=== GridCube is now known as ZERO_COOL === ZERO_COOL is now known as GridCube [06:14] Unit193: I did that for you [06:15] \o/ [06:15] mostly because you can do all that packagy stuff but not edit a wiki page :p [06:15] Wikis are hard, or at least logging in is. :3 [06:15] I think they might have looked at that [06:16] whilst coming up with all ways to make it harder :p [06:17] not really sure milestones needs to be there - given that qa and tech lead and web lead say no to b1 and no-one else cares enough to comment [06:17] and I'll always -1 any raspberry pi thing officially [06:17] so can just wait for the workhorse ping :p [07:31] bluesabre: re thunar and testing - been thinking about this - not sure quite what we can do with the current testcase - other than ask people to sit there copy/pasting till they see problems - then how long do we ask them to do it for ;) [07:32] or we could add a very specific testcase - sit there copy/pasting > how long did it take to crash on you? [07:32] did it crash quicker post-crash? [07:32] or: did you give up and use a different file manager :p [08:33] ochosi: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/1576576 [08:33] Launchpad bug 1576576 in gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu) "Update to 3.20 needs work and coordination" [Wishlist,Confirmed] [10:40] flocculant: if the gui automation (whats that called again) worked with gtk2, we could easily make a script to test it [10:56] yea - but it doesn't :p [11:09] and I've given up thinking about it tbh ;) [11:16] knome: when you've got 10 minutes or so and it's not lunch time can we haz chat about buildlog and tracker thingymajig :) [11:33] flocculant: I'll figure something out [12:53] flocculant, i'll be on and off today, but feel free to talk about something and i'll reply when i'm back ;) === PaulW2U_ is now known as PaulW2U === Logan_ is now known as Logan === yofel_ is now known as yofel [17:55] knome: no rush - really don't want a disjointed discussion [18:21] knome: added some about this to very top of http://pad.ubuntu.com/xubuntuqa-y-cycle [18:46] ochosi: In case you didn't see, there was also "interesting" discussions with that link to the bug. [18:46] tried hard not to ramble too much [18:47] Unit193: in -desktop or on bug? [18:47] -devel, actually. [18:47] oh right - well that just seems really pointless for me to idle in :) [18:48] Unit193: uhm when what where? [18:48] (sry, i vaguely remember you posting a link to a gtk3.20 lp bug today but i was too busy @work to read9 [18:49] ochosi: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/1576576 I linked to this, there was discussion in -devel at 04:21 local time. [18:49] Launchpad bug 1576576 in gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu) "Update to 3.20 needs work and coordination" [Wishlist,Confirmed] [18:49] evening ochosi :) [18:49] Basically a GNOME guy and unity peeps talking about if they're going to update this cycle. [18:49] right [18:49] well no worries i'll work on the greybird rewrite soon [18:50] so we'll be good either way [18:50] the only thing that could bite us is if xfce applications inject css [18:50] cause that will fail [18:50] Unity wasn't so interested in updating gtk3, actually. It was interesting, they have nobody at all that really understands themes now. :P [18:50] or: will need patches for 3.20 compat [18:50] yeah, i know. i talked to larsu at fosdem before he left the desktop team and canonical altogether [18:51] basically they'll have to switch to adwaita soon if they don't find anyone who maintains their themes [18:51] would have to be a community member from what i see [18:52] Oh? Wow, that's lovely. [18:52] mmm [18:52] ochosi: Know if satya will be working on Numix? :P [18:52] i think they're already working on it [18:53] so numix should be good i guess [18:53] Eric seems to have taken an interest in Blackbird, no? [19:35] menulibre 2.0.7-1.1 uploaded by Samuel Henrique Oltramari Pinto (SamuelOPH) (Closes: #811324) [19:38] Hi guys (and specially flocculant), can you look this bug and see if you are able to reproduce it, please ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-appfinder/+bug/1576771 [19:38] Launchpad bug 1576771 in xfce4-appfinder (Ubuntu) "Window can't be reduced horizontally" [Undecided,New] [19:38] flocculant: g+ and fb done re: irc sessions [19:38] I'll try to keep an eye on it to see if people yay in those places ;) [19:39] pleia2: thanks :) [19:40] I think I see fb stuff - but maybe not [19:40] pleia2: re counting - I'll probably ask for a bump in a week or so - then see what 'yay's' we