/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/04/04/#ubuntu-ci-eng.txt

Mirvrobru: I don't seem to find where to set overlay PPA in bileto anymore, and the "ubuntu" selection just lists "ubuntu"07:40
davmor2sil2100, jibel: emulator is stuck in a loop here on the new welcome wizard also it looks like it is saying there is no sim and no network for which I obviously blame Saviq ;)09:19
sil2100davmor2: a loop? Damn09:20
sil2100The security team won't be happy about that09:20
davmor2sil2100: I'm just destroying it and trying again to confirm09:20
* Saviq pretends doesn't here09:21
Saviqtrainguards, can you please delete gsettings-qt from https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-076 thanks!09:26
MirvSaviq: ok09:26
=== seb128_ is now known as seb128
davmor2Saviq, sil2100, jibel: So destroyed recreated same issue, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phablet-tools/+bug/156568509:36
ubot5`Launchpad bug 1565685 in phablet-tools (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu-emulator: Crash in new welcome wizard cause the emulator to reboot" [Undecided,New]09:36
Saviqdavmor2, ack09:36
davmor2Saviq: and it is unity8 crashing I attached the crash hopefully it shows something09:36
Saviqdavmor2, if a unity8 crash is 150kB, it doesn't ;)09:37
jibeldavmor2, great, everything was working nicely when you were on holidays ;)09:37
davmor2jibel: yeah sure, sure, I'm back now and need to blame Saviq for stuff09:38
Saviqwhaa, so this is targetting OTA10¿!?09:39
davmor2Saviq: Yes it is critical for the security team that's why the emulator got fixed09:40
davmor2Saviq: and then you broke it09:40
Saviqok, on it09:40
jibelMirv, we don't have anything to verify on https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1121, do we?09:47
Mirvjibel: no, it's just a "FYI, please let this pass when convenient".09:52
Saviqdavmor2, got it, does it always crash after "Preferred name" page for you, too?10:02
davmor2Saviq: first time yes second time can happen on that page or others, but mostly that page10:03
Saviqlooks to me like oxide assumes the existence of vibrator10:03
SaviqMirv, are there dbg symbols available for -gles qtdeclarative?10:06
Saviqdavmor2, jibel, do you know if/how it's possible to increase the emulator disk size? oxide debug symbols are over 1GB...10:26
jibelSaviq, I have no idea sorry10:27
Saviqdavmor2, jibel, AFAICT bug #1565685 is oxide aborting due to missing vibrator in the emulator10:33
ubot5`bug 1565685 in Canonical System Image "Ubuntu-emulator: Crash in new welcome wizard cause the emulator to reboot" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/156568510:33
MirvSaviq: nowadays yes the PPA:s have the -dbgsym packages too even though explicit debug packages aren't built from the gles packaging: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/stable-phone-overlay/+sourcepub/6226219/+listing-archive-extra10:35
SaviqMirv, yeah I was trying to use -dbg, prolly not built for -gles?10:36
Saviqand anyway /me likes -dbgsyms more - smaller10:36
MirvSaviq: yep the -dbg is from the packaging, that's only for non-gles10:36
Saviqyup10:37
davmor2Saviq: meh why would that crash out unity8 though?10:38
Saviqdavmor2, because we're displaying terms of service for Here in a WebView10:39
Saviqlooks like it's not limited to unity8/wizard in any case10:39
* Saviq tries10:39
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch
=== lan3y is now known as Laney
=== Laney is now known as Guest76158
=== Guest76158 is now known as Laney
Saviqsil2100, hey, how're we on deadlines? OTA10 snapshotted yet? are we opening xenial overlay?12:21
nik90jibel, ping12:32
jibelSaviq, yes it has been snapshotted12:32
jibelnik90, pong12:33
nik90jibel, Hi, We're gearing up to release uNav 0.58. Before we send the click package to QA, we compiled a list of manual tests at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/unav.12:33
nik90jibel, I was told that QA already had a list of tests for uNav somewhere.12:34
nik90jibel, Can we group them all in one location for convenience?12:34
jibelnik90, this is great. Thanks for that.12:35
