[07:40] <Mirv> robru: I don't seem to find where to set overlay PPA in bileto anymore, and the "ubuntu" selection just lists "ubuntu"
[09:19] <davmor2> sil2100, jibel: emulator is stuck in a loop here on the new welcome wizard also it looks like it is saying there is no sim and no network for which I obviously blame Saviq ;)
[09:20] <sil2100> davmor2: a loop? Damn
[09:20] <sil2100> The security team won't be happy about that
[09:20] <davmor2> sil2100: I'm just destroying it and trying again to confirm
[09:21]  * Saviq pretends doesn't here
[09:26] <Saviq> trainguards, can you please delete gsettings-qt from https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-076 thanks!
[09:26] <Mirv> Saviq: ok
[09:36] <davmor2> Saviq, sil2100, jibel: So destroyed recreated same issue, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phablet-tools/+bug/1565685
[09:36] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1565685 in phablet-tools (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu-emulator: Crash in new welcome wizard cause the emulator to reboot" [Undecided,New]
[09:36] <Saviq> davmor2, ack
[09:36] <davmor2> Saviq: and it is unity8 crashing I attached the crash hopefully it shows something
[09:37] <Saviq> davmor2, if a unity8 crash is 150kB, it doesn't ;)
[09:37] <jibel> davmor2, great, everything was working nicely when you were on holidays ;)
[09:38] <davmor2> jibel: yeah sure, sure, I'm back now and need to blame Saviq for stuff
[09:39] <Saviq> whaa, so this is targetting OTA10¿!?
[09:40] <davmor2> Saviq: Yes it is critical for the security team that's why the emulator got fixed
[09:40] <davmor2> Saviq: and then you broke it
[09:40] <Saviq> ok, on it
[09:47] <jibel> Mirv, we don't have anything to verify on https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1121, do we?
[09:52] <Mirv> jibel: no, it's just a "FYI, please let this pass when convenient".
[10:02] <Saviq> davmor2, got it, does it always crash after "Preferred name" page for you, too?
[10:03] <davmor2> Saviq: first time yes second time can happen on that page or others, but mostly that page
[10:03] <Saviq> looks to me like oxide assumes the existence of vibrator
[10:06] <Saviq> Mirv, are there dbg symbols available for -gles qtdeclarative?
[10:26] <Saviq> davmor2, jibel, do you know if/how it's possible to increase the emulator disk size? oxide debug symbols are over 1GB...
[10:27] <jibel> Saviq, I have no idea sorry
[10:33] <Saviq> davmor2, jibel, AFAICT bug #1565685 is oxide aborting due to missing vibrator in the emulator
[10:33] <ubot5`> bug 1565685 in Canonical System Image "Ubuntu-emulator: Crash in new welcome wizard cause the emulator to reboot" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1565685
[10:35] <Mirv> Saviq: nowadays yes the PPA:s have the -dbgsym packages too even though explicit debug packages aren't built from the gles packaging: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/stable-phone-overlay/+sourcepub/6226219/+listing-archive-extra
[10:36] <Saviq> Mirv, yeah I was trying to use -dbg, prolly not built for -gles?
[10:36] <Saviq> and anyway /me likes -dbgsyms more - smaller
[10:36] <Mirv> Saviq: yep the -dbg is from the packaging, that's only for non-gles
[10:37] <Saviq> yup
[10:38] <davmor2> Saviq: meh why would that crash out unity8 though?
[10:39] <Saviq> davmor2, because we're displaying terms of service for Here in a WebView
[10:39] <Saviq> looks like it's not limited to unity8/wizard in any case
[10:39]  * Saviq tries
[12:21] <Saviq> sil2100, hey, how're we on deadlines? OTA10 snapshotted yet? are we opening xenial overlay?
[12:32] <nik90> jibel, ping
[12:32] <jibel> Saviq, yes it has been snapshotted
[12:33] <jibel> nik90, pong
[12:33] <nik90> jibel, Hi, We're gearing up to release uNav 0.58. Before we send the click package to QA, we compiled a list of manual tests at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/unav.
[12:34] <nik90> jibel, I was told that QA already had a list of tests for uNav somewhere.
[12:34] <nik90> jibel, Can we group them all in one location for convenience?
[12:35] <jibel> nik90, this is great. Thanks for that.
[12:35] <jibel> nik90, yes, definitely. There is a large overlap between both suites.
[12:36] <nik90> jibel, We did it wiki ubuntu since that's what most other projects did..I wasn't aware of the other QA test suite until yesterday.
