| davecheney | grrr, something is leaking /tmp/gui* turds | 01:20 |
|---|---|---|
| === menn0 is now known as menno-afk | ||
| axw | thumper: "Generally LGTM" = shipit? I've answered your question about newline | 01:25 |
| axw | thanks for reviewing btw | 01:26 |
| thumper | axw: yes | 01:31 |
| axw | thumper: ta | 01:31 |
| === menno-afk is now known as menn0 | ||
| davecheney | // If any post-MVP command suite enabled the flag, keep it. | 02:50 |
| davecheney | hasFeatureFlag := featureflag.Enabled(feature.PostNetCLIMVP) | 02:50 |
| davecheney | s.BaseSuite.SetUpTest(c) | 02:50 |
| davecheney | s.FakeJujuHomeSuite.SetUpTest(c) | 02:50 |
| davecheney | if hasFeatureFlag { | 02:50 |
| davecheney | s.BaseSuite.SetFeatureFlags(feature.PostNetCLIMVP) | 02:50 |
| davecheney | } | 02:50 |
| davecheney | wut | 02:50 |
| davecheney | if the feature flag is enabled, then enable the feature flag | 02:50 |
| davecheney | taht feel when you find the same bug copy pasted into several test suites | 02:57 |
| natefinch | heh | 02:57 |
| thumper | heh | 04:26 |
| thumper | golint needs more smarts | 04:26 |
| thumper | don't use underscores in Go names; type interface_ should be interface (golint)at line 13 col 6 | 04:27 |
| thumper | also complains about type_ | 04:27 |
| menn0 | thumper: here's an important one: http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/4414/ | 04:53 |
| * thumper looks | 04:53 | |
| menn0 | that was fun | 04:54 |
| * menn0 hasn't been in the zone like that for a long time | 04:54 | |
| thumper | I'm sure will will like that one | 04:54 |
| menn0 | thumper: yes, he doesn't like these custom watchers | 04:55 |
| menn0 | thumper: and I now pretty much agree with him | 04:55 |
| thumper | shipit | 04:57 |
| menn0 | thumper: cheers | 04:58 |
| === thumper is now known as thumper-afk | ||
| thumper-afk | bbl to catch europeans | 05:00 |
| davecheney | fixing cleanup suite failures in the ec2 tests are making me sad | 07:28 |
| davecheney | all day | 07:28 |
| davecheney | no fucking idea what is broken | 07:29 |
| davecheney | touch one thing, and magic values in other parts of the program dont' get overwritten | 07:29 |
| davecheney | i hate patch value | 07:29 |
| davecheney | it's tumor | 07:29 |
| rogpeppe | davecheney: sorry about that | 07:39 |
| rogpeppe | davecheney: it seemed like a good idea at the time | 07:39 |
| davecheney | FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU | 07:51 |
| davecheney | Cleanup suite uses a package singleton | 07:51 |
| davecheney | so you can have multiple CleanupSuites | 07:51 |
| davecheney | pooped all the way through your suite construction | 07:51 |
| davecheney | and they all COMPETE FOR THE SAME FUCKING SingleTON! | 07:51 |
| davecheney | oh | 07:51 |
| davecheney | no | 07:51 |
| davecheney | i was wrong | 07:51 |
| davecheney | i take that rant back | 07:52 |
| davecheney | https://github.com/juju/testing/pull/94 | 07:58 |
| dooferlad | frobware, voidspace: hangout time | 09:00 |
| voidspace | dooferlad: frobware: be there in 2 minutes! | 09:01 |
| voidspace | dooferlad: omw | 09:06 |
| voidspace | babbageclunk: I'll ping you shortly, just fending off some emails | 09:32 |
| babbageclunk | ok cool | 09:32 |
| voidspace | babbageclunk: I've pulled in the changes from use-boot-resources onto our maas2instance branch | 09:34 |
| voidspace | babbageclunk: and am doing the rename | 09:34 |
| babbageclunk | voidspace: the one Tim suggested? ok | 09:34 |
| voidspace | babbageclunk: yeah, I think it's clearer | 09:34 |
| * babbageclunk nods | 09:35 | |
| voidspace | babbageclunk: so the old maasInstance becomes maas1Instance and the interface becomes maasInstance | 09:35 |
| voidspace | babbageclunk: we need to update to the latest version of gomaasapi and fix verifyCredentials to not hit Machines endpoint plus use the new gomaasapi error instead of the net/http one | 09:36 |
| voidspace | babbageclunk: we can do that in a new branch though | 09:36 |
| babbageclunk | voidspace: shall I make a start on the verifyCredentials change? | 09:45 |
| === menn0 is now known as menn0-afk | ||
| voidspace | babbageclunk: sorry, missed your message | 10:26 |
| voidspace | babbageclunk: sure you can look at errors too | 10:26 |
| voidspace | babbageclunk: just grabbing coffee then I'm ready | 10:28 |
| voidspace | babbageclunk: use-boot-resources landed | 10:30 |
| voidspace | frobware: dooferlad: gah, updating to use the latest version of gomaasapi from thumper causes 23 test failures :-/ | 11:40 |
