slangasek | darkxst: debug messages> many modules include a 'debug' option which will increase verbosity to syslog, provided you're logging syslog debug messages somewhere | 00:30 |
---|---|---|
ypwong | cyphermox, we found a serious issue in grub that worth a look: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntukylin/+bug/1559933 | 02:22 |
ubot5` | Launchpad bug 1559933 in Ubuntu Kylin "[Grub] There are messy codes on displaying Chinese characters in grub after install xenial-desktop_0320." [High,Triaged] | 02:22 |
tyhicks | pitti, stgraber: hi - I believe that the failing lxc test that's preventing the apparmor migration is a bad lxc test: "There is no download available for release=xenial, stream=daily, arch=amd64" | 03:30 |
tyhicks | pitti, stgraber: I see the same failure when running the lxc tests locally without a the new apparmor | 03:31 |
stgraber | hmm, so something happened with simplestreams over the last few days which broke that test | 03:31 |
stgraber | but indeed, unlikely to have been caused by the apparmor upload | 03:31 |
tyhicks | thanks for the confirmation | 03:33 |
stgraber | I'm assuming you attempted a retry of the test already? | 03:34 |
tyhicks | yes | 03:34 |
tyhicks | twice on amd64 and i386 | 03:34 |
tyhicks | both sets of retries failed | 03:34 |
stgraber | doing a local adt run here as a simple lxc-create does work fine for me | 03:40 |
stgraber | well, adt is crashing here (as in the tool) so not much luck with it, will let pitti figure it out | 03:45 |
stgraber | tyhicks: just got adt to run properly here and it passed fine, so looks like it's something in the adt environment which changed | 04:30 |
tyhicks | stgraber: ok, thanks for looking into that - I don't guess there's anything that I can do on my end | 04:31 |
stgraber | nah, though it means that if you ever run into that problem again, you can run adt-run locally and it should avoid that particular failure | 04:32 |
stgraber | might have been a firewall or proxy change in scalingstack, I'm sure pitti will take a look once he's around | 04:32 |
tyhicks | stgraber: I did do a local adt-run and saw the same failure | 04:33 |
stgraber | oh, odd | 04:33 |
stgraber | PASS: lxc-tests: /usr/bin/lxc-test-ubuntu | 04:33 |
stgraber | just got that 5min ago | 04:33 |
tyhicks | my run was ~2 hours ago (without the new apparmor) | 04:34 |
stgraber | adt-run -U --apt-pocket=proposed lxc --- adt-virt-qemu adt-xenial-amd64-cloud.img | 04:34 |
stgraber | that's what I ran here | 04:34 |
tyhicks | I'll give that a try in a bit | 04:35 |
stgraber | also odd that it doesn't affect ppc64el | 04:37 |
tyhicks | agreed | 04:40 |
stgraber | pitti: looks like ppc64el adt is kinda stuck, had a lxd adt stuck on nova create for a while now | 05:15 |
stgraber | tyhicks: btw, another adt retry for lxc just passed, so if that was the only blocker, apparmor will migrate very soon | 05:46 |
pitti | tyhicks: apparmor is held back by regressing systemd; that and the regressing udisks2 are because "scsi_debug" is missing, it seems that linux-image-extra does not get installed any more all of a sudden; investigating | 05:55 |
pitti | lxc seems happy again | 05:56 |
stgraber | pitti: looks like ppc64el adt for lxd also got unblocked, package just migrated now | 05:56 |
pitti | yeah, but that looks relatively stable (http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/lxd/xenial/ppc64el/) | 05:57 |
stgraber | yeah, just not sure why it was seemingly stuck for over half an hour on nova create | 05:58 |
tyhicks | pitti: I also can't locally reproduce the systemd "storage" test failure that is preventing the apparmor migration: "modprobe: FATAL: Module scsi_debug not found in directory /lib/modules/4.4.0-18-generic" | 05:58 |
pitti | stgraber: pretty much everything has a timeout, I guess it timed out, and auto-retried | 05:59 |
pitti | tyhicks: yes, that's the thing I meant above 4 mins ago | 05:59 |
* pitti shakes fists at lcy01 | 05:59 | |
tyhicks | pitti: ah, I missed that message, sorry! | 05:59 |
pitti | tyhicks: I hinted apparmor for now to unblock this | 06:03 |
tyhicks | pitti: thank you! | 06:03 |
lordievader | Good morning. | 07:51 |
davmor2 | jibel, cyphermox, slangasek, seb128: hmmm no image today? | 08:11 |
infinity | davmor2: Need a bit more verbosity. | 08:12 |
davmor2 | infinity: no xenial images build today the page is missing from the cdimages http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/daily-live/20160409/ | 08:13 |
