[15:00] <sil2100> o/
[15:00] <Mirv> o/
[15:00] <FourDollars> o/
[15:01] <rbasak> o/
[15:03] <slashd> o/
[15:03] <BenC> o/
[15:04] <sil2100> cyphermox, micahg, bdmurray: ping
[15:06] <bdmurray> o/
[15:06] <sil2100> rbasak: ping!
[15:06] <Laney> sil2100: you should update the !dmb-ping alias
[15:06] <sil2100> Ah
[15:06] <Laney> test it with ubottu in a PM :)
[15:06]  * rbasak is here
[15:06] <sil2100> rbasak: unping, yeah, missed your hand ;)
[15:06] <Laney> then say "!dmb-ping is <new text>" to i
[15:06] <Laney> t
[15:06] <sil2100> Laney: ok! Thanks ;)
[15:07] <sil2100> I guess we have a quorum
[15:07] <sil2100> By priniciple infinity should be chairing from what I see as we go alphabetically, but he's not around it seems
[15:09] <BenC> I would offer to go since I’m in order of succession, but this is my first rodeo, so I’d rather decline the first run.
[15:09] <sil2100> BenC: I guess you'd be the next alphabetically-wise, want to chair?
[15:09] <sil2100> bdmurray: hey, could you chair for us this time ;)?
[15:09] <sil2100> We'd have time to learn the ropes
[15:10]  * micahg is here
[15:10] <bdmurray> sil2100: okay
[15:10] <sil2100> Do we have some docs on using meetingology ?
[15:11]  * bdmurray always looks at last meeting ;-)
[15:11] <bdmurray> #startmeeting 2016-04-11
[15:11] <meetingology> Meeting started Mon Apr 11 15:11:15 2016 UTC.  The chair is bdmurray. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[15:11] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[15:11] <sil2100> I guess it's been a while
[15:11] <sil2100> :)
[15:12] <bdmurray> So we have a new DMB, welcome everyone!
[15:12] <BenC> Cheers all
[15:12] <bdmurray> The agenda is still influx due to it not having been updated recently.
[15:12] <cyphermox> o/
[15:12] <bdmurray> sil2100: you'd mentioned you were going to look at the candidate list. Did you get a chance to do that?
[15:13] <sil2100> bdmurray: didn't do it throughly sadly, but so far we had two candidates willing to participate in today's meeting: Mirv and FourDollars
[15:13] <rbasak> slashd is here too I think?
[15:14] <slashd> yes, am I
[15:14] <bdmurray> Right, I see slashd and FourDollars on the agenda for today.
[15:15] <sil2100> Mirv is also here, his application was postponed a bit
[15:15] <Mirv> there are four applications to meetings that were cancelled in February and March
[15:16] <sil2100> Mirv: yes, but some of them already have core-dev privilages, so the list is not really up-to-date
[15:16] <Mirv> sil2100: ah correct I think 2016-02-29 was held and some of them were handled. then mine 2016-03-14 was the meeting that got cancelled.
[15:17] <sil2100> From the core-dev field there's you and psusi left
[15:17] <BenC> Are there people on the current agenda that are already handled and can be removed?
[15:17] <bdmurray> Let's start with Mirv then since he's been waiting a while and circle back to Ubuntu Contributing Developer.
[15:17] <sil2100> Agreed
[15:17] <bdmurray> BenC: Yes, that was mentioned via email. I did remove some.
[15:17] <BenC> Ok
[15:18] <bdmurray> #topic Ubuntu Core Developer applications
[15:18] <bdmurray> #subtopic Timo Jyrunki's application for core-dev
[15:18] <bdmurray> Mirv: Could you please introduce yourself?
[15:19] <Mirv> Hi. So I'm Ubuntu user since 2004, and currently a MOTU and have rights to two PPU package sets. I'm working for Canonical for four years now, and as part of that have maintained for example the Qt packages and their migrations, and various other things as part of the phone efforts.
[15:20] <Mirv> My special interests tend to have been the "consumer" parts of Ubuntu, including desktop, phone and the different flavors of Ubuntu (where I'm glad to help, while I use Unity myself).
[15:21] <bdmurray> Does anybody have any questions for Mirv?
[15:21] <BenC> o/
[15:22] <bdmurray> BenC: feel free to just ask
[15:22] <BenC> Mirv: In what way would becoming a core-dev help you to contribute to Ubuntu further. What about not being a core-dev hinders your contributions?