[12:36] <jibel> nik90, np, I'll talk to iahmad to discuss the best options.
[12:37] <nik90> jibel, cool
[12:37] <nik90> thnx
[12:37] <jibel> nik90, I saw other apps store the test suite in a checkbox job format in trunk
[12:37] <nik90> jibel, Yes, I did that with clock app. That's an option too.
[12:37] <jibel> nik90, it's easy to share the test suites and process them automatically this way
[12:38] <nik90> I wasn't sure what the state of checkbox was and if it was continued to be used.
[12:38] <jibel> it's also very easy to review a diff and check if the tests have been updated accroding to the changes
[12:39] <nik90> jibel, Do you want to convert these tests into the checkbox format? Or you want to check with iahmad first?
[12:40] <jibel> nik90, lets talk to iahmad first before generating unnecessary work.
[12:40] <nik90> ack.
[12:40]  * sil2100 had a pipe malfunction at home
[12:41] <sil2100> Just finished fixing it up, was away in the last ~1 hour, eh
[13:44] <boiko> robru: hi, britney failed on silo 57, where can I get logs to see what happened?
[14:00] <jibel> boiko, in bileto there are 2 links to excuses. one for vivid and one for xenial
[14:01] <jibel> boiko, you click on the link and it'll show what failed with links to the log and the test artifacts
[14:02] <boiko> jibel: great! thanks!
[14:22] <boiko> trainguards: hi, we have britney failing on silo 57, and after checking the logs, it is a unity8 test not related to telephony-service (confirmed with mzanetti), how can we proceed now?
[14:26] <sil2100> boiko: why is this test failing? Is it a known failure with the unity8 team?
[14:27] <boiko> sil2100: mzanetti told me it only happens on britney, and that they are on it already
[14:27] <boiko> sil2100: and he confirmed it has nothing to do with the telephony-service changes
[14:27] <mzanetti> sil2100, yeah... issue on our end
[14:27] <sil2100> boiko: I suppose in this case you could request a manual override to the QA queue - but that would be jibel as the decision-maker
[14:27] <sil2100> mzanetti: ok
[14:28] <boiko> jibel: could you please take a look?
[14:34] <jibel> boiko, I can force it but it'll block again when it's in xenial proposed
[14:34] <jibel> I cannot for it indefinitely
[14:34] <boiko> mzanetti: just curious, any ETA on a fix for this? (just to check if we can wait for it)
[14:35] <mzanetti> boiko, I'll find out in a minute
[14:35] <boiko> jibel: let's wait for mzanetti's feedback on this then
[14:56] <mzanetti> boiko, you probably don't want to wait
[14:56] <mzanetti> jibel, ^
[14:56] <boiko> :/
[14:56] <mzanetti> yeah, sorry... one of them is really weird and we're still a bit lost
[14:56] <mzanetti> so while we might solve ti soon, I can't promis it
[15:47] <Saviq> sil2100, in case you missed: <Saviq> sil2100, hey, how're we on deadlines? OTA10 snapshotted yet? are we opening xenial overlay?
[15:48] <sil2100> Saviq: hey! Yes, OTA-10 has been more-or-less snapshotted (need to copy over the new langpacks) and copied to rc
[15:48] <sil2100> Saviq: the images are in BQs hands
[15:48] <sil2100> So we're on schedule so far
[15:49] <sil2100> As for xenial overlay... I would say yes, but will make sure everyone is ok with that and then we switch
[15:49]  * Saviq just wonders when does it make sense to put up the next unity8 silo... "ready to test" QA queue looks significant, I assume because of OTA10 and 16.04
[15:54] <jibel> Saviq, we are still testing OTA10 and most of the testers are on holidays (national holiday)
[15:54] <jibel> we'll catch up with the queue starting from tomorrow
[15:56] <Saviq> jibel, ack, nothing pressing... /me just learned we already have 25+ branches to land in unity8 :P
[15:56] <jibel> Saviq, oh, mega silo 41 didn't teach you anything right?
[15:56] <jibel> ;)
[15:57] <Saviq> jibel, what was wrong with that?
[15:57] <jibel> it's a PITA to land
[15:57] <Saviq> jibel, if we tried to split it in 4-5 by "feature", it'd be a bigger PITA IMO
[15:58] <Saviq> it wouldn't have helped locating the deadlock much
[15:58] <Saviq> and then we'd be backed up even more
[15:58] <Saviq> we just need to reduce the code churn :P
[16:02] <robru> Mirv: yes, all vivid landings now point at overlay (and dual always was vivid->overlay) so there's no longer any need to specify overlay.
