[04:16] <bzoltan> jibel: The silo16 is OK for QA, the exuses files are all OK,but the automated signoff process is hanging on something https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1242
[04:17] <bzoltan> jibel:  would you please manually set it to "ready for QA"... in the meantime I ping pitti if he can help with that blocker process.
[05:01] <Mirv> robru: right thanks, we had a deal and mitya57 did a direct upload combining my and his uploads, so the silo is now essentially vivid only anymore
[05:03] <robru> bzoltan: "hanging on something"? The tests aren't finished running yet. Xenial shows one test still in progress
[05:12] <Mirv> robru: it has shown that for 15h+, and it has not been on the running page. so it is hanged.
[05:13] <Mirv> and if it thinks it's running it's also not possible to restart it :(
[08:28] <veebers> trainguards, anyone around that could help me with my 'publish' question?
[08:33] <Mirv> veebers: sure
[08:33] <Mirv> veebers: I don't see the question though but I guess it's coming :)
[08:33] <veebers> Mirv: heh, awesome :-) The requests page has updated to publishing (and now landed). I was concerned by the 'failure' state of the publish jenkins job
[08:34] <veebers> but I take it all is well?
[08:35] <Mirv> veebers: it seems all landed well, and I think robru is aware of most overlay publish jobs ending with fake FAILURE even though it worked fine (and the train notices it and says "Landed")
[08:35] <veebers> Mirv: right, cool thanks.
[08:35] <veebers> Mirv: oh, hmm. I'm late reading some emails, I take it that to get that published to Xenial archive (i.e. available on desktop) I need to do something further?
[08:36] <sil2100> veebers: as long as you see the publish job mentioning package copies and you see those are done, I guess all is well
[08:36] <sil2100> veebers: yes, you would need to ask some core-dev (me or Mirv can help as well) to publish your packages to the main archive
[08:36] <sil2100> (if your silo was a dual-landing silo that is)
[08:37] <veebers> Hi sil2100 o/ Yes I would love your help :-)
[08:37] <veebers> sil2100: the autopilot bug fix fixes the ubiquity tests so will need to be available for desktop too
[08:38] <sil2100> veebers: could you give me the landing request for your landed landing ;) ?
[08:38] <Mirv> veebers: sil2100: me, me, I've new core-dev rights!
[08:38] <sil2100> I would then copy those from the overlay to xenial
[08:38] <sil2100> ...or Mirv will do it ;p
[08:38] <Mirv> ;)
[08:38] <sil2100> He's got super powers too
[08:39] <veebers> sil2100, Mirv: Does this help: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1249 (it's landing-052)
[08:39] <veebers> heh, thanks Mirv and sil2100 :-)
[08:40] <Mirv> veebers: sil2100: ok done, it's now in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text= and will hopefully progress from there soon to proposed and eventually to release pocket
[08:41] <veebers> Mirv: excellent, thanks again for all your help
[08:42] <veebers> Mirv: What's the best way to tell when it's all done?
[08:43] <Mirv> veebers: well since it's not seeded it got auto-accepted in proposed. so refresh https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopilot/1.5.1+16.04.20160412-0ubuntu1 occasionnaly. the "Pocket" is currently empty. in about 30 mins it will say "Proposed". when it turns in to "Release" it's all done.
[08:43] <veebers> Mirv: sweet. Much appreciated :-)
[08:44] <sil2100> Mirv: you copied it from the overlay I hope? :)
[08:44] <Mirv> sil2100: yes
[08:44] <sil2100> Excellent
[08:45] <Mirv> sil2100: I guess I couldn't from anywhere else after it was landed from the PPA, or is there some caveat I'm unaware of?
[11:04] <bzoltan> jibel: ping
[11:09] <sil2100> bzoltan: jibel is sprinting IIRC so he might be hard to reach
[11:11] <bzoltan> sil2100: Who else would be able to manually push my silo?
[11:18] <Mirv> ubuntu-qa: can you help the issue above ^ ? (jib_el not reachable, so we need someone else). that is, please force https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1242 to be "Ready" for QA signoff. The vivid excuses are 100% pass, and the only xenial problem is a "running" test that is actually hanged for last 18 hours and we can't seem to get over it.
[11:18] <Mirv> that would get it properly to the Trello board
[11:18] <rvr> Mirv: Let me see
[11:19] <rvr> Mirv: I set it to "Ready" but switches back to "Required"
[11:25] <Mirv> rvr: ok. I know jibel was able to force it somehow, but I think sil2100 also does not know how he did that.
[11:26] <Mirv> but I have a vague memory that someone else was able to do that too at some point, hmm
[11:26] <sil2100> hmmm
[11:27] <Mirv> jibel has these magic things like "type http in some field and then something unlocks", it's like some Nintendo game trick :)
[11:28] <sil2100> Yeah, no idea how to do that, I know jibel sometimes manually inserted trello-card tickets for silos that needed manual override
[11:28] <Mirv> yeah I think rvr could do that of course, to get it into queue
[11:29] <rvr> I can create a manual card for it :)
[11:30] <rvr> But I fear that if I'm not able to set it as QA Ready I won't be able to approve it either
[11:36] <Mirv> thank you. we can continue pinging foundations do get it fixed for real in parallel, but they seem super busy
[11:38]  * sil2100 hides
[11:40] <rvr> Mirv: bzoltan: All the merge proposals in that silo appear as already merged ?
[11:41] <bzoltan> rvr:  that silo has one and only one MR ... the links to the MR are the MRs what all merged tothe staging branch of the UITK
[11:41] <rvr> bzoltan: Ah, which one?