[15:24] <Mirv> BenC: I can't currently do packaging reviews of main packages that go through CI Train. As a landing team member, it hurts a bit to not be able to help other teams in that, while they tend to ask me for packaging help often. I could have more PPU:s, but I already have quite some. I'm also nowadays familiar with most things that happen in the archives, and I'd be glad to help where I can with eg releas
[15:24] <Mirv> e pocket migrations more often than I currently can.
[15:25] <Mirv> Likewise, my patch pilot is currently limited to universe packages, while I do see things on the sponsoring list occasionally where I'd be familiar with the package but don't have upload rights.
[15:26] <bdmurray> Mirv: What kinds of feedback have you provided when reviewing packages that go through the CI Train?
[15:27] <sil2100> Mirv: regarding that actually - since I see you have a lot of main experience through the Qt stack and do patch-piloting sessions, did you work on some lot of other package work from main?
[15:27] <sil2100> s/lot of//
[15:28] <Mirv> bdmurray: the most common feedback (if something is needed) has to do with handling moved files, where people tend to not use Breaks/Replaces etc correctly.
[15:29] <Mirv> sil2100: well in the past we handled the unity/compiz SRU:s, but most of the time I've found it easier to just contribute within my MOTU rights where there is also work to be done. I mean, I've not done much of eg sponsoring where I'd do review but ask then actual core-dev to sponsor it, after I got MOTU rights.
[15:30] <BenC> Mirv: I guess I’m not familiar enough with the CI Train. Just for my own education, what about providing feedback to main packagers requires core-dev access?
[15:30] <Mirv> sil2100: well of course I've libvoikko, suomi-malaga/voikko-fi, libreoffice-voikko etc in main from Debian that I work on but can't upload myself in Ubuntu
[15:30] <sil2100> Mirv: ACK
[15:30] <Mirv> BenC: I can provide feedback and I usually do, but then if I get the fixes from the developers I can't approve them since it requires a core-dev to ack them.
[15:31] <Mirv> BenC: so then I need to spend some other core-dev's time and he also needs to look through the changes since he's essentially taking the responsibility (since I'm not core-dev)
[15:31] <BenC> Mirv: That makes more sense, thanks.
[15:31] <bdmurray> micahg, cyphermox: any questions?
[15:32] <sil2100> BenC: usually when there's a package from main that Mirv reviews he forwards his concerns/opinion to me or someone else that's around, but it's still a bit duplicating work
[15:32] <micahg> Mirv: out of curiosity, do the CI Train rules change as the cycle progresses?
[15:32] <BenC> sil2100: Your endorsement speaks well to him. Thanks for the additonal info.
[15:33] <Mirv> micahg: not much, other than by the final freeze we will not land anymore to archives but to overlay PPA, from where packages will be copied to +1 when it opens
[15:34] <micahg> so, is it up to the reviewers to decide whether or not to approve something based on feature freeze?
[15:34] <cyphermox> no questions from me
[15:35] <sil2100> micahg: yes
[15:36] <Mirv> micahg: yes otherwise, but actually if there are no packaging changes (debian/), any lander can essentially land anything. which has of course been a bit hot topic regarding traditional processes.
[15:36] <Mirv> we've had standing FFe:s for touch related packages for that reason, and those have not been considered optimal from all people either.
[15:36] <micahg> ah
[15:37] <bdmurray> Any more questions?
[15:37] <Mirv> it's a bit tough with touch being essentially rolling release releasing to traditional half year Ubuntu cycle archives.
[15:37] <sil2100> No questions from me, all good here
[15:37] <micahg> I think that's it from me
[15:38] <BenC> Me as well
[15:38] <bdmurray> #vote Mirv to be granted membership to core-dev
[15:38] <meetingology> Please vote on: Mirv to be granted membership to core-dev
[15:38] <meetingology> Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname)
[15:38] <BenC> +1
[15:38] <meetingology> +1 received from BenC
[15:38] <micahg> +1
[15:38] <meetingology> +1 received from micahg
[15:39] <cyphermox> +1
[15:39] <meetingology> +1 received from cyphermox
[15:39] <rbasak> +1
[15:39] <meetingology> +1 received from rbasak
[15:39] <sil2100> +1
[15:39] <meetingology> +1 received from sil2100
[15:39] <bdmurray> +1
[15:39] <meetingology> +1 received from bdmurray
[15:40] <bdmurray> #endvote
[15:40] <meetingology> Voting ended on: Mirv to be granted membership to core-dev
[15:40] <meetingology> Votes for:6 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0
[15:40] <meetingology> Motion carried
[15:40] <bdmurray> Mirv: congratulations!
