| === mcphail_ is now known as mcphail | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| mcphail | On 16.04 desktop, can snaps only be installed locally (using "snap install blah") rather than from the store (using "snappy install blah")? | 08:12 |
|---|---|---|
| * mcphail wants a neat way to install kyrofa's owncloud snap | 08:15 | |
| thomas25 | Hi | 13:53 |
| thomas25 | I download a snappy image from here http://people.canonical.com/~mvo/all-snaps/ | 13:53 |
| thomas25 | But i'm a little stuck then. | 13:54 |
| thomas25 | I would like to clone snapcraft repo | 13:54 |
| thomas25 | However I need git | 13:54 |
| thomas25 | Since I can't use apt-get install and "snap find" has a limited number of snaps I'm not sure how I can do anything. | 13:55 |
| thomas25 | maybe i missed something ? | 13:55 |
| oparoz | thomas25, see if you can enable classic mode | 13:56 |
| oparoz | that gives you a shell with access to standard tools | 13:56 |
| thomas25 | So today I can't have a minimum ubuntu core 'working' ? | 13:57 |
| thomas25 | With read only partition and no use of apt-get. | 13:58 |
| ali1234 | thomas25: such a thing wouldn't make any sense... how you going to use git when it is sandboxed? | 14:06 |
| ali1234 | classic mode exists specifically for doing development because you can't do development when each of your tools is in it's own sandbox | 14:06 |
| ali1234 | i could be wrong but i think classic mode is more or less just a snap that has everything (via apt) inside one sandbox | 14:07 |
| thomas25 | ali1234: That makes sense ^^. Thank you | 14:08 |
| thomas25 | How do you enter classic mode ? | 14:09 |
| thomas25 | I'm not sure my image give me that possibility. | 14:11 |
| ali1234 | not sure | 14:11 |
| oparoz | snappy enable-classic | 14:11 |
| ali1234 | let me read my logs | 14:12 |
| oparoz | if that still works, then you can do snappy shell classic | 14:12 |
| thomas25 | No binary "snappy" only "snap" on my image, and no such option as described here https://github.com/ubuntu-core/snappy-dev-website/blob/master/src/versioned/guides-and-reference/release/build-apps/setup.md | 14:13 |
| oparoz | try with snap then? | 14:14 |
| oparoz | It's been renamed | 14:14 |
| ali1234 | looks like the old classic mode was removed | 14:14 |
| ali1234 | will be replaced by an actual snap one day? | 14:15 |
| thomas25 | So for now, no "developer mode" ? | 14:16 |
| ali1234 | yeah looks like it | 14:16 |
| ali1234 | seems like classic-mode wasn't actually a snap, it used most of the same tech but could not be updated like one | 14:17 |
| oparoz | Well it depends, if it's for a personal project, you can use older images | 14:17 |
| ali1234 | so i guess they want to turn it into a proper snap | 14:18 |
| oparoz | the images in the obsolete folder still have classic | 14:18 |
| thomas25 | oparoz: Yeah it is just to understand and discover snappy. | 14:18 |
| thomas25 | oparoz: ok thanks, i'll try it then. | 14:19 |
| oparoz | thomas25, use the old images then, but other things have also changed, such as how to set up policies | 14:19 |
| ali1234 | the older images have different problems though | 14:19 |
| thomas25 | Do you know if an alpha release or something is planned ? | 14:23 |
| ali1234 | i dont see anything on the mailing list about it | 14:23 |
| oparoz | They're hard at work trying to release something, yes | 14:23 |
| oparoz | Best to come during business hours to get some answers I think | 14:24 |
| thomas25 | yeah probably ^^ | 14:24 |
| thomas25 | I will see next week. Thanks for the replies. | 14:25 |
| oparoz | 👍 | 14:25 |
| thomas25 | An other question, how the configuration file are handled ? | 15:01 |
| thomas25 | If it is in the snap it would be read only. | 15:02 |
| thomas25 | So how to modify it ? | 15:02 |
| thomas25 | I heard about hard link however I tried the "mosquitto" snap present in the snapcraft repository, but it seems there are no writable file available for "mosquitto.conf". | 15:19 |
