| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| jin_ | rvr, Hello mate, | 06:44 |
|---|---|---|
| jin_ | rvr, I just created a task into CI-Train | 06:45 |
| jin_ | as ticket: 1222 | 06:45 |
| jin_ | jibel, ping | 07:50 |
| jin_ | jibel, I just created a task by CI but I found nothing shown on your dash-board, | 07:51 |
| jin_ | tihs one -> https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1222 | 07:51 |
| jin_ | I am the lander and get it approved already, need your help on signing it off :) | 07:51 |
| jibel | jin_, Hi | 08:03 |
| jibel | jin_, it's because it's a click package, the QA status must be set manually to ready | 08:03 |
| jibel | jin_, I just did it, it'll appears on the board soon | 08:03 |
| jin_ | jibel, ok, i got you | 08:03 |
| jin_ | jibel, really thanks for your help.. :) | 08:04 |
| jin_ | i will check the status there (the dashboard) | 08:04 |
| jibel | jin_, telegram 2.0.10.0 is just an update of the import to fix the mixed import issue with sdk 1.3? | 08:27 |
| jin_ | jibel, yes, we schedule this update which is related to "Palette apparent" only | 08:28 |
| jibel | jin_, okay, it should land today | 08:28 |
| jin_ | because it comes a huge modification - converged UI we want it to be verified from Victor | 08:28 |
| jin_ | jin_, okay | 08:29 |
| jin_ | jibel, okay | 08:30 |
| jin_ | jibel, and.. I just saw you indicated it with "Fast track", | 08:30 |
| jin_ | if you guys get it verified, just ping me directly so that I can schedule the rest (publish to store) | 08:31 |
| popey | jibel: davmor2 https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1223 weather app for QA. | 09:25 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| jibel | popey, I'm trying the new weather app, does openweather works for you? it doesn't on current and new app for me | 10:55 |
| popey | jibel: it can be flaky | 11:06 |
| popey | ahayzen: 11:55 < jibel> popey, I'm trying the new weather app, does openweather works for you? it doesn't on current and new app for me | 11:07 |
| ahayzen | uhoh ... popey do you have the keys? | 11:07 |
| ahayzen | and sometimes their servers go down :-( | 11:08 |
| popey | a857 are the first 4 digits of the key in keys.js | 11:08 |
| popey | on my phone using the click I gave jibel | 11:08 |
| popey | (so yes, the key is in place) | 11:09 |
| ahayzen | yeah i think that's right | 11:09 |
| ahayzen | does it work for you? | 11:10 |
| popey | no | 11:10 |
| ahayzen | yeah i get "Network error" | 11:10 |
| popey | same | 11:10 |
| popey | qml: wrong response http code, got 429 / | 11:11 |
| popey | url works on desktop | 11:11 |
| popey | 429 is 'too many requests' | 11:12 |
| ahayzen | ugh | 11:12 |
| ahayzen | have we hit some kind of limit with our key? | 11:12 |
| popey | over use of the api key? | 11:12 |
| ahayzen | popey, didn't we get ours unlimited or did that not happen? (obviously it hasn't) | 11:13 |
| popey | https://community.openhab.org/t/openweathermap-binding-and-http-error-429/7822 | 11:13 |
| popey | maybe not that | 11:13 |
| popey | might just be too many requests from the client at once | 11:13 |
| popey | (either way, for jibel purposes, not a regression) | 11:13 |
| popey | "This does not happen, when trying to use DEBUG or TRACE inside the weather binding. The problem can be avoided (partly) by defining different time schedules for the two locations -- than a 429 error happens only, when the two locations are refreshed at the same time (common multiple of the schedules)." | 11:13 |
| ahayzen | :-/ | 11:14 |
| popey | I'll file a bug | 11:15 |
| popey | thanks jibel | 11:15 |
| popey | works now :) | 11:15 |
| popey | highly intermittent | 11:15 |
| popey | so yeah, we probably could do something to mitigate, but looks like an issue their end | 11:16 |
| popey | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-weather-app/+bug/1566794 ahayzen jibel | 11:19 |
| ubot5` | Launchpad bug 1566794 in Ubuntu Weather App "Error 429 "Network Error" on openweathermap" [Undecided,New] | 11:19 |
| ahayzen | thanks popey | 11:20 |
| jibel | popey, thanks | 11:20 |
| bzoltan | jibel: I have top approved the silo50 MRs | 11:22 |
| jibel | bzoltan, thanks | 11:23 |
| jibel | bzoltan, do you have a changelog? | 11:23 |
| Mirv | jibel: bzoltan: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-050/+sourcepub/6280695/+listing-archive-extra | 11:26 |
| bzoltan | Mirv: jibel: more high level - http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bzoltan/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/OTA10-landing-2016-03-10/files/head:/debian/ | 11:26 |