| voidspace | just venting | 11:40 |
| voidspace | now bisecting to find what caused it | 11:41 |
| frobware | voidspace: 23 test failures in juju or gomaasapi? | 12:03 |
| perrito666 | marcoceppi: hello, you had mentioned the name of a charm that implements update-status what was it? | 12:23 |
| perrito666 | also mgz ping | 12:23 |
| babbageclunk | frobware: juju - it turned out to be an errors.Trace that was added in gomaasapi. | 12:49 |
| babbageclunk | frobware: it meant adding errors.Cause in a few places. | 12:49 |
| perrito666 | anyone knows the exact version of lxd that works with master? | 12:54 |
| voidspace | frobware: that was in juju | 13:18 |
| voidspace | frobware: we found the cause, and fixed it | 13:18 |
| voidspace | ah yes | 13:18 |
| voidspace | babbageclunk: grabbing coffee | 13:18 |
| voidspace | frobware: dooferlad: http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/4422/ | 14:06 |
| marcoceppi | perrito666: any of the bigdata charms | 14:17 |
| perrito666 | yup, already found tx a lot marcoceppi | 14:18 |
| mup | Bug # changed: 1229903, 1292157, 1323446, 1365542, 1531954 | 14:18 |
| mup | Bug #972515 changed: Charm store needs search functionality <store> <juju-core:Invalid by niemeyer> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/972515> | 14:27 |
| mup | Bug #972515 opened: Charm store needs search functionality <store> <juju-core:Invalid by niemeyer> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/972515> | 14:42 |
| frobware | voidspace, sorry, sidetracked by a customer issue. | 14:46 |
| frobware | dooferlad: would you mind obliging with voidspace's review ^^ | 14:46 |
| dooferlad | frobware: sure | 14:46 |
| mup | Bug #972515 changed: Charm store needs search functionality <store> <juju-core:Invalid by niemeyer> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/972515> | 14:48 |
| mup | Bug #1565826 opened: Unable to build juju2 from master <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1565826> | 14:48 |
| mup | Bug #1565827 opened: TestTimeoutRun fails <ci> <test-failure> <juju-core:Incomplete> <juju-core feature-juju-run-action:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1565827> | 14:48 |
| dooferlad | voidspace: got a +1 | 14:52 |
| voidspace | dooferlad: thanks! | 14:59 |
| katco | natefinch: ericsnow: standup time | 15:01 |
| alexisb | morning all | 15:05 |
| alexisb | if anything needs attention from me today please ping me directly | 15:05 |
| alexisb | crawling through email atm | 15:06 |
| katco | alexisb: wb | 15:08 |
| alexisb | thanks katco ! | 15:08 |
| mup | Bug #1565831 opened: unable to create authenticated client with maas 1.9 <bootstrap> <ci> <maas-provider> <juju-core:New> <juju-core maas2:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1565831> | 15:09 |
| perrito666 | returning from holidays my brain is all :"oh that english thing again, sure, lemme switch everything, in the meanwhile, talk like scooby doo" | 15:15 |
| katco | perrito666: you did fine ;) | 15:17 |
| perrito666 | katco: when I just connected my brain was in "what are these people talking?" mode | 15:17 |
| natefinch | perrito666: lol | 15:22 |
| === ericsnow is now known as ericsnow-afk | ||
| === ericsnow-afk is now known as ericsnow | ||
| ericsnow | fwereade: thanks for the review; processing now | 15:47 |
| voidspace | rick_h_: is the meeting on today? | 16:00 |
| voidspace | frobware: dooferlad: is the meeting with rick_h_ on today? | 16:01 |
| voidspace | I added babbageclunk as a guest | 16:01 |
| natefinch | ericsnow: charmstore meeting | 16:02 |
| mup | Bug #1565826 changed: Unable to build juju2 from master <juju-core:Invalid> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1565826> | 16:09 |
| rick_h_ | voidspace: frobware babbageclunk sorry! | 16:10 |
| voidspace | dooferlad: frobware: rick_h_ is here! | 16:10 |
| katco | ericsnow: natefinch: so when we all have a moment, we should point new work, and i can give you update on projected completion of project to see if we're in trouble | 16:12 |
| frobware | voidspace, rick_h_: omw | 16:13 |
| ericsnow | katco: k | 16:13 |
| frobware | rick_h_: sorry was clicking as you were speaking... | 16:15 |
| rick_h_ | frobware: all good | 16:16 |
| mup | Bug #1565872 opened: As a juju user I would like to use docker on the local provider <adoption> <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1565872> | 16:18 |
| alexisb | katco, ping | 16:19 |
| katco | alexisb: pong | 16:19 |
