[01:16] micahg, :( [08:30] uups === DrKranz is now known as DktrKranz === freeflying__ is now known as freeflying === jrgifford_ is now known as jrgifford === infinity_ is now known as infinity === kloeri__ is now known as kloeri === bigon_ is now known as bigon === slackner_ is now known as slackner === ogra_` is now known as ogra_ [15:06] I guess its too late for a new upstream version from debian now? [15:07] I'd really like a newer openblas in xenial as that thing is quite aweful to backport patches for [15:07] (yey programs consisting of mostly assembler) [15:11] jtaylor: not too late - unseeded packages just follow the usual freeze process. [15:12] hm ok I'll create a ffe then === Guest15381 is now known as medberry === medberry is now known as med_ [16:04] micahg, is there anything i can do to get these backports in? I know youre busy but its been weeks [16:04] is there anyone else that does backports? [18:02] karstensrage: there's a few that do backports, but again, there's no SLA for backports to be done [18:02] you *really* need to wait and have more patience... [18:02] i know it's important to get that software into backports, but you *need* to have patience, right now it's "Prepare For Release" week... [19:17] how to release I haven'T done any work in too long: when you forget what the dput target for ubuntu is ._. [19:18] jtaylor: heh [19:19] ubuntu should be it in a default config right? [19:19] jtaylor: just plain dput [19:19] no extra args to push to Ubuntu [19:19] at least, unless they changed it since the last time I uploaded to Xenial (~1.5 weeks ago) [19:20] yes seems to map to ubuntu [19:20] yup [19:31] i think i have been somewhat patient [19:32] i dont know whats involved with a backport so its hard for me to judge if its just pushing a button or more [19:32] karstensrage: do you have a bug for the backport? [19:32] * teward will glance at it even though he can't do squat [19:32] teward, i believe so [19:32] and by 'bug' i mean a backport request [19:32] https://bugs.launchpad.net/precise-backports/+bug/1562434 [19:33] Launchpad bug 1562434 in trusty-backports "Please backport libpam-ufpidentity 1.0-1 (universe) from xenial" [Undecided,New] [19:33] that? [19:33] https://bugs.launchpad.net/precise-backports/+bug/1561837 [19:33] Launchpad bug 1561837 in trusty-backports "Please backport identity4c 1.0-1 (universe) from xenial-proposed" [Undecided,New] [19:34] karstensrage: erm, why did you assign it to Micah? [19:34] i don't think that's what you get to do :P [19:34] its a PAM module and its associated library, i know that no backporter has the time or willingness to test that a PAM module works so i can do whatever need to compensate for that, but they have been ppa's for two months and are well testing [19:35] i think it's really a case of us focusing on Xenial [19:35] and i know you really want this [19:35] but Xenial release is only a few days off [19:35] after that maybe ping? [19:35] (everyone, I bet, is in Xenial-mode) [19:35] well ok :( [19:36] and as was stated by infinity elsewhere, (I think it was infinity?) don't expect any type of SLA dictating time-to-address-backport [19:36] it doesn't exist :P [19:36] (they get to it when they get to it) [19:36] of course i understand that [19:37] it was just that i felt very close, it got pushed into xenial like within minutes [19:37] so i figured it was just a push button kind of thing and was told twice that it could be gotten too (maybe) [19:40] bugfix only in unseeded can still be just uploaded? [19:42] jtaylor: #ubuntu-release ? [19:44] right probably more appropriate [19:54] teward, ok, ill wait some more [19:55] a few days an xenial will be released, is there a schedule or announcement page? [19:56] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseSchedule [19:58] hmm ok