[15:40] <BenC> Mirv: Congrats
[15:40] <sil2100> Mirv: congratulations :)
[15:40] <Mirv> thank you! :)
[15:42] <bdmurray> Based off the wiki history it looks like FourDollars signed up first.
[15:43] <bdmurray> FourDollars: Are you available / ready?
[15:43] <FourDollars> bdmurray: yes
[15:43] <bdmurray> #topic MOTU Applications
[15:43] <bdmurray> #subtopic Shih-Yuan Lee
[15:44] <bdmurray> FourDollars: Could you please introduce yourself?
[15:44] <FourDollars> OK
[15:44] <FourDollars> Hi, I am Ubuntu user since 6.04. I am working for Canonical for six years now.
[15:45] <FourDollars> I am a free software developer and contributor, a Debian Maintainer.
[15:46] <FourDollars> I host the physical community http://www.tossug.org at https://moztw.org/space/.
[15:47] <FourDollars> I am also the member of some different communities in Taiwan, such as Ubuntu Taiwan, Linux Taiwan, Debian Taiwan.
[15:48] <bdmurray> FourDollars: How much of your work is for the development release?
[15:48] <FourDollars> I contributed to efibootmgr, dell-recovery, gnome-screenshot and upower.
[15:48] <FourDollars> bdmurray: Most of my work is about LTS.
[15:49] <FourDollars> I takes care of the issues directly from the OEM/ODM.
[15:49] <FourDollars> If the issue is not kernel related, I will try to fix them.
[15:50] <FourDollars> So I will provide the patch to the upstream and then backport to Ubuntu.
[15:50] <bdmurray> FourDollars: What do you do if the fix is not in the development release?
[15:50] <sil2100> FourDollars: let's say you publish a package to the archives, but you see it doesn't migrate from the -proposed pocket - where would you look for clues?
[15:52] <FourDollars> I don't understand the question.  :(
[15:53] <sil2100> FourDollars: which one? bdmurray's or mine? I'm happy to provide more context if needed
[15:53] <FourDollars> bdmurray: I will search for the upstream source control system if the fix is not in the development release.
[15:54] <FourDollars> bdmurray: If I can not find the fix, I will open a bug on upstream bug tracking system and provide the details.
[15:54] <FourDollars> bdmurray: Then if I have time, I will try it fix it directly.
[15:54] <FourDollars> sil2100: I don't understand yours.
[15:55] <sil2100> FourDollars: so, let's say you have a package that you prepare with a fix and upload it to the Ubuntu archive using dput
[15:56] <sil2100> FourDollars: you see that the upload succeeded and that the packages built correctly - looking, for instance, through Launchpad
[15:56] <sil2100> FourDollars: but the package you uploaded is stuck in the proposed pocket, not migrating to the release pocket for some reason
[15:57] <sil2100> FourDollars: what steps would you perform to check why it doesn't migrate from, let's say, xenial-proposed to xenial?
[15:57] <FourDollars> sil2100: I remember there are some days delay about 1~2 weeks from -proposed to -updates.
[15:58] <sil2100> FourDollars: ah, yes, that's the case for SRUs
[15:58] <sil2100> FourDollars: but let's say it doesn't migrate even after this time, or doesn't migrate when you upload the package to the current development series
[15:58] <sil2100> (which shouldn't have any specific delays)
[15:59] <FourDollars> sil2100: I will ask for the help from the mailing list or IRC channels.
[16:00] <sil2100> FourDollars: ok, that's always an option - did you have any experience with the output_excuses page?
[16:01] <bdmurray> FourDollars: Looking at the "My involvement" section of your application, I'm a bit confused as I see some bugs where it isn't clear to me how you were invovled. For example bug 1452238, bug 1042231.
[16:02] <FourDollars> sil2100: I will check if there is any freezing date.