| mup | Bug #1565872 changed: Juju needs to support LXD profiles as a constraint <adoption> <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1565872> | 16:27 |
| mup | Bug #1565872 opened: As a juju user I would like to use docker on the local provider <adoption> <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1565872> | 16:39 |
| mup | Bug #1565880 opened: juju list-credentials --show-secrets does not do anything <docteam> <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1565880> | 16:39 |
| natefinch | katco: done meeting with the charmstore guys, would like to get lunch if that's ok? | 16:40 |
| katco | natefinch: that's fine | 16:42 |
| katco | ericsnow: natefinch: we'll meet after | 16:42 |
| ericsnow | katco: k | 16:42 |
| perrito666 | natefinch: just as a reference, re lxd, the version required for juju to work is the one in the ppa no the one in wily | 16:44 |
| natefinch | perrito666: wait, I thought they reversed that | 16:45 |
| perrito666 | natefinch: so did I but juju says otherwise | 16:46 |
| natefinch | perrito666: whatever, my lxd works, that's all I care about for now | 16:46 |
| perrito666 | natefinch: heh, mine too | 16:47 |
| natefinch | perrito666: you're right, mines from the PPA | 16:47 |
| * natefinch lunches | 16:47 | |
| === natefinch is now known as natefinch-lunch | ||
| voidspace | frobware: dooferlad: review if you get a chance http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/4425/ | 16:58 |
| === natefinch-lunch is now known as natefinch | ||
| natefinch | katco, ericsnow: ready when you guys are | 17:50 |
| ericsnow | natefinch: k | 17:51 |
| katco | natefinch: ericsnow: let's do it! | 17:52 |
| marcoceppi | can I remove storage from a service? | 18:17 |
| marcoceppi | why do we have a detaching hook, but no way to detach storage? | 18:19 |
| marcoceppi | rick_h_: ^ | 18:19 |
| katco | urulama: rick_h_: hey, can you be authorized to a specific channel? | 18:39 |
| urulama | yes | 18:39 |
| urulama | acls are different for each channel | 18:39 |
| natefinch | urulama: so a macaroon is channel-specific? | 18:39 |
| mup | Bug #1503029 changed: juju plugins which exit > 0 report a subprocess ERROR <charmers> <juju-core:Fix Released by cmars> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1503029> | 18:40 |
| rick_h_ | katco: yes, the idea being you give your tester folks access to dev channel | 18:40 |
| katco | rick_h_: makes sense... suspicion confirmed ty :) | 18:40 |
| urulama | natefinch: macaroon is not, but ACL is | 18:41 |
| mup | Bug #1565943 opened: Can't bootstrap on VSphere <vsphere> <juju-core:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1565943> | 18:46 |
| natefinch | urulama: so that's kinda weird... there's no channel parameter sent up when you get a charm archive.. I guess if that charm is in a public channel it'll just work? and if it's not it'll return an access denied error of some sort? | 18:59 |
| urulama | natefinch: sure it does. check out https://api.jujucharms.com/charmstore/v5/~jorge/bundle/wiki-simple/archive?channel=unpublished vs https://api.jujucharms.com/charmstore/v5/~jorge/bundle/wiki-simple/archive | 19:09 |
| natefinch | urulama: ahh, ok, I was looking at the docs, where it doesn't seem to indicate channels get passed to get the archives | 19:11 |
| natefinch | urulama: https://github.com/juju/charmstore/blob/v5-unstable/docs/API.md#get-idarchive | 19:12 |
| urulama | natefinch: ha, ok, that needs some updating then | 19:12 |
| natefinch | urulama: oh, I guess the blurb about channels at the top covers that, for any endpoint that takes an id can take a channel | 19:12 |
| urulama | natefinch: works also on /meta endpoint | 19:13 |
| natefinch | urulama: cool, thanks for clarifying | 19:13 |
| urulama | np | 19:13 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: Have you seen issues with deploying LXD issues with deploying xenial with the juju agent not finishing installation? | 19:57 |
| katco | can anyone tell me why we aren't using logging here? https://github.com/juju/juju/blob/master/provider/common/bootstrap.go#L133 | 19:57 |
| mbruzek | ping anyone else working with LXD and xenial | 19:59 |
| natefinch | katco: weird | 19:59 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: I haven't tried it in a couple days | 20:00 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: are you using lxd provider on a daily xenial image? | 20:00 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: yes. | 20:00 |
