=== lathiat_ is now known as lathiat | ||
=== Spads_ is now known as Spads | ||
beisner | coreycb that one has the bzr import issue and isn't in sync @ LP | 00:42 |
---|---|---|
coreycb | beisner, oh.. so maybe I'm picking up the LP version | 00:45 |
=== cos1 is now known as c0s | ||
=== redir is now known as redir_afk | ||
=== bdx_ is now known as bdx | ||
nullagent | Hi all, having trouble getting juju installed on wily. Just did in an install on a new machine yesterday and everything went just fine. Now today I decided to re-install on my dev machine to make sure I'm charm dev-ing in an identical environment. Eveything fails to start for some reason. No running jujud and my /var/lib/juju is completely empty | 05:56 |
=== med_ is now known as Guest46337 | ||
=== bradm_ is now known as bradm | ||
hoenir | hi guys, someone could help me with some commands in juju? I'm trying to remove a pending machine with the command juju remove-machine 0 | 07:13 |
hoenir | but when I do juju status I'm getting the machine.. and it does not remove | 07:14 |
hoenir | here is my output on juju status | 07:15 |
hoenir | https://paste.ubuntu.com/15824849/ | 07:15 |
hoenir | I was deploying this machine when my machine was suddenly shut down and now I have this machine in "pending.." state how can I remove it and start again the deployment? | 07:16 |
hoenir | opss, to "machine" words.. | 07:17 |
hoenir | anyway reading the doc on juju it says that I should run the juju destroy-environment <environment> but how can I know what <environment> I'm in? | 07:18 |
blahdeblah_ | hoenir: juju switch will tell you which env you're currently in | 07:18 |
=== blahdeblah_ is now known as blahdeblah | ||
hoenir | ohh but something tells me that I should not remove this... anyway how can I remove that problematic machine? | 07:19 |
hoenir | or should I realease from the "MAAS web interface" that machine? | 07:21 |
hoenir | I tried from the MAAS web interface, my node is "released" but from juju status I'm still getting that machine in pending state any thoughts on this? | 07:24 |
hoenir | juju status | 07:26 |
chrido | hoenir: no thoughts, but if destroy-environment does not work you can try --force | 07:43 |
hoenir | tried to destroy controller but I hangs.. any advice? | 07:44 |
hoenir | I just wanted to reset everything from 0 to bootstrap again | 07:45 |
chrido | with --show-log --force? | 07:45 |
hoenir | on juju destroy-controller --show-log --force mycontroller | 07:46 |
hoenir | like this? | 07:46 |
chrido | yes | 07:46 |
hoenir | "force dosen't exist" | 07:47 |
hoenir | with just --show-log opt it's just "dailing" | 07:48 |
chrido | you are using juju2 i guess, i think its juju kill-controller | 07:48 |
bradm | hoenir: this with juju2 ? you can try juju2 kill-controller | 07:48 |
hoenir | yeee, it worked..thanks a lot guys! | 07:49 |
hoenir | and yeah I'm using the 2.0 juju version | 07:50 |
hoenir | so what's the primary difference with destroy and kill? | 07:50 |
hoenir | could anyone clarify this? | 07:50 |
bradm | I think kill is the new --force | 07:51 |
hoenir | oh, thanks a lot again ! | 07:53 |
chrido | here is some explanation: https://jujucharms.com/docs/devel/commands | 07:53 |
chrido | also destroys the model | 07:54 |
chrido | Does somebody know where in Juju2 you should put the proxy configuration? (Juju 1 had set-env or you could put it in the environments.yaml) | 07:56 |
jamespage | gnuoy, urgh | 08:05 |
jamespage | xenial specific issue: | 08:05 |
jamespage | http://10.245.162.19/test_charm_pipeline_amulet_full/openstack/charm-neutron-gateway/305121/1/2016-04-13_18-21-57/test_charm_amulet_full/juju-stat-tabular-collect.txt | 08:05 |
jamespage | gnuoy, https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+source/neutron-gateway/+bug/1547122 | 08:06 |
mup | Bug #1547122: xenial: nova-api-metadata not running post deployment <openstack> <xenial> <neutron-gateway (Juju Charms Collection):New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1547122> | 08:06 |
jamespage | I rasied a but a while back, but had not hit it since... | 08:06 |
