leaeasy | I have uploaded source to ppa, but nothing happend. Without any error or email-notify. | 02:57 |
---|---|---|
tsimonq2 | leaeasy: what's the terminal output? successful? and how long did you wait? | 03:04 |
leaeasy | tsimonq2, I had wait for more than one days, But I had recieved the email notify just now. | 03:26 |
tsimonq2 | cool :) | 03:27 |
=== gkadam is now known as Guest91385 | ||
=== Guest91385 is now known as gkadam | ||
Driskell | Hello. Is there a way to "un" Supersede a PPA package? I had a broken PPA dependency fail a build and now the old version is superseded and I would like to restore it as published. | 11:49 |
cjwatson | Driskell: Delete the new version, go to "Copy packages" on the PPA in question, change the "Published" filter to "Superseded" so that you can find the old version, select the old version, leave "Destination PPA" and "Destination series" at their defaults of the same PPA and series, select "Copy existing binaries", and press "Copy Packages" | 11:57 |
cjwatson | Driskell: This will only work if the old version was superseded fairly recently and hasn't been garbage-collected yet | 11:57 |
Driskell | cjwatson: Excellent! Thanks - I hadn't noticed the filter! | 12:15 |
cjwatson | np | 12:16 |
kyrofa | cjwatson, I managed to get a few successful snaps built with LP over the weekend. Still had about 20% failures though | 13:11 |
kyrofa | cjwatson, makes me wonder if it is indeed load-induced | 13:11 |
cjwatson | kyrofa: it's a timing thing, I have a trello card now with details on what to do to sort it out | 13:11 |
cjwatson | just have had an annoying headache all day and not making much actual progress | 13:11 |
kyrofa | cjwatson, ugh, I know how that goes. Glad you know where to go though! Rest up :) | 13:12 |
=== Laney is now known as trmsu | ||
=== trmsu is now known as Laney | ||
keiserr | Hi..., i kind of have a stupid question about dch, if kind of made a commit, and i left a typo when i was documenting in the changelog, did a dch -e, and changed it, is there something like a git --amend with bzr ? I now have two commits for a changelog [which technically will commit, i.e that latest will fix it, but it is not very pretty, any idea how i can cancel that merge request and do an amend instead? ] | 19:04 |
dobey | keiserr: not really a question for launchpad. it has nothing to do with launchpad. bzr doesn't have an amend function though. | 19:29 |
keiserr | dobey: exactly my concern am a bit confused how to react without the amend, I ended up making another commit to fix the documentation typo, and hopefully whoever does the merge doesn't get botherred to do 2 merges for one changelog. | 19:31 |
dobey | keiserr: technically a second commit is the correct thing to do | 19:32 |
keiserr | great! Thanks. | 19:33 |
dasjoe | Hey, loading https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1 gives interesting results. For some people the output is incomplete, only the first and last 40 comments are loaded. For me it is complete, but all meta actions are shown between #40 and #41 | 19:35 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1 in Ubuntu Malaysia LoCo Team "Microsoft has a majority market share" [Critical,In progress] | 19:35 |
dasjoe | Also, the last three comments are spam | 19:36 |
cjwatson | bzr does have an amend function, it's just spelled bzr uncommit; bzr commit | 19:41 |
cjwatson | but best not to use it if you've already pushed the branch somewhere, or if it's bound | 19:41 |
cjwatson | (same guidelines as for git commit --amend) | 19:42 |
cjwatson | dasjoe: first and last 40> that's the way it works for large bugs to avoid timeouts | 19:42 |
cjwatson | the middle comments are loaded asynchronously later from JS | 19:42 |
cjwatson | dasjoe: I've hidden the spam | 19:43 |
DalekSec | I just have to ask, when someone uses comments in PPA deletions, do those go anywhere? | 19:46 |
cjwatson | DalekSec: They're visible in publishing history | 19:46 |
cjwatson | DalekSec: e.g. change filter to Superseded on +packages and expand a Deleted entry | 19:47 |
DalekSec | Oh, well then. Thanks, I guess I shouldn't make snarky comments. >_> | 19:49 |
dasjoe | cjwatson: right, thanks for clearing that up | 20:04 |
Laibsch | Is there a way I can omit the kernel bugs from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/ ? They're getting in the way of looking through NEW bugs. | 22:03 |
Laibsch | If the web interface can't do, can the API? | 22:04 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!