jibelnik90, yes, definitely. There is a large overlap between both suites.12:35
nik90jibel, We did it wiki ubuntu since that's what most other projects did..I wasn't aware of the other QA test suite until yesterday.12:36
jibelnik90, np, I'll talk to iahmad to discuss the best options.12:36
nik90jibel, cool12:37
nik90thnx12:37
jibelnik90, I saw other apps store the test suite in a checkbox job format in trunk12:37
nik90jibel, Yes, I did that with clock app. That's an option too.12:37
jibelnik90, it's easy to share the test suites and process them automatically this way12:37
nik90I wasn't sure what the state of checkbox was and if it was continued to be used.12:38
jibelit's also very easy to review a diff and check if the tests have been updated accroding to the changes12:38
nik90jibel, Do you want to convert these tests into the checkbox format? Or you want to check with iahmad first?12:39
jibelnik90, lets talk to iahmad first before generating unnecessary work.12:40
nik90ack.12:40
* sil2100 had a pipe malfunction at home12:40
sil2100Just finished fixing it up, was away in the last ~1 hour, eh12:41
=== alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g
=== _salem is now known as salem_
boikorobru: hi, britney failed on silo 57, where can I get logs to see what happened?13:44
=== fginther` is now known as fginther
jibelboiko, in bileto there are 2 links to excuses. one for vivid and one for xenial14:00
jibelboiko, you click on the link and it'll show what failed with links to the log and the test artifacts14:01
boikojibel: great! thanks!14:02
boikotrainguards: hi, we have britney failing on silo 57, and after checking the logs, it is a unity8 test not related to telephony-service (confirmed with mzanetti), how can we proceed now?14:22
sil2100boiko: why is this test failing? Is it a known failure with the unity8 team?14:26
boikosil2100: mzanetti told me it only happens on britney, and that they are on it already14:27
boikosil2100: and he confirmed it has nothing to do with the telephony-service changes14:27
mzanettisil2100, yeah... issue on our end14:27
sil2100boiko: I suppose in this case you could request a manual override to the QA queue - but that would be jibel as the decision-maker14:27
sil2100mzanetti: ok14:27
boikojibel: could you please take a look?14:28
jibelboiko, I can force it but it'll block again when it's in xenial proposed14:34
jibelI cannot for it indefinitely14:34
boikomzanetti: just curious, any ETA on a fix for this? (just to check if we can wait for it)14:34
mzanettiboiko, I'll find out in a minute14:35
boikojibel: let's wait for mzanetti's feedback on this then14:35
mzanettiboiko, you probably don't want to wait14:56
mzanettijibel, ^14:56
boiko:/14:56
mzanettiyeah, sorry... one of them is really weird and we're still a bit lost14:56
mzanettiso while we might solve ti soon, I can't promis it14:56
Saviqsil2100, in case you missed: <Saviq> sil2100, hey, how're we on deadlines? OTA10 snapshotted yet? are we opening xenial overlay?15:47
sil2100Saviq: hey! Yes, OTA-10 has been more-or-less snapshotted (need to copy over the new langpacks) and copied to rc15:48
sil2100Saviq: the images are in BQs hands15:48
sil2100So we're on schedule so far15:48
sil2100As for xenial overlay... I would say yes, but will make sure everyone is ok with that and then we switch15:49
* Saviq just wonders when does it make sense to put up the next unity8 silo... "ready to test" QA queue looks significant, I assume because of OTA10 and 16.0415:49
jibelSaviq, we are still testing OTA10 and most of the testers are on holidays (national holiday)15:54
jibelwe'll catch up with the queue starting from tomorrow15:54
Saviqjibel, ack, nothing pressing... /me just learned we already have 25+ branches to land in unity8 :P15:56
jibelSaviq, oh, mega silo 41 didn't teach you anything right?15:56
jibel;)15:56
Saviqjibel, what was wrong with that?15:57
jibelit's a PITA to land15:57
Saviqjibel, if we tried to split it in 4-5 by "feature", it'd be a bigger PITA IMO15:57
Saviqit wouldn't have helped locating the deadlock much15:58
Saviqand then we'd be backed up even more15:58
