[07:35] <Rhonda> Guess it's too late now to request tmux 2.2 into xenial. :)
[07:36] <Rhonda> (ok, was only just yesterday uploaded to Debian unstable)
[07:38] <dholbach> ping the release team and ask if it's important
[13:52] <Rhonda> Yay!
[13:53] <Rhonda> For all those who didn't believe in me anymore … (that is, including myself …):  packages.ubuntu.com now also shows the architectures from ports.  \o/
[13:53] <Laney> nice!
[13:53] <Laney> you made it support the split archive thing?
[13:54] <Rhonda> Well …  I used the existing code and finally got around to understood the configuration for it and adapted the configuration.  >.>
[13:54] <Laney> heh
[13:56] <rbasak> Rhonda: thank you!
[13:57] <Rhonda> There are some tiny bits that needs to get adjusted still though: http://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/s390-tools  *hides*
[14:13]  * Rhonda . o O ( let's see if that removal of "deb" b0rked it all … )
[14:16]  * Laney knows who is whispering in Rhonda's ear
[14:21] <Rhonda> ssh
[14:21] <Rhonda> Laney: silence, I'll kill you
[14:40] <Rhonda> Wait.  Do I read this correctly, libunbound2 was in precise in universe but moved to main since trusty?
[14:41] <rbasak> Rhonda: rmadison agrees.
[14:42] <Rhonda> sweet. :)
[15:57] <Rhonda> yay me!  http://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/s390-tools now says ports instead of debports!
[15:58] <Laney> high five
[19:11] <Unit193> Logan: Wow, thanks for commenting!  And, debdiff(s) attached, now.
[19:11] <Logan> you're welcome
[19:14] <Logan> I'll probably just use grab-merge :P
[19:14] <Logan> easier than sponsoring merge debdiffs
[19:16] <Unit193> Logan: Well you know me, always have a dsc: https://sigma.unit193.net/source/apt-cacher-ng_0.9.1-1ubuntu1.dsc :P
[19:16] <Unit193> But, that works too. :3
[19:16] <Logan> haha too late
[19:21] <Unit193> Hey that just means your name on it rather than mine in case something goes wrong. :>
[19:22] <Logan> ahh, the life of a sponsor
[19:22] <Unit193> I've been using 0.9.1-1 for a couple weeks or so now, so no real issues.  I had to edit the config as the patch does no good for me, in terms of by-hash.
[19:23] <Logan> but do you know if the patch works well with 0.9.1?
[19:24] <Logan> like, continues to work properly?
[19:24] <Unit193> It should for normal use, yeah.  I just have a weird and patched up mini-dinstall.
[19:25] <Logan> ok