* infinity raises his brow at the empty directories. | 08:13 | |
davmor2 | infinity: current image is based on the 8th | 08:13 |
rbasak | Launchpad was down briefly last night. Related? | 08:15 |
infinity | No. Today's just exploded too. | 08:16 |
rbasak | I fixed the libgda5 FTBFS yesterday, but am not sure whether to upload: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811068 | 08:16 |
davmor2 | infinity: you understand my asking now right :) | 08:16 |
ubot5` | Debian bug 811068 in libgda5 "FTBFS: FAIL: check_vcnc: ../../test-driver: line 107: 77018 Aborted" [Serious,Open] | 08:16 |
rbasak | Old libgda5 was building against an older sqlite. Rebuilding it even with my patch may regress it. | 08:17 |
rbasak | The source would only be made better, but the binary may regress from the perspective of a user. | 08:17 |
jamespage | ^^ that swift upload should resolved the autopkgtest failure that's blocking 2.7.0 from the release pocket... | 11:28 |
rbasak | ^ will (should?) dep-wait without mysql-connector-c++ | 14:28 |
rbasak | (he says to the mystery person accepting his stuff) | 14:28 |
rbasak | Oh, the mystery person being the unseeded auto-accept. | 14:37 |
teward | heheh, rbasak | 14:39 |
cyphermox | stgraber: since you cared about it before to review: ^ | 15:16 |
cyphermox | this fixes the current autopkgtest failure, which was due to a changed default I didn't notice, because I was testing with my own existing connections. | 15:17 |
cyphermox | infinity: remember my cpc merge for ubuntu-cdimage? | 15:20 |
stgraber | cyphermox: looking | 15:31 |
Mirv | ^ you can reject ubuntu2, which only contains a partial fix to the emulator image building (or ubuntu-touch installation). ubuntu3 handles all upgrade situations. sorry for the hassle. | 16:06 |
Mirv | the gles packaging is in the middle of migrating to completely new system as mandated by CI Train changes, but I'm going to keep everything in sync now. | 16:07 |
xnox | infinity, cjwatson - why you hate UTF-8 on s390x? Looking at buildds, all arches are now on UTF-8, apart from s390x | 16:08 |
xnox | cause on s390x in addition to LANG=C.UTF-8, there is also LC_ALL=POSIX which trumps the UTF-9-ness | 16:09 |
xnox | cause on s390x in addition to LANG=C.UTF-8, there is also LC_ALL=POSIX which trumps the UTF-8-ness | 16:09 |
cjwatson | bluff | 16:11 |
cjwatson | sbuild-package:export LANG=C.UTF-8 LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 LANGUAGE= | 16:11 |
cjwatson | unless sbuild hates us lots, which is possible | 16:13 |
cjwatson | $host_defaults->{'ENV'}->{'LC_ALL'} = 'POSIX'; | 16:13 |
cjwatson | that line dates from 2010 though | 16:14 |
cjwatson | oh I don't know, please puzzle something out, I need to think about SSO stuff | 16:15 |
xnox | =) | 16:15 |
xnox | cjwatson, https://youtu.be/IXmF4GbA86E | 16:15 |
xnox | oh wait you said SSO, not SOS =) oh well. | 16:16 |
xnox | i guess POSIX is coming from the host itself, rather than the chroot, which is coming from debian, because our hosts got cross-graded _from_ debian rather than being ubuntu installs. | 16:17 |
xnox | infinity, could you ssh and fiddle with builders? | 16:17 |
* xnox is not going to fiddle with them via HMC console, because i shouldn't. | 16:17 | |
cjwatson | can't be the host | 16:18 |
cjwatson | I mean except for xenial's sbuild | 16:18 |
cjwatson | and "grep -rs POSIX /etc" has nothing of interest | 16:19 |
cjwatson | I strongly suspect xenial's sbuild, just can't easily prove it right now | 16:21 |
xnox | ack. | 16:24 |
cpaelzer | Hi, we just realized that likely due to the reorg regarding build-dependencies we had a few packages falling out of main the last days | 18:53 |
cpaelzer | in particular all of dpdk and openvswitch-switch-dpdk | 18:53 |
cpaelzer | what would be the appropriate way to address that? | 18:53 |
infinity | cpaelzer: openvswitch-switch-dpdk was never in main... | 19:02 |
cpaelzer | infinity: I'll have to clarify that with jamespage tomorrow then | 19:04 |
cpaelzer | the changes made by doko back then wehn bug 1492186 was closed seem to be lost | 19:05 |
jamespage | cpaelzer, infinity: I'm still here | 19:05 |
ubot5` | bug 1492186 in dpdk (Ubuntu) "[MIR] dpdk" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1492186 | 19:05 |
jamespage | and it was never in main - that's quite correct | 19:05 |
cpaelzer | but dpdk was, the bug even holds the "override component to main" | 19:05 |
cpaelzer | I wonder what was lost | 19:05 |
jamespage | cpaelzer, infinity: that said it is build from a main source package, so I can seed if if thats OK | 19:05 |