jamespage | systemd is less aggressive with restarting services that shutdown straight away | 08:06 |
=== terje is now known as Guest76597 | ||
gnuoy | jamespage, so you think previously is was crashing straight away but upstart was restarting it till it worked? | 08:37 |
jamespage | gnuoy, yeah | 08:38 |
jamespage | gnuoy, its racey so you don't see it all of the time on systemd based installs - this is the 3rd hit i've seen since I started testing xenial | 08:38 |
gnuoy | jamespage, on the plus side its nice the way workload status calls it out clearly | 08:38 |
jamespage | gnuoy, yeah | 08:39 |
jamespage | gnuoy, ok fixes up for nova-cc and neutron-gateway | 08:58 |
gnuoy | jamespage, kk, thanks | 08:58 |
gnuoy | jamespage, it looks like you're not gating the restart on paused status for neutron-gateway | 09:02 |
jamespage | gnuoy, oh good point | 09:02 |
jacekn_ | hello. Can somebody check why my charm is still not recommended in the charm store? It was meant to happen 2 weeks ago. I know ingestion was broken but I'm pretty sure it's fixed now. https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1538573 | 09:17 |
mup | Bug #1538573: New collectd subordinate charm <Juju Charms Collection:Fix Released> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1538573> | 09:17 |
=== jacekn_ is now known as jacekn | ||
jamespage | gnuoy, that restart service on nonce change is a pattern we should model | 09:21 |
jamespage | but later... | 09:21 |
freak_ | 09:25 | |
=== terje is now known as Guest32809 | ||
jamespage | gnuoy, ok both of the reviews for https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+source/neutron-gateway/+bug/1547122 are good | 09:59 |
mup | Bug #1547122: xenial: nova-api-metadata not running post deployment <openstack> <xenial> <neutron-gateway (Juju Charms Collection):In Progress by james-page> <nova-cloud-controller (Juju Charms Collection):In Progress by james-page> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1547122> | 09:59 |
jamespage | not proposing a full recheck as the change is not specific to xenial | 09:59 |
jamespage | gnuoy, just running smoke testing on staging now so we can promote through to updates... | 10:09 |
jamespage | coreycb, hit a haproxy problem last night which has now been resolved.. | 10:09 |
jamespage | dosaboy_, rebased https://review.openstack.org/#/c/300164/ for you | 10:25 |
jamespage | turns out we can all contribute to each others changes ! | 10:25 |
jamespage | gnuoy, ^^ | 10:25 |
gnuoy | kk | 10:27 |
=== dosaboy_ is now known as dosaboy | ||
dosaboy | jamespage: you are too kind | 10:49 |
tinwood | gnuoy, how long should simple_os_checks.py take? I think I've got a 'stuck' test? | 10:54 |
gnuoy | tinwood, typically 2 or 3 mins | 10:55 |
tinwood | oh. | 10:55 |
tinwood | gnuoy, that's not good then. I'll have to see where it got stuck. | 10:55 |
gnuoy | tinwood, give me a shout if you want a hand | 10:56 |
tinwood | gnuoy, will do. | 10:57 |
dosaboy | gnuoy: might wanna squeeze https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+source/swift-proxy/+bug/1570314 into 16.04 | 11:04 |
mup | Bug #1570314: can't set min-part-hours back to zero <swift-proxy (Juju Charms Collection):In Progress by hopem> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1570314> | 11:04 |
dosaboy | jamespage: ^^ | 11:04 |
urulama | jacekn: which is your collectd charm? ingestion fix doesn't touch that part (just makes it fast again and deal with disk space) | 11:09 |
jacekn | urulama: https://jujucharms.com/u/jacekn/collectd/trusty/0 . Marked as "Fix Released" with +1 from marcoceppi here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1538573 | 11:10 |
mup | Bug #1538573: New collectd subordinate charm <Juju Charms Collection:Fix Released> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1538573> | 11:10 |
urulama | jacekn: the logs see revision 0, but not newer one | 11:14 |
urulama | jacekn: i'll put it on the list. if you want, you can always push it direclty with the new charm command from juju/devel ppa | 11:15 |
icey | beisner: no idea why that won't merge | 11:48 |