| ovalseven8 | Hello - heard of the new "Snap package". Which packages are available? Is there an official Ubuntu repository? | 15:49 |
| thomas25 | If you just want to test the snap packages, you should try the ubuntu 16.04 lts but there are not a lot of packages by default however. | 15:50 |
| thomas25 | But you can build some with snapcraft. | 15:51 |
| ovalseven8 | thomas25: Yes. My question is - which packages can you install by default? Will there come new packages or how does it work | 15:51 |
| ovalseven8 | If I create a snap for a software, how can I make it that normal people can install it on 16.04? | 15:52 |
| thomas25 | Using "snap find" you have 14 snaps available | 15:55 |
| thomas25 | Like "ubuntu-clock-app" | 15:55 |
| ovalseven8 | thomas25: Yes, but how can I add new snap software? | 15:56 |
| thomas25 | There is a store where you can probably find more package (you need authentication) | 15:56 |
| thomas25 | But not sure , I never tried | 15:56 |
| thomas25 | But I don't know when more package will be added to the 'default' ones | 15:57 |
| thomas25 | See https://github.com/ubuntu-core/snapcraft/tree/master/examples | 15:58 |
| thomas25 | You can build snap using these examples | 15:59 |
| thomas25 | It is very easy | 15:59 |
| thomas25 | Just run "snapcraft" in "webchat" for example | 15:59 |
| thomas25 | Then "snap install" will do the job. | 16:00 |
| ovalseven8 | thomas25: I am just curious how the distribution of snap software will work | 16:00 |
| ovalseven8 | Who decides which snap apps will be available by default and so on | 16:00 |
| thomas25 | If your asking if canonical will check every snap I don't know. | 16:02 |
| thomas25 | Since it is "contained" I don't think so | 16:02 |
| thomas25 | But I really don't know. | 16:02 |
| ovalseven8 | thomas25: I see, thanks anyway! | 16:03 |
| thomas25 | Come asking again Monday you will probably have more and better answers | 16:04 |
| daker | ovalseven8: a snap is checked via automated checks once you upload it to the store | 16:08 |
| ovalseven8 | daker: Do you have a link to the store? | 16:08 |
| daker | some checks needs manuals checking | 16:08 |
| daker | https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/ | 16:09 |
| ovalseven8 | daker: And everybody with 16.04 installed will have access to the uploaded packages? | 16:09 |
| daker | ovalseven8: yes | 16:10 |
| daker | approved packages | 16:10 |
| thomas25 | daker: Do you know what kind of tests are performed ? | 16:12 |
| daker | thomas25: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~click-reviewers/click-reviewers-tools/trunk/files/head:/clickreviews/ | 16:14 |
| thomas25 | daker: Thanks | 16:15 |
| thomas25 | daker: Do you know how configuration files are handled ? | 16:17 |
| ovalseven8 | What about snap security? Is there an automatic check if they are signed or how will be checked that everything that is downloaded (for example github) is ok? | 16:19 |
| daker | ovalseven8: i guess snappy takes care of that | 16:25 |
| daker | ovalseven8: https://github.com/ubuntu-core/snappy/blob/master/store/snap_remote_repo.go#L53 | 16:28 |
| ovalseven8 | daker: Mh, I don't really understand | 16:29 |
| daker | the store provides the checksum of the snap you uploaded, then snappy performs a checksum of the downloaded snap somewhere in the code to compare if nothing happened | 16:30 |
| ovalseven8 | daker: But I don't see the point. If I can manipulate the download, I can also manipulate the checksum check, no? | 16:32 |
| daker | ovalseven8: maybe try to make a POC for that :) | 16:39 |
| ovalseven8 | Snap packages seems to be interesting. But I guess I will deal with it when more time is passed and I have more time | 16:40 |
| ovalseven8 | It will be very time consuming if you deal with it the very first time, I guess | 16:41 |
| ovalseven8 | Additionally, there will be more documentation in the future, I hope. At the moment, there is not too much info | 16:41 |
| ogra_ | As long as you use snapcraft, the lerning curve is pretty low imho | 16:44 |
