[00:59] gnome 3.20 working well on xenial [01:52] Hello? [01:52] hi [01:53] I want the Ubuntu 16.04! But... when is the realase? [01:54] *release [01:54] !16.04 [01:54] Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial Xerus) will be the 24th release of Ubuntu. It is due to be released on April 21st. Discussion in #ubuntu+1 [01:55] yeah [01:55] Is soon [01:55] I prefer the LTS releases [01:56] But I expect will not run on my netbook [01:56] So, I'm waiting the Lubuntu 16.04 [04:12] I [04:14] koudelkaa: can we help you? [04:22] I just wanted to report a possible package error [04:23] koudelkaa: whats going on mate? [04:23] librocksdb package in ubuntu 16.04 seems to not be portable [04:24] koudelkaa: is it a part of another package? [04:24] no it's just a c++ library [04:24] I use it for one of my projects [04:24] !find librocksdb [04:24] Found: W:, W:, W:, W:, W:, W:, W:, W:, W:, W: (and 29 others) http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=librocksdb&searchon=names&suite=xenial§ion=all [04:25] my program couldn't run, illegal instruction error when I run it, after debugging i found that rocksdb was the source [04:25] koudelkaa: did you install from repos, or ppa? [04:25] if i compile and install rocksdb from source it works, so I think something is wrong with the ubuntu supplied version [04:25] repos [04:25] !info rocksdb [04:25] Package rocksdb does not exist in xenial [04:26] koudelkaa: exact packagename? [04:26] the make file for rocksdb will compile a non portable version, I think the build script might not have enabled PORTABLE=1 [04:26] so it's compiled to the build server cpu instructions [04:26] koudelkaa: did you clean install 16.04 or upgrade? [04:27] librocksdb-dev - persistent Key-Value Store for Flash and RAM Storage (development) [04:27] librocksdb4.1 - persistent Key-Value Store for Flash and RAM Storage [04:27] librocksdb-dev - persistent Key-Value Store for Flash and RAM Storage (development) [04:27] librocksdb4.1 - persistent Key-Value Store for Flash and RAM Storage [04:27] librocksdb-dev - persistent Key-Value Store for Flash and RAM Storage (development) [04:27] librocksdb4.1 - persistent Key-Value Store for Flash and RAM Storage [04:27] librocksdb-dev - persistent Key-Value Store for Flash and RAM Storage (development) [04:27] !info librocksdb4.1 [04:27] Package librocksdb4.1 does not exist in xenial [04:28] !info librocksdb-dev [04:28] Package librocksdb-dev does not exist in xenial [04:28] wth.. [04:29] apt-cache search shows it..weird [04:30] I got a clean install, not upgrade [04:49] !find libperl.so [04:49] Found: W:, W:, W:, W:, W:, W:, W:, W:, W:, W: (and 29 others) http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libperl.so&searchon=names&suite=xenial§ion=all [04:51] Hi I am using Ubuntu 16.04 beta 2 with everything up to date. The issue i see is that, when i open gnome-terminal and i have multiple tabs open, the current one does not get highlighted properly. In the default gnome there is an underline but in ubuntu unity its quite difficult to find out which is the current tab. Is there any solution to highlight that ? [04:52] In 14.04 the current tab gets highlighted better but with the current unity its hard to find out which is the present tab if its Tab 1 or Tab 2 etc [04:52] is there any solution/workaround for this problem ? [04:53] G__81: how do you open new tab? [04:53] Ctrl+Shift+T [04:54] and when i go to lets tab 1 and then i want to move to Tab2, i do use Alt+1, 2 etc but when you look @ the screen, its hard to find out on which tab i am presently on [04:54] G__81: yep just tested that, doesnt highlight [04:55] If i use the Ubuntu Gnome 16.04, it gets highlighted beautifully with a blue line + the tab look also is much better where in you can easily find out which is the current one [04:56] !bug | G__81 [04:56] G__81: If you find a bug in Ubuntu or any of its derivatives, please file a bug using the command « ubuntu-bug » - See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs for other ways to report bugs. [04:57] G__81: just tested a tail into a tab, no highlight on a working session neither [04:58] G__81: file a new bug mate [04:58] lotuspsychje: ok sure would do that [04:59] G__81: perhaps add a screenshot of the situation + story [04:59] would this get fixed or is it too late for the final ? :) [04:59] G__81: its never too late for bugs, even after final release bug will stream in.. [05:00] G__81: not sure if this will get fixxed 'before' final, 2 weeks to go :p [05:00] ok i hope this gets fixed before final [05:00] should be simple to fix it i