icey | oh yeah I do, it depended on the abandoned C-H sync commit, let me re make the commit on master | 11:48 |
lazyPower | urulama - is there a way that I can flip the necessary bits in launchpad to enable things like bugreporting on a package that doesn't exist in the old launchpad structure? as an example try filing a bug here and watch it complain - https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+source/nexentaedge-swift-gw/+filebug | 11:50 |
icey | beisner: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305780/ | 11:51 |
icey | jamespage: this replicates the abandoned merge's functionality | 11:51 |
urulama | lazyPower: not sure i understand correctly. you'd like to have just bug reporting done in LP, but the code would be somewhere else? | 11:53 |
=== Guest46337 is now known as med_ | ||
=== CyberJacob is now known as zz_CyberJacob | ||
lazyPower | urulama - correct, but i think i'm going to move out of the charms collection to to do this, as there are some restrictions in there that just dont make sense for this application. | 12:44 |
beisner | jamespage, gnuoy - i believe ceilometer is legitimately failing to pause/resume @ wily-liberty (re: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/304188/) | 12:56 |
jamespage | beisner, \o/ | 12:57 |
jamespage | craple | 12:57 |
gnuoy | beisner, jamespage, I can grab that and check it out | 12:57 |
beisner | i'd say let's land that amulet test update, because it is identical to ceilometer-agent, except for the pause/resume, and i've not touched that. | 12:58 |
jamespage | gnuoy, I have my test in odl atm | 12:58 |
jamespage | test/head | 12:58 |
jamespage | you can see what its doing to me... | 12:58 |
gnuoy | beisner, +1 | 12:58 |
beisner | glad your head is in test, jamespage | 12:58 |
beisner | ;-) | 12:58 |
gnuoy | beisner, would you mind filing a bug for that and I'll grab it? | 12:58 |
beisner | gnuoy, yep sec | 12:59 |
jamespage | beisner, btw I have a ch branch that switches our amulet to github | 12:59 |
jamespage | however | 12:59 |
jamespage | amulet borks on it atm | 12:59 |
jamespage | I tried working the feature for a hour this morning and got tangled - hoping marcoceppi might repay me my upload work for him in amulet features... | 12:59 |
beisner | jamespage, :) saw that wip. fyi, already had a card in backlog, added your name to it and a link to that review, to revisit in case we don't push that now. | 13:00 |
beisner | it looks like its close | 13:00 |
jamespage | beisner, what package provides juju-test ? | 13:00 |
beisner | charm-tools i believe | 13:00 |
jamespage | beisner, oh | 13:00 |
jamespage | ok | 13:00 |
beisner | gnuoy, https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+source/ceilometer/+bug/1570375 | 13:03 |
mup | Bug #1570375: pause/resume failing for wily-liberty (blocked: apache2 still running) <uosci> <ceilometer (Juju Charms Collection):New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1570375> | 13:03 |
beisner | she's baaaack. the blessed apache2 | 13:03 |
gnuoy | beisner, ta | 13:03 |
beisner | yw gnuoy thx for looking | 13:04 |
=== skay_ is now known as skay | ||
beisner | icey, ha! good catch, i totally missed that review dependency. | 13:07 |
icey | heh yeah beisner, new change up also updates the C-H in tests but should be passing shortly :) | 13:08 |
marcoceppi | jamespage: let me know what features you need, you got it. | 13:20 |
jamespage | marcoceppi, https://github.com/juju/amulet/issues/127 | 13:21 |
jamespage | marcoceppi, just uploaded charm 2.1.1 btw | 13:21 |
marcoceppi | jamespage: <3 thank you so much. That's it for packaging from me. I'll just turn everyone else down from this point forward | 13:21 |
marcoceppi | jamespage: where would this show up? | 13:22 |
marcoceppi | jamespage: in like the the Deployment.add() ? | 13:22 |
jamespage | marcoceppi, yah so | 13:22 |
* jamespage looks for references | 13:22 | |
jamespage | right now we use the bzr branches on lp | 13:23 |
jamespage | marcoceppi, I want todo https://review.openstack.org/#/c/304477/1/tests/charmhelpers/contrib/openstack/amulet/deployment.py | 13:23 |