[11:41] <bzoltan> rvr: the one what is in the silo
[11:42] <bzoltan> rvr: Merge Proposal URLs	ubuntu-ui-toolkit OTA11-landing-2016-04-08
[11:42] <bzoltan> rvr: https://code.launchpad.net/~bzoltan/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/OTA11-landing-2016-04-08/+merge/291398
[11:43] <bzoltan> rvr:  all other MRs what you see are in the comment field only... might be confusing :) jibel asked me to put all the MRs for this this revision there
[11:44] <rvr> bzoltan: Ok
[12:38] <ChrisTownsend> ubuntua-qa: Hi!  Could someone mark QA Signoff to Approved since it passed?
[12:39] <ChrisTownsend> Err, ubuntu-qa even^^^^
[12:40] <rvr> ChrisTownsend: When did it pass QA?
[12:41] <ChrisTownsend> rvr: According to alesage, the Trello card was marked approved yesterday at 6:42PM.
[12:41] <ChrisTownsend> I should say passed.
[12:41] <rvr> ChrisTownsend: Sorry, which silo?
[12:41] <rvr> 31
[12:41] <ChrisTownsend> rvr: Right, 31
[12:42] <rvr> ChrisTownsend: Done
[12:42] <ChrisTownsend> rvr: Thank you!
[12:42] <ChrisTownsend> rvr: And thanks again for bumping the priority of that.
[12:42] <rvr> No problem
[12:47] <nik90> rvr, if you have any questions about uNav, let me know.
[12:48] <rvr> nik90: Ack
[12:48] <nik90> hopefully we can get a approval today
[12:48] <rvr> Yes, I'm on it
[12:48] <Mirv> ChrisTownsend: libertine is published, but do note that everything is now going (this week) to overlay only. if it's a requirement to have it in 16.04 LTS archives, it will need to be copied manually there and acked by release team.
[12:49] <ChrisTownsend> Mirv: Sure, I've asked a core dev for some help getting it in the archive.  Do we have to ping someone on the release team directly or will they notice and review it based on being in the queue?
[12:51] <Mirv> ChrisTownsend: If it gets stuck in the queue (it will not if it's not seeded in any seed), they will get to it at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text= . then after it gets to proposed you will need to monitor it getting to the release pocket too.
[12:52] <Mirv> I mean they will get to it without a separate notice usually.
[12:52] <ChrisTownsend> Mirv: Ok, thanks!
[12:57] <bzoltan> Mirv:  ^
[12:57] <Mirv> bzoltan: \o/
[12:58] <Mirv> Trevinho: unapproved MP:s in the unity7 landing, please get all top-approved
[12:58] <Mirv> (couldn't publish)
[13:01] <Trevinho> Mirv: oh, right... I'll get them ASAP.
[14:23] <Trevinho> Mirv: everything should be approved now...
[14:31] <rvr> popey: Wait a moment for uNav, that I forgot to do sanity check in stable
[14:32] <popey> rvr: okay, will wait for your okay
[14:32] <rvr> nik90_: ^
[14:36] <Mirv> Trevinho: ok all good now, in release team's hands
[14:36] <Trevinho> Mirv: awesome, thanks
[14:56] <rvr> popey: Checked
[14:56] <rvr> popey: You can publish now
[15:03] <popey> rvr: thank you!
[15:24] <oSoMoN> ubuntu-qa: the landing of silo 38 yesterday introduced a bad regression (https://launchpad.net/bugs/1569938, really sorry about it), I’ve got a fix for it currently building in silo 50, any chance it can be validated later today? (the fix is small, self-contained, and it comes with an autopilot test)
[15:24] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1569938 in webbrowser-app (Ubuntu) "Backspace while an HTML text field has focus triggers a back navigation in history" [Critical,In progress]
[15:24] <nik90_> rvr, thnx a lot :)
[15:25] <rvr> oSoMoN: I'll put it in the queue
[15:26] <oSoMoN> rvr, thanks a bunch (and sorry again about the regression, it’s a really bad timing for regressions to sneak in)
[15:27] <rvr> oSoMoN: No problem, at least it was discovered right after it landed
[15:27] <oSoMoN> yeah, it could have been worse, we could have found it after the release of xenial
[17:15] <robru> Mirv: sil2100: if you set http://foo in the manual download links field it unlocks control over the qa field. I agree that this needs to be improved but I'm not sure what the best solution is, open to suggestions
[17:26] <dobey> robru: support for building clicks in launchpad, and to upload them to the store in biletto? ;)
[17:28] <robru> dobey: hey man, as soon as somebody implements click building in lp, I'm happy to implement click-uploading-to-store in bileto.
[17:28] <robru> dobey: same problem with device tarballs.
[17:29] <robru> dobey: but my current comment is more about ppa builds where the auto-setting of the QA field is doing unhelpful things due to britney glitches.
[17:29] <dobey> oh, that seems odd
[17:30] <dobey> well at least i don't have to bugger bout with pay-ui clicks any more
[17:30] <dobey> huzzah
[17:33] <robru> dobey: I was under the impression that clicks will be phased out in favor of snaps, though? so eventually we'll have snap-based phones, not much point in investing time improving click architecture.
[17:34] <dobey> robru: i've been hearing that for 2 years. so in another 2 years when it actually happens, i'll agree. :)
[17:35] <robru> heh
[17:36] <dobey> oh, there's no way to delete packages in myapps
[18:34] <oSoMoN> rvr, I approved silo 50, automated signoff should be running on it now, maybe we can parallelize with your validation?
[20:12] <robru> bregma: ^ you need my qtmir branch
[20:14] <robru> bregma: also no more -gles branches
[20:16] <bregma> robru, what qtmir branch?
[20:18] <robru> bregma: I added it already