| jibel | Mirv, that's good, I didn't know about this. | 11:27 |
| jibel | thanks | 11:28 |
| jibel | popey, what does "Force app into sidestage when on tablets" exactly means? I tried on a tablet and it doesn't open in side stage | 11:28 |
| popey | uh, it should | 11:29 |
| popey | I don't have a tablet | 11:29 |
| popey | has something changed in sidestage behaviour? | 11:29 |
| popey | X-Ubuntu-StageHint=SideStage | 11:30 |
| popey | that's set in the desktop file | 11:30 |
| jibel | Saviq, do you know? ^ | 11:30 |
| jibel | did it change with recent landing of unity8? | 11:30 |
| ahayzen | popey, i think also, in converged mode without it was causing the whole shell to be rotated :') | 11:31 |
| jibel | ahayzen, true | 11:31 |
| jibel | and it doesn't happen with the new version | 11:31 |
| ahayzen | think that was the bug davmor showed me originally | 11:31 |
| jibel | ahayzen, popey apart from this side stage issue, everything else is fine. | 11:34 |
| ahayzen | \o/ | 11:35 |
| jibel | and openweathermap that I couldn't verify | 11:35 |
| jibel | ahayzen, popey wat do you want to do, land it or wait until you figure out what's going on with side stage? | 11:36 |
| jibel | what* | 11:36 |
| ahayzen | jibel, what currently happens on a tablet when it is in 'tablet' mode...and then in 'convergence' mode ? | 11:36 |
| ahayzen | 'currently' as in the version you are testing | 11:37 |
| jibel | in staged mode it opens full screen, in windowed mode, it opens in the current window | 11:38 |
| jibel | ahayzen, ^ | 11:38 |
| popey | this seems like a platform bug? | 11:38 |
| popey | what does clock do? | 11:38 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| popey | hm, clock doesn't have sidestage, bad example | 11:38 |
| ahayzen | jibel, also in landscape does everything remain in the correct orientation when in (non)converged mode ? | 11:39 |
| popey | sudoku and dropping letters do | 11:39 |
| ahayzen | hmm system-settings? | 11:39 |
| jibel | popey, ahayzen correction, in windowed mode it opens in a new window | 11:40 |
| jibel | behaviour is the same for the clock | 11:40 |
| ahayzen | hmm, we should probably check with the unity8 guys if that haven't changed that sidestage hint | 11:40 |
| jibel | ahayzen, yes orientation is fine | 11:40 |
| ahayzen | otherwise i'm cool to land, but really it should go into the sidestage | 11:41 |
| ahayzen | ok thanks jibel :-) | 11:41 |
| popey | just tested it on my nexus 7 2013 running stable and it loads in sidestage | 11:41 |
| popey | so something has changed in the platform | 11:42 |
| jibel | popey, ahayzen okay, lets wait for Saviq then decide | 11:42 |
| jibel | overall it's an improvement over current version, so I'm fine landing it and do a subsequent landing for side stage | 11:42 |
| popey | http://imgur.com/a/mvnQn | 11:42 |
| * popey hugs marvin | 11:42 | |
| ahayzen | popey, you need a marvin IRC bot :-) | 11:43 |
| popey | heh | 11:43 |
| popey | also need to bypass or fake the location prompt :( | 11:43 |
| ahayzen | hah | 11:43 |
| ahayzen | join the autopilot problems :-) | 11:43 |
| popey | :) | 11:44 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| jibel | Mirv, bzoltan can you add a canonical-devices-system-image task to all the bugs fixed by silo 50 if it is not already done | 12:17 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| Mirv | jibel: bzoltan: yes I'll do it | 12:24 |
| bzoltan | Mirv: thank you | 12:24 |
| jibel | Mirv, thank you | 12:24 |
| Saviq | jibel, popey, ahayzen, by design no app starts in side stage on its own any more | 12:32 |
| ahayzen | ugh | 12:33 |
| ahayzen | so now we get the clock and weather app fullscreen on a 10" display? :') | 12:33 |
| Saviq | needs to be manually put there (and then we remember) | 12:33 |
| Saviq | ahayzen, yeah, one thing I had in mind is take the app's {min,max}{Height,Width} into account and decide based on that | 12:34 |
| Saviq | ahayzen, care to file a bug against unity8 and ubuntu-ux? | 12:34 |
| popey | ugh | 12:34 |
| ahayzen | popey, i guess we should implement convergence designs :-) | 12:35 |
| ahayzen | Saviq, sure, stating that if an app has set a min/max height/width it should in certain cases decide to start the app in the sidestage? | 12:35 |
| Saviq | ahayzen, stating the problem (with screenshots, ideally) and a proposed solution, yeah | 12:37 |
| ahayzen | Saviq, i don't have a device :-/ ... popey ? | 12:37 |
| jibel | ahayzen, I think it's good to land the new weather app then? | 12:38 |