| mbruzek | Marco and I looked at the logs, we saw a modprobe fail. | 20:01 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: k, let me provision a new xenial instance | 20:01 |
| natefinch | katco: that's the output for the bootstrap command, to the CLI | 20:01 |
| katco | natefinch: was just typing that | 20:01 |
| katco | natefinch: got lost in a lot of --debug output so incorrectly seemed odd looking at backtraces | 20:01 |
| natefinch | katco: it would still make sense to wrap it in a logger so you don't risk interleaved writes, but it's less likely on the client, I guess | 20:01 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: I assert the agent will be stuck "Waiting for agent initialization to finish" | 20:03 |
| mbruzek | after deploying a charm in xenial series | 20:03 |
| mbruzek | Or at least that is what I am seeing | 20:04 |
| * thumper dives into email | 20:04 | |
| cherylj | mbruzek: so it's also a xenial container you're deploying too? | 20:05 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: is it a trusty controller? | 20:05 |
| mbruzek | I was following this page: https://jujucharms.com/docs/devel/config-LXD | 20:05 |
| mbruzek | That bootstrap command looks like I am requesting a xenial controller. | 20:06 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: Once you get bootstrapped, deploy a xenial charm. | 20:13 |
| mbruzek | juju deploy ubuntu --series xenial --force | 20:13 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: ^ | 20:13 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: are you using beta3, or tip of master? | 20:14 |
| mbruzek | beta3 | 20:14 |
| cherylj | omg, I'm deploying an openstack bundle on my vmaas and my laptop is screaming! | 20:14 |
| cherylj | much lag, such slow | 20:15 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: Oh | 20:15 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: Yikes! | 20:15 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: I just deployed the ubuntu charm on both trusty and xenial | 20:16 |
| cherylj | k, my instance in aws is coming up :) | 20:16 |
| mbruzek | LXD inside aws? | 20:16 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: yeah, I like to spin up a clean xenial install when testing the lxd provider | 20:17 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: so I got both of the charms to deploy completely but I see the error in the machine log that will never work on lxd | 20:19 |
| mbruzek | The juju agent checks for kvm: WARNING juju.cmd.jujud machine.go:760 determining kvm support: INFO: /dev/kvm does not exist | 20:20 |
| mbruzek | Not there in the base cloud image | 20:20 |
| mbruzek | HINT: sudo modprobe kvm_intel | 20:20 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: Then I see an error when the juju agent tries to do modprobe. | 20:21 |
| mbruzek | modprobe: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod.c:556 kmod_search_moddep() could not open moddep file '/lib/modules/4.4.0-15-generic/modules.dep.bin' | 20:21 |
| mbruzek | : exit status 1 | 20:21 |
| mbruzek | no kvm containers possible | 20:21 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: and that's causing the machine agent to barf? | 20:21 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: that should be fine | 20:21 |
| cherylj | bootstrapping now... | 20:22 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: This time it does not appear that they barfed, both trusty and xenial seem OK now. | 20:22 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: did you do anything differently? or did just doing it a second time work? | 20:23 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: why do you think that is OK? doing a modprobe within a LXD container is never going to work. | 20:23 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: it's just a check to see if we have the capability of hosting KVMs | 20:23 |
| cherylj | happens on all providers | 20:24 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: but since LXD is sharing the kernel, a modprobe will not work in KVM. So the error is handled approprately? | 20:26 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: s/KVM/LXD | 20:26 |
| mbruzek | Because they share the kernel | 20:26 |
