/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/04/21/#ubuntu-ci-eng.txt

=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
=== alecu_ is now known as alecu
_morphisrobru: ping04:59
robru_morphis: pong05:00
_morphisrobru: is it possible we stack silos on top of another?05:00
robru_morphis: what are you trying to do?05:00
_morphisrobru: I have a libhybris landing in progress which is a dependency for another silo05:01
_morphisbut I would like to prepare both now05:01
_morphisrather than waiting until early/mid next week when the libhybris one lands05:01
robru_morphis: can you not just have one big silo?05:01
_morphisrobru: no05:01
_morphisrobru: we have to land this in three steps05:02
_morphisalso use QA resources as best as possible05:02
robru_morphis: k, put the same MPs in all silos then05:02
_morphisrobru: its a mixture of source packages (vivid only, dual landing) and MPs05:03
_morphisrobru: so stacking silos on top of each other is not possible?05:03
robru_morphis: there is no way to stack silos, all that can be done is copy packages around05:03
_morphisaye05:04
_morphisrobru: could you have a quick look at https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-000-1-build/111/console05:05
_morphisit seems to fail with05:05
_morphis2016-04-20 19:45:59,470 ERROR Build failed: Download failed: /var/lib/jenkins/silos/ubuntu/landing-000/vivid/network-manager/network-manager-0.9.10.005:05
_morphisbut I removed networkmanager from the silo05:05
_morphisah it seems to be back in the silo list05:07
robru_morphis: it comes back as a manual package because it's detected in the PPA05:07
_morphisrobru: any way to solve that other than abandoning the silo and recreate it?05:08
robruMirv: you around? _morphis needs some packages copied & deleted ^^05:08
_morphisrobru: let me do it the easy way, I will create a new silo for this05:09
robru_morphis: wait05:09
_morphisok05:09
robru_morphis: how many packages are in this silo? How wasteful is it too rebuild everything? Are you rebuilding everything anyway?05:10
_morphisyes05:10
_morphisrobru: its silo 005:10
_morphisits there since last year05:10
robru_morphis: oh if you're rebuilding everything anyway, just abandon and reassign the same request05:10
_morphisaye05:10
Mirvrobru: ok05:11
robru_morphis: i can delete nm but it's 10pm is all05:11
Mirvrobru: go, go, go!05:11
robruOh it's Mirv yay05:11
_morphisrobru: no problem!05:11
Mirvrobru: to other activities, I mean05:11
robruOK goodnight guys05:11
Mirvgoodnight robru05:11
_morphisrobru: n8!05:12
Mirv_morphis: ok at least the network-manager should be now gone from 000 (both ticket and PPA), should you try again or what was the thing about copying packages?05:14
_morphisMirv: thanks, but I will recreate the silo to get rid of all the hold shit still in there05:14
Mirv_morphis: ok, just ping whatver you need05:16
_morphisMirv: thanks!05:16
_morphisMirv: hm, there is one thing you can do05:25
_morphisMirv: copying the libhybris packages from silo 6 to silo 4605:25
_morphisbut leave silo 6 as it is05:26
Mirv_morphis: ok05:29
_morphisMirv: thanks!05:30
Mirvok, they are there05:30
_morphisMirv: great!05:37
dbarthjibel, sil2100: i'm doing the emulator bug verification right now; will mark the silo asap08:21
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
jibeldbarth, okay08:22
jibeldbarth, the system partition on the emululator is pretty small, you may need to remove some packages08:22
jibelSaviq, _salem mentioned that AP tests of unity8 failed in silo 55 (telephony-service) Is it a known failure or flaky test?08:32
jibelSaviq, https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/xenial/landing-055/excuses.html08:32
jibeland https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/silo/05508:32
rvrjgdx: Silo 47 approved08:53
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
seb128mdeslaur, looks like bug #1572876 could be a regression from trusty samba security update09:48
ubot5`bug 1572876 in samba (Ubuntu) "After Samba upgrade can't access unpassworded windows share" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/157287609:48
dbarthjibel: I can't run the emulator properly here under vmware; i propose to run oxide 1.14.6 against regressions while you guys check the emulator fix itself09:49
dbarth(assuming you have a working emulator setup already)09:49
dbarthas to not block to long on that silo09:49
=== marcusto_ is now known as marcustomlinson
jibeldbarth, okay, not today though. A bit busy with the release of xenial right now10:21
dbarthjibel: oSoMoN just verified the fix for the emulator, so we'll be good for tomorrow for you10:23
jibeldbarth, great, can you approve the silo then so it'll appear on our board10:24
oSoMoNdbarth, I updated the test plan with my results, all good as far as I’m concerned10:36
mdeslaurseb128: yeah, thanks, there are a bunch of known interoperability issues with the samba badlock fix11:02
seb128mdeslaur, hey! wrong channel11:02
seb128mdeslaur, k, good to know ... is that an unfortunate but needed consequence or a bug?11:03
mdeslaurseb128: half of them are bugs that upstream hasn't fixed yet, half of them are unfortunate consequences that need config file changes to work with older devices or unpatched windows11:04
seb128k11:04
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
=== fginther is now known as fginther`
=== pat_ is now known as pmcgowan
=== ahayzen_ is now known as ahayzen
=== oSoMoN is now known as oSoMoN|afk
=== ahayzen_ is now known as ahayzen
=== vrruiz_ is now known as rvr
=== dpm is now known as dpm-afk
tedgHello ubuntu-qa, I have a silo that doesn't seem to be getting to the trello board.19:00
dobey?19:01
dobeytedg: the ual one? or pk one?19:02
tedgYeah, the UAL one. Seems it failed automated signoff.19:02
alesagetedg hiya19:02
