=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [02:52] RAOF: Can you remember the path of the /real/ xenial Mir branch? Something like lp:ubuntu/* [02:55] We have everything except xenial... [02:55] https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mir/+all-branches === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [03:18] Can anyone remember the path of the real xenial release branch? [03:18] It's not lp:mir/ubuntu .. that's just a dummy [03:33] duflu: Do we *have* a real xenial Mir branch? === chihchunl is now known as chihchun [03:35] RAOF: Yeah I found it a couple of months ago. Maybe I'm remembering the wily one === peps is now known as robjh === tvoss|dinner is now known as tvoss [10:06] alan_g: How many processes/threads implement mtf::ConnectedClientHeadlessServer ? [10:06] (are used to implement) [10:06] one process [10:08] alan_g: I mean is the server spawned from the same thread as the client (test case) runs? [10:08] Seems like that's my problem [10:08] There's a async thread to control the server, plus what the server uses, plus what the client uses === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [10:14] alan_g: Put another way - is it possible the server (compositor) and client in mtf are the same thread? [10:14] That's what I'm seeing, and didn't expect [10:16] Hmm, assert will tell me [10:16] I wouldn't expect it. I guess a test *could* inject client-API calls into one of the compositor threads. But that isn't sensible. [10:18] alan_g: I'm not aiming for it, but apparently have been given it. The test server and client are the same thread ID [10:19] You'd have to do it deliberately === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [10:26] alan_g: Never mind. I think I confused the fact that client+server are constructed from the same thread, vs called back in the same thread === Saviq_ is now known as Saviq === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk [13:41] slvn_: That's the odd thing, I have it already installed oO [13:43] suebt, sure? gpgv is different from gpg :/ [13:43] check if it's on the PATH.. ($> which gpgv_ === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === dandrader is now known as dandrader|lunch === dandrader|lunch is now known as dandrader === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD [18:27] svln_: Yeah, pretty sure http://paste.ubuntu.com/15570065/ It says it is installed to /usr/bin/gpgv [18:43] suebt, no luck :( [18:43] ? [19:01] No :| [19:03] :( [19:03] suebt, let me ... attempt to cross compile a simple SDL2 file for you [19:04] or actually i have a phone i can compile on... you're on vivid+overlay? [19:06] eww the sdl2 in vivid+overlay is out of date... hmm [19:06] o yeah let me get a newer one pushed to a ppa === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk [19:09] suebt, also :| * Rebuild against libsndio6.1. [19:09] i see this in the changelog for [19:09] libsdl2 [19:09] sooo i think ... the one you could be using could have an ABI break? [19:09] * bschaefer isnt sure what version of libsndio6.1 is in vivid+overlay === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader [20:06] suebt, I have retried my script for chroot, and I got the same issue "W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net vivid InRelease: Could not execute 'gpgv' to verify signature (is gpgv installed?)" [20:06] but it seems to compile correctly ... [20:24] suebt, I confirmed this works ... [20:24] bye+late there ..