| mbruzek | you can not insert any more mods | 20:26 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: OK I was able to bootstrap, deploy and clean up correctly this time. | 20:30 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: is there a better way to detect whether or not we can host KVMs? (I'm not familiar with how we would do that) | 20:32 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: and on this lxd instance issue - when the unit was waiting for agent initialization, did it have an instance ID yet? | 20:33 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: Not that I am aware of, but perhaps we should check for LXD / containers first and if not in a container then check for kvm. | 20:33 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: let me check my status | 20:33 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: yes, I was even able to ssh to it, but the juju agent was dead | 20:34 |
| cherylj | ah, I'm running into a different issue then | 20:34 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: were both unit and machine agents dead? | 20:34 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: I think it was the machine unit, and I was not able to destroy the controller | 20:34 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: when you did destroy-controller, what was the error? or did it just hang? | 20:35 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: it went into an infinite loop | 20:35 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: ah, in the "waiting for x service" blurb? | 20:36 |
| mbruzek | I hit control-c and re ran it with --debug on | 20:36 |
| mbruzek | Waiting on 2 models, 1 machine, 2 services | 20:36 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: with debug: | 20:37 |
| mbruzek | 2016-04-04 19:32:20 INFO cmd cmd.go:129 Waiting on 2 models, 1 machine, 2 services | 20:37 |
| mbruzek | 2016-04-04 19:32:20 INFO cmd cmd.go:141 admin@local/default (alive), 1 service | 20:37 |
| mbruzek | for ever, I could not --force it | 20:37 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: this sounds familiar. I think I've run into this before, but couldn't recreate | 20:37 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: well kill the machine agent, and try to destroy the controller | 20:38 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: you can manually terminate the controller machine, then run kill-controller | 20:38 |
| mbruzek | But this time everything came down OK | 20:38 |
| cherylj | ok | 20:39 |
| cherylj | let me poke more, see if I can recreate | 20:39 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: Yes I figured out the lxc commands to stop and delete the images | 20:39 |
| mbruzek | But all the Juju stuff was left in the .local/share/juju | 20:40 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: yeah, if you just kill the controller machine and run kill-controller, it will give up talking to the controller and then go to the provider to clean up | 20:40 |
| cherylj | and then it will clean up your local cache information | 20:40 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: OK I was not able to reproduce that, but I didn't know that worked | 20:41 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: I wrote a lot of the destroy / kill controller code so I know ALL ITS SECRETS | 20:41 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: OK well thank you for the information | 20:41 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: there's also a bug open to provide a way to clean up stale controller information | 20:42 |
| cherylj | It'd be super awesome if we could get that done for 2.0 | 20:42 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: OK so you were able to get a xenial ubuntu and everything looks good? | 20:43 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: no, I'm running into a different bug | 20:43 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: what I see is that on a new xenial install, deploying in lxd doesn't even get an instance associated with the service | 20:43 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: so let me understand, you are using amazon to run a local LXD provider? | 20:43 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: yes, I manually deploy a xenial machine, install juju2 on it, and bootstrap lxd | 20:44 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: OK, I just wanted to understand the workflow | 20:44 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: :) I do it to make sure it's clean and I haven't messed things up some how | 20:44 |
| mbruzek | that is a good idea! | 20:45 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: if you haven't seen it before, I use the cloud image finder to quickly launch a particular instance in a particular region: https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/locator/daily/ | 20:45 |