jamespage | marcoceppi, the location field gets handed to amulet here | 13:24 |
jamespage | https://review.openstack.org/gitweb?p=openstack/charm-neutron-api.git;a=blob;f=tests/charmhelpers/contrib/amulet/deployment.py;h=d451698d344942d957a922529d7caf352e31f1ec;hb=80108561c5b7dba5b7c62811c66a2d5b69e772f0#l68 | 13:24 |
marcoceppi | jamespage: gotchya, I'll see if we can get a patch to amulet this week | 13:24 |
marcoceppi | jamespage: this has ramifications on deployer, which we use to underpin amulet, but I'm sure we can make this happen | 13:26 |
jamespage | marcoceppi, deployer already supports this format :-) | 13:26 |
marcoceppi | jamespage: then this will be easy | 13:26 |
jamespage | beisner, gnuoy: hey so are we going todo the series in metadata thing now that 1.25.5 is out? | 13:36 |
jamespage | it would mean that anyone who wants to use the new charms would have to upgrade to latest 1.25 first... | 13:37 |
lazyPower | jamespage - i tested that using whats in proposed and it still choked on series-in-metadata | 13:37 |
jamespage | lazyPower, well that answers that question - I thought mgz_ had fixed that... | 13:38 |
lazyPower | I dont want to cry wolf if this was fixed since Monday | 13:38 |
rick_h_ | lazyPower jamespage series in medata choked 1.25.5? | 13:38 |
rick_h_ | lazyPower: yes, 1.25.5 that went out yesterday has the fix? | 13:38 |
lazyPower | rick_h_ - was that release staged in -proposed ppa? | 13:38 |
* lazyPower pulls latest stable to test | 13:38 | |
rick_h_ | yes | 13:38 |
lazyPower | ill re-verify, 1 sec | 13:39 |
rick_h_ | it was in proposed for a bit and hit released yeterday | 13:39 |
lazyPower | yeah i was using what was in proposed | 13:39 |
lazyPower | and it tanked on me on monday, so lemme flex this again and turn myself into a liar - which is best case scenario here | 13:39 |
rick_h_ | lazyPower: k, yes please let me know what the metadata looks like and verify version | 13:39 |
rick_h_ | lazyPower: because we specifically held onto 1.25.5 to get that fixed | 13:39 |
lazyPower | ubuntu@charmbox:~$ juju --version | 13:39 |
lazyPower | 1.25.5-trusty-amd64 | 13:39 |
lazyPower | rick_h_ - i'm full of lies, looks like it works. Apologies for the noise :) | 13:42 |
lazyPower | jamespage ^ | 13:42 |
jamespage | lazyPower, lol | 13:42 |
rick_h_ | lazyPower: ok, phew. I'll not go nuts then :) | 13:42 |
=== beuno_ is now known as beuno | ||
marcoceppi | lazyPower: I meant to mention it yesterday at standup, but we tested it at bigdata sprint and it works | 13:44 |
lazyPower | marcoceppi - its weird tho the proposed ppa was choking on series in metadata so we reverted it. we must have been running on -stable and not -proposed like we thought we were or something | 13:44 |
* lazyPower shrugs | 13:44 | |
lazyPower | i'm just happy to see that i was wrong :D | 13:44 |
rick_h_ | lazyPower: all good, it happens to the best of us. I mean, there was that one time a few years ago it happened to me :P | 13:44 |
lazyPower | rick_h_ - thats pretty much the bar i set for every week. Find one thing i've been complaining about thats been fixed. I'll gladly be the guy thats always wrong if you keep fixing my bugs :D | 13:45 |
lazyPower | #thingsilearnedfromjorge | 13:46 |
rick_h_ | hah | 13:46 |
* rick_h_ sees lazyPower turning that into a coffee table book | 13:46 | |
lazyPower | rick_h_ - i thought you were on vacation this week? | 13:50 |
rick_h_ | lazyPower: starts tomorrow | 13:50 |
rick_h_ | lazyPower: so one more day to bug you all before I go :P | 13:50 |
* marcoceppi gets my long list of last min asks for rick_h_ | 13:51 | |
lazyPower | rick_h_ i want a pony, can you stuff a pony in before release? | 13:51 |
* aisrael adds to the list | 13:51 | |
* rick_h_ notes all lists must be mailed in triplicate and delivered by USPS...no change of it getting here before I'm on a plane now! | 13:51 | |
=== med_ is now known as Guest90748 | ||
bbaqar | Anyone got a working openstack bundle for xenial? | 13:57 |
jamespage | bbaqar, yeah | 13:59 |
jamespage | one second | 13:59 |
