| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| Mirv | renatu: still there? did you see questions from allan on silos 064 and 039? | 05:16 |
|---|---|---|
| Mirv | renatu: "Is a new calendar app required to see this fix? I'm finding that events (e.g. a breakfast appointment) no longer appear in day view to verify." | 05:17 |
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| koza | trainguards, who could help in understanding/resolving a strange issue with silo 51? | 07:16 |
| robru | koza: what's the issue? Looks fine to me | 07:18 |
| koza | robru, it segfaults when installed on the device [latest image] however when compiled on device [using chroot] works fine. Could it be some kind of clash opf gcc versions [on chroot is gcc version 4.9.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.9.2-10ubuntu13)] or mismatch in libs? | 07:20 |
| robru | koza: oh i have no idea about that. You should talk to the branch author or somebody who knows about the project in question. I just help if the ticket itself has an issue | 07:21 |
| koza | robru, I see, thanks | 07:23 |
| robru | You're welcome | 07:23 |
| Mirv | koza: also 4.9.2-10ubuntu13 was used for the PPA builds as seen in the build logs | 07:32 |
| Mirv | koza: vivid + stable-overlay don't have toolchain variations, so I can't think of too many things that could be different in PPA builders or on device | 07:32 |
| Mirv | koza: did you compile with for example 'debuild' on device or more like make / make install? using the packaging via debuild might bring some different compilation options compared to you running compilation manually | 07:33 |
| Mirv | koza: you can also install gdb and debug symbols on the device to try to get backtrace, although I'm not sure how qtubuntu-media/media-hub should be started in debug mode | 07:34 |
| koza | Mirv, so we have the same gcc version | 07:34 |
| koza | do not know how it was compiled on chroot as jhodapp did it however will check once he is online | 07:35 |
| Mirv | koza: yeah you'll probably need jhodapp to help in debugging that | 07:36 |
| koza | Mirv, thanks for extra info. we will take it from here and will see how it goes | 07:38 |
| om26er | popey, Hi! | 11:02 |
| om26er | popey, I need to land latest dekko, who can I request to create a silo ? I am volunteering to test it. | 11:03 |
| popey | om26er: it's already in a silo | 11:12 |
| popey | om26er: https://trello.com/c/3u8N2Xw8/3077-1280-dekko-popey | 11:12 |
| om26er | popey, great, one question though. how much effort/work will it be to land this change in that silo ? https://git.launchpad.net/~om26er/+git/dekko/commit/?id=81da994204079a620b04372c0be9e38697f17938 | 11:13 |
| om26er | Just 4 lines and it will unblock me completely | 11:13 |
| popey | ask Dan | 11:13 |
| popey | testing has already started so it might have to wait for the next release | 11:13 |
| jibel | om26er, rvr is already testing it | 11:14 |
| om26er | jibel, popey, ok. this current silo has quite a few changes that I wanted for my tests. I will pursue another release once this lands then. | 11:16 |
| Saviq | trainguards, I just abandoned two silos and still can't assign any, says no silos available - that true? | 12:00 |
| Mirv | Saviq: does seem incorrect, there should be 19 free | 12:04 |
| Mirv | Saviq: might be a problem with the train then | 12:04 |
| Saviq | Mirv, https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/prepare-silo/ | 12:04 |
| Mirv | Saviq: yeah I'm getting the same | 12:04 |
| Saviq | https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/500 | 12:05 |
| Mirv | unless sil2100 knows of any magic knobs we need to wait for robru. I remember in the past there was another situation like this, and back then even freeing up yet another silo did not help anything. | 12:05 |
| Saviq | oh well https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/error.gif | 12:05 |
| Mirv | we can stare at that | 12:05 |
| * Saviq runs around waving frantically | 12:05 | |
| * Saviq has a feeling robru is our SPOF | 12:07 | |
| jhodapp | koza, Mirv I compiled it on device with "cd build; qmake ..; make -j3" and then copied the resulting .so file into the appropriate place under /usr | 12:08 |
| sil2100 | hmmm | 12:30 |
| * sil2100 takes a look at that | 12:31 | |
| sil2100 | This will take a bit as I'm no longer up-to-date with the train code | 12:32 |
| sil2100 | I htink I see one possible issue | 12:34 |
| sil2100 | uuuu, looks like latest change in bileto broke it | 12:44 |
