwhudson/api/v1/filebug
[20:06] <slangasek> (Internet RESTful Chat)
[20:07] <mwhudson> heh
[20:07] <mwhudson> i wonder what package the bug should be against...
[20:07] <infinity> mwhudson: Guessing dh-golang is where the magic happens.
[20:08] <infinity> mwhudson: And it probably just needs to dereference paths before doing the file->package->source resolution.
[20:08] <infinity> (Assuming it's checking the owner of /usr/bin/go and such)
[20:08] <doko> wondering if mozc should be accepted ... we still have a very old version ...
[20:08] <doko> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozc/+bug/1547816
[20:08] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1547816 in mozc (Debian) "Merge mozc (2.17.2116.102+gitfd0f5b34+dfsg-1) from Debian unstable (main)" [Unknown,New]
[21:40] <mwhudson> infinity: got an example of a package that has broken built-using?
[21:41] <mwhudson> uh i guess lxd probably
[21:44] <mwhudson> yeah
[21:48] <rtg> infinity, thanks, re: linux-snapdragon