jamespage | bbaqar, I do - I'll try push it to lp today (have a couple of meetings todo) | 13:59 |
jamespage | bbaqar, it will appear here - https://jujucharms.com/u/openstack-charmers-next/openstack-base | 14:00 |
BrunoR | Hi. The submission to the charmstore is described using bazaar, how can I use git instead? | 14:02 |
jcastro | cmars: stokachu: hey guys, any of your layered charms worth polishing off and pushing into review for the store? | 14:02 |
bbaqar | james, much appreciated | 14:02 |
cmars | jcastro, possibly. does that mean i have to use LP? | 14:02 |
jcastro | hah no | 14:02 |
cmars | jcastro, how do i submit a charm for review straight out of CS? | 14:02 |
jcastro | https://jujucharms.com/docs/devel/authors-charm-store | 14:02 |
cmars | sweet | 14:02 |
jcastro | ^^ this will cover you too BrunoR | 14:03 |
cmars | jcastro, cs:~cmars/gogs is close | 14:03 |
cmars | jcastro, i've also got mattermost in devel | 14:03 |
jcastro | I see it, that's awesome. | 14:03 |
jcastro | I'd like to like, tell those projects what you're up to, but ideally it'd be something solid and testable, something they could be proud of if you know what I mean | 14:03 |
jcastro | BrunoR: the new store doesn't care about vcs, you just use the charm command to publish to the store from a working directory | 14:04 |
jcastro | but you will need the latest version of the charm tools from the ppa | 14:04 |
BrunoR | jcastro: ok, thanks. that means I can publish the charms on github and do charm push (with my launchpad-account) from my working directory? | 14:08 |
=== Guest90748 is now known as medberry | ||
jcastro | BrunoR: yep. | 14:11 |
jcastro | BrunoR: from there you can basically publish into a devel and stable channels as you see fit | 14:11 |
marcoceppi | cmars jcastro that won't get it submitted for review, that will just get it into the charm store | 14:12 |
jcastro | right | 14:12 |
jcastro | I was just about to get to the review queue portion | 14:12 |
jcastro | so we're working on a new review queue where you'll just submit whatever version you just published in your stable channel for review | 14:13 |
jcastro | and then at some point jujucharms.com/foo will point to your version of the charm | 14:13 |
jcastro | or you can leave it in your personal namespace, depending on what you want. | 14:14 |
tinwood | jamespage, beisner: may have found a bug in the dpdk code in neutron-openvswitch whilst testing dvr (mojo): https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+source/neutron-openvswitch/+bug/1570411 | 14:22 |
mup | Bug #1570411: custom add_bridge_port(...) function doesn't bring up interface <neutron-openvswitch (Juju Charms Collection):New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1570411> | 14:22 |
beisner | tinwood, woot :) appreciate the test spike on that. | 14:28 |
tinwood | beisner, kk :) I'm trying out a fix -- let you know how it goes. | 14:29 |
=== cos1 is now known as c0s | ||
icey | beisner: you've got 2 community approves on https://code.launchpad.net/~xfactor973/charm-helpers/ceph-pool-replicas/+merge/291827 :) | 14:45 |
beisner | icey, cholcombe - ok thanks guys. will merge shortly. will both ceph and ceph-mon need resync'd? | 14:46 |
icey | I believe so, yes | 14:46 |
icey | and thanks beisner! | 14:46 |
icey | also, I'll see about writing a couple of tests to cover this case in the future | 14:47 |
jamespage | tinwood, ugh thats possible | 14:59 |
tinwood | jamespage, I'm trialling a fix at the moment. | 14:59 |
=== scuttle|afk is now known as scuttlemonkey | ||
beisner | cholcombe, c-h change landed. clear to propose re-syncs. (fyi jhobbs ) | 15:17 |
cholcombe | beisner, thanks | 15:17 |
beisner | tyvm cholcombe jhobbs | 15:17 |
cholcombe | beisner, so how many charms do you think are affected? i think ceph, ceph-mon, cinder, glance, radosgw. anything else? | 15:19 |
beisner | cholcombe, let's get jamespage 's assessment on that. i'm not sure. | 15:19 |
cholcombe | ok | 15:19 |
beisner | jamespage, fyi bug 1565120 ^ | 15:29 |
