[02:52] <duflu> RAOF: Can you remember the path of the /real/ xenial Mir branch? Something like lp:ubuntu/*
[02:55] <duflu> We have everything except xenial...
[02:55] <duflu> https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mir/+all-branches
[03:18] <duflu> Can anyone remember the path of the real xenial release branch?
[03:18] <duflu> It's not lp:mir/ubuntu .. that's just a dummy
[03:33] <RAOF> duflu: Do we *have* a real xenial Mir branch?
[03:35] <duflu> RAOF: Yeah I found it a couple of months ago. Maybe I'm remembering the wily one
[10:06] <duflu> alan_g: How many processes/threads implement mtf::ConnectedClientHeadlessServer ?
[10:06] <duflu> (are used to implement)
[10:06] <alan_g> one process
[10:08] <duflu> alan_g: I mean is the server spawned from the same thread as the client (test case) runs?
[10:08] <duflu> Seems like that's my problem
[10:08] <alan_g> There's a async thread to control the server, plus what the server uses, plus what the client uses
[10:14] <duflu> alan_g: Put another way - is it possible the server (compositor) and client in mtf are the same thread?
[10:14] <duflu> That's what I'm seeing, and didn't expect
[10:16] <duflu> Hmm, assert will tell me
[10:16] <alan_g> I wouldn't expect it. I guess a test *could* inject client-API calls into one of the compositor threads. But that isn't sensible.
[10:18] <duflu> alan_g: I'm not aiming for it, but apparently have been given it. The test server and client are the same thread ID
[10:19] <alan_g> You'd have to do it deliberately
[10:26] <duflu> alan_g: Never mind. I think I confused the fact that client+server are constructed from the same thread, vs called back in the same thread
[13:41] <suebt> slvn_: That's the odd thing, I have it already installed oO
[13:43] <slvn_> suebt, sure? gpgv is different from gpg :/
[13:43] <slvn_> check if it's on the PATH.. ($> which gpgv_
[18:27] <suebt> svln_: Yeah, pretty sure http://paste.ubuntu.com/15570065/ It says it is installed to /usr/bin/gpgv
[18:43] <bschaefer> suebt, no luck :(
[18:43] <bschaefer> ?
[19:01] <suebt> No :|
[19:03] <bschaefer> :(
[19:03] <bschaefer> suebt, let me ... attempt to cross compile a simple SDL2 file for you
[19:04] <bschaefer> or actually i have a phone i can compile on... you're on vivid+overlay?
[19:06] <bschaefer> eww the sdl2 in vivid+overlay is out of date... hmm
[19:06] <bschaefer> o yeah let me get a newer one pushed to a ppa
[19:09] <bschaefer> suebt, also :|   * Rebuild against libsndio6.1.
[19:09] <bschaefer> i see this in the changelog for
[19:09] <bschaefer> libsdl2
[19:09] <bschaefer> sooo i think ... the one you could be using could have an ABI break?
[19:09]  * bschaefer isnt sure what version of libsndio6.1 is in vivid+overlay
[20:06] <slvn_> suebt, I have retried my script for chroot, and I got the same issue "W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net vivid InRelease: Could not execute 'gpgv' to verify signature (is gpgv installed?)"
[20:06] <slvn_> but it seems to compile correctly ...
[20:24] <slvn_> suebt, I confirmed this works ...
[20:24] <slvn_> bye+late there ..