believe as they use the same software from upstream [05:00] G__81: might be an idea to test other terminal packages [05:01] yeah true [05:01] G__81: lemme reboot real quick after xenial update holdon [05:01] Anyone installed xenial with LVM? [05:02] okl sure [05:02] ok sure* [05:04] lotuspsychje: any luck ? [05:05] G__81: no, still the same [05:05] hmm thats bad :( [05:05] against which component should i file this bug, gnome-terminal ? [05:05] yeah sudo ubuntu-bug gnome-terminal [05:05] if you create, ill add me as affected also [05:07] sure i get a dialox box where it has collected some info [05:08] now where do i describe the issue that i face? [05:08] geenie: we had some users with issues with lvm lately here [05:08] G__81: after it redirects you to launchpad bugs, you can add own text at bottom [05:08] G__81: where you can explain the story [05:08] oh ok got it [05:09] G__81: you can share the bug url here, when done [05:09] geenie: can you explain whats happening? [05:15] lotuspsychje: yeah will do that [05:19] lotuspsychje: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1568451 [05:19] Launchpad bug 1568451 in gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) "Current Tab in Gnome-terminal does not get highlighted " [Undecided,New] [05:20] G__81: ty, ill add me affected [05:20] yeah that would be great [05:21] G__81: nicely described mate, tnx for filing [05:21] lotuspsychje: thanks a lot for your help [05:21] lotuspsychje: yeah thanks :) [05:23] have also added the screenshot [05:23] G__81: added comment also [05:24] G__81: i guess beta2 sticks to your .15 kernel? [05:24] G__81: did you try a dist-upgrade also lotuspsychje: i didnt try dist-upgrade ? [05:25] G__81: can you try please? [05:25] yeah running that now [05:25] G__81: just to see if beta2 stays on your kernel [05:26] G__81: im on daily iso [05:26] lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch) Release: 16.04 Codename: xenial [05:26] this is what i see [05:26] lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch) Release: 16.04 Codename: xenial [05:26] uname -a Linux bg-workstation 4.4.0-15-generic #31-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 18 19:08:31 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [05:27] G__81: try sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade [05:27] yeah thats already done now running dist-upgrade [05:27] G__81: cool [05:27] will reboot after dist-upgrade and let you know [05:27] All my commands need root for working or else i get a dpkg error why so? [05:28] G__81: tnx [05:28] !lvm | geenie did you step into this tutorial? [05:28] geenie did you step into this tutorial?: Tips and tricks for RAID and LVM can be found on https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/SoftwareRAID and http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO - For software RAID, see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FakeRaidHowto [05:33] lotuspsychje: still the same [05:33] G__81: uname -a ? [05:33] uname -a Linux bg-workstation 4.4.0-18-generic #34-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 6 14:01:02 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [05:34] G__81: ah beta2 gets to latest also great [05:34] yeah i downloaded beta 2 and installed it on my system and then got everything updated [05:35] lotuspsychje: is this a channel only for ubuntu with unity or even with gnome ? [05:35] G__81: all xenial flavors [05:36] oh i feel ubuntu gnome is miles ahead in terms of work flow and polish [05:36] just my opinion [05:36] G__81: can you test another theme plz? [05:37] ok i have now moved to the other theme [05:37] i dont see anything significant change with the other one also [05:38] shouldnt we see a blue line under the current tab? [05:38] since ubuntu is using gnome shell [05:39] G__81: higlight is working on high contrast [05:40] oh [05:40] i didnt test that [05:40] G__81: and active tab is showing roundings on other themes [05:40] G__81: so i guess it wasnt really a bug [05:40] yes its working [05:40] why it was not a bug ? [05:41] its still not working with the default theme right? [05:41] G__81: because your active tab shows real thin lines [05:41] G__81: thats why its confusing [05:41] so thats how it would be ? [05:42] G__81: yeah i thinks thats meant to be, but np your bug might make the devs look into it [05:42] yeah they should fix that else its difficult for me to use Unity as for me its the terminal that matters :) [05:43] G__81: just tested on terminator also, working much better there [05:43] the tab gets white there [05:43] others grey out [05:43] oh good [05:43] and is there a way to change Alt+Tab behavior in 16.04 release ? [05:44] not sure [05:44] ok [05:48] !hotkeys | G__81 [05:48] G__81: Keyboard shortcuts can be set in System -> Preferences -> Keyboard Shortcuts. If your multimedia keys don't work with that, try the 'keytouch' package, explained at http://keytouch.sourceforge.net/ - See !Keyboard for changing layouts. A list of keyboard shortcuts for Unity is available at http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=2209015&seqNum=3 [05:49] lotuspsychje: hard to get used to just using apt instead of apt-get [05:50] Fudge: ? [06:06] raul: http://news.softpedia.com/news/ubuntu-linux-32-bit-iso-images-are-up-for-discussion-again-499754.shtml [06:07] raul: not sure if they will keep 32bit lightweight flavors yet...to be continued [06:14] I hope canonical or his flavors keep the 32bit releases for some years. I got several pc's running Ubuntu, Lubuntu and Xubuntu with 32bit. They're old-fashioned , but useful to me. [06:14] thanks for the link. [06:15] raul: no prob :p [06:16] raul: im surely they will keep in mind, many machines would suffer.. [06:18] Yes. There are many pc's all over the world running 32bit versions yet. [06:19] they're cheap here in my country. [06:20] the 64bit machines are so expensive yet. [06:21] raul: im sure they wont just shutdown stuff.. [06:30] I know Windows 10 still support 32bit pc's because of the huge amount of machines running that architecture. I think that Canonical or other GNU/Linux distro have to support that machines. This is the Linux philosopy: Use it, don't throw it away. [06:31] raul: well for now 16.04 will still support it, lets see what happens to the future right [06:36] OK. Thanks a lot for your answers. 32bit support til 2021. That makes me happy. [07:00] Redbeardt: daily url in topic [07:00] ;D danke [07:05] Hi! [07:05] Looking for the Xenial Ubuntu server channel. Is this the right place? [07:24] yes ubuntu+1 === Redbeardt_ is now known as Redbeardt [07:24] or #ubuntu-server may help too [07:24] this is the right channe [07:24] not ubuntu-server [07:24] thats for the stable releases [07:35] well, that's a fine line [07:38] not really [07:39] this is for support [07:39] no, it's for discussion and help [07:39] there is no official support for pre-release [07:39] topic? [07:39] but yes, I know what you mean [07:39] support is just a word, but yes, I take your point [07:39] alright :) [08:37] !find 364 [08:37] File 364 found in abiword-dbg, amarok-dbg, aolserver4-doc, asterisk-dbg, blueproximity, botan1.10-dbg, breeze-dbg, buildbot, calculix-ccx-doc, calligra-dbg (and 287 others) http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=364&mode=&suite=xenial&arch=any [08:41] tried to update a machine to 16.04 today, got the following: [08:41] W:Failed to fetch [08:41] http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/i18n/Translation-en_AU [08:41] Hash Sum mismatch [08:41] , W:Failed to fetch [08:41] http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/multiverse/i18n/Translation-en_AU [08:41] Smedles: any ppa's, manual install or behind proxy? [08:42] lotuspsychje: nope - likely to be a temporary glitch or bug worthy? [08:42] Smedles: lets investigate a bit first [08:42] Smedles: upgrade or clean install? [08:43] lotuspsychje: fyi - just tried to update a server install, and it's giving the same error [08:43] both machines in question are upgrades - the installs have been around a little while [08:43] Smedles: upgrades from wich version? [08:44] lotuspsychje: upgrades from 15.10 [08:44] Smedles: ok keep in mind that we still in developing phase until final ok [08:45] Smedles: you can ask in #ubuntu-mirrors for known issues on repos for your country perhaps? [08:45] lotuspsychje: yeah, totally understand - however - the machine I'm writing on has been on 16.04 for a couple of months now - I like being an early adopter :) [08:45] Smedles: yeah i got 2 boxes running on xenial also, np [08:45] Smedles: but fresh installs here, all working like a charm [08:45] lotuspsychje: i tried the .au mirror, then when I had issues switched to the main site - same issue [08:46] my 1st guess was an issue on the aussie mirror [08:46] Smedles: you absolutly sure to have no external ppa's added right? [08:46] not the end of the world that I can't update these 2x machines, maybe I'll try again tomorrow, and if the problem is still around, raise a ticket [08:46] Smedles: doublecheck your sources.list if unsure [08:47] Smedles: dont make a bug before you ask in #ubuntu-mirrors [08:47] the laptop I tried probably