[16:02] <sil2100> FourDollars: also an option, yes, but a place worth remembering whenever things like this happen is http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html (for latest development series)
[16:02] <FourDollars> sil2100: If I can not make it, I will wait.
[16:04] <FourDollars> sil2100: I didn't deal with it before, but I knows it.
[16:06] <rbasak> FourDollars: you said in your application that you're looking go get MOTU so that you can do package relative works for the Ubuntu community in Taiwan. Could you give us an example of a sponsored upload with this sort of work?
[16:06] <rbasak> *to get
[16:06] <FourDollars> bdmurray: Regarding https://launchpad.net/bugs/1452238, I test it in the beginning and I was trying to fix it. But there are other tasks so Tim helps me to deal with it.
[16:06] <rbasak> Sorry, I forgot about that outstanding question. Take your time.
[16:06] <FourDollars> rbasak: ibus-chewing
[16:07] <sil2100> Ok
[16:08] <FourDollars> bdmurray: Regarding https://launchpad.net/bugs/1042231, I help to verify the fix.
[16:08] <FourDollars> rbasak: I knows a Debian developer and he is active dealing with all Chinese input related packages in Debian.
[16:08] <bdmurray> FourDollars: While verifying is helpful to the process it does not demonstrate development work.
[16:09] <FourDollars> rbasak: So I am wondering if I can help him to do the similar works in Ubuntu.
[16:09] <FourDollars> rbasak: You can check https://github.com/fourdollars. There are some development work.
[16:10] <FourDollars> bdmurray: You can check https://github.com/fourdollars. There are some development work.
[16:10] <rbasak> FourDollars: I understand that with work done in Debian you wouldn't expect to upload much to the development release in Ubuntu. So I presume you're looking at SRUs mainly, is that right? Are there any other packages in particular that you expect to want to upload with MOTU?
[16:10] <FourDollars> rbasak: Sorry. I replied to wrong person.
[16:10] <rbasak> np
[16:12] <FourDollars> rbasak: I am not looking at SRU only.
[16:14] <FourDollars> rbasak: I would like to also join the development work.
[16:15] <rbasak> FourDollars: have you been hindered by not having MOTU?
[16:16] <FourDollars> rbasak: In fact, my goal is to become a core developer because most packages I want to fix is in main.
[16:16] <FourDollars> rbasak: So that I can fix them quicker.
[16:17] <rbasak> OK
[16:17] <FourDollars> rbasak: However I am not familiar with the process yet so I apply MOTU first.
[16:18] <bdmurray> We are a bit over time now, are there any more questions? cyphermox, micahg, BenC?
[16:18] <FourDollars> rbasak: My plan is to practice the process of MOTU and help to fix some universe/multiverse packages.
[16:18] <FourDollars> rbasak: My own Debian packages are in universe/multiverse.
[16:19] <micahg> FourDollars: usually people do that before they apply, to demonstrate mastery
[16:19] <FourDollars> micahg: I see.
[16:21] <sil2100> No more questions from me
[16:22] <bdmurray> #vote FourDollars to be granted membership in motu
[16:22] <meetingology> Please vote on: FourDollars to be granted membership in motu
[16:22] <meetingology> Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname)
[16:24] <bdmurray> -1
[16:24] <meetingology> -1 received from bdmurray
[16:25] <rbasak> -1
[16:25] <meetingology> -1 received from rbasak
[16:25] <rbasak> I'll explain after the vote has ended.
[16:25] <sil2100> +0 (I do see potential, but I suppose you'd need to gain a bit more experience)
[16:25] <meetingology> +0 (I do see potential, but I suppose you'd need to gain a bit more experience) received from sil2100
[16:25] <bdmurray> While your work on SRUs has been great, that is a double gated process (sponsor / SRU team member) and follows a very strict process. I'd like you to be more involved / experienced with Ubuntu development before granting you membership in motu.
[16:25] <cyphermox> +0
[16:25] <meetingology> +0 received from cyphermox
[16:27] <micahg> +0 good intentions, good work so far, but hasn't displayed mastery of MOTU style work (library transitions, helping proposed-migration in devel release, merges from Debian)
[16:27] <meetingology> +0 good intentions, good work so far, but hasn't displayed mastery of MOTU style work (library transitions, helping proposed-migration in devel release, merges from Debian) received from micahg
[16:27] <cyphermox> I've seen (and in fact sponsored) some good uploads after some back and forth, but I would like to see more sponsored uploads (in main or otherwise)
[16:27] <bdmurray> BenC: still about, care to vote?
