[10:28] <sakrecoer> looking into those things kryte mentioned yesterday, not sure i get it... but as he suggested in a query, i optimized the pictures with optipng and jpegoptim and it gave a rather poor result...
[10:29] <sakrecoer> do i get it right when i understand that the first path should have no leading slash? http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-dev/ubuntustudio-look/trunk/revision/179/debian/ubuntustudio-wallpapers.links
[10:30] <sakrecoer> as put in the example he sent: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/xenial/en/man1/dh_link.1.html
[15:29] <zequence> sakrecoer: I already changed that
[15:30] <zequence> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-dev/ubuntustudio-look/trunk/revision/188
[15:33] <zequence> sakrecoer: Why did you add the author name to the wallpaper name for each wallpaper in the gnome .xml file
[15:33] <zequence> You know what that does?
[15:34] <zequence> That is what will show instead of the actual file name when selecting wallpapers in at least Gnome
[15:34] <zequence> I don't want our names in there. Just the name of the wallpapers
[15:35] <zequence> So, please put that back as it was
[15:35] <zequence> And, why are you renaming old wallpapers that have already been released?
[15:35] <zequence> Doesn't make sense to rename files that are already known
[15:35] <zequence> unless there's a bug
[15:35] <zequence> It's backwards
[15:37] <zequence> The worst that can happen with wallpapers is that someone already has one of those as their default. When they upgrade, it isn't anymore, cause the filename changed
[15:37] <zequence> NEver a good idea to change file names, just out of pedantism
[15:39] <zequence> Even worse when done in programming
[15:39] <krytarik> zequence: Regarding that, you realize that the package just keeps on growing anyway?
[15:39] <zequence> krytarik: Yes, I'm very well aware of that. What's your point?
[15:40] <zequence> You want to skim off 20MB out of our 2.6GB ISO?
[15:40] <OvenWerks> sort of a thing in computers in general, everything grows.
[15:40] <zequence> As I already said last time you mentioned that - maybe next time there is a wallpaper contest, only the five best are included - and the art team can decide which of the old ones stay
[15:41] <zequence> Changing filenames just for the fun of it is a bit of waste of time, if you ask me
[15:42] <OvenWerks> zequence: I think the bigger thing as you mentioned is that it breaks things.
[15:43] <zequence> OvenWerks: Exactly
[15:59] <sakrecoer> zequence: some had the author some dont it was about 50/50 so i thought: either we remove all authors or we add...
[15:59] <sakrecoer> but sure, i can remove them from there..
[16:04] <zequence> sakrecoer: Might be cfhowlett did some of that, I'm not sure. His choice. But, I'd rather go with just having a pretty name for the wallpaper, nothing else.
[16:05] <zequence> Since those were from the contest, that makes a little bit of sense
[16:05] <zequence> I wouldn't do it that way though
[16:05] <zequence> sakrecoer: MOre importantly, never change filenames unless you have a really good reason
[16:05] <zequence> For stuff that is yet not released, it's less of a matter
[16:06] <zequence> But, older stuff, it's a big no no. NOt the end of the world, when it comes to wallpapers, but still
[18:31] <sakrecoer> ok, so middle ground: i leave the credits in the pretty name-space on the entires from the contest and remove them elsewhere. no more filname changes until we plan for next blueprints. is that a viable sollution? 
[18:41] <sakrecoer> adding "1604_ghostcolor.png" to debian/copyright also. fixed it but i'll wait a little before i push. maybe you will catch something else that is missing or needs correction...
[20:03] <zequence> sakrecoer: No, I haven't been looking actually. Just push whatever's left. I'll just go though each package before upload
[21:36] <zequence> sakrecoer: Ok, I see your commit has got trough. Getting late, so I will upload the packages first thing tomorrow
[21:36] <zequence> Still need to fix some icons too.
[21:50] <sakrecoer> thanks zequence