[01:16] <karstensrage> micahg, :(
[08:30] <Rhonda> uups
[15:06] <jtaylor> I guess its too late for a new upstream version from debian now?
[15:07] <jtaylor> I'd really like a newer openblas in xenial as that thing is quite aweful to backport patches for
[15:07] <jtaylor> (yey programs consisting of mostly assembler)
[15:11] <rbasak> jtaylor: not too late - unseeded packages just follow the usual freeze process.
[15:12] <jtaylor> hm ok I'll create a ffe then
[16:04] <karstensrage> micahg, is there anything i can do to get these backports in? I know youre busy but its been weeks
[16:04] <karstensrage> is there anyone else that does backports?
[18:02] <teward> karstensrage: there's a few that do backports, but again, there's no SLA for backports to be done
[18:02] <teward> you *really* need to wait and have more patience...
[18:02] <teward> i know it's important to get that software into backports, but you *need* to have patience, right now it's "Prepare For Release" week...
[19:17] <jtaylor> how to release I haven'T done any work in too long: when you forget what the dput target for ubuntu is ._.
[19:18] <teward> jtaylor: heh
[19:19] <jtaylor> ubuntu should be it in a default config right?
[19:19] <teward> jtaylor: just plain dput
[19:19] <teward> no extra args to push to Ubuntu
[19:19] <teward> at least, unless they changed it since the last time I uploaded to Xenial (~1.5 weeks ago)
[19:20] <jtaylor> yes seems to map to ubuntu
[19:20] <teward> yup
[19:31] <karstensrage> i think i have been somewhat patient
[19:32] <karstensrage> i dont know whats involved with a backport so its hard for me to judge if its just pushing a button or more
[19:32] <teward> karstensrage: do you have a bug for the backport?
[19:32]  * teward will glance at it even though he can't do squat
[19:32] <karstensrage> teward, i believe so
[19:32] <teward> and by 'bug' i mean a backport request
[19:32] <karstensrage> https://bugs.launchpad.net/precise-backports/+bug/1562434
[19:33] <karstensrage> that?
[19:33] <karstensrage> https://bugs.launchpad.net/precise-backports/+bug/1561837
[19:34] <teward> karstensrage: erm, why did you assign it to Micah?
[19:34] <teward> i don't think that's what you get to do :P
[19:34] <karstensrage> its a PAM module and its associated library, i know that no backporter has the time or willingness to test that a PAM module works so i can do whatever need to compensate for that, but they have been ppa's for two months and are well testing
[19:35] <teward> i think it's really a case of us focusing on Xenial
[19:35] <teward> and i know you really want this
[19:35] <teward> but Xenial release is only a few days off
[19:35] <teward> after that maybe ping?
[19:35] <teward> (everyone, I bet, is in Xenial-mode)
[19:35] <karstensrage> well ok :(
[19:36] <teward> and as was stated by infinity elsewhere, (I think it was infinity?) don't expect any type of SLA dictating time-to-address-backport
[19:36] <teward> it doesn't exist :P
[19:36] <teward> (they get to it when they get to it)
[19:36] <karstensrage> of course i understand that
[19:37] <karstensrage> it was just that i felt very close, it got pushed into xenial like within minutes
[19:37] <karstensrage> so i figured it was just a push button kind of thing and was told twice that it could be gotten too (maybe)
[19:40] <jtaylor> bugfix only in unseeded can still be just uploaded?
[19:42] <teward> jtaylor: #ubuntu-release ?
[19:44] <jtaylor> right probably more appropriate
[19:54] <karstensrage> teward, ok, ill wait some more
[19:55] <karstensrage> a few days an xenial will be released, is there a schedule or announcement page?
[19:56] <teward> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseSchedule
[19:58] <karstensrage> hmm ok