mup | Bug #1565120: incorrect replica count in a single-unit ceph deployment <oil> <ceph (Juju Charms Collection):In Progress by xfactor973> <glance (Juju Charms Collection):Invalid> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1565120> | 15:29 |
jamespage | beisner, cholcombe: does the pool creation happen in the ceph and ceph-mon charms right? | 15:30 |
cholcombe | jamespage, i believe it does | 15:30 |
cholcombe | i'm going to resync both of them | 15:30 |
jamespage | cholcombe, I think that scope makes sense to me | 15:30 |
jamespage | that was the intent of the broker - shove everything serverside in ceph itself... | 15:31 |
cholcombe | so i can skip cinder/glance/radosgw | 15:31 |
jamespage | beisner, ok I switch the xenial test for odl to use BE - point testing that before I do a recheck-all | 15:48 |
jamespage | full rather | 15:48 |
beisner | ack jamespage thx | 15:49 |
jamespage | beisner, graaddhdhdhhdhsafdchjk cvsdjhn]# | 15:50 |
jamespage | 14:43:20 Permission denied (publickey). | 15:50 |
jamespage | 14:43:20 ConnectionReset reading response for 'BzrDir.open_2.1', retrying | 15:50 |
jamespage | 14:43:20 Permission denied (publickey). | 15:50 |
jamespage | on a recheck-full on mitaka-xenial | 15:50 |
jamespage | that's like the last test... | 15:50 |
beisner | wee. i suspect the IS-outage is affecting us. | 15:50 |
jamespage | ggrrrreeat! | 15:50 |
beisner | also hit rockstar's lxd test | 15:50 |
rockstar | Yup. I was waiting for that to get sorted before charm-recheck | 15:51 |
jamespage | is it just me or has everything been working against us this week.... | 15:51 |
rockstar | jamespage: it's not just you, but I don't have the luxury of drinking a beer at the end of the day. :) | 15:54 |
beisner | http://i.imgur.com/KZyNequ.gif | 15:54 |
c0s | guys, any references to the nodejs layer source code? I can not find anything on the github ;( | 16:07 |
lazyPower | stokachu - you did the node layer didn't you? | 16:08 |
lazyPower | c0s https://github.com/battlemidget/juju-layer-node | 16:08 |
stokachu | yea | 16:08 |
c0s | yep, thanks lazyPower - just found it too ;) | 16:08 |
stokachu | c0s: interfaces.juju.solutions points to the upstream git repo too | 16:09 |
c0s | k! | 16:09 |
c0s | thanks stokachu | 16:09 |
stokachu | np, patches very welcome too ;) | 16:09 |
c0s | Sure, but I won't touch nodejs :) | 16:11 |
c0s | I want to take a look at it so I can do puppet layer ;) | 16:11 |
c0s | total noob with charms | 16:11 |
=== Spads_ is now known as Spads | ||
bdx | c0s: whats your strategy on the puppet layer? | 16:31 |
bdx | c0s: heres what I have going on so far for a puppet agent layer -> https://github.com/jamesbeedy/layer-puppet-agent | 16:32 |
jamespage | beisner, oh chicken and egg | 16:35 |
jamespage | I need https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305121/ to land before I can get the xenial amulet tests to pass again... | 16:35 |
jamespage | for odl-controller | 16:36 |
c0s | bdx I am doing a master-less puppet layer, so we can get fixed version of the puppet and (mostly) hiera in the trusty | 16:54 |
c0s | this is will be pretty dumb-ass one: just installing packages from a correct puppetlabs repo | 16:55 |
beisner | jamespage, cholcombe, rockstar - i've squashed the check that has been intermittently causing "ERROR:root:One or more units are not ok (machine 0 ssh check fails)" .. you'll need a recheck if you saw that. the underlying issue is unidentified, but the bootstrap node is clearly not accessible at the moment we were checking. | 16:56 |
beisner | will add card to revisit and t-shoot as a potential juju issue | 16:57 |
cholcombe | beisner, yeah i saw a bunch of failures that seemed wrong because they passed tests locally | 16:57 |
rockstar | zul: if you please - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305896/ | 16:57 |
beisner | fyi that is re: the charm single test. compounding that, it looks like several tests were false-failed by an internet/infra hiccup (lp bzr ssh fails) | 16:58 |
beisner | recheck ftw | 16:58 |
zul | rockstar: done | 16:58 |
bdx | c0s: look at my layer | 17:14 |
bdx | c0s: that is exactly what it does | 17:14 |