has the chrome ppa, but the server install has nothing [08:48] Smedles: we dont support ppa's mate, and that can be the bottleneck of issues [08:48] 'the server install has nothing' [08:48] yes i hear you [08:49] anyway, doesn't the installer disable all external PPA's as part of the install process? [08:49] no [08:49] !ppa [08:49] A Personal Package Archive (PPA) can provide alternate software not normally available in the offical Ubuntu repositories - Looking for a PPA? See https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas - WARNING: PPAs are unsupported third-party packages, and you use them at your own risk. See also !addppa and !ppa-purge [08:52] lotuspsychje: I had similar yesterday actually doing some vanilla trusty/wily to xenial upgrade tests [08:52] main server [08:53] flocculant: when having repo issues ask in #ubuntu-mirrors [08:53] they can test out/known issues [08:54] lotuspsychje: pretty sure it's not repo issues [08:55] flocculant: trusty to xenial isnt recommended either yet.. [08:56] lotuspsychje: you'll find that they're testing it - they'd almost *have* to be - and it works - or has done up till Friday ;) [08:57] pretty sure there's something wrong somewhere [08:58] flocculant: xenial is still in development [08:58] lotuspsychje: I know [08:59] I've been testing upgrades for xubuntu with the help of people from Canonical - upgrade wasn't working - then it was fine - now it isn't [08:59] I've just passing on the information I am aware of [09:01] and if there is a hash sum mismatch ONLY when doing an upgrade - there's something up with that [09:01] this is just why i dont recommend upgrades to xenial yet [09:02] well I'd certainly not recommend it to someone who was a drive-by 'is it there yet' person :) [09:03] lol [09:03] but given this is +1 [09:03] I'll try and catch the couple of canonical peeps I've been talking to [09:03] anyway if someone experiences apt-get issues, i would ask in #ubuntu-mirrors first after disabling all ppa's/firewall/proxy [09:04] it *appears* that *this* has shown up since they did whatever they did for Colin Watson to blog http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~cjwatson/blog/no-more-hash-sum-mismatch-errors.html [09:04] lets c [09:04] hopefully completely coincidental :D [09:05] interesting [09:06] i never had 1 apt-get issue yet on clean installs, ever [09:07] Nice link for reading material :) [09:08] xenial to the rescue :p [09:08] * alkisg has had that issue in .gr mirrors for months now, and had to switch to the main ones... [09:08] just installed vivaldi on xenial, and after install i get a nice 'vivaldi is now installed' notifcation [09:08] lotuspsychje: with this - IF I had installed the trusty or wily done the apt-get update/upgrade thing and got hash sum issues - then was ok, then did the upgrade and got the same I would wonder - but given that's not the case and it appears to ONLY mismatch with update-manager, it's making me mmm a bit :) [09:09] flocculant: you try all this when final releases, and we will talk once more :p [09:09] ha ha [09:09] heh [09:09] you guys seens the new wallpapers from latest udate yet? [09:10] lotuspsychje: when xenial releases I''ll be setting yaketty yak up here for Xubuntu and stasrting again [09:10] I don't think I've used a supported version for years ... [09:10] !yak [09:10] Hey, nice wallpapers! [09:10] lol we dont have a Y codename yet? [09:10] lotuspsychje: I've seen the wallpapers for Xubuntu yes ;) [09:11] lotuspsychje: yasmin's yurt [09:11] lol [09:11] !codename [09:11] !codenames [09:11] Ubuntu has awesome release codenames. See http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DevelopmentCodeNames for more [09:31] lotuspsychje: and now it's working :p [09:32] magic :p [09:33] yup - some of that let's wait for someone to do a bunch of talking then work afterwards magic :p [09:33] haha [09:33] Hey, I'm testing out Ubuntu 16.04 Server Beta 2, and I can't seem to do an installation without a network connection. Anyone else seen this? [09:33] a7ndrew: didnt test the server install myself, cable or wifi? [09:34] lotuspsychje: I'm trying to do it without either. I can boot and use the installer from a USB stick. [09:35] maybe what I'm trying to do isn't supported?? [09:35] a7ndrew: well, at any time you will need updates so..better get connection anyway? [09:36] a7ndrew: you could ask the #ubuntu-server guys, if offline install is supported [09:37] Maybe it is supported with a few preselected tasks, and you selected additional tasks? [09:38] I haven't selected anything, just can't seem to get