| ovalseven8 | ogra_: There is only snapcraft? | 16:45 |
| ogra_ | That is what you should use, yeah | 16:46 |
| ogra_ | Packaging means to create a single yaml file once... The rest is done fully automatic | 16:47 |
| ovalseven8 | ogra_: The .snap package contains the binary, right? | 16:48 |
| ogra_ | A snap package is a readonly squashfs file that contains all binaries of your project, yes | 16:49 |
| daker | ogra_: hi, did you have chance to work on the wifi firmware for the rpi ? | 16:50 |
| ovalseven8 | ogra_: So, everythign will be statically linked, right? | 16:50 |
| ogra_ | daker, nope, had to do some disaster recovery on release day | 16:51 |
| ogra_ | ovalsend, no, why would it ? | 16:51 |
| daker | ogra_: it doesn't work on the rpi3 too ? | 16:52 |
| ogra_ | you indeed *can* statically link if you feel like... Up to you... by defaukt snapcraft just pulls deb packages from the archive for the defined dependencies. | 16:52 |
| ogra_ | (and puts them inside your snap) | 16:53 |
| ovalseven8 | ogra_: I don't understand the concept completely yet, sorry | 16:53 |
| ogra_ | daker too ? | 16:53 |
| daker | i mean the wifi :) | 16:54 |
| ogra_ | there is no wifi on the pi2 ;) | 16:54 |
| ogra_ | the pi3 firmware will be added with an SRU and eventually end up in the kernel snap | 16:55 |
| daker | ogra_: i use the wifi dongle but it's didn't managed to get it detected | 16:55 |
| daker | a* | 16:55 |
| daker | i see you were talking about the pi3 when speaking about the firmware | 16:56 |
| ogra_ | Well, we install the normal linux-firmware package | 16:56 |
| ogra_ | and the sub drivers should all be enabled | 16:57 |
| ogra_ | usb | 16:57 |
| daker | the same wifi dongle works with raspibian and other distros | 16:57 |
| ogra_ | I.e. it should not work any different from any Ubuntu desktop install | 16:58 |
| ogra_ | if it works on desktop but not on the pi2 thats a snappy bug indeed, else just an Ubuntu one.. | 16:58 |
| daker | it works on Ubuntu | 16:59 |
| ogra_ | Well, then file a bug please | 16:59 |
| ogra_ | (I know that raspbian patches a lot of non free ralink stuff into their kernel, so thats not really a metric) | 17:00 |
| ogra_ | ... but if it works on desktop thats clearly a bug | 17:01 |
| daker | Bus 002 Device 004: ID 148f:2070 Ralink Technology, Corp. RT2070 Wireless Adapter | 17:01 |
| ogra_ | and you are sure that works on desktop ? | 17:05 |
| ogra_ | (the ralink statically devices are definitely shaky without the driver from the ralink site) | 17:05 |
| ogra_ | s/statically/sta/ | 17:06 |
| ogra_ | (silly autocompletion on the tablet) | 17:06 |
| daker | ogra_: well it gets the wifi networks | 17:10 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| daker | well it works | 17:13 |
| daker | it connects to the wifi but i am seeing timeouts | 17:16 |
| daker | ieee80211 phy1: rt2800usb_entry_txstatus_timeout: Warning - TX status timeout for entry 7 in queue 2 | 17:17 |
| ovalseven8 | Hi again. Question: A statically linked .snap package makes sense but I don't see a reason for dynamically linked binaries | 17:35 |
| ovalseven8 | The advantage of dynamic linking is less disk space. But because snap distributes every single dependency, this is not an advantage anymore | 17:36 |
| ogra_ | daker, yeah thats what I mean, the in-kernel driver usually isn't stable | 17:36 |
| ovalseven8 | Can someone explain me, please? | 17:36 |
| mcphail | ovalseven8: it is usually easier to create dynamically linked apps, particularly if you're just pulling pre-built dependencies | 17:37 |
| ogra_ | you can use statically linked libs if you feel like | 17:37 |
| ogra_ | but as daker said... It is easier to just use existing binaries | 17:37 |
| ogra_ | err... *as mcphail said... Sorry | 17:40 |
| daker | :D | 17:41 |
| ovalseven8 | Which dependencies have I add to? Even packages that are installed on Ubuntu by default? | 17:41 |
| ogra_ | Whatever your binary needs | 17:41 |
| ovalseven8 | And if a dependency will change (security update), will I have to upload the new .snap package? | 17:42 |