| ahayzen | jibel, yeah i think so, popey gets the final decision :-) | 12:38 |
| popey | +1 from me. | 12:39 |
| jibel | popey, ^ land or not? | 12:39 |
| jibel | great | 12:39 |
| jibel | approved | 12:39 |
| popey | thanks | 12:39 |
| popey | uploaded | 12:40 |
| popey | published | 12:40 |
| ahayzen | \o/ thanks jibel popey :-) | 12:43 |
| popey | Yes, thanks chaps! | 12:44 |
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| * sil2100 changes location | 14:12 | |
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| Saviq | robru, hey, any idea what happened here https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-013-1-build/56/console | 18:05 |
| Saviq | +N debian/gles-patches/series | 18:05 |
| Saviq | No series file found | 18:05 |
| Saviq | ¿? | 18:05 |
| Saviq | any chance PWD isn't what I expect it to be? | 18:06 |
| robru | Saviq: $PWD is the bzr branch root | 18:08 |
| robru | Saviq: you didn't export $QUILT_PATCHES | 18:08 |
| Saviq | ah | 18:08 |
| robru | Saviq: why aren't you using my branch? I fixed that already | 18:08 |
| Saviq | robru, looks like you didn't push, then ;) | 18:09 |
| Saviq | robru, it's a branch on top of yours actually | 18:09 |
| Saviq | in a subsequent silo | 18:09 |
| robru | Saviq: bruh https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1221 branch pushed and built successfully | 18:09 |
| Saviq | robru, hrm | 18:10 |
| Saviq | ah I know what I did :9 | 18:10 |
| Saviq | robru, as you were | 18:11 |
| robru | Saviq: let me guess, you based it on my non-quilt branch and didn't see my new quilt branch based on your quilt branch? | 18:11 |
| Saviq | robru, no, I had a checkout here already and didn't pull your branch that's on top of my branch | 18:13 |
| Saviq | robru, must say the temporary citrain user looks *really* weird :P | 18:18 |
| Saviq | but I ♥ the new build speed ;) | 18:18 |
| robru | Saviq: yeah I'll probably hide the details of the temporary user, just left it in for now since it's so new & experimental, wanted to see it all working | 18:20 |
| robru | Saviq: thanks though, and this isn't even parallelized, just no build deps. in a few months the parallelization stuff will land and it'll be even faster | 18:20 |
| Saviq | whaaa | 18:26 |
| Saviq | robru, can you please have a look: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-013 | 18:27 |
| Saviq | did LP just explode? | 18:27 |
| robru | Saviq: it does look goofy without the buildlogs | 18:31 |
| robru | Saviq: I'll try retrying everything and if that doesnt fix it we should escalate to colin | 18:31 |
| Saviq | robru, tx | 18:32 |
| Saviq | robru, doesn't seem to help | 18:32 |
| Saviq | cjwatson, any idea what happened here https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-013/+packages | 18:33 |
| Saviq | all builds failed without buildlogs or any other visible reason | 18:33 |
| robru | Saviq: yeah those failures are quick. too quick to have even created a chroot. something's definitely wrong with the infra. | 18:35 |
| robru | cjwatson: ^ | 18:35 |
| === nuclearbob is now known as nuclearbob_afk | ||
| jhodapp | robru, I see that there's still 2 pending armhf builds for vivid and xenial for https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1225 so does that mean the "Failed to build" status is still an old status? | 20:00 |
| robru | jhodapp: no, once one arch fails, the whole thing is considered to be a failure (unless it's an arch that has *never* succeeded) | 20:09 |
| jhodapp | robru, I couldn't find the log of what failed though | 20:09 |
| robru | jhodapp: right, the buildlog is missing, Saviq also noticed this earlier today | 20:10 |
| robru | wgrant: cjwatson ^ | 20:10 |
| jhodapp | robru, ok great, so I'm not going insane :) | 20:10 |
| robru | jhodapp: must be an infra issue, needs LP people to look at the ppa builders. | 20:11 |
| jhodapp | robru, alright...I'm off on holiday starting tomorrow but I've got koza looking after this landing for me after today | 20:12 |
| dobey | what's the plan going forward for dual/multi-landing, considering pending xenial archive closure, y-series opening, and our still being based on 15.04? | 20:34 |
| dobey | (or did i miss a mail about it?) | 20:34 |
| === nuclearbob_afk is now known as nuclearbob | ||
| barry | robru: oh my robru https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-047/+packages | 20:39 |
| robru | barry: as far as I can tell all lp ppa buildds are toast. lots of people complaining about this in #launchpad | 20:40 |
| barry | robru: ah. i'm never sure if i casey jonesed it or not. i'll hop on over there | 20:41 |
