[06:34] <pitti> Bonjour tout le monde !
[06:35] <duflu> Bonjour tout le monde, et pitti
[06:54] <duflu> pitti: Unrelated to recent discussions -- if I have a crash on startup and it gets uploaded, can I find via the filesystem which error/bug/URL it was?
[06:54] <duflu> I don't have working X, only VT login
[06:55] <sarnold> /var/crash/ ?
[06:56] <duflu> sarnold: Yes, files in /var/crash, but no URL to tell me where it went to or which existing bug it is
[06:56] <duflu> And no X either. Just a console
[06:57] <duflu> I wonder, can I look my machine up on errors.ubuntu by some ID?
[07:01] <duflu> I take it back. Unity7 in software mode eventually started after about 10 minutes
[07:35] <willcooke> Laney, https://launchpad.net/~attente/+archive/ubuntu/gnome-software/+sourcepub/6363890/+listing-archive-extra
[07:36] <willcooke> Laney, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=
[07:51] <seb128> willcooke, teaching upload queues and ppas to Laney? ;-)
[07:51] <willcooke> someone has to
[07:51] <Laney> I'm learning something
[07:51] <Laney> PPAs don't have -proposed you know
[07:51] <seb128> right
[07:51] <pitti> Laney: that's configurable
[07:51] <seb128> but we upload to "version" for years
[07:52] <seb128> and have the archive redirect to proposed
[07:52] <pitti> and -- seb128, Laney: OHAI!
[07:52] <seb128> hey pitti
[07:52] <willcooke> obligatory: http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4jt8mkkUX1qdojzho1_500.png
[07:53] <seb128> Laney, what's the issue with not having proposed? xenial is closed so uploads are going to go to proposed anyway no?
[07:56] <seb128> the https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text= view has the correct "proposed" pocket info
[07:58] <Laney> HAHA
[07:58] <Laney> don't worry about this you guys
[08:00] <Laney> hi pitti ;-)
[08:00] <Laney> such worker spam
[08:00] <pitti> Laney: yeah :/ but  as long as they are squeaking, they are alive
[08:00] <pitti> Laney: the days when I wished I had asked IS for cleaning up the quota DB last week..
[08:01] <pitti> but there's also this weird "invalid version" (with the newline and duplicate version), haven't looked at that yet
[08:01] <pitti> I'm currently working on a little script to filter out requests from particular triggers, so that we can go easy on the perl tests
[08:02] <pitti> (there's not much change, no need to run 2500 tests on 4 arches
[08:02] <pitti> well, I'm going to write that script, that is; still need to fix my juju-local install
[08:11] <seb128> Trevinho, andyrock, bug #1575452 seems an annoying issue (I can confirm)
[08:38] <Trevinho> seb128: that was actually a designed feature... Ask JohnLea if you want know more
[08:38]  * Trevinho had to spend some day in order to do that
[08:38] <Trevinho> s
[08:39] <seb128> Trevinho, what is a feature? not being able to focus the copy dialog?
[08:39] <seb128> can't click on it in the launcher, can alt-tab, by design?
[08:40] <seb128> but you can click/alt-tab if you open a nautilus dialog first and then click again
[08:46] <Trevinho> seb128: in theory the only wa to access to that should have been alt+tab
[08:46] <Trevinho> seb128: or alt+tab + arrows
[08:56] <Trevinho> seb128: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/784804
[08:57] <Trevinho> seb128: I fixed that on 13/01/12 ;P
[09:01] <seb128> Trevinho, that bug doesn't say that alt-tab should skip the item, it only speaks about focus when clicking on the icon
[09:02] <Trevinho> seb128: yeah... In fact alt+tab should see it
[09:03] <seb128> does the click thing makes sense as well? the bug rational seemed to be because unity was not able to tell appart different nautilus windows
[09:03] <seb128> but now it does?
[10:42] <andyrock> seb128: https://code.launchpad.net/~azzar1/gtk/lp-1574693-shadows/+merge/293082
[10:42] <seb128> andyrock, can you get desrt and/or Trevinho to review?