| * ogra_ would suggest to just install snapcraft and the snapcraft-examples packages and play with the examples | 17:42 | |
| ogra_ | yes | 17:42 |
| ovalseven8 | Oh my god. So, a program with Qt5 and such dependencies will need an update very often | 17:43 |
| ogra_ | as often as the packages in the archive get security updates | 17:44 |
| ogra_ | for qt thats probably rather rare | 17:44 |
| ogra_ | (and if your app is confined some security issues are actually irrelevant, really depends what issues get fixed | 17:46 |
| ogra_ | ) | 17:46 |
| ogra_ | (and how your app is run) | 17:46 |
| ali1234 | ogra_: what's the deal with classic mode on 16.04? is it planned to convert it into a normal snap? | 17:48 |
| ogra_ | I don't think so | 17:49 |
| ali1234 | so it's just gone forever? | 17:49 |
| ogra_ | nah | 17:49 |
| ovalseven8 | I mean, creating a .snap for a big gui desktop application will be very complicated | 17:49 |
| ogra_ | only temporary... Like snap config | 17:49 |
| ali1234 | why can't it be implemented as a normal snap btw? | 17:50 |
| ogra_ | ovalseven8, well, fir fox will most likely switch completely to snap | 17:50 |
| ogra_ | *firefox | 17:50 |
| ogra_ | ali1234, because yo want everything o be rw | 17:51 |
| ali1234 | okay but snaps must support rw to some extent. like what if i make a ftp server where people can upload things... you want that to be rw too | 17:51 |
| ogra_ | The point of classic is to have a rw playground for apt... shipping that as ro squashfs makes no sense | 17:52 |
| ovalseven8 | Unfortunately, the examples for snapcraft on GitHub are just very easy programs :/ | 17:52 |
| ali1234 | it would make more sense on a filesystem that supports snapshots | 17:53 |
| ali1234 | hmm SNAPshots | 17:53 |
| ogra_ | snaps have a rw dir... Installing an apt chroot/container would mean to copy the whole ro snap into the rw dir | 17:53 |
| ogra_ | that would be totally wasteful | 17:53 |
| ogra_ | what we really only want is to have the container ship the bits we removed...as rw overlay | 17:54 |
| ali1234 | yes.. overlay filesystem backed by a ro snapshot | 17:55 |
| ogra_ | not over rlay fs | 17:55 |
| ovalseven8 | The snapcraft docs are poor at the moment | 17:55 |
| ali1234 | no, overlayfs sucks | 17:55 |
| ali1234 | but maybe btrfs | 17:55 |
| ogra_ | Nah | 17:55 |
| ali1234 | zfs? | 17:56 |
| thomas25 | probably | 17:56 |
| ogra_ | btrfs sucks even most more :p | 17:56 |
| ogra_ | -most | 17:56 |
| ogra_ | silly autocomplete | 17:56 |
| ogra_ | zfs on embedded ? | 17:56 |
| ali1234 | sure why not | 17:56 |
| thomas25 | Canonical is targeting "big" embedded device | 17:57 |
| ali1234 | embedded is meaningless when you talk about running ubuntu on it, it's already many times bigger than a real embedded system | 17:57 |
| ogra_ | dunno, I wouldn't want to give half my ram to a feature that I can also get cheaper in other ways | 17:57 |
| ogra_ | snappy is focused on embedded | 17:57 |
| ogra_ | it is designed for it | 17:57 |
| daker | ogra_: Sagem XG-76NA 802.11bg doesn't work on snappy :/ | 17:58 |
| ogra_ | daker but on desktop ? | 17:58 |
| ovalseven8 | Am I right that I have to add parts step by step in snapcraft? So, compile part1 that is needed for part2 and so on? | 18:00 |
| thomas25 | About zfs/ubuntu http://news.softpedia.com/news/canonical-is-delighted-to-collaborate-with-nexenta-on-optimizing-zfs-for-ubuntu-502806.shtml | 18:00 |
| daker | it works | 18:00 |
| ogra_ | daker, file bugs :) | 18:00 |
| daker | ogra_: against what ? | 18:00 |
| ogra_ | ovalseven8 NT necessarily | 18:01 |
| ogra_ | not | 18:01 |
| ogra_ | daker see topic ;) | 18:01 |
| daker | ok | 18:01 |
| ogra_ | feel free to assign to me, I'll get it in the right hands then | 18:02 |
| ogra_ | (if you can) | 18:02 |
| ogra_ | ovalseven8, if you need an order you can define one, but I guests the majority of snaps don't need it | 18:03 |
| ogra_ | guess | 18:03 |
| daker | ogra_: i can't assign it (bug 1574075) | 18:17 |
