[00:19] <pleia2> knome: sorry, been sick, I'll post and try to review
[03:04] <bluesabre> knome: typos in the window manager keyboard shortcuts, had horizontal and vertical reversed... fixed
[03:33] <bluesabre> knome: screenshots don't work too well with keyboard shortcut posts, but I put together a demo video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCfZ8XPDPOk -- its taking forever to process, and I'm going to bed, but here's the link at least :)
[03:35] <bluesabre> nighty all
[03:36] <Unit193> G'nighty.
[06:31] <flocculant> bluesabre: yes - must say I was surprised ... 
[08:47] <knome> pleia2, np :)
[08:47] <knome> bluesabre, lol, k
[09:48] <knome> pleia2, we also have the status tracker article mostly ready since september; i tweaked it a bit now and am fine with publishing it too after a quick review from somebody
[12:24] <knome> dkessel, Unit193: the plugin tells me you both have one submissions left unvoted
[12:24] <knome> flocculant, ^ and you have 2
[12:25] <knome> if this is intentional, dismiss
[12:25] <Unit193> You sure?
[12:25] <knome> of course it might be a bug too, but that's what i'm seeing here
[15:22] <knome> jjfrv8, hey! what's the state of th xfce power manager settings 1.4.4 docs?
[15:23] <knome> bluesabre, do we have a shortlist of the xubuntu-related packages that need appstream updating?
[15:39] <jjfrv8> knome, xfpm is just waiting for review.
[15:40] <jjfrv8> knome, I don't seem to be able to vote on the contest site.
[15:42] <knome> jjfrv8, when you logged in, did you allow it to see that you're on ~xubuntu-team ?
[15:43] <jjfrv8> what do you mean "allow it to see"?
[15:44] <knome> when you log in, you should see the ubuntu one confirmation screen that tells you the site is requiring some information
[15:44] <knome> from that list you need to check the checkbox next to xubuntu-team
[15:44] <jjfrv8> oic, the checkbox.
[15:45] <knome> :)
[15:45] <jjfrv8> ok, I'll try to complete my votes later this evening.
[15:45] <knome> no hurry :)
[15:46] <knome> by wednesday midnight i mean the midnight after wednesday
[15:46] <knome> i think the midnight deadline is always a bit ambiguous
[18:19] <knome> https://xubuntu.org/news/my-media-manager-gmusicbrowser/ is published
[18:20] <pleia2> g+ and fb done
[20:09] <Unit193> mhall119: Thanks for the email, dropped it to the rest of the core team.
[20:09] <mhall119> thanks
[20:09] <mhall119> pleia2: did you tell me that Xubuntu is going to use Gnome Software?
[20:10] <Unit193> Already is.
[20:10] <knome> yep, and should be for the release too
[20:10] <knome> unless it blows up in 1000 little pieces
[20:10] <mhall119> cool, thanks
[20:10] <Unit193> We're not thrilled with it, but there it is.
[20:11] <knome> we weren't thrilled with USC either, but there it was ;)
[20:11] <mhall119> Unit193: it's faster than USC was at least :)
[20:11] <Unit193> mhall119: It just can't find things well. :P
[20:11] <Unit193> knome: Truth
[20:11] <mhall119> no?
[20:11] <knome> mhall119, nope.
[20:12] <Unit193> mhall119: It's designed to only find graphical programs, can be a bit of a pain.
[20:12] <knome> mhall119, try to install a library!
[20:12] <mhall119> oh, well USC had the same problem didn't it? being application-centric
[20:12] <knome> unfortunately
[20:13] <Unit193> Pretty sure you could find screen in it though, no?
[20:13] <mhall119> but using Gnome Software from the archives means you get the Snappy Store automatically too
[20:15] <flocculant> mhall119: it leaves dependencies behind too
[20:16] <mhall119> flocculant: ?
[20:16] <mhall119> Gnome Software does?
[20:16] <flocculant> yup
[20:16] <flocculant> unless it's been fixed - pretty sure not - or not read that in changelog
[20:17] <flocculant> as far as usc not seeing the same things as g-s > https://launchpadlibrarian.net/249956293/missing%20package.png
[20:17] <flocculant> I guess not the case for everything 
[20:18] <flocculant> bug 1552792 for dependencies
[20:18] <mhall119> yeah, I think usc would find non-app packages during a search, but not browsing
[20:18] <mhall119> but GS is built around the AppStream spec, which is application only
[20:19] <flocculant> wouldn't be able to give a definitive answer - didn't much like USC either :)
[20:19] <flocculant> yea I understand that - pretty much a case of making sure everyone knows that if they want to be able to install anything from the repos then g-s isn't the tool for them ;)
[20:22] <flocculant> works for most people - like USC did - I would expect 
[20:22] <Unit193> Exactly, I can't comment on it too much as I like apt, a lot.
[20:23] <flocculant> yup
[20:23] <flocculant> well I tend to use ye olde worlde synaptic a lot 
[21:25] <flocculant> bluesabre: I guess that this late - the best we're going to be able to do with thunar is make sure as many of the real issues are properly highlighted in the notes
[21:25] <flocculant> and sru/backport fixes when they eventually surface
[21:27] <flocculant> rc next week
[21:27] <knome> rollercoaster
[21:27] <flocculant> yea
[21:27] <knome> and hello!
[21:28] <flocculant> bluesabre: so unless I hear different I'll get that rolling before next week
[21:28] <flocculant> knome: hi and night ... 
[21:28] <knome> ha, nighty :)
[23:05] <bluesabre> knome: packages that have appstream errors are:
[23:06] <bluesabre> http://appstream.ubuntu.com/xenial/universe/issues/xfce4-settings.html
[23:06] <bluesabre> http://appstream.ubuntu.com/xenial/universe/issues/xfce4-notifyd.html
[23:06] <bluesabre> http://appstream.ubuntu.com/xenial/universe/issues/libxfce4ui-utils.html
[23:06] <bluesabre> http://appstream.ubuntu.com/xenial/universe/issues/xfce4-power-manager-data.html
[23:06] <bluesabre> from http://appstream.ubuntu.com/xenial/universe/issues/
[23:07] <Unit193> \o/
[23:07] <bluesabre> "icon-not-found" errors are usually because there is no 64px or higher icon in the package or humanity icon theme
[23:16] <knome> night everybody
[23:59] <jjfrv8> knome, my wallpaper votes are in.