knome | zequence, requested the main branch to be reviewed and pushed to your WP installation, so you should have it when IS has done their thing | 09:32 |
---|---|---|
krytarik | Since we are apparently touching the seeds/meta still anyway, we should consider replicating this as well: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/ubuntu-seeds/xubuntu.xenial/revision/997 | 13:18 |
=== luisbg` is now known as luisbg | ||
snapfractalpop | Will the vanilla switch to mir affect ubuntu studio 16.04 in any way? | 14:37 |
OvenWerks | snapfractalpop: Studio is still using x | 14:48 |
OvenWerks | my wife has been running xubuntu 16.04 for a few months now without trouble. | 14:50 |
snapfractalpop | that's good to hear | 14:50 |
snapfractalpop | thanks for the response | 14:50 |
sakrecoer | is it -default-settings that is responsible for setting whoch programs open what file types by default? | 15:23 |
sakrecoer | s/whoch/which | 15:23 |
krytarik | Yep. | 15:23 |
sakrecoer | we might have to have a look at them, it seems firefox wants to show files in kid3 instead of thunar. audio files also open in kid3 from desktop | 15:24 |
sakrecoer | instead of parole | 15:24 |
krytarik | Well, look at my last commit there. | 15:26 |
sakrecoer | krytarik: have i told you i love you lately? :) | 15:28 |
sakrecoer | i was looking at how to put the dekstop settings in the config files yesterday, and noticed the settings for lightdm are put in /etc/lightdm/lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf, that file is not in -default-settings branch in launchpad, does that mean it has to be added there? or is it set somewhere else? | 15:34 |
krytarik | Yep. | 15:34 |
sakrecoer | thanks krytarik ! i'll wait for zequence aproval before i do anything tho :) | 15:35 |
krytarik | sakrecoer: Like here: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/xubuntu-default-settings/trunk/files/head:/usr/share/lightdm/lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf.d/ | 15:38 |
krytarik | And I'd certainly +1 doing so. | 15:38 |
sakrecoer | should it also be named like that, with a priority number? | 15:40 |
sakrecoer | and yeah, even if the color theme is not approved by zequence, we should at least set Noto in there... | 15:40 |
krytarik | sakrecoer: Btw, regarding the NOX theme, this still seems to be true, i.e. no GTK+ 3 support: http://crunchbang.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=26192 - Numix looks like a viable alternative though, and might indeed both fit the Studio style better, and distinguish it more from Xubuntu. | 16:07 |
sakrecoer | krytarik: right, that would explain why NOX isn't affecting pavu controls... | 16:09 |
sakrecoer | new version of fontforge today also! its release party everywhere! :D | 16:10 |
sakrecoer | i wonder why debian is still developping that old 2012 version.. i got absolutely no response when i adressed the fonts guys mailing list | 16:12 |
sakrecoer | and that list was so full of spambots and automated emails that i unsubed after a month.. | 16:14 |
OvenWerks | sakrecoer: that would be a general indication that there are no fonts guys left. | 16:16 |
sakrecoer | OvenWerks: well, from to time, they would discuss things, so it wasn't a dead list | 16:17 |
OvenWerks | ah. | 16:17 |
sakrecoer | and i would see fixes being pushed for fontforge, but that old version. | 16:17 |
sakrecoer | and the fontforge guys have made such a beautyfull doc, but of course, it is made for later version | 16:17 |
sakrecoer | the numix available is a bright theme... | 16:28 |
sakrecoer | sort of abright and dark... | 16:29 |
sakrecoer | just a few elements are dark in numix. | 16:32 |
sakrecoer | well... seems like there goes darkness | 16:36 |
krytarik | sakrecoer: Since you mention availability, I forgot to mention that NOX isn't even in the repos, but figured it doesn't matter anyway. | 18:16 |
sakrecoer | krytarik: "NOX isn't even in the repos" what does that mean? i used what i found after a fresh install of the latest US xenial build... | 19:35 |
zequence | sakrecoer: Right, we should look at the lightdm stuff as well | 21:28 |
zequence | Also the plymoth theme | 21:30 |
zequence | sakrecoer: To find out which package a file belongs to, do: dpkg -S /path/to/file | 21:32 |
zequence | Only works on system wide files, of course - not stuff in home | 21:32 |
zequence | Also, if you ever want to see the list of packages we have, I put together a nice comprehensive list here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/UbuntuStudioPackages | 21:32 |
zequence | The link is at the bottom part of the sidebar | 21:32 |
krytarik | And I have linked to the manifest before: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/dvd/current/xenial-dvd-amd64.manifest | 21:48 |
zequence | krytarik: my list only shows our own original source, to be clear | 21:49 |
krytarik | Yep, I see. | 21:50 |
knome | apt-cache search ubuntustudio | 21:50 |
* knome hides | 21:50 | |
sakrecoer | ok, thanks guys! krytarik, can you please clarify for me that nox and repo thing? | 21:53 |
sakrecoer | knome: probably because atm i am on 14.04 but "E: Invalid operation ubuntustudio" | 21:54 |
sakrecoer | first time i see that manifest, must have past me by, or been posted in offtopic :D however, i see NOX isnät there but numix is... so where did i get nox from? | 21:55 |
knome | sakrecoer, with apt-cache? | 21:58 |
krytarik | sakrecoer: No, wasn't in -offtopic. And I simply meant it as I said it - didn't find it in the repos on a quick search. | 21:59 |
sakrecoer | knome: yes, with apt-cache and also sudo .. | 22:08 |
knome | sakrecoer, are you sure? | 22:09 |
knome | krytarik, tell him he's lunatic | 22:09 |
zequence | Is that someone who loves the moon? | 22:09 |
knome | could be | 22:09 |
sakrecoer | ok, i'm a lunatic moron who forgot to type "search" | 22:10 |
knome | indeed :P | 22:10 |
sakrecoer | zequence: no, it is someone who follows the cycles of the mon | 22:11 |
sakrecoer | moon | 22:11 |
sakrecoer | =not always in its full mind | 22:11 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!