[01:49] <AndyWojo> Hi, is openstack getting a repo/ppa on 16.04?
[01:50] <sarnold> I suspect it will once the 'n' series is out; before that, maybe not?
[10:31] <mispp> hey everybody, i have a problem setting a default gateway for lxd containers. anyone has a suggestion how to make this happen without involving host file /etc/network/interfaces? (i set ip addresses using systemd-networkd)
[10:43] <mispp> i'd like to have set up like this: http://s32.postimg.org/nqfehky51/Screenshot_20160430_124201.png but somehow the gateway doesnt get set within the container (i also want to avoid NAT)
[10:45] <mispp> settings for lxd bridge are set with init
[10:45] <mispp> it's ubuntu 16.04 server
[14:59] <daum_> hey guys i have a ubuntu 14.04 server which has two interfaces one public and one private, both are static ips configured like this: http://pastebin.com/h1Zx0QJ0 .  when i try to ping outside networks it seems to be going over only the internal one, so the destination is unreachable.  Any ideas how to fix that?
[15:02] <patdk-lap> why did you define two gateways?
[15:03] <patdk-lap> why is your netmask screwed up?
[15:03] <daum_> patdk-lap, two gateways since one is for the internal network (10.0.0.X) then the other is our public network?
[15:07] <patdk-lap> heh?
[15:07] <patdk-lap> do you know what a gateay is?
[15:07] <patdk-lap> you can only have 1 gateway
[15:07] <patdk-lap> unless you are an absolute expert, and know exactly how much you are breaking things by adding more than one
[15:09] <daum_> that i am not, but i thought i'd need one for each interface?
[15:10] <patdk-lap> kindof like a car
[15:10] <patdk-lap> you can have many people inside it
[15:10] <patdk-lap> but only ONE should be driving at a time
[15:10] <daum_> so basically we have a private internal only network which we have a bunch of 10.0.0.XXX ips on one of the nics, then on the other nic we have public ips
[15:11] <daum_> so how would you suggest the file should look for that?
[15:11] <patdk-lap> change netmask to 255.255.255.0
[15:11] <patdk-lap> remove gateway line
[15:12] <daum_> then ifdown em2  and em1 and ifup them both?
[15:12] <patdk-lap> no, you should only be touching em2
[15:14] <daum_> so i did ifdown em2 and ifup em2, after switching that netmask to 255.255.255.0 and commenting out the gateway, and now get destination unreachable on the private and public, both trying with ips they should be able to ping
[15:14] <patdk-lap> you didn't touch the gateway on em1?
[15:14] <daum_> nope
[15:14] <daum_> route isn't showing it though
[15:15] <patdk-lap> maybe ifdown em1 also
[15:15] <patdk-lap> to fix the gateay
[15:15] <daum_> says em1 isn't configured
[15:15] <patdk-lap> then you did something to break your config you aren't showing
[15:15] <patdk-lap> does em1 and em2 actually both exist?
[15:16] <daum_> yes
[15:16] <daum_> let me restart the server
[15:19] <daum_> ok so now the public internet works fine but private is unreachable
[15:20] <patdk-lap> what does, ifconfig em2 show?
[15:22] <daum_> http://i.imgur.com/Nt3fpIR.png
[15:22] <patdk-lap> what are you attempting to ping?
[15:22] <daum_> 10.0.0.195
[15:22] <daum_> alright weird
[15:23] <daum_> it just started to work fine
[15:23] <daum_> so i guess we're all set
[15:23] <daum_> thank you
[15:23] <patdk-lap> probably stp on your switch
[15:24] <daum_> so any idea why we have a total of 13 other servers that have pretty much my same original config except different ips
[15:24] <daum_> but they work fine. was that just pure luck?
[15:24] <patdk-lap> yes, depends on the order the nics turn up
[15:24] <daum_> with the dual gateway and netmask set to 255.0.0.0
[15:24] <patdk-lap> and the gateways are defined
[15:24] <daum_> ah
[15:24] <daum_> good to know
[15:24] <daum_> thank you so much
[15:25] <patdk-lap> but sounds like it's probably more complex
[15:25] <patdk-lap> they only ever talk to 10.0.0.x internally?
[15:25] <patdk-lap> no vpn's or any other reason it would need to talk to 10.0.0.1?
[15:25] <daum_> yep
[15:25] <daum_> they just talk to each other over the 10.0.0.XX
[15:25] <patdk-lap> ya, should be safe then
[15:26] <patdk-lap> if you had a vpn or something on 10.0.0.1
[15:26] <patdk-lap> then you would need to add a route so it knows how to get there
[15:26] <daum_> ah
[15:27] <daum_> thanks for your help
[15:27] <daum_> appreciate it!
[17:25] <nashant> Hey, I'm trying to ssh in to a new install and it's failing. auth.log says authentication failure and failed password. The password is correct and ssh works fine from localhost
[17:25] <nashant> Any ideas?
[18:00] <linuxlove> hello
[18:05] <linuxlove> this is my configuration file at /etc/apache2/sites-available/dahliaco.com.conf
[18:06] <linuxlove> http://pastebin.com/BwGiJ8TN
[18:07] <linuxlove> i did a2ensite dahliaco.com in terminal also
[18:08] <Sling> ..and?