| sil2100 | Mirv, Saviq: it looks like the reason this does not work is because robru removed the 'distribution' dropdown from bileto | 12:47 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| sil2100 | Mirv, Saviq: so now it's not really possible to set the target distribution to 'ubuntu', it's left as '' by default | 12:47 |
| sil2100 | Mirv, Saviq: which makes CI Train think there are no silos available for this dest, as it doesn't know silos for the '' distribution | 12:47 |
| sil2100 | In other words: | 12:48 |
| === sil2100 changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Train trouble? ping trainguards | CI problems? Use JenkaaS: http://bit.ly/jenkins-docs | Train: http://bit.ly/1hGZsfS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known issues: silo assignment currently broken | ||
| sil2100 | I'll try to work-around it somehow | 12:48 |
| Saviq | ack | 12:48 |
| sil2100 | I say 'work-around' because I do not know what plans robru had with removing the distribution field | 12:49 |
| sil2100 | Saviq: ok, so I assigned your silo by hacking around the javascript - let me now try to get that into production | 12:56 |
| Saviq | sil2100, ack, thanks | 12:57 |
| robru | sil2100: oh god I'm so sorry | 13:02 |
| sil2100 | robru: I have a workaround (just re-adding the distribution field) but not sure if that's what you planned having ;) | 13:03 |
| sil2100 | btw. wow, isn't it like, super still-dark-outside morning at your place? | 13:04 |
| robru | sil2100: up early instead of up late | 13:04 |
| robru | sil2100: you could have reverted the latest commit and rolled that out | 13:04 |
| sil2100 | robru: yeah, well, I just made a 1 line diff for now, can I push it to lp:bileto or you prefer to fix it more properly? I wouldn't want you to work when you have a free day ;) | 13:06 |
| sil2100 | (or a revert, if that's safe to do) | 13:06 |
| robru | sil2100: just push it to trunk, it's my fault, once I'm more awake (in some hours) I'll fix it better | 13:07 |
| robru | sil2100: glad you figured it out | 13:07 |
| sil2100 | robru: ok! Yeah, the workaround should just work for now, go back to sleep or get some coffee ;) | 13:09 |
| robru | sil2100: once it's on trunk just get webops to run a configger as per the wiki, should be smooth sailing | 13:09 |
| robru | sil2100: thanks yeah, I'll go back to sleep ;-) | 13:09 |
| sil2100 | robru, Mirv, Saviq: the 'fix' will be deployed by webops in the nearest moments | 13:20 |
| Mirv | sil2100: thanks a lot! | 13:36 |
| === fginther` is now known as fginther | ||
| sil2100 | Mirv, Saviq: fix deployed! Please be sure to edit your requests and set the distribution field | 13:42 |
| === sil2100 changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Train trouble? ping trainguards | CI problems? Use JenkaaS: http://bit.ly/jenkins-docs | Train: http://bit.ly/1hGZsfS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known issues: if you have issues assigning silos, edit request and re-set the distribution field | ||
| sil2100 | I suppose CI Train should just default to 'ubuntu' if distribution is '', but yeah, robru will decide on the final fix | 13:44 |
| Saviq | ack | 13:53 |
| Saviq | robru, hey, I just realized... what are you using to push to lp:~ci-train-bot/ branches? | 15:18 |
| robru | Saviq: the train is self hosting but I often just push to trunk if it's a simple fix | 15:19 |
| Saviq | robru, I meant to the project branches | 15:20 |
| * Saviq has a feeling that leaves borked tags when it --overwrites | 15:20 | |
| Saviq | because the train tagged the previous version, pushed that to LP and then overwrites when it gets rebuilt | 15:21 |
| Saviq | so the tags remain on the LP branch forever... | 15:21 |
| robru | Saviq: oh that's possible | 15:21 |
| Saviq | gotta love bzr | 15:22 |
| robru | Saviq: so what are you wanting? dangling tags to be cleared? | 15:22 |
| robru | Saviq: yeah it just tags the release commit and then 'bzr push lp:~ci-train-bot/project/.... --overwrite' | 15:23 |
| Saviq | robru, by now - not really, since everyone has them already ;) | 15:23 |
| * Saviq almost gave up on bzr tags | 15:23 | |
| robru | Saviq: what are you trying to use tags for and how is it not working? eg if you're looking at version numbers in debian/changelog those should all correspond to bzr tags (at least in xenial, the vivid half of a dual silo wouldn't) | 15:24 |
| robru | Saviq: also it should be easy to ignore dangling tags eg if you're trying to parse the output of 'bzr tags' because it just lists the tag without any revid. | 15:24 |
