[03:17] <sarnold> rbasak: hello :) is 1574458 something you'd fix up?
[05:03] <El_Presidente> hi, i have a question about a linux raid. if i have two hdds with different sizes can i still create an md0 if i match it the smallest hdd?
[05:46] <rbasak> sarnold: I'll ask upstream to look at it, thanks.
[08:41] <zzebster> Hi I could do with some help with a preseed issue. I have configured the apt-setup/security_protocol to https and this is correctly set during the installation but when it added to the target os sorces.list it is set to http. the trusty and trusty-updates are added correctly with https. Any one know how to make it add it to the sources.list with the correct https protocol?
[09:09] <Ox032F> I'm trying to update from 14.04 to 16.04 but I get a lot of "/usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d: 1: /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d: /sbin/runlevel: not found" and systemd is not installed, what can I do?
[09:09] <Ox032F> is it even possible to upgrade a virtual-server?
[09:10] <Ox032F> or do I need to stick to the original release?
[09:17] <dasjoe> Upgrading from 14.04 will be supported once 16.04.1 is released, which is scheduled for July 21st
[14:22] <karstensrage> ok got the credential provider to work, apparently you have to compile it 64 bit and copy it to System32
[14:23] <karstensrage> the project defaults to compiling for 32 bit and its never mentioned anywhere
[14:23] <karstensrage> i think one of the reasons windows is such a baffling ordeal is its so non-intuitive
[14:23] <karstensrage> of course 64 bit stuff goes in System32
[14:24] <karstensrage> oops
[14:24] <karstensrage> wrong -server channel
[17:52] <sarnold> rbasak: thanks -- but I thought -we- were apport hook upstream?
[18:21] <mdeslaur> sarnold: we're apport upstream, but the package may ship an apport hook
[18:21] <mdeslaur> the apport hook may be provided from upstream
[18:22] <mdeslaur> though in this case it looks like something we ship and not upstream
[18:23] <mdeslaur> sarnold: oh, which is exactly what you said
[18:23] <mdeslaur> sarnold: never mind me, sometimes I ramble
[18:24] <TJ-> the recent 15.10 php5 ... ubuntu3.2 is apparently causing an OOM with SOAP requests, who deals with that?
[18:34] <sarnold> mdeslaur: interesting, I didn't know that 'upstreams' were ever involved in the apport hooks.. well, apart perhaps from canonical-driven things, like apparmor apport hooks ..
[18:43] <mdeslaur> TJ-: file a bug and point me to it please
[18:46] <TJ-> mdeslaur: bug 1575298   I asked the reporter to add specific info to it, he told me one of his colleagues had traced the fault in the source.
[18:53] <opwallin> does anyone idea why postfix want use 25 port and not 587 ?
[18:54] <nacc> opwallin: that's the default smtp port, iirc (meaning you didn't modify your postfix configuration?)
[18:55] <opwallin> yes i have may of them ... :)
[18:56] <nacc> opwallin: it's been a while since i messed with a postfix configuration, but i believe the port is managed by /etc/postfix/master.cf
[18:56] <nacc> opwallin: and by default the entry is just "smtp" which means port 25
[18:56] <sarnold> .. wouldn't 587 be used by MUAs?
[18:56] <opwallin> if i remove all of smtp no happends
[18:57] <opwallin> nothing happends ...
[18:57] <nacc> opwallin: i don't know what you mean; you'd have to add a new entry to get it
[18:57] <nacc> opwallin: and iirc, 587 is the same as "submission"
[18:58] <nacc> sarnold: it might be, but my most common interaction with this question is ISPs blocking port 25 :)
[18:59] <mdeslaur> TJ-: oh, I see the problem...I'll have a php5 package to test in the security team ppa in a few minutes
[19:07] <opwallin> Failed to start submission.service: Unit submission.service not found.
[19:08] <opwallin> loaded not-found, actvie: inactive (dead)
[19:09] <TJ-> mdeslaur: you're a star... I think the user will be pleased
[19:10] <nacc> opwallin: apologies, had an internet hiccup at home; was that directed at me? submission is in /etc/postfix/master.cf, it's not its own service (iirc)
[19:11] <opwallin> mmmh ok i'll check it
[19:12] <opwallin> how to increase debug logs in postfix ?
[19:13] <opwallin> probably i will found it somehow ..
[19:24] <jamespage> smoser, hey - can you help gsamfira with his maas/curtin issue? I'm do mim atm
[19:24] <jamespage> doing
[19:25] <jamespage> smoser, https://screencloud.net/v/6G34 does that look familiar?
[19:42] <smoser> jamespage, looking
[20:08] <dgsdfgfdgsdf> anyone try conjure-up?
[20:24] <ubuoneubu> ciao a tutti
[20:24] <ubuoneubu> posso chiedere info generali su ubuntu server?
[20:25] <tarpman> ubuoneubu: hello, please ask in #ubuntu-it
[20:27] <danawar> Hey Ubuntu Server how can i install a package without upgrade packages that have upgrades available i want to install kodi but not install the latest samba update.
[20:28] <bekks> danawar: sudp apt install kodi
[20:29] <danawar> http://pastebin.com/7SfyfWSN
[20:32] <tarpman> danawar: maybe - apt install kodi libsmbclient=<samba version you currently have installed>
[20:32] <tarpman> danawar: or pin libsmbclient
[20:32] <tarpman> danawar: why don't you want to update samba?
[20:33] <tarpman> pardon me, pin samba, not pin libsmbclient
[20:33] <danawar> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1572301
[20:33] <danawar> How do i pin samba?
[20:34] <teward> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PinningHowto
[20:34] <tarpman> sudo apt-mark hold samba
[20:34] <tarpman> and teward's link
[20:38] <danawar> http://pastebin.com/AGqGFiy3
[20:44] <danawar> Any more suggestions regarding the paste above?
[20:47] <tarpman> danawar: I still think the easiest is the very first thing I suggested: apt install kodi libsmbclient=<samba version you currently have installed>
[20:48] <tarpman> danawar: otherwise you probably are going to end up having to pin all those samba packages (including libsmbclient) otherwise apt will keep trying to upgrade them
[20:56] <danawar> Thanks tarpman that worked a treat!
[20:57] <opwallin> qmgr[10718]: warning: connect to transport private/submission: No such file or directory
[20:58] <opwallin> i think port 587 is ok, it's open and owned by postfix
[20:59] <opwallin> but still, somethig prevent to select submission transport even order to do that cf file