[01:23] bdmurray, I can take a look now, or are you already on it? [01:40] darkxst: I've uploaded a fix now. [02:06] bdmurray, ok thanks === uaa is now known as Guest19294 === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson === mwhudson is now known as Guest85752 === Guest85752 is now known as mwhudson === Guest19294 is now known as az === athairus is now known as afkthairus [10:00] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1571166 [10:00] Launchpad bug 1571166 in squid3 (Ubuntu) "package squid3 3.3.8-1ubuntu16.2 failed to install" [Undecided,New] [10:05] alexlist: That's not the version in 16.04, so a curious report already. :P [10:05] alexlist: Can you attach the apt term log from the upgrade? === sunweave1 is now known as sunweaver [10:55] infinity: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1571174 [10:55] Launchpad bug 1571174 in squid3 (Ubuntu) "package squid3 3.3.8-1ubuntu16.2 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving triggers unprocessed" [Undecided,New] [11:01] alexlist: Can you try upgrading ufw first, on a hunch? [11:02] alexlist: I might need to do some fiddling to force upgrade order there. [11:03] infinity: you mean manually installing the xenial ufw on a wily box? Sure, can try... [11:13] hello, I'm trying to create a scope from ubuntu sdk, however there are no virtual device to do it and I can not add an armdevice to qt [11:13] anyone knows why this happens? [13:24] hmm, vlc upnp support seems broken in xenial === sidi_ is now known as sidi [13:39] Question, i'm trying to read eglibc code. If I get it using apt-get source eglibc it will be automatically patched to the way it's used in ubuntu, correct? [13:40] Also, if I wanted to find what build configuration is used in the actual distributed version, where could I find that? === ejat_ is now known as ejat [14:41] infinity: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/15873401/ -> started ubuntu 15.10 in privileged docker container, installed squid-deb-proxy and ufw, installed ubuntu-release-upgrader-core, installed xenial ufw, ran release upgrade without issues. Will amend bug report. [14:42] * ogra_ files bug 1571199 [14:42] bug 1571199 in libupnp (Ubuntu) "vlc broken with latest libupnp" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1571199 [14:54] p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; } Starting /usr/bin/ubuntu-html5-app-launcher... Setting import path to: [0416/165255:FATAL:setuid_sandbox_client.cc(126)] Check failed: IsFileSystemAccessDenied(). [14:54] why? === Spads_ is now known as Spads === padv_ is now known as rona [16:08] r1nuz: yes. The build configuration is what you see in the package [16:09] tumbleweed: thanks, so when i run make without ./configure first it should build the way it's distributed? [16:09] because when i try, i get: [16:09] $ make [16:09] Makeconfig:42: *** missing separator. Stop. [16:09] r1nuz: when you run dpkg-buildpackage -B [16:09] (on the same ubuntu release) [16:11] tumbleweed: awesome, thanks :) [16:11] will that also create the proper Makefile btw? [16:11] guess i should read the dpkg manpage [16:12] (what i secretly really want is the appropriate Makefile config so that i can use unifdef to make the libc sources more readable but consistent with my distro) [16:14] I have no experience in the eglibc package, but I'd expect it to be a little complex and weird [16:14] r1nuz: debian/rules is the entry point for the packaged build system. And what tumbleweed says [16:14] tumbleweed cjwatson thanks [16:14] looks like dpkg-buildflags might be what i want [16:14] no [16:14] what I said is what you want [16:14] dpkg-buildflags is a small piece [16:15] that's generic distribution-wide flags basically, not package-specific changes, of which I'm sure glibc has many [16:15] if you want to understand an Ubuntu (or Debian) source package, start with debian/rules [16:15] oh debian/rules file, i see [16:15] thanks [16:16] appreciate it [16:16] you'll have to chase up a lot of references from there [16:16] ah well, i enjoy a good rabbithole :) [16:16] but normally at least the set of configure flags and such is in there [16:16] (I think in glibc's case it may actually be in an included makefile under debian/rules ...) [16:16] the best might be to build it and read the build log (or just read the log for the most recent ubuntu build) [16:17] where could i find that latter log? for the most recent build? [16:18] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc [16:18] thanks [16:18] follow the links through to a version, and then an architecture [16:19] and note that Ubuntu switched back to glibc after 14.04, so if you're based on anything newer than that then you want https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc instead [16:21] ah good to know, still on 14.04 for this machine === afkthairus is now known as athairus [17:50] hi there :) [17:51] is it true, that snappy is something like the Google Play Store? [17:51] no mirrors anymore? [17:51] no forks? === ShalokShalom_ is now known as ShalokShalom [17:53] ShalokShalom: https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/snappy/#tour <-- start here? [17:54] !crosspost | ShalokShalom [17:54] ShalokShalom: Please don't ask the same question in multiple Ubuntu channels at the same time. Many helpers are in more than one channel and it's not fair to them or the other people seeking support. [17:54] i post in each related room [17:54] some people are just in one room and i aim to reach them as well [17:54] it's better to pick one room, ask, and if nobody answers in 15 minutes, try another one. [17:55] rather than just post in every room at once [17:57] teward: why do you link me a post, which doesnt answer my questions? [17:57] this page shows only the pros === ochosi_ is now known as ochosi === directhex_ is now known as directhex [21:55] Hi! [21:57] I keep forgetting the answer, the installer terminal output can be translated WHERE? [21:57] The terminal like window that appears when you click the arrow when the installation starts. [21:58] I hope someone knows what I mean. [21:58] I want to translate it more. [21:58] I searched for bash, but that seems to be fully translated now. [21:59] Should I check with ubiquity? [22:19] Umeaboy: That output is intentionally not translated so that bug reports are readable by the developers. [22:23] OK. [22:23] infinity: What about when you install updates in the terminal window then? [23:14] Umeaboy: it can't be translated anywhere special, that's just the output from whatever gets run as part of the install, mostly debug information for the developers as infinity pointed out [23:14] you'll see some pieces *are* translated, those are the ones that would be translated on the installed system, from commands an user would run and care about [23:14] ie. "Installing $package" or "Preparing to unpack $package" [23:15] we translate the "high level" messages that show just above the terminal window so users still know what is happening [23:17] OK. [23:31] cyphermox: What parts of Ubuntu are need to be more translated? I wish launchpad only would show me the stuff that needs to be translated and hide thoose that are finished. [23:32] It currently can't. [23:32] At least I haven't found a way to do so. [23:33] I don't know off hand. You would have to look at https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/ which will display the languages your launchpad page says you know, and then click on a langauge, that will show all the different bits and pieces [23:33] from there you dig in in the fourth column which is "untranslated", sometimes there are numbers there [23:33] for example, if you scroll to the bottom of https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+lang/es [23:34] there are four untranslated strings for gnome-software and also four for nm-applet [23:36] we're past the translation deadlines though, so your work may only go in later [23:58] cyphermox: OK so Xenial is about to be released now? [23:59] thursday