/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/03/31/#ubuntu-mir.txt

=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
dufluRAOF: Can you remember the path of the /real/ xenial Mir branch? Something like lp:ubuntu/*02:52
dufluWe have everything except xenial...02:55
dufluhttps://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mir/+all-branches02:55
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
dufluCan anyone remember the path of the real xenial release branch?03:18
dufluIt's not lp:mir/ubuntu .. that's just a dummy03:18
RAOFduflu: Do we *have* a real xenial Mir branch?03:33
=== chihchunl is now known as chihchun
dufluRAOF: Yeah I found it a couple of months ago. Maybe I'm remembering the wily one03:35
=== peps is now known as robjh
=== tvoss|dinner is now known as tvoss
duflualan_g: How many processes/threads implement mtf::ConnectedClientHeadlessServer ?10:06
duflu(are used to implement)10:06
alan_gone process10:06
duflualan_g: I mean is the server spawned from the same thread as the client (test case) runs?10:08
dufluSeems like that's my problem10:08
alan_gThere's a async thread to control the server, plus what the server uses, plus what the client uses10:08
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
duflualan_g: Put another way - is it possible the server (compositor) and client in mtf are the same thread?10:14
dufluThat's what I'm seeing, and didn't expect10:14
dufluHmm, assert will tell me10:16
alan_gI wouldn't expect it. I guess a test *could* inject client-API calls into one of the compositor threads. But that isn't sensible.10:16
duflualan_g: I'm not aiming for it, but apparently have been given it. The test server and client are the same thread ID10:18
alan_gYou'd have to do it deliberately10:19
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
duflualan_g: Never mind. I think I confused the fact that client+server are constructed from the same thread, vs called back in the same thread10:26
=== Saviq_ is now known as Saviq
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch
=== alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g
=== dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk
suebtslvn_: That's the odd thing, I have it already installed oO13:41
slvn_suebt, sure? gpgv is different from gpg :/13:43
slvn_check if it's on the PATH.. ($> which gpgv_13:43
=== dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
=== dandrader is now known as dandrader|lunch
=== dandrader|lunch is now known as dandrader
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD
suebtsvln_: Yeah, pretty sure http://paste.ubuntu.com/15570065/ It says it is installed to /usr/bin/gpgv18:27
bschaefersuebt, no luck :(18:43
bschaefer?18:43
suebtNo :|19:01
bschaefer:(19:03
bschaefersuebt, let me ... attempt to cross compile a simple SDL2 file for you19:03
bschaeferor actually i have a phone i can compile on... you're on vivid+overlay?19:04
bschaefereww the sdl2 in vivid+overlay is out of date... hmm19:06
bschaefero yeah let me get a newer one pushed to a ppa19:06
=== dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk
bschaefersuebt, also :|   * Rebuild against libsndio6.1.19:09
bschaeferi see this in the changelog for19:09
bschaeferlibsdl219:09
bschaefersooo i think ... the one you could be using could have an ABI break?19:09
* bschaefer isnt sure what version of libsndio6.1 is in vivid+overlay19:09
=== dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader
slvn_suebt, I have retried my script for chroot, and I got the same issue "W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net vivid InRelease: Could not execute 'gpgv' to verify signature (is gpgv installed?)"20:06
slvn_but it seems to compile correctly ...20:06
slvn_suebt, I confirmed this works ...20:24
slvn_bye+late there ..20:24

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!