[09:32] <knome> zequence, requested the main branch to be reviewed and pushed to your WP installation, so you should have it when IS has done their thing
[13:18] <krytarik> Since we are apparently touching the seeds/meta still anyway, we should consider replicating this as well: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/ubuntu-seeds/xubuntu.xenial/revision/997
[14:37] <snapfractalpop> Will the vanilla switch to mir affect ubuntu studio 16.04 in any way?
[14:48] <OvenWerks> snapfractalpop: Studio is still using x
[14:50] <OvenWerks> my wife has been running xubuntu 16.04 for a few months now without trouble.
[14:50] <snapfractalpop> that's good to hear
[14:50] <snapfractalpop> thanks for the response
[15:23] <sakrecoer> is it -default-settings that is responsible for setting whoch programs open what file types by default?
[15:23] <sakrecoer> s/whoch/which
[15:23] <krytarik> Yep.
[15:24] <sakrecoer> we might have to have a look at them, it seems firefox wants to show files in kid3 instead of thunar. audio files also open in kid3 from desktop
[15:24] <sakrecoer> instead of parole
[15:26] <krytarik> Well, look at my last commit there.
[15:28] <sakrecoer> krytarik: have i told you  i love you lately? :)
[15:34] <sakrecoer> i was looking at how to put the dekstop settings in the config files yesterday, and noticed the settings for lightdm are put in /etc/lightdm/lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf, that file is not in -default-settings branch in launchpad, does that mean it has to be added there? or is it set somewhere else?
[15:34] <krytarik> Yep.
[15:35] <sakrecoer> thanks krytarik ! i'll wait for zequence aproval before i do anything tho :)
[15:38] <krytarik> sakrecoer: Like here: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/xubuntu-default-settings/trunk/files/head:/usr/share/lightdm/lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf.d/
[15:38] <krytarik> And I'd certainly +1 doing so.
[15:40] <sakrecoer> should it also be named like that, with a priority number?
[15:40] <sakrecoer> and yeah, even if the color theme is not approved by zequence, we should at least set Noto in there...
[16:07] <krytarik> sakrecoer: Btw, regarding the NOX theme, this still seems to be true, i.e. no GTK+ 3 support: http://crunchbang.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=26192 - Numix looks like a viable alternative though, and might indeed both fit the Studio style better, and distinguish it more from Xubuntu.
[16:09] <sakrecoer> krytarik: right, that would explain why NOX isn't affecting pavu controls...
[16:10] <sakrecoer> new version of fontforge today also! its release party everywhere! :D
[16:12] <sakrecoer> i wonder why debian is still developping that old 2012 version.. i got absolutely no response when i adressed the fonts guys mailing list
[16:14] <sakrecoer> and that list was so full of spambots and automated emails that i unsubed after a month..
[16:16] <OvenWerks> sakrecoer: that would be a general indication that there are no fonts guys left.
[16:17] <sakrecoer> OvenWerks: well, from to time, they would discuss things, so it wasn't a dead list
[16:17] <OvenWerks> ah.
[16:17] <sakrecoer> and i would see fixes being pushed for fontforge, but that old version.
[16:17] <sakrecoer> and the fontforge guys have made such a beautyfull doc, but of course, it is made for later version
[16:28] <sakrecoer> the numix available is a bright theme...
[16:29] <sakrecoer> sort of abright and dark...
[16:32] <sakrecoer> just a few elements are dark in numix.
[16:36] <sakrecoer> well... seems like there goes darkness
[18:16] <krytarik> sakrecoer: Since you mention availability, I forgot to mention that NOX isn't even in the repos, but figured it doesn't matter anyway.
[19:35] <sakrecoer> krytarik: "NOX isn't even in the repos" what does that mean? i used what i found after a fresh install of the latest US xenial build...
[21:28] <zequence> sakrecoer: Right, we should look at the lightdm stuff as well
[21:30] <zequence> Also the plymoth theme
[21:32] <zequence> sakrecoer: To find out which package a file belongs to, do: dpkg -S /path/to/file
[21:32] <zequence> Only works on system wide files, of course - not stuff in home
[21:32] <zequence> Also, if you ever want to see the list of packages we have, I put together a nice comprehensive list here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/UbuntuStudioPackages
[21:32] <zequence> The link is at the bottom part of the sidebar
[21:48] <krytarik> And I have linked to the manifest before: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/dvd/current/xenial-dvd-amd64.manifest
[21:49] <zequence> krytarik: my list only shows our own original source, to be clear
[21:50] <krytarik> Yep, I see.
[21:50] <knome> apt-cache search ubuntustudio
[21:50]  * knome hides
[21:53] <sakrecoer> ok, thanks guys! krytarik, can you please clarify for me that nox and repo thing? 
[21:54] <sakrecoer> knome: probably because atm i am on 14.04 but "E: Invalid operation ubuntustudio"
[21:55] <sakrecoer> first time i see that manifest, must have past me by, or been posted in offtopic :D however, i see NOX isnät there but numix is... so where did i get nox from?
[21:58] <knome> sakrecoer, with apt-cache?
[21:59] <krytarik> sakrecoer: No, wasn't in -offtopic.  And I simply meant it as I said it - didn't find it in the repos on a quick search.
[22:08] <sakrecoer> knome: yes, with apt-cache and also sudo ..
[22:09] <knome> sakrecoer, are you sure?
[22:09] <knome> krytarik, tell him he's lunatic
[22:09] <zequence> Is that someone who loves the moon?
[22:09] <knome> could be
[22:10] <sakrecoer> ok, i'm a lunatic moron who forgot to type "search"
[22:10] <knome> indeed :P
[22:11] <sakrecoer> zequence: no, it is someone who follows the cycles of the mon
[22:11] <sakrecoer> moon
[22:11] <sakrecoer> =not always in its full mind