| robru | dobey: I don't think you missed any mail (or if you did I missed it to). my understanding is that at some point we'll switch dual silos so both xenail & vivid go to overlay PPA, then at some point xenial overlay will be copied to y, then dual will be switched to y+vivid. I haven't heard any plans to get phones off vivid. | 20:41 |
| barry | thanks a lot queuebot | 20:42 |
| robru | barry: I had the same issue on a silo of my own, and same with Saviq and jhodapp. it's happening to everybody I think. | 20:42 |
| dobey | robru: shouldn't we be doing triple landings when y opens? | 20:42 |
| jhodapp | oh gosh please no :) | 20:43 |
| Saviq | :D | 20:43 |
| === blr_ is now known as blr | ||
| robru | dobey: I'll reach through your computer screen and slap you in the face. | 20:43 |
| dobey | at least it seems like we want to move to xenial for phone images at some point, but we just don't have a plan to do that yet, because yay gcc | 20:43 |
| barry | if that's not called yakkity yak it will be a serious missed opportunity | 20:43 |
| dobey | and my saxxity sax will be sad | 20:44 |
| robru | dobey: if phone images switch to xenial, then duals will be y+xenial. there's no reason to do triple. duals are always dev series + whatever stable series phones use. | 20:44 |
| barry | :) | 20:44 |
| robru | barry: don't talk back | 20:44 |
| dobey | robru: well, to keep things updated in xenial overlay for when we eventually do switch | 20:44 |
| robru | dobey: you mean after y opens, but before phones switch to xenial, we're going to need y + xenial overlay + vivid overlay? kill me | 20:45 |
| dobey | it seems the most logical plan | 20:46 |
| robru | dobey: I'd rather see the vivid->xenial migration have a minor regression at first until people start doing y+xenial landings to catch xenial up. nobody is going to QA a trual silo. | 20:47 |
| jhodapp | I long for the days of single landings | 20:47 |
| jhodapp | simplicity | 20:47 |
| robru | jhodapp: you need to convince somebody in management to rebase phones on dev series. resurrect the rolling release proposal. | 20:48 |
| dobey | robru: eh, people only QA on the phone anyway really | 20:48 |
| jhodapp | robru, yeah, either that or just call it good and drop xenial | 20:48 |
| dobey | if we based phones on devel, we'd never release phones | 20:48 |
| robru | dobey: right, which means triad silos were only having vivid qa'd, we'd be releasing untested crap to xenial overlay, which would make the vivid->xenial migration really hard. | 20:49 |
| dobey | the vivid->xenial migration is already really hard. keeping stuff compiling isn't going to make it harder | 20:50 |
| dobey | it's just going to consume cpu time and disk space | 20:50 |
| dobey | but anyway | 20:50 |
| robru | I don't understand why the phone wasn't migrated to wily when wily went stable. the older vivid gets the more painful it's going to be to migrate off it. | 20:54 |
| jhodapp | robru, yes agreed...I think we need to stop and accept the pain now before it becomes impossible | 20:54 |
| robru | jhodapp: not up to me :-/ | 20:57 |
| jhodapp | robru, why not? :) | 20:57 |
| dobey | robru: because gcc5 | 21:00 |
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| renatu | trainguards, could you take a look on https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1205, it is not building | 21:26 |
| robru | renatu: yes, the builders are busted | 21:27 |
| === robru changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Train trouble? ping trainguards | CI problems? Use JenkaaS: http://bit.ly/jenkins-docs | Train: http://bit.ly/1hGZsfS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known Issues: all launchpad ppa builds are failing. | ||
| cjwatson | robru: looking, modulo it being bedtime | 22:25 |
| robru | cjwatson: ah, thanks | 22:26 |
| cjwatson | robru,Saviq,jhodapp,renatu: LP deployment rolled back, retried all affected builds | 22:56 |
| === cjwatson changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Train trouble? ping trainguards | CI problems? Use JenkaaS: http://bit.ly/jenkins-docs | Train: http://bit.ly/1hGZsfS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | ||
| Saviq | cjwatson, ack, thanks | 22:56 |
| robru | Thanks | 22:56 |
| cjwatson | https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1567132 <- analysis | 23:20 |
| ubot5` | Launchpad bug 1567132 in Launchpad itself "r17979 causes package build dispatch failures in devirtualised PPAs" [Critical,Triaged] | 23:20 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!