tedgAh, this is ChrisTownsend's fault19:02
dobeytedg: yes, you have unsatisfiable binary dependencies19:02
tedgChrisTownsend: How were you deping on xmir?19:02
alesagetedg I'll leave you to it :)19:02
tedgalesage: Thank you!19:03
tedgOh, that's only on vivid too.19:03
ChrisTownsendtedg: I added 'xmir' to the packages Depends.19:03
tedgChrisTownsend: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/vivid/landing-031/excuses.html19:04
ChrisTownsendtedg: I don't think that uses the overlay, so we need an exception.19:04
dobeytedg: well, not sure where the xenial autopkgtests are but probably same issue there19:04
tedgdobey: I think we fixed the deps so Mir is on those arches in xenial.19:04
dobeyChrisTownsend: problem is that xmir/mir isn't built on those archs19:04
dobeyis it?19:05
tedgdobey: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mir/0.21.0+16.04.20160330-0ubuntu119:05
dobeyhmm, so it is19:05
dobeyah, and they are in the overlay too19:06
ChrisTownsendWell, xmir is part of xorg-server, but only ppc64el is not built.19:06
dobeyoh no19:07
dobeyso the error is correct19:07
dobeyxmir only for amd64/armhf/i386 in overlay19:08
dobeyand in xenial too19:08
ChrisTownsendOh, I see that now too.19:08
dobeyso you probably need to change the binary dep to "xmir [amd64 armhf i386]," to cheat and get by19:09
tedgYeah :-/19:09
dobeyor fix xmir to build on other archs too and deal with getting a new xorg-server build for both xenial and vivid in the overlay19:10
ChrisTownsendtedg: Yeah, what dobey said.19:10
ChrisTownsendI wouldn't hold my breath on getting xmir built for the other archs.19:10
tedgIt was probably legacy from when mir only built on them.19:11
dobeyChrisTownsend: well, xorg builds on them, and mir does too, so i don't see why it couldn't be done :)19:16
ChrisTownsenddobey: It probably can.  bregma, care to follow up? ^^^^19:17
* tedg wants a ppc64 tablet19:19
bregmaChrisTownsend, we've just never tested it and have no way of testing it, and don't really want the burden of maintenance for something there's been no request for until now (and that's only to satisfy 3rd party build deps), but there's no strong objection19:25
ChrisTownsenddobey: tedg: ^^^19:26
tedgrobru: So I have a package that has never been in a repo, but I changed the name of. And somehow the build system keeps finding the old name. I can't figure where from though. Is there a cache or something on branch IDs?19:26
tedgrobru: Specifically this should be policykit-unity8: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-053-1-build/41/console19:26
robrutedg: yes, there is a cache: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/citrain/LandingProcess#Renaming_a_Source_Package19:27
tedgrobru: Ah! Okay. Can you flush the cache for me? :-)19:28
robrutedg: yeah one sec19:28
robrutedg: ok it's flushed, try your build again19:30
robrutedg: train is also slightly on fire for other reasons, working on a fix, apologies if affects you19:31
tedgrobru: Not sure, but it seems to list both packages. Is that an issue? https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-053-1-build/42/console19:32
* tedg is a firestarter!19:32
bregmasome people just want to watch the train burn19:33
robrutedg: is policykit-unity8 the right name? or the old one?19:36
tedgThat's the right one. Both were on the ticket for some reason, so I deleted the old.19:36
tedgTrying to build again without that.19:36
AlbertArobru: can you abort the ppa builds for https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-019/+packages?19:36
dobeybregma: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6l6vqPUM_FE19:36
robruAlbertA: sure. was just trying to fix the train there19:37
AlbertArobru: thanks!19:40
robruAlbertA: yw. sorry for stepping on your toes there19:40
AlbertArobru: no worries, I need to update the mir branch anyway19:40
=== oSoMoN|afk is now known as oSoMoN
tedgrobru: Okay, it seems to be working now, thanks!19:43
robrutedg: you're welcome!19:43
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
=== ralsina_ is now known as ralsina
=== robru changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Train trouble? ping trainguards | CI problems? Use JenkaaS: http://bit.ly/jenkins-docs | Train: http://bit.ly/1hGZsfS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known issues: train sometimes failng to generate diffs; notify robru if you see any unhandled exceptions
robru_morphis: ok, I think I fixed the issue you were seeing with unhandled exceptions on ticket 708, please try your build again (if necessary)20:25
=== blr_ is now known as blr
tedgHow long does automated signoff take?21:40
dobeytedg: depends on how long the autopkgtests take, for all that are triggered by the upload21:43
tedgAh, I see.21:43
dobeytedg: and i think the thing that checks for status updates every 35 minutes or so21:43
tedgI was checking the status much more frequently than needed then :-)21:44
AlbertArobru: could you re-trigger the i386 build for mir/vivid: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-019/+packages22:01
AlbertAtrainguards: or somebody that could trigger that ^22:05
robruAlbertA: done. Please ping trainguards first as I'm on sick leave, only intermittently available22:08
AlbertArobru: ack thanks!22:08
=== robru changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Train trouble? ping trainguards | CI problems? Use JenkaaS: http://bit.ly/jenkins-docs | Train: http://bit.ly/1hGZsfS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known issues: robru on sick leave until May
robruAlbertA: you're welcome22:08
robrutedg: dobey: the britney runs take 45-60 minutes depending on load22:09
robruThat doesn't include autopkgtest time, that's just how long in between checks on autopkgtest progress22:11

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!