past the mirror selection screen. [09:38] I'm guessing it fails when it can't get updates to the installer components. [09:48] hi - on 16.04 how do you change the menu buttons to the right? [09:48] ubunut-tweak-tool seems to no long have an effect [09:49] one other thing - I just installed konversation (as I don't know what irc chat is used by ubuntu by default?) - I cannot see konversation in the dash menu [09:49] i had to launch via cli [09:57] ah - actually now konversation is appears in dash [09:57] *appearing* [09:58] anyone know about the menu placement ? [10:04] yossarianuk: wait [10:04] $ gsettings list-recursively | grep button-layout [10:04] org.gnome.desktop.wm.preferences button-layout 'menu:minimize,maximize,close' [10:05] That's what I have to get the buttons to the right [10:05] I.e. run: gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.wm.preferences button-layout 'menu:minimize,maximize,close' [10:08] alkisg: cheers - however that has no effect [10:08] the output of ' gsettings list-recursively | grep button-layout' [10:08] yossarianuk: are you using unity with compiz? [10:08] org.gnome.desktop.wm.preferences button-layout 'menu:minimize,maximize,close' [10:08] alkisg: ikts the default from beta 2 [10:09] sudo lsof -n |grep compiz -> shows compiz in use [10:10] ive uupdated beta2 (i.e apt-get dist-upgrade) [10:14] yossarianuk: maybe they've removed support for it, it still works with flashback/metacity here but not with unity/compiz [10:14] *it also works with flashback/compiz [10:16] shall i write a bug report ? [10:17] Sure, why not. I don't know if they want to support it though, if so they'll reply "won't fix" and we'll know that's the case. [10:20] ok cheers - seems silly to prevent someone doing it (i'm from a KDE background....) [10:20] always check out the latest stable unity when a release is out [10:20] and 16.04 generally seems good [10:21] * alkisg can't use unity because it requires compositing, so he's using gnome-flashback... maybe I'll switch to mate though [10:21] which package should I file the bug under [10:21] (i'm waiting on a stable kde neon release....) [10:23] I'm not sure, maybe unity-settings-daemon... [10:35] ok will do [11:03] I have entered a bug report about not being able to move window controls [11:03] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-settings-daemon/+bug/1568490 [11:03] Launchpad bug 1568490 in unity-tweak-tool (Ubuntu) "Can no longer move windows controls to the right (16.04) - gsettings has no effect now" [Undecided,New] [11:15] that bug is wont fix and known since some time [11:18] https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-tweak-tool/+bug/1309942 <--- [11:18] Launchpad bug 1309942 in Unity Tweak Tool "Window Controls not functioning." [Medium,Won't fix] [11:30] Hello! [11:30] I need to install Ubuntu in my netbook soon, but I don't know if I can wait until the release of the 16.04 version. What to do? [11:32] install 15.10 and upgrade form end of april to july to 16.04 [11:40] Why 15.10 and not 14.04? [11:50] or just install 16.04 now [11:50] Not a good idea. Unreleased software always have serious problems. [11:51] two weeks won't change much of that [11:53] Software can have serious problems even months after stabilization :) 16.04 is good enough at this stage. I'm using it on the primary, and only, production desktop of mine. [12:11] Hiyas all [14:33] When 16.04 is released, how will I can install it without any nonfree software? [14:35] probly use a different desktop other tha unity ? [14:35] than [14:36] It's just Unity? [14:37] Isn't that what the thirdpary checkbox is for? [14:37] unity has all the bloatware and links to pais apps and promotions afaik [14:37] thirdparty* [14:38] paid [14:38] Mrsanderson: without any proprietary software? You might want to take a loot at: http://trisquel.info then, it's a ubuntu distro 100% cleaned from non free softwares [14:39] BluesKaj: unity has nothing non-free in it. [14:39] Mrsanderson: there is an option before you even boot to the desktop to install only free software [14:39] i think you press F6 at the boot menu [14:39] popey: really? I didn't know that [14:40] it's been there for years [14:40] it says a lot about how important it is to people :P [14:40] Well, we created Gobuntu as a Free Software only flavour but nobody seemed to want to maintain it [14:40] so it was rolled into the standard iso image [14:41] http://askubuntu.com/questions/426160/what-is-the-free-software-only-option-when-installing-ubuntu [14:41] popey, why does it have all that commercial stuff on the desktop