| ubottu | bug 1574075 in Snappy "Snappy does not detect Sagem wifi dongle" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1574075 | 18:17 |
| ogra_ | Thanks | 18:18 |
| ali1234 | so how do i get started with snappy 2.0? | 18:19 |
| ogra_ | easiest is to have a denial desktop install ;) | 18:20 |
| ogra_ | xenial | 18:20 |
| ali1234 | my app only runs on raspberry pi | 18:21 |
| ogra_ | then you can grab an experimental image from mvos all-snaps dir | 18:21 |
| ali1234 | is the partition expansion fixed? | 18:21 |
| ogra_ | since ages :) | 18:21 |
| ali1234 | okay. does it work on pi 3 yet? | 18:22 |
| ogra_ | yep, but we don have a dedicated image yet | 18:22 |
| ali1234 | what does that mean? | 18:22 |
| ali1234 | why do you need a dedicated image if it works? | 18:22 |
| ogra_ | that you nedd to build it yourself | 18:23 |
| ali1234 | i see, so ubuntu-device-flash? | 18:23 |
| ogra_ | Yes, the latest one from mvo | 18:23 |
| ogra_ | with the canonical-pi3 gadget | 18:23 |
| ogra_ | (from the store) | 18:23 |
| ali1234 | the store? | 18:24 |
| ogra_ | Yes | 18:25 |
| ali1234 | what store? | 18:28 |
| ogra_ | snap store.... Where u-d-f pulls its. Snaps | 18:29 |
| ali1234 | expected a gadget snaps: snap not found | 18:30 |
| * ogra_ needs to rush out | 18:31 | |
| ogra_ | I guess your command is wrong then... | 18:32 |
| ali1234 | i copied it from the shell script :) | 18:32 |
| ogra_ | The options changed slightly | 18:32 |
| ali1234 | make-rpi2-all-snap.sh | 18:32 |
| ogra_ | series is 16 now instead of rolling | 18:32 |
| ogra_ | No idea what that is | 18:32 |
| ali1234 | okay it's doing something | 18:32 |
| ali1234 | http://people.canonical.com/~mvo/all-snaps/make-rpi2-all-snap.sh | 18:33 |
| ogra_ | Ah, never seen that | 18:33 |
| ogra_ | anyway... Out | 18:33 |
| dduffey | I have a snappy 16 image I made last week. Now when I boot with that image (even fresh) I'm not able to do a snappy search | 18:43 |
| dduffey | it says "no such command" | 18:43 |
| dduffey | sorry "Unknown command" | 18:43 |
| dduffey | wililupy, ^^^ | 18:46 |
| ali1234 | it's called snap now | 19:18 |
| ali1234 | and snappy automatically updates itself | 19:18 |
| dduffey | ali1234, thanks, how do I snap install webdm? | 19:31 |
| ali1234 | no idea | 19:31 |
| dduffey | even "snap install" says "Unkown command" install|search | 19:32 |
| ali1234 | i haven't even managed to make an image that boots yet | 19:35 |
| ogra_ | ali1234, whats the issue with booting ? | 19:47 |
| ogra_ | (note that serial output is currently not available on pi2) | 19:48 |
| ogra_ | will be fixed on monday | 19:48 |
| ali1234 | i don't know what the issue is | 19:49 |
| ali1234 | because it doesn't boot | 19:49 |
| ali1234 | maybe i am trying the wrong ip address | 19:50 |
| ogra_ | defintely boots here... | 19:51 |
| ogra_ | on both pi's | 19:51 |
| ali1234 | okay i am in | 19:51 |
| ogra_ | good | 19:51 |
| ali1234 | why is the led blinking constantly? | 19:51 |
| ogra_ | heartbeat... | 19:52 |
| ali1234 | they are backwards | 19:52 |
| ogra_ | shows you the system is alive | 19:52 |
| ali1234 | disk activity makes the power led blink | 19:52 |
| ali1234 | heartbeat is on the disk activity led | 19:52 |
| ogra_ | worth a bug I guess | 19:53 |
| ali1234 | i actually asked the foundation developers if this was possible once and they said no | 19:53 |
| ali1234 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/snappy/+bug/1574103 | 19:57 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1574103 in Snappy "Raspberry Pi 2 image LEDs are swapped." [Undecided,New] | 19:57 |
| ali1234 | so now what? install snapcraft on my desktop? | 19:59 |
| ogra_ | To build for arm ? | 20:00 |
| ogra_ | No | 20:00 |
| ali1234 | yes | 20:00 |
| ogra_ | only native | 20:00 |
| ali1234 | oh. | 20:00 |
| ali1234 | what if i install ubuntu-mate on my other raspberry pi and then install snapcraft on that? | 20:01 |
| ogra_ | scp an ubuntu-core (not snappy) tarball to the device and use it as chroot | 20:02 |
| ogra_ | Yeah, mate works too indeed | 20:02 |