[10:42] <andyrock> Trevinho: ^^^
[10:42] <Trevinho> I will
[10:42] <Trevinho> seb128: actually desrt already suggested that change in the first rivew
[10:42] <Trevinho> review*
[10:51] <seb128> Trevinho, k
[10:51] <seb128> so +1 it
[10:56] <Trevinho> seb128: oh, wait... andyrock there's one more thing maybe
[11:37] <willcooke> desktoppers - are you snapping in the big room or do you want to come back in to the smaller one?
[11:37] <robert_ancell_> big room
[11:37] <seb128> robert_ancell_, too cold in the meeting one
[11:37] <seb128> ups
[11:37] <seb128> willcooke, ^
[11:38]  * flocculant thinks willcooke should alias desktoppers for crocodiles ... 
[11:38] <willcooke> ack
[11:38] <willcooke> omw in a mo
[11:46] <desrt> om a ni wmo
[11:48] <Trevinho> willcooke: yeah, finished a patch and co,ing
[11:48] <Trevinho> ah never mind... it's on the big room :)
[11:51] <Laney> wo ai ni
[12:45] <jcastro> If I have screen tearing in games in unity on nvidia where do I need to start investigating?
[13:21] <pitti> seb128: oh, gotcha evolution translations!
[13:21] <pitti> since when is evo in universe?
[13:22] <ogra_> oh, yes, please ... i'd like my evo in german again :)
[13:22] <ogra_> pitti, trusty i think
[13:22] <ogra_> when thunderbird entered
[13:22] <pitti> ogra_: yep, bug 1545212
[13:23] <ogra_> (i actually didnt notice it was english until i took a screenshot of another bug ... definitely to much english in my brain )
[13:23] <pitti> ogra_: Inglisch heh?
[13:23] <ogra_> hah
[13:23] <pitti> on parle français ici !
[13:24] <seb128> pitti, feb I would say?
[13:24] <ogra_> Putain !
[13:24] <pitti> anyway, what a nasty bug, this affects quite a bunch of packages/domains
[13:25] <seb128> pitti, what was it?
[13:25] <jcastro> seb128: willcooke: where you guys serious about hosting our own firmware update service? If that is the case lmk now, marco would like to start writing the charm
[13:25] <pitti> seb128: really stupid :( http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-langpack/langpack-o-matic/main/revision/562
[13:25] <desrt> jcastro: i think the situation is fine as-is
[13:26] <ogra_> jcastro, hughsie seems pretty happy ... he even shows off with the numbers
[13:27] <jcastro> yeah, and I know that openshift can scale and all that stuff, I just noticed discussion last week if it makes sense to depend on a third party service for things like that or if it should be more like an ntp-pool.
[13:28] <jcastro> anyway, not my decision to make, I'm just saying our team can help if that's the case
[13:28] <desrt> jcastro: please don't make hughsie unhappy.  he's very nice to us :)
[13:28] <seb128> pitti, oh, got catch!
[13:29] <pitti> Laney: oh, speaking of openstack, did you ever find a solution for the appstream downloads to prodstack?
[13:29] <seb128> jcastro, the service rely on rh cloud hosting parts apparently, so not likely easy to get our version, willcooke is talking to upstream to see how we can collaborate
[13:30] <jcastro> seb128: ack
[13:30] <jcastro> desrt: I'm like hughsie fan #1, no worries
[13:31] <Laney> pitti: some split between the webservers and the service
[13:32] <Laney> so yeah, it got fixed
[13:35] <Laney> and I got to learn all about load balancing
[13:35] <Laney> attempted to learn about mojo but gave up
[13:37] <pitti> Laney: ah, good to hear!
[13:37] <pitti> Laney: so, no proxying through a scalingstack instance after all :)
[14:14] <hikiko> Trevinho, andyrock: https://code.launchpad.net/~hikiko/compiz/compiz.scale-bottomYoffset https://code.launchpad.net/~hikiko/unity/unity.scale-launcher-at-the-bottom (the scale) I'm fixing the expo now
[14:16] <desrt> seb128: http://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/7679/
[14:16] <willcooke> seb128, just writing here so I don't forgot:  a LP tag for snap bugs is "snapd-interfaces"   (is that right jdstrand?)
[14:16] <jdstrand> seb128, willcooke: snapd-interface
[14:16] <willcooke> thx jdstrand
[14:16] <seb128> jdstrand, thanks
[16:04] <seb128> night