[16:24] <teward> who's the list administrator for the ubuntu-quality mailing list?
[16:36] <slickymaster> teward → brian at ubuntu.com, hggdh2 at ubuntu.com, jean-baptiste at ubuntu.com, nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
[16:37] <teward> slickymaster: thanks, I already prodded, though I thought balloons wasn't in charge of QA?
[16:38] <slickymaster> he isn't anymore, but the change isn't yet reflected in the m/l
[16:38] <teward> ah
[16:38] <teward> indeed
[16:38] <teward> well, I poked hggdh so meh
[16:38] <slickymaster> :)
[16:39] <tsimonq2> I thought he is transitioning off and it will be 100% on Thursday...but I could be wrong? I thought it was gradual...
[16:40]  * teward shrugs
[17:49]  * hggdh has been poked, and prodded, and raised from the tomb
[17:50] <teward> hggdh: and summoned, but you didn't appear
[17:50] <teward> and I had sacrificed ten windows computers as a part of the ritual tolo
[17:50] <teward> see PM
[17:57] <hggdh> nah, you have to understand that the portents have to happen, like the cracking of the tombstone, and cries of anguish & tearing of clothes, and throwing of ashes
[17:57] <hggdh> etc, etc
[17:58] <teward> heh
[17:58] <hggdh> yes. Rather rude.
[17:59] <hggdh> we will deal with it; meanwhile, please do not downlevel yourselves to his/her level
[18:08] <hggdh> OK. dealt with, as of now. Meanwhile, please do discuss closing old bugs, and how to deal with it -- this is something we should revisit every so often
[18:09] <hggdh> as a historical help, we started *not* closing any bugs, no matter how old; then we moved to closing old bugs.
[18:09] <hggdh> so, the question, is: are we doing the right thing by closing old bugs? If we are, why? If not, why?
[18:11] <hggdh> tsimonq2: about balloons moving: I would expect his involvement with QA (and the ML) to still exist, but now focused on his new tasks
[18:18] <hggdh> teward: just a comment: sacrificing Windows computers does not really count as an offering...
[18:23] <tsimonq2> hggdh: ahh alright :)