| mup | Bug #1564622 changed: Suggest juju1 upon first use of juju2 if there is an existing JUJU_HOME dir <juju-release-support> <juju-core:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1564622> | 20:46 |
| mup | Bug #1565991 opened: juju commands don't detect a fresh juju 1.X user and helpfully tell them where to find juju 1.X <juju-core:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1565991> | 20:46 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: Thanks for the link | 20:46 |
| mbruzek | cherylj: which type do you pick, I imagine the ssd ones are more expensive | 20:47 |
| cherylj | mbruzek: I just go with the ssd ones | 20:47 |
| voidspace | thumper: ping | 20:53 |
| thumper | voidspace: hey | 20:53 |
| voidspace | thumper: morning | 20:53 |
| voidspace | thumper: I just wanted to say thanks | 20:54 |
| thumper | for? | 20:54 |
| voidspace | thumper: your changes to gomaasapi broke 24 tests and it took us nearly two hours to work out why | 20:54 |
| voidspace | ;-) | 20:54 |
| voidspace | thumper: we fixed it, but I do wonder if we ought to change it (which is why I'm really pinging) | 20:54 |
| thumper | wont make that mistake again then will you? | 20:54 |
| voidspace | hehe | 20:54 |
| voidspace | thumper: you added an errors.Trace to the error the client returns | 20:54 |
| thumper | gomaasapi.GetServerError(err error) (ServerError, bool) | 20:55 |
| voidspace | thumper: which means that anything that attempts to cast to a ServerError fails | 20:55 |
| voidspace | sure | 20:55 |
| thumper | I added that for that exact reason | 20:55 |
| voidspace | but it's backwards incompatible | 20:55 |
| thumper | eh... | 20:55 |
| thumper | yeah | 20:55 |
| thumper | ish | 20:55 |
| thumper | a bit | 20:55 |
| thumper | not heaps | 20:55 |
| voidspace | well, it broke 23 tests on master... | 20:55 |
| voidspace | so yeah - ish | 20:55 |
| thumper | you're welcome | 20:55 |
| voidspace | :-D | 20:55 |
| voidspace | it's *better* | 20:55 |
| voidspace | maybe we just see if anyone else complains | 20:56 |
| voidspace | gomaasapi does have users | 20:56 |
| voidspace | not many probably but some :-) | 20:56 |
| voidspace | (I mean the change is better) | 20:56 |
| voidspace | anyway, I'm off to bed | 20:57 |
| voidspace | well - watch TV anyway | 20:57 |
| voidspace | thumper: just thought as you were around I'd hassle you :-) | 20:57 |
| voidspace | thumper: have a good day | 20:57 |
| thumper | :) | 20:57 |
| mup | Bug # opened: 1564157, 1564163, 1564165, 1566011, 1566014 | 21:34 |
| mup | Bug # changed: 1564157, 1564163, 1564165, 1566011, 1566014 | 21:37 |
| mup | Bug #1565880 changed: juju list-credentials --show-secrets does not do anything <docteam> <juju-release-support> <juju-core:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1565880> | 21:46 |
| mup | Bug # opened: 1564157, 1564163, 1564165, 1564168, 1564670, 1566011, 1566014, 1566023, 1566024 | 21:46 |
| menn0-afk | thumper: PR #20 LGTM. It's a bit hard to read the #21 b/c it builds on it so let me know when you've merged #20. | 22:19 |
| === menn0-afk is now known as menn0 | ||
| thumper | menn0: ack, will land, and update pr | 22:20 |
| mup | Bug #1566044 opened: list-models and show-model should represent similar keys for controller model <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1566044> | 22:37 |
| mup | Bug #1566044 changed: list-models and show-model should represent similar keys for controller model <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1566044> | 22:49 |
| === redir is now known as redir_afk | ||
| mup | Bug #1566044 opened: list-models and show-model should represent similar keys for controller model <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1566044> | 22:52 |
| perrito666 | axw: anastasiamac is standup still happening? | 23:15 |
| axw | perrito666: yes, omw | 23:15 |
| anastasiamac | m here | 23:15 |
| davecheney | # github.com/juju/juju/provider/ec2_test | 23:38 |
| davecheney | local_test.go:93: ambiguous selector t.AddCleanup | 23:38 |
| davecheney | FATAL: command "test" failed: exit status 2 | 23:38 |
| davecheney | pungent smell that CleanupSuite is present more than once in this suite | 23:39 |
| perrito666 | davecheney: odd, although I found someone had refactored something upstream last time I was nearby | 23:44 |
| === redir_afk is now known as redir | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!