[16:28] <bdmurray> #endvote
[16:28] <meetingology> Voting ended on: FourDollars to be granted membership in motu
[16:28] <meetingology> Votes for:0 Votes against:2 Abstentions:3
[16:28] <meetingology> Motion denied
[16:29] <bdmurray> rbasak: did you want to say something?
[16:29] <rbasak> I appreciate the good work you have been doing, but it doesn't seem to have that much relevance for MOTU specifically. I'd expect to see more sponsored uploads to universe.
[16:29] <rbasak> You mentioned wanting to becoming familiar with the process. I believe it's more appropriate to do that under the guidance of sponsors, and then apply again for MOTU when you have some experience exercising the process.
[16:29] <rbasak> I'm a little torn because I appreciate that doing the right thing in Debian means fewer uploads to Ubuntu, which hinders getting a good track record for Ubuntu uploads. But if that is the case, then getting the odd sponsored universe upload shouldn't be a problem either.
[16:30] <BenC> +1
[16:30] <BenC> Sorry
[16:30] <rbasak> FourDollars: your sponsored upload history does look good though. So can I suggest a vote to give you Ubuntu Contributing Developer in recognition of that, if you're interested in that?
[16:30] <BenC> Actually, I meant +0
[16:30] <FourDollars> rbasak: OK
[16:31] <jjohansen> \o
[16:32] <rbasak> bdmurray: #vote FourDollars for Ubuntu Contributing Developer please?
[16:32] <sil2100> FourDollars: I would recommend joining the patch-piloting initiative to gain experience and additional upload history :)
[16:32] <sil2100> FourDollars: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/CodeReviews
[16:32] <bdmurray> #vote FourDollars for Ubuntu Contributing Developer
[16:32] <meetingology> Please vote on: FourDollars for Ubuntu Contributing Developer
[16:32] <meetingology> Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname)
[16:32] <rbasak> +1
[16:32] <meetingology> +1 received from rbasak
[16:33] <micahg> +1
[16:33] <meetingology> +1 received from micahg
[16:33] <sil2100> +1
[16:33] <meetingology> +1 received from sil2100
[16:33] <bdmurray> +1
[16:33] <meetingology> +1 received from bdmurray
[16:34] <bdmurray> that's enough so in the interest of time...
[16:34] <bdmurray> #endvote
[16:34] <meetingology> Voting ended on: FourDollars for Ubuntu Contributing Developer
[16:34] <meetingology> Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0
[16:34] <meetingology> Motion carried
[16:35] <rbasak> FourDollars: sorry we couldn't give you MOTU. But please pretend you have it, stick the uploads you would have made to universe into the sponsorship queue, and re-apply once you have a few of these.
[16:35] <FourDollars> rbasak: OK. Thx.
[16:35] <bdmurray> FourDollars: the patch piloting queue frequently has incomplete items in it, so isn't just stuff that needs sponsoring
[16:35] <bdmurray> #topci AOB
[16:35] <bdmurray> #topic AOB
[16:36] <bdmurray> #action bdmurray to summarize the meeting / send annoucements
[16:36] <meetingology> ACTION: bdmurray to summarize the meeting / send annoucements
[16:36] <bdmurray> #action cyphermox to make membership changes
[16:36] <meetingology> ACTION: cyphermox to make membership changes
[16:36] <bdmurray> #action bdmurray to update agenda
[16:36] <meetingology> ACTION: bdmurray to update agenda
[16:37] <rbasak> So we didn't get to slashd :-(
[16:37] <bdmurray> sil2100: are you still willing to review the status of applicants on the agenda?
[16:38] <rbasak> He was down for today. Is there anyone else in the backlog?
[16:38] <bdmurray> rbasak: ah right, I feel like an hour isn't long enough
[16:38] <sil2100> bdmurray: yes, please add an action item for that for me :)
[16:38] <bdmurray> #action sil2100 to review status of applicants on the agenda
[16:38] <meetingology> ACTION: sil2100 to review status of applicants on the agenda
[16:38] <sil2100> I'll make sure to review the list this week
[16:39] <slashd> Do I need to reschedule my application for next meeting ?
[16:39] <bdmurray> We could review it by email I think, right micahg?