Saviqwe just need to reduce the code churn :P15:58
robruMirv: yes, all vivid landings now point at overlay (and dual always was vivid->overlay) so there's no longer any need to specify overlay.16:02
Trevinhosil2100: ehy, so can you publish https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1153 please? :)16:03
Mirvrobru: ah, well then it makes sense, but the text "Warning: Are you sure you want to publish an SRU?" should be removed16:05
robruMirv: oh, heh, oops. ok I'll drop that16:05
Mirvrobru: and "QA Signoff" should be Required instead of forced N/A16:06
Mirvrobru: thanks16:06
robruMirv: ok, fixes in production, give it a check over16:11
sil2100Trevinho: on it now! :)16:33
sil2100Trevinho: published - sorry it took so long, touch preempted me always ;)16:35
TrevinhoLaney: ^ oh :)16:35
sil2100It's +1'ed16:35
sil2100It's all good16:35
sil2100Ok, not all good16:35
sil2100https://code.launchpad.net/~albertsmuktupavels/compiz/gwd-fix-tests/+merge/289535 <- needs review ;)16:35
sil2100Trevinho: could you get that approved ^?16:35
Trevinhosil2100: oh, sorry... I thought I had16:36
Trevinhosil2100: done16:36
sil2100Trevinho: published o/16:41
Trevinhosil2100: thanksss16:42
bschaeferhello, so im interested in getting a package/ppa pushed back to vivid + overlay. I have a ppa with it built (against the vivid + overlay ppa): https://launchpad.net/~brandontschaefer/+archive/ubuntu/capnproto16:49
bschaeferneed a newer capnproto since the older one 0.4.0 is missing some functionality16:50
sil2100bschaefer: is it required by our stable touch products?16:57
bschaefersil2100, it will be required for mir16:57
bschaefer(branches are blocked on this the older version no having the correct functionality)16:57
* bschaefer is having hard time with english it appears16:58
sil2100bschaefer: ok, so let's think about getting it in then - prepare a silo for its inclusion, I'll check the packages in your PPA and upload them there (either by source copy or manual dput)16:58
bschaefersil2100, awesome thanks! Also who would i poke to get a silo :)16:59
sil2100bschaefer: I think you should have the right permissions to do so :)16:59
bschaefero right16:59
sil2100http://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/16:59
bschaeferyup, thanks16:59
sil2100Go here and try filling one in (after logging in) - and then assigning16:59
bschaefercool let me see if i remember how to do all of it :).17:00
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD
bschaefersil2100, the on concern with this ppa is libunity-scopes depends on libcapnproto17:00
bschaeferannnd IIRC it had some issues with the newer capnproto17:00
bschaefersil2100, also...theres no MP ... soo not sure what to put there :)17:02
* bschaefer digs around wiki17:04
bschaefersil2100, soo it looks like you've to directly upload my ppa to this silo :): https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/121817:07
bschaeferit got silo https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-00317:07
robrubschaefer: I can do that, one sec17:10
bschaeferrobru, thanks!17:11
robrubschaefer: oh, where's your ppa?17:12
bschaeferhttps://launchpad.net/~brandontschaefer/+archive/ubuntu/capnproto17:12
bschaefererr17:12
bschaefero i guess thats right17:12
* bschaefer thought the url would be different linking to a ppa from my account :)17:13
Mirvrobru: looks good now, both aspects, thanks!17:13
robruMirv: you're welcome17:13
robrubschaefer: ok copy done, the ticket should reflect the status in about ~15 (also it needs time to rebuild anyway)17:13
bschaeferrobru, sweet thanks!17:14
robrubschaefer: you're welcome17:14
sil2100robru, slangasek: I need to go AFK in around ~1 hour, not sure if I'll be around for the meeting17:23
robruslangasek: sil2100: not much new on my end, propose we just cancel?17:23
slangaseksil2100, robru: would prefer a quick sync if you guys are available - can be short and sil2100 can go afk :)18:02
robruslangasek: ok I'm in the hangout18:03
robruslangasek: hmm I see you joined the chat but I can't see or hear you18:04

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!