| ali1234 | /home = /wrtable/user-data? | 20:10 |
| ogra_ | Kind of, yeah | 20:13 |
| ali1234 | okay i chrooted. apt can't find snapcraft | 20:16 |
| ogra_ | copied resolv.conf ? | 20:17 |
| ali1234 | yes | 20:17 |
| ogra_ | universe enabled ? | 20:17 |
| ali1234 | no | 20:17 |
| ogra_ | there you go | 20:17 |
| ali1234 | debconf is unhappy because it cannot show a dialog | 20:21 |
| ogra_ | It only tells you the frontend isn't installed, doesn't mean it would use it ;) | 20:29 |
| ali1234 | okay i have a snapcraft.yaml | 20:30 |
| ali1234 | it's downloading cmake stuff... | 20:32 |
| ali1234 | it failed to build because no C++ compiler | 20:34 |
| ali1234 | is it a problem that i am running snapcraft as root? | 20:36 |
| ali1234 | okay it still didn't work because no pkg-config | 20:38 |
| ali1234 | why do some snaps put build-packages in the top level, but others put it under parts: | 20:39 |
| ali1234 | i wish debs would have consistent names | 20:47 |
| ali1234 | why is it libgstreamer1.0-dev but libgstrtspserver-1.0-dev | 20:47 |
| ali1234 | wow it actually attempted to compile a source file that time | 20:53 |
| ali1234 | /root/piroverd/parts/daemon/src/i2cdevice.cpp:38:43: error: ‘ioctl’ was not declared in this scope | 20:53 |
| ali1234 | seriously? | 20:53 |
| ali1234 | how do i make snapcraft redownload the git repository after i made changes? | 20:58 |
| ali1234 | i found the repo and pulled manually | 20:59 |
| ali1234 | okay now i got /root/piroverd/parts/daemon/src/i2cdevice.cpp:54:58: error: ‘i2c_smbus_read_byte_data’ was not declared in this scope | 21:00 |
| ali1234 | this is that thing where's there's two different versions of linux/i2c-dev.h | 21:01 |
| ali1234 | finally it built | 21:06 |
| ali1234 | now i get "make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop." | 21:06 |
| ali1234 | this is what i've got so far http://paste.ubuntu.com/16015163/ | 21:09 |
| ali1234 | let's see if it can build gst-rpicamsrc | 21:12 |
| ali1234 | configure: error: Raspberry Pi files not found in /opt/vc/include | 21:13 |
| ali1234 | nope | 21:14 |
| ali1234 | well, i give up | 21:14 |
| ali1234 | all of my software uses the videocore libraries heavily | 21:15 |
| Domi | Hello, where do I get the latest builds for rpi 3? | 21:18 |
| ali1234 | you have to build the image yourself for rpi3 | 21:18 |
| ali1234 | http://people.canonical.com/~mvo/all-snaps/ubuntu-device-flash | 21:18 |
| ali1234 | then do something like this: | 21:19 |
| ali1234 | sudo ./ubuntu-device-flash --verbose core 16 -o rpi2-all-snap.img --channel stable --enable-ssh --gadget canonical-pi3 --kernel canonical-pi3-linux --os ubuntu-core | 21:19 |
| ali1234 | except that doesn't work... snap not found | 21:20 |
| Domi | thank you. Is there any documentation on this? | 21:21 |
| ali1234 | nope | 21:21 |
| ali1234 | https://www.mail-archive.com/snappy-devel@lists.ubuntu.com/msg01307.html | 21:21 |
| ali1234 | that looks out of date | 21:22 |
| ali1234 | earlier ogra told me to use canonical-pi3 gadget | 21:23 |
| Domi | http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/snappy/all-snaps/rpi3/ what is with this images? | 21:23 |
| ali1234 | i dunno | 21:23 |
| ali1234 | earlier ogra told me there are no images :) | 21:23 |
| ali1234 | i wouldn't trust that to actually work | 21:23 |
| Domi | ok is there anyone who is able to help me? Or can i ask someone? | 21:25 |
| ali1234 | ogra :) | 21:25 |
| ali1234 | but i think he's hiding | 21:25 |
| ali1234 | i'd help you if i could, but i have abslutely no idea what i am doing | 21:26 |
| ali1234 | this channel has more activity during european business hours | 21:27 |
| Domi | ok thank you for your help I will try it tomorrow. | 21:46 |
| === oparoz_ is now known as oparoz | ||
| oparoz | Is there a deb we can use to include extra dynamic linkers? | 22:39 |
| oparoz | I've got an arm binary using the wrong one and symlinking works, but that's not possible in Snappy | 22:39 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!