had - then follow up [19:41] I will follow up with either a 'nope then' or more detail [19:41] okie [19:43] pleia2: freudian almost ... "but you're welcome to follow this path. Since our team handling the official social media is very small[0" [19:43] :) [19:44] nairwolf: I saw that bug - not looked in detail yet - will try tomorrow if I get chance [19:44] ok, so we'll talk to that tomorrow if I can be here also. (Should be outstide this saturday) [19:45] dinner time, see you. [21:09] flocculant, we probably want to just look at the source (not LP) for the builds, should be relatively simple to fetch that data [21:10] mmk [21:16] knome: which sources ? [21:16] nairwolf, build log [21:18] flocculant, also left a comment on the pad [21:20] oh, ok [21:21] nairwolf, if you are very interested in *any* discussions happening on this channel, i'd suggest you to either 1) get a shell so you can get a bnc/client always stay on the channel so you can check the backlog 2) start reading the logs found from irclogs.ubuntu.com [21:28] knome: Usually, I'm reading logs at irclogs.ubuntu.com, but this time, I didn't [21:32] knome: yea - thought second might be better [21:34] re multiple builds - they're only likely to happen when milestone - or someone from release team triggers a rebuild [21:34] yeah, but the tracker doesn't know when that happens [21:34] s/likely/going to afaik [21:34] nope [21:34] all tracker knows is date.1 [21:34] so it needs to check a possible .1/.x rebuild every time [21:34] indeed [21:34] or shows [21:34] the tracker i'm referring to here is dev.xubuntu.org [21:35] oh [21:35] but sure, the iso tracker too [21:35] well I'm referring to what shows on iso [21:35] mhm [21:35] all that aside [21:35] in fact - we 'could' end up in the same position as we would get from autotest [21:36] eg build builds - build lands on iso tracker - dev tracker says 'yay' [21:36] but it doesn't actually work [21:37] the only way to get around that is Last options thinking: [21:37] well, i was thinking about something like asking http headers to see if a file exists [21:37] if that's possible [21:37] from iso.tracker? [21:38] evening alllll [21:38] ugh, no, i most likely won't touch the ISO tracker :P [21:38] but i can talk to matthew in SF in june... [21:38] knome: mmm [21:39] who's matthew? [21:39] bluesabre: evening :) [21:39] MatthewAllen, from code-in [21:39] didn't he poke the tracker too? [21:39] hey flocculant knome [21:39] knome: well - a positive from the image test on the tracker is the only real positive [21:39] 'lo bluesabre [21:39] all the others are positives that we have a build [21:40] yep [21:40] and if the build includes a broken ubiquity ... [21:40] ;)= [21:40] bluesabre: /lastlog menulibre, just an FYI. [21:40] knome: if it's possible to do - the iso tracker would be my preference unfortunately :p [21:41] assuming we can move cron time of build [21:41] flocculant, ack [21:41] let's see [21:41] ok [21:41] i need to think this with no smudge on the brain :P [21:41] anyway - I think we're both up to speed on the 'what' at least :) [21:41] and by smudge i mean snot [21:41] :( [21:41] still full of it then [21:42] :p [21:42] well, kind of the aftermath [21:42] didn't have much of it coming out when i was "really" sick [21:42] almost worst [21:42] yep [21:42] yea - pretty normal state of affairs in my experience [21:42] but that happens, so... [21:42] :) [21:43] bluesabre: so good luck with gtk2 and autotest :p [22:21] flocculant: probably going to look at other options [22:25] I think I've discovered a bug on Mousepad. [22:26] Open mousepad, write some stupid thoughts, then do alt+f4 and click on "Do not save" it's not highlighted as other options [22:26] no, do not click on "do not save", but move the cursor with the keyboard to "do not save" [22:27] Do you see this bug ? [22:28] I do see that bug [22:29] feel free to report it :) [22:29] ok [22:34] Done : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mousepad/+bug/1576890 [22:34] Launchpad bug 1576890 in mousepad (Ubuntu) ""Do not save" option isn't highlighted " [Undecided,New] [22:34] As I'm not an native english speaker tell me if something isn't clear [22:34] I will edit my description [22:35] I'd say that it's not highlighted in the same way the other buttons are [22:36] It's a graphical issue, so it seems hard for me to solve this bug. But, I'll try to see what I can do [22:36] Next week, I will be in holydays, so I should start to work the next week [22:37] ok, thanks [22:38] I've edited the bug report [22:38] Now, it's time to go to bed. See you bluesabre ;)