[16:03] <Trevinho> sil2100: ehy, so can you publish https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1153 please? :)
[16:05] <Mirv> robru: ah, well then it makes sense, but the text "Warning: Are you sure you want to publish an SRU?" should be removed
[16:05] <robru> Mirv: oh, heh, oops. ok I'll drop that
[16:06] <Mirv> robru: and "QA Signoff" should be Required instead of forced N/A
[16:06] <Mirv> robru: thanks
[16:11] <robru> Mirv: ok, fixes in production, give it a check over
[16:33] <sil2100> Trevinho: on it now! :)
[16:35] <sil2100> Trevinho: published - sorry it took so long, touch preempted me always ;)
[16:35] <Trevinho> Laney: ^ oh :)
[16:35] <sil2100> It's +1'ed
[16:35] <sil2100> It's all good
[16:35] <sil2100> Ok, not all good
[16:35] <sil2100> https://code.launchpad.net/~albertsmuktupavels/compiz/gwd-fix-tests/+merge/289535 <- needs review ;)
[16:35] <sil2100> Trevinho: could you get that approved ^?
[16:36] <Trevinho> sil2100: oh, sorry... I thought I had
[16:36] <Trevinho> sil2100: done
[16:41] <sil2100> Trevinho: published o/
[16:42] <Trevinho> sil2100: thanksss
[16:49] <bschaefer> hello, so im interested in getting a package/ppa pushed back to vivid + overlay. I have a ppa with it built (against the vivid + overlay ppa): https://launchpad.net/~brandontschaefer/+archive/ubuntu/capnproto
[16:50] <bschaefer> need a newer capnproto since the older one 0.4.0 is missing some functionality
[16:57] <sil2100> bschaefer: is it required by our stable touch products?
[16:57] <bschaefer> sil2100, it will be required for mir
[16:57] <bschaefer> (branches are blocked on this the older version no having the correct functionality)
[16:58]  * bschaefer is having hard time with english it appears
[16:58] <sil2100> bschaefer: ok, so let's think about getting it in then - prepare a silo for its inclusion, I'll check the packages in your PPA and upload them there (either by source copy or manual dput)
[16:59] <bschaefer> sil2100, awesome thanks! Also who would i poke to get a silo :)
[16:59] <sil2100> bschaefer: I think you should have the right permissions to do so :)
[16:59] <bschaefer> o right
[16:59] <sil2100> http://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/
[16:59] <bschaefer> yup, thanks
[16:59] <sil2100> Go here and try filling one in (after logging in) - and then assigning
[17:00] <bschaefer> cool let me see if i remember how to do all of it :).
[17:00] <bschaefer> sil2100, the on concern with this ppa is libunity-scopes depends on libcapnproto
[17:00] <bschaefer> annnd IIRC it had some issues with the newer capnproto
[17:02] <bschaefer> sil2100, also...theres no MP ... soo not sure what to put there :)
[17:04]  * bschaefer digs around wiki
[17:07] <bschaefer> sil2100, soo it looks like you've to directly upload my ppa to this silo :): https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1218
[17:07] <bschaefer> it got silo https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-003
[17:10] <robru> bschaefer: I can do that, one sec
[17:11] <bschaefer> robru, thanks!
[17:12] <robru> bschaefer: oh, where's your ppa?
[17:12] <bschaefer> https://launchpad.net/~brandontschaefer/+archive/ubuntu/capnproto
[17:12] <bschaefer> err
[17:12] <bschaefer> o i guess thats right
[17:13]  * bschaefer thought the url would be different linking to a ppa from my account :)
[17:13] <Mirv> robru: looks good now, both aspects, thanks!
[17:13] <robru> Mirv: you're welcome
[17:13] <robru> bschaefer: ok copy done, the ticket should reflect the status in about ~15 (also it needs time to rebuild anyway)
[17:14] <bschaefer> robru, sweet thanks!
[17:14] <robru> bschaefer: you're welcome
[17:23] <sil2100> robru, slangasek: I need to go AFK in around ~1 hour, not sure if I'll be around for the meeting
[17:23] <robru> slangasek: sil2100: not much new on my end, propose we just cancel?
[18:02] <slangasek> sil2100, robru: would prefer a quick sync if you guys are available - can be short and sil2100 can go afk :)
[18:03] <robru> slangasek: ok I'm in the hangout
[18:04] <robru> slangasek: hmm I see you joined the chat but I can't see or hear you