| Saviq | robru, sure, /me just dies a little every time I see them :P | 15:25 |
| robru | Saviq: write a script to delete them yourself ;-) | 15:25 |
| Saviq | robru, http://people.canonical.com/~msawicz/unity8/ | 15:25 |
| Saviq | check out the date :P | 15:25 |
| robru | Saviq: so this was a problem 1.5 years ago and you're only just telling me now? :-P | 15:26 |
| Saviq | robru, no, back then it was us inheriting lp:unity tags | 15:26 |
| Saviq | robru, because we were hosting at lp:unity/8.0 | 15:27 |
| robru | ah | 15:27 |
| robru | Saviq: file a bug I guess but it'll be quite some time until I get around to it, I'm off for the rest of the month | 15:27 |
| Saviq | robru, and we *almost just* got rid of them, but every now and again someone pops up with an old checkout in an MP and EVERYTHING has them again | 15:28 |
| Saviq | robru, yeah, I don't care any more really... looking forward to git ;P | 15:28 |
| robru | Saviq: yeah me too, once the parallelization/ephemeral PPA work is done it should be easy to add git support. | 15:28 |
| Saviq | robru, any reason why you didn't just land inline gles bits? ;) | 15:29 |
| Saviq | can we just sneak them in under the train? managing any silo while those are not landed is just meh | 15:29 |
| robru | Saviq: what do you mean? you want me to push my branches to trunks? | 15:29 |
| Saviq | robru, yeah ;P | 15:29 |
| robru | Saviq: because it was the last couple days before OTA10 was released and I didn't want to invalidate any silos by having unbuilt trunk commits in case there was a silo already in QA or something. | 15:30 |
| robru | Saviq: are they not all landed yet? the branches should be in every silo | 15:30 |
| Saviq | robru, yeah, problem arises as soon as any of the branches touches debian/control | 15:30 |
| Saviq | then you have to rebase on that | 15:30 |
| Saviq | robru, </complaining>, I'll manage | 15:31 |
| robru | Saviq: right. so I made a silo with my own branches but it never landed... | 15:31 |
| robru | Saviq: this is the future you chose, you have to rebase the patch every time you touch control file anyway ;-) | 15:32 |
| Saviq | robru, that's fine when it's in trunk | 15:32 |
| Saviq | but until then it's meh | 15:32 |
| Saviq | robru, really, our fault, I'll manage | 15:33 |
| robru | Saviq: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1221 buh I forgot to signoff after the most recent rebuild. want me to submit it for QA? | 15:33 |
| robru | Saviq: I hadn't anticipated that so many qtmir/qtubuntu silos would just sit around for so long, I assumed you guys were actually landing silos with some frequency. | 15:34 |
| Saviq | robru, we are, except when there's OTAs, Ubuntu freezes, *things* | 15:34 |
| Saviq | robru, no, we've got another silo with this already - you can abandon, really | 15:35 |
| robru | Saviq: ok will do | 15:35 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| Saviq | robru, hmm, do you know what's with https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-069-0-status/7179/console ? did the packages fail to upload, or do you think it's just waiting? | 17:27 |
| robru | Saviq: how long has it been since you ran the build? | 17:29 |
| Saviq | robru, https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-069-1-build/32/ ½h | 17:31 |
| Saviq | and they're still not there | 17:31 |
| robru | Saviq: Hmmmmmmm yeah that's pushing it, they should appear in just a few minutes | 17:32 |
| Saviq | robru, ok, will get back to you if they don't | 17:32 |
| Saviq | or well, will try another build maybe | 17:32 |
| robru | Saviq: looks like you have one running already | 17:33 |
| Saviq | robru, different pkg | 17:33 |
| robru | Ah | 17:33 |
| robru | Saviq: yeah you should ping Colin if the packages aren't appearing in the PPA, he can dig up the logs | 17:34 |
| Saviq | robru, kk | 17:34 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| salem_ | jibel, hi, we have a fix for bug 1571094 on silo 55, but looks like it's marked is failed because of a problem with unity8 tests. | 17:54 |
| ubot5` | bug 1571094 in Canonical System Image "/usr/bin/phone-gsettings-migration.py:ValueError:/usr/bin/phone-gsettings-migration.py@27:__call__:call_blocking" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1571094 | 17:54 |
| salem_ | jibel, I think we had this problem before and you added the silo to the qa queue anyway. Could you do that again? | 17:55 |
| === dpm is now known as dpm-mostly-afk | ||
| === blr_ is now known as blr | ||
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