then. [14:41] thats an entirely separate subject from software freedom [14:41] BluesKaj: the ad can be free software, huh [14:42] BluesKaj: you can see the source code of it I think [14:42] ok , now we're into person al definitions of bloatware [14:42] also no [14:42] you're off on a tangent [14:43] the question asked was "how will I can install it without any nonfree software" [14:43] *you* took a different turn and started talking about "bloatware" [14:43] and somehow concluding that unity is nonfree [14:43] which it isn't [14:43] nm, I don't really care it's immaterial to me .... i use kde anyway [14:43] Super [14:44] next time maybe research the topic before spouting fud [14:45] popey, maybe you couls help the user next time rather than being a correction troll [14:45] I _did_ [14:45] Now that the latest Nvidia binary driver (364.72) supports the EGL extensions required by Wayland and Mir, and also supports KMS, could one reasonably expect Ubuntu 16.04 to support Unity 8 + Mir + Nvidia binary driver at some point? [14:45] you seem to have missed the part where I explained the free software option above. [14:46] * BluesKaj shrugs ...blah blah .... [14:46] Nice attitude. [14:46] this "proprietary" and "spyware" FUDmyth should really die. it's total nonsense. [14:48] The online stuff was finally removed in 16.04. [14:50] There isn't really a way to make Ubuntu free of nonfree software, other than using another distro? [14:51] 15:41 < popey> http://askubuntu.com/questions/426160/what-is-the-free-software-only-option-when-installing-ubuntu [14:51] MisterSanderson: ^ [14:51] I will check. [14:51] or use a different DE [14:51] Again, the DE has nothing to do with free/non-free. Stop the fud BluesKaj [14:52] Hello, I'm having issues upgrading to Ubuntu GNOME 16.04 using the "do-release-upgrade -d" terminal command. I upgraded to 15.10 yesterday and tried to do the 16.04 upgrade again but I'm having the same issue I did on 14.04. this is the error https://paste.ubuntu.com/15725661/ [14:53] nauticalnexus: might have been a transient thing, you could retry again? [14:53] popey: I've tried again 3 times. Same exact error. I've tried switching the servers in software-properties-gtk but same thing [14:53] hm [14:54] nauticalnexus: I had some issues with that yesterday and this morning - worked in the end [14:54] BluesKaj: wow hey, please read what popey said again, and he even gave you the solution [14:54] there have been some connectivity issues off and on seemingly [14:54] this is far from being a troll omg [14:55] popey: I eventually got a ISO and put it on a USB, booted it, and it wouldn't let me upgrade from 14.04(this was before I upgraded to 15.10), I would've had to do a clean install, which is not what I wanted to do [14:55] it's not my problem , freaj [14:55] popey: had issues with repos/pad/login.ubuntu most of the morning [14:55] BluesKaj: your misinformation in an ubuntu support channel _is_ actually. [14:55] I can try again, though. But I'm fairly certain it'll be the same error. [14:56] nauticalnexus: I dont think we heavily test 14.04 -> 16.04 upgrades yet [14:56] nauticalnexus: as I said - I got there with upgrade in the end - same as you [14:56] they only generally get switched on around the point release [14:56] popey: I'm doing 15.10 -> 16.04 now [14:56] so when 16.04.1 ships it will have been more tested [14:56] ok [14:56] but still, that doesn't explain the weird network issues with your archive connections [14:57] I don't get it either. [14:58] Just tried again, same error. [14:58] bug 1568354 [14:58] bug 1568354 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "version upgrade fails due to wrong translation hash checksums" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1568354 [14:59] flocculant: why does it affect me then? I'm using English, albeit British English [14:59] nauticalnexus: no idea - as I said I had the same thing over and over - worked in the end [14:59] and exactly the same issue here - uk stuffs [14:59] flocculant: so what, I just have to keep trying? [15:00] well [15:00] popey, I meant it's not my problem since I don't use unity and wasn't the user asking about non-free software, however if you guys think I made the wrong sud=gestion then I'll leave well enough alone next time. [15:00] Today I'll be building a kernel on 16.04 for my first time idk how to go abt it ,I'll be using a guide [15:00] personally I think there's something up more generically - not just repos - I've had issues with more than 1 canonical thing today :) [15:00] nauticalnexus: ^^ [15:00] Anyways idk how to use lvm [15:01]