bdx | c0s: if you `charm build` layer-puppet-agent, you will get a charm that does what you are talking about | 17:15 |
bdx | c0s: I made layer-puppet-agent for that purpose alone | 17:15 |
=== redelmann is now known as rudi_meet | ||
bbaqar | Getting a ERROR cannot resolve charm URL "cs:xenial/ubuntu": charm not found when i deploy a ubuntu charm or xenial .. where should i pull it from .. should i just use the trusty one? | 17:34 |
=== matthelmke is now known as matthelmke-afk | ||
marcoceppi | bbaqar: just use the trusty one | 17:52 |
marcoceppi | bbaqar: why do you need the ubuntu charm anyways? | 17:52 |
* marcoceppi is curious | 17:52 | |
bbaqar_ | What is the user/pass for logging into mysql | 17:58 |
=== redir_afk is now known as redir | ||
sparkiegeek | bbaqar: https://jujucharms.com/u/landscape/ubuntu/xenial/0 if you need it :) | 18:01 |
marcoceppi | bbaqar: that's created when you create a relation, the root password is available on the unit in /var/lib/mysql/mysql.passwd | 18:09 |
marcoceppi | lazyPower: 2.1.1 backported to juju/stable should be built in a few mins | 18:10 |
lazyPower | \nn/, | 18:13 |
bbaqar_ | sparkiegeek: thanks :) | 18:15 |
jhobbs | hey beisner - just curious when this charmhelpers fix will be synced to the -next ceph charm https://code.launchpad.net/~xfactor973/charm-helpers/ceph-pool-replicas/+merge/291827 | 18:21 |
jhobbs | any ideas? | 18:21 |
beisner | jhobbs, cholcombe has the syncs proposed and pending CI/functional tests now | 18:22 |
beisner | hoping to have results and land tonight | 18:22 |
jhobbs | beisner: excellent, thanks | 18:22 |
bbaqar_ | marcoceppi: there is no /var/lib/mysql/mysql.passwd .. i am on cs:trusty/percona-cluster-32 | 18:23 |
marcoceppi | bbaqar: I'm not sure where percona-cluster puts it | 18:24 |
beisner | jhobbs, yw & thx for raising that. fyi we've got a card to implement that scenario as a regression test before 16.07. | 18:27 |
jhobbs | beisner: np, glad we decided to start testing on -next. regression test sounds good, that will ease my mind about keeping that scenario working | 18:28 |
beisner | jamespage, looks like your neutron-gateway change is tripping over bug 1570032 (raised yesterday, tldr: all precise is borky on this) | 18:36 |
mup | Bug #1570032: Precise-Icehouse: publicURL endpoint for network service not found <uosci> <neutron-gateway (Juju Charms Collection):New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1570032> | 18:36 |
beisner | thedac, did you have any cycles to poke at that ?^ | 18:36 |
thedac | beisner: I have not yet. I'll try and look this afternoon | 18:37 |
beisner | much appreciated thedac | 18:37 |
bbaqar_ | in HA why doesn't horizon ask for provider type and segmentation id, when creating a network from admin? | 18:38 |
bbaqar_ | Is there any config that needs to be done for it? | 18:38 |
bbaqar_ | I can use CLI to make an external network with provider type and segmentation id but why cant i do that in horizon | 18:39 |
c0s | hmm... interestingly it seems that apt layer doesn't work ;( | 18:53 |
marcoceppi | c0s: how so? | 18:54 |
marcoceppi | I use it frequently and works quite well | 18:54 |
marcoceppi | beisner coreycb do you have an answer for bbaqar's question? ^^ | 18:55 |
c0s | after apt layer is done there's no sources added to the /etc/apt/sources.apt.d/ | 18:56 |
c0s | as the results, wrong version of the package is getting installed | 18:56 |
c0s | marcoceppi: I am using it for 2 install sources, not sure if that causes the problem | 18:58 |
beisner | hi bbaqar_, marcoceppi - i've only done that sort of admin network create/wiring foo via nova and neutron cli. if the behavior is unexpected, please raise a bug and be sure to include details of what is deployed (openstack version, ubuntu version, bundle if you have it, etc). | 18:58 |
c0s | https://github.com/c0s/juju-layer-puppet/blob/master/config.yaml | 18:58 |
marcoceppi | c0s: remote the quotes? | 18:59 |
marcoceppi | c0s: https://git.launchpad.net/layer-apt/tree/README.md#n28 | 18:59 |
c0s | ok, lemme try | 18:59 |