jamespage | that would pull the runtime dpdk bits back into main | 19:06 |
cpaelzer | jamespage: IIRC you intended bring in openvswitch-switch-dpdk anyway | 19:06 |
cpaelzer | yet I wonder why dpdk itself was "lost" | 19:06 |
jamespage | cpaelzer, its only a build-time depends atm | 19:06 |
infinity | Right, it's not a runtime dep of anything in main, nor is it seeded, so universe is correct. | 19:07 |
jamespage | it was pulled into main by the ovs source package, but only used by the -dpdk binary package | 19:07 |
infinity | jamespage: If the intent is to support ovs-dpdk, seeding that is your path of least resistance. | 19:07 |
cpaelzer | so was I right to assume that it was lost due to the changes to the archive regarding build dependencies? | 19:07 |
jamespage | infinity, that is the intent yes - I'll add it to the supported seed now | 19:07 |
cpaelzer | the intend was to support that | 19:08 |
cpaelzer | thank you jamespage | 19:08 |
cpaelzer | and thanks infinity for clarifying | 19:08 |
jamespage | cpaelzer, infinity: done | 19:10 |
cpaelzer | jamespage: thanks | 19:10 |
davmor2 | infinity: did you figure out what was up with the images or is that a job for today? | 19:12 |
infinity | davmor2: cjwatson sorted it out, a fresh batch is being attempted right now. | 19:14 |
davmor2 | infinity: nice one so hopefully in the morning we should have new images then? | 19:14 |
infinity | davmor2: Or right now. | 19:15 |
infinity | davmor2: I see 20160411.2 | 19:15 |
davmor2 | infinity: yeah but I finish now so I don't care till the morning ;) | 19:16 |
infinity | davmor2: Well, they'll still be there in the morning. :P | 19:16 |
davmor2 | infinity: just happy to have images again \o/ good work everyone :) | 19:16 |
stgraber | final 2.0 release ^ | 19:44 |
slangasek | so someone appears to have bulk-downgraded the packages that were in components-mismatches | 21:55 |
cjwatson | wat | 21:55 |
cjwatson | example? | 21:55 |
slangasek | doko: was this you? | 21:55 |
cjwatson | should be visible in publishinghistory | 21:56 |
slangasek | cjwatson: libiberty would be an example | 21:56 |
cjwatson | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libiberty/+publishinghistory doesn't show a downgrade | 21:56 |
cjwatson | better example? :) | 21:57 |
slangasek | cjwatson: it doesn't? main->universe? | 21:57 |
cjwatson | oh that sort of downgrade! | 21:57 |
cjwatson | I thought you meant version | 21:57 |
slangasek | ah no | 21:57 |
slangasek | sorry, 'demotion' | 21:57 |
slangasek | but it doesn't tell me who did it | 21:57 |
slangasek | and at least the discussion we had here concluded we wanted two sets of eyeballs to sanity check before demoting | 21:59 |
slangasek | and libiberty is one I know it *wasn't* sane to demote, because it only builds a static lib and needs to be in Built-Using | 21:59 |
slangasek | apw, infinity, RAOF, arges, Daviey, jdstrand, pitti, doko, stgraber, wgrant: did any of you mass-demote the packages that were listed on component-mismatches? | 22:01 |
stgraber | wasn't me | 22:01 |
stgraber | I did see the discussion last week and agree that we need to take a close look before demoting stuff :) | 22:01 |
slangasek | ok looks like it was pitti :) | 22:11 |
lamont | slangasek: I'm preparing to rage-upload for bugs 1569077 and 1528710, fyi... | 23:04 |
ubot5` | bug 1528710 in python-django (Ubuntu) "overly agressive URLField validation causes failures" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1528710 | 23:04 |
ubot5` | bug 1569077 in python-formencode (Ubuntu) "Incorrect regex for TLDs causes locally defined TLDs to be rejected" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1569077 | 23:04 |
mwhudson | just in case the archive team did not have enough to do | 23:18 |
slangasek | lamont: well I assume that's bugfix, or else you would have asked for an FFe | 23:20 |
lamont | slangasek: yes. silly upstreams keep breaking my entire environment | 23:30 |
lamont | kindly, django already called it a regression and fixed it in 1.8.10, so I'm just backporting that fix to 1.8.7 | 23:30 |
lamont | slangasek: the one I already discussed with infinity is the postfix 3.1.0-2 upload that I will do in a (today). Upstream is far more pedantic than I, and everything in 3.1.0 (vs 3.0.4) is either a bugfix we'd want to backport, or a bugfix that we need to backport | 23:33 |
lamont | but I need to re-review the list before I so assert | 23:34 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!