[16:39] <sil2100> slashd: no worries, we'll reschedule you to the next one - if it's ok with you
[16:40] <sil2100> Or that
[16:40] <micahg> we could do by email
[16:40] <sil2100> Fine with me as well
[16:40] <rbasak> I endorsed slashd, so there's an implicit +1 from me already.
[16:40] <micahg> or now if no one needs to channel and DMB members are still around
[16:41] <rbasak> jjohansen: did you need the channel?
[16:42] <jjohansen> rbasak: nah, sorry for hoping into your meeting, we moved to meeting-2 when we saw your meeting was still going
[16:43] <rbasak> jjohansen: ah OK. Thanks!
[16:43] <bdmurray> Okay, I guess there are still four of us.
[16:44] <bdmurray> #topic Eric Desrochers for Ubuntu Contributing Developer
[16:44] <bdmurray> lets just skip the intro part and move to questions
[16:45] <micahg> link?
[16:45] <bdmurray> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/slashd/ContributingDeveloperApplication
[16:46] <micahg> #link https://wiki.ubuntu.com/slashd/ContributingDeveloperApplication
[16:46] <bdmurray> slashd: What needs to happen next with bug 1546735?
[16:46] <slashd> bdmurray, I need to change my plan and focus on the solterm issue (debian bug) more than the entreprise impact with zabbix
[16:47] <slashd> the patch is now available in xenial but need to work on justification for Trusty surrounding solterm more than Zabbix
[16:49] <bdmurray> slashd: I'd consider justification as the impact, so the Test Case section is also missing.
[16:49] <bdmurray> any questions from the DMB members?
[16:50] <slashd> bdmurray, I'm my defense I did it in the private bug, since there was sensible informations about UA customer, but yes I agree, I should also put it on the public bug
[16:50] <slashd> without UA customer reference
[16:52] <rbasak> Hmm. openipmi is in part GPL. Is it even compatible with openssl's license?
[16:52] <rbasak> Anyway, offtopic, sorry.
[16:53] <bdmurray> slashd: You put information about how to verify the bug using a third party package not supported by Ubuntu, which as I've mentioned before isn't SRU worthy.
[16:53] <slashd> bdmurray, yeah this is why I need to re-work the justification around the debian bug (solterm)
[16:54] <micahg> slashd: you mention attending local networking events as something you can do better.  Have you ever been to an Ubuntu meetup?
[16:54] <micahg> or and Ubuntu LoCo event?
[16:56] <slashd> micahg, I'm attending a few devops meetings (as an organizer) where we talked about different techno and represent Ubuntu in those one such as montreal devops, the community in montreal doesn't seems to be very strong, but yes my goal is to attend more event in Montreal
[16:58] <slashd> it's not very active except for the mailing list
[17:00] <bdmurray> #vote slashd for Ubuntu Contributing Developer
[17:00] <meetingology> Please vote on: slashd for Ubuntu Contributing Developer
[17:00] <meetingology> Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname)
[17:01] <micahg> +1 bug fixes + dev event representation, keep up the good work!
[17:01] <meetingology> +1 bug fixes + dev event representation, keep up the good work! received from micahg
[17:02] <BenC> +1 sustained effort
[17:02] <meetingology> +1 sustained effort received from BenC
[17:02] <sil2100> +1
[17:02] <meetingology> +1 received from sil2100
[17:02] <bdmurray> +1
[17:02] <meetingology> +1 received from bdmurray
[17:02] <rbasak> +1
[17:02] <meetingology> +1 received from rbasak
[17:03] <bdmurray> #end vote
[17:03] <bdmurray> #endvote
[17:03] <meetingology> Voting ended on: slashd for Ubuntu Contributing Developer
[17:03] <meetingology> Votes for:5 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0
[17:03] <meetingology> Motion carried
[17:03] <bdmurray> #topic AOB
[17:03] <slashd> thanks everyone
[17:03] <bdmurray> Anything other business x2?
[17:05] <bdmurray> Alright! Thanks everyone.
[17:05] <bdmurray> #endmeeting
[17:05] <meetingology> Meeting ended Mon Apr 11 17:05:14 2016 UTC.
[17:05] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2016/ubuntu-meeting.2016-04-11-15.11.moin.txt
[17:05] <sil2100> o/
[17:05] <sil2100> Thanks!