c0s | yeah, I read it... | 18:59 |
tvansteenburgh | options: apt: .... | 18:59 |
tvansteenburgh | aren't you missing the apt key? | 19:00 |
marcoceppi | tvansteenburgh: these are config.yaml not layer.yaml | 19:01 |
c0s | it's right there in the config | 19:01 |
c0s | what marcoceppi said | 19:02 |
=== cos1 is now known as c0s | ||
rockstar | beisner: could I get a Workflow +2 on this? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305896/ | 19:05 |
c0s | nope, marcoceppi - removing quotes doesn't have any effect | 19:08 |
beisner | rockstar, we'd need to update bundles in o-c-t (and possibly the charm store <-- jamespage ) and i want to make sure we have that all queued up to land along side this. otherwise deploy tests will start to fail if we land this alone. | 19:16 |
rockstar | beisner: are those gate tests? | 19:16 |
beisner | rockstar, no, but they run every day, and are part of the release process | 19:17 |
rockstar | beisner: do you want me to do that? | 19:17 |
beisner | rockstar, yes please. lp:openstack-charm-testing ...the *next* files in the bundles/lxd and bundles/multi-hypervisor dirs will need MPs. then after release, the *default* files in the same dirs will need MPs. | 19:19 |
beisner | rockstar, fwiw, your gate would be ++many-hours if we did all that on commits ;-) hence the scheduled runs. | 19:21 |
rockstar | beisner: cool. Branch coming. | 19:24 |
c0s | marcoceppi: is there a need to do configre_sources call from apt layer to make these sources available somehow? | 19:59 |
marcoceppi | c0s: shouldn't | 19:59 |
marcoceppi | c0s: stub wrote the layer, he might be able to help | 19:59 |
c0s | thanks marcoceppi. stub - if you can help to figure out why apt doesn't configure sources in this commit | 20:04 |
c0s | https://github.com/c0s/juju-layer-puppet/commit/59bdb701af0dc65054bc33e935c993fd97cbb2ab | 20:04 |
c0s | I would be real grateful ;) | 20:04 |
marcoceppi | c0s: layer is off to a good start | 20:12 |
jcastro | hey so marcoceppi | 20:18 |
jcastro | https://jujucharms.com/docs/devel/getting-started | 20:18 |
jcastro | so if get-started ends up going here I have some concerns | 20:18 |
jcastro | so first off, this is a kickass local/zfs setup, which is fine | 20:18 |
marcoceppi | jcastro: some is an understatement | 20:18 |
jcastro | but it feels a little full on if someone just wants to try it | 20:19 |
marcoceppi | jcastro: yes, but it's not terrible | 20:19 |
jcastro | right | 20:19 |
jcastro | I am talking from a zero-to-workload aspect | 20:19 |
jcastro | obviously if someone is using juju for more than just trying it we'd want to give them this experience | 20:20 |
jcastro | I am just concerned that it's like "want to try juju? step one, ZFS IN YOUR FACE." | 20:20 |
bdx | c0s: you are using the layer apt to install the sources, but not the packages | 20:20 |
jcastro | it's like dang all I wanted to do was fire up mysql | 20:20 |
bdx | c0s: see -> https://github.com/jamesbeedy/layer-kibana | 20:21 |
marcoceppi | jcastro: lets talk Monday about it | 20:22 |
jcastro | ack | 20:22 |
c0s | thanks bdx - checking | 20:32 |
c0s | bdx - I am actually installing the packages in the layer | 20:33 |
c0s | bdx, the call is right here https://github.com/c0s/juju-layer-puppet/blob/master/reactive/puppet.py#L48 | 20:34 |
c0s | bdx, I see what you're saying | 20:45 |
c0s | I think you're right - let me try | 20:45 |
bdx | c0s: also, you must run `apt update` after you add the puppet sources | 20:48 |
bdx | that is the root of your issue | 20:48 |
c0s | ok, got it - let do just that. | 20:48 |
bdx | c0s: https://github.com/c0s/juju-layer-puppet/pull/1 | 20:53 |
bdx | that should get you going | 20:54 |
bdx | c0s: per ^ - I said that backwards .. you are installing the packages with apt layer, but not the sources | 21:04 |
bdx | c0s: which shouldn't really matter, but consistency is also nice | 21:04 |
bdx | c0s: also, you will need the packages puppet + puppet-common | 21:09 |
bdx | just puppet doesn't cut it unfortunately | 21:09 |
=== redir is now known as redir_afk |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!