[04:15] <tsimonq2> wxl, phillw, ianorlin: I've filed bug 1575470 FYI
[04:18] <tsimonq2> bug 1575470
[04:18] <tsimonq2> *sigh* :/
[04:20] <tsimonq2> *cracks fingers* one last try
[04:20] <tsimonq2> bug 1575470
[04:20] <tsimonq2> *SIGH*
[04:20] <tsimonq2> whatever, I'm off to bed :P
[04:21] <krytarik> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcmanfm-qt/+bug/1575470 - for good measure. :P
[04:24]  * ianorlin just changed the status to confirmed as I reproduce it easily
[18:24] <wxl> firefox users about?
[20:17] <ianorlin> tsimonq2, remeber the plan to talk about the testcases from two days ago but it seems he is currently away
[20:18] <ianorlin> wxl I sometimes do but mostly use qupzilla have something for me to test
[20:34] <tsimonq2> o/
[20:35] <tsimonq2> on phone connected to tablet's 4G, router is broken and dad won't go to TWC to get a new one
[20:35] <tsimonq2> ianorlin
[20:36] <phillw-virtual> ah, working :)
[20:37] <ianorlin> well I did not have that much on the testcases but I think one giant testcase for lxqt-config might be too long as it contains things that would be multiple testcases in lxde
[20:39] <tsimonq2> like what?
[20:39] <ianorlin> lxqt-config-monitor would have all the length of the lxrandr testcase
[20:40] <tsimonq2> ohh I see
[20:41] <tsimonq2> well there is pros and cons to multiple test cases
[20:41] <tsimonq2> s/is/are/
[20:42] <ianorlin> yes it would be like the length of three package testcases put together
[20:42] <tsimonq2> as a pro, it will be huge
[20:42] <tsimonq2> one will
[20:42] <tsimonq2> and splitting it up would be best
[20:43] <tsimonq2> but on the contrary, how would we do that?
[20:43] <ianorlin> maybe make one for like each seperate GUI applicatoin
[20:44] <tsimonq2> how would people test this? don't you think it would be weird to have separate test cases for each?
[20:44] <tsimonq2> I get your point, but I really don't think it is doable
[20:44] <ianorlin> I think it could be but like the results of say one program crashes at startup makes if the rest pass or fail wierd
[20:44] <tsimonq2> unless you have a suggestion?
[20:45] <tsimonq2> oic
[20:45] <tsimonq2> yeah
[20:45] <tsimonq2> so do you have any ideas of how we can accomplish this?
[20:50] <wxl> ianorlin: bug 1575803
[20:51] <tsimonq2> ianorlin: so for now can we just move on from that and not get a test case for that?
[20:51] <ianorlin> I am not sure how strict the testcases have to be 1 to 1 for each package
[20:51] <ianorlin> as lxqt-config has so much functionality in it
[20:52] <ianorlin> like at least three of the current lxde testcases would be covered by a test for it
[20:52] <ianorlin> wxl ^
[20:52] <tsimonq2> and do you think Alpha One would be a good milestone to have all of the LXQt test cases done by?
[20:52] <ianorlin> yeah I can get started on other ones but that needs a lot of planning
[20:53] <ianorlin> They don't take that long
[20:53] <tsimonq2> ic yeah wxl, what do you think?
[20:53] <wxl> hm
[20:53] <wxl> let's make a sketch of all the things we probably should test and then try making something up from there
[20:53] <wxl> i don't think we need to be 1 to 1
[20:53] <ianorlin> I mean there is a unity alt tab testcase
[20:54] <ianorlin> the panel would be an important one and pcmanfm-qt
[20:55] <tsimonq2> yeah
[20:57] <tsimonq2> I'll hack on a few later
[20:57] <tsimonq2> ianorlin: but Alpha 1 is a good goal?
[20:58] <ianorlin> yes putting it off will only result in less testing of lxqt
[20:58] <tsimonq2> alright cool
[20:59] <tsimonq2> while I am here, wxl, could you please talk to the release team to see what it would take to get images for LXQt?
[20:59] <tsimonq2> or the ones making the images? XD
[21:00] <tsimonq2> because I think it would be good to have an image for that for Alpha one as well
[21:00] <tsimonq2> thoughts?
[21:00] <wxl> sure
[21:00] <tsimonq2> awesome, thanks :)
[21:01] <tsimonq2> well ima take off, thanks guys :)
[21:17] <bipul> tsimonq2,  http://paste.ubuntu.net/16088679/ can anyone tell me what went wrong?
[22:27] <tsimonq2> bipul: you have weird dependency errors
[22:28] <tsimonq2> bipul: what package are you trying to modify?
[22:32] <bipul> bc
[22:32] <tsimonq2> bipul: can we take this to #lubuntu-offtopic please?
[22:33] <bipul> :) ok
[22:33] <tsimonq2> thanks ianorlyn :)
[22:33] <tsimonq2> (for people reading the logs, bug 1575933 )