[18:08] <linuxlove> but i cant see index.html contents at /var/www/html when i browse dahliaco.com
[18:08] <Sling> what happens instead?
[18:09] <linuxlove> i have another domain khoonehbazar.ir and its configuration is at /etc/apache2/sites-available/laravel.example.com.conf
[18:10] <linuxlove> its point is at /var/www/html/laravel/public
[18:10] <linuxlove> and i see welcome page for khoonehbazar.ir when i browse dahliaco.com
[18:11] <Sling> what is the output of apache2ctl -S
[18:12] <linuxlove> http://pastebin.com/qy17gRNi
[18:12] <linuxlove> what is problem ?
[18:13] <Sling> why do you have the docroot for khoonehbazar.ir inside the docroot for dahliaco.com? why is the default vhost still enabled? why do you have 'laravel.example.com' as ServerName for the khoonehbazar.ir vhost?
[18:13] <thesheff17> quick question if anyone knows...any reason vim 16.04 doesn't have python support compiled in?  I see people installing vim-gnome but this seems overkill especially on the server edition of ubuntu
[18:14] <linuxlove> Sling, it is in sites-avalable
[18:14] <Sling> also why do you enable htaccess files if you have access to the main config? and why don't you set 'Require all granted' in the virtualhosts so the permissions are OK?
[18:14] <linuxlove> what should i do now to solve problem
[18:14] <Sling> linuxlove: you should first clean up your setup
[18:15] <Sling> linuxlove: it doesn't matter that it's in sites-available, those are ignored unless they are enabled (and by enabled I mean a symlink to the config exists in sites-enabled)
[18:15] <Sling> and since it shows up in apache2ctl -S, it's enabled
[18:15] <Sling> so far with the info given, I can't explain why you would see khoonehbazar.ir when browsing to dahliaco.com
[18:16] <linuxlove> then is configuration for dahliaco.com wrong?
[18:16] <Sling> please first read trough the questions I asked
[18:16] <Sling> and fix your configuration
[18:16] <Sling> then we can look at solving a problem
[18:17] <Sling> if you don't understand your own configuration, then you won't be able to fix problems :)
[18:18] <linuxlove> Sling, i did configuration from a website http://tecadmin.net/install-laravel-framework-on-ubuntu/
[18:18] <linuxlove> it is what i did
[18:18] <Sling> linuxlove: that's a horrible howto
[18:19] <Sling> it uses mod_php which nobody should be using anymore, it sets 777 permissions
[18:19] <linuxlove> what should i do now?
[18:19] <Sling> I already told you a few times.
[18:19] <linuxlove> Sling, you say i have to clean settings ?
[18:19] <Sling> are you going to answer everything with a question?
[18:20] <linuxlove> i am confused and i dont know how can i fix
[18:20] <Sling> you blindly copied some tutorial, even keeping the laravel.example.com hostname in place, and now you expect it to be magically fixed
[18:20] <linuxlove> i just did from that website
[18:20] <Sling> learn about what you're doing
[18:20] <Sling> read the documentation
[18:20] <Sling> not some random website
[18:21] <Sling> setting up public webservers is not trivial
[18:21] <Sling> you should not be managing websites if this is all voodoo to you
[18:21] <linuxlove> Sling, you are right
[18:22] <linuxlove> but it was first page that i saw on google
[18:23] <linuxlove> Sling, just give me a reference please
[18:23] <linuxlove> i need to fix
[18:23] <Sling> scroll back, read the things I said
[18:23] <Sling> if you don't understand, look them up in the apache httpd documentation
[18:24] <Sling> if you still don't understand, feel free to ask
[18:24] <linuxlove> Sling, okay i am reading them
[18:39] <linuxlove> Sling, my project for dahliaco.com is on /home/mohammad/Documents/simple and when i run localhost:8000 i see my project for dahliaco.com
[18:41] <linuxlove> my configuration for dahliaco.com on /etc/apache2/sites-available/dahliaco.com.conf is http://pastebin.com/rGz0JvFr
[18:42] <linuxlove> Sling, php artisan serv
[18:42] <linuxlove> Laravel development server started on http://localhost:8000/
[18:42] <linuxlove> Sling, what is my wrong now ?
[18:44] <linuxlove> Sling, ?
[18:44] <linuxlove> excuse me that i repeat your name
[19:36] <linuxlove> anyone?
[19:36] <linuxlove> please help
[20:16] <Simon-> on a 15.10 VM, the ethernet device was named eth0; on a new 16.04 VM the ethernet device is named ens1; where is this configured? the device name didn't change when upgrading from 15.10 to 16.04 so it must be configured somewhere or affected by installed packages
[20:22] <bekks> Simon-: Thats due to systemd, get used to it :)
[20:25] <Simon-> that doesn't answer my question
[20:26] <mikedep333> Hi. In the past, I was told to discuss issues with cloud images here. The xenial vagrant box is failing to work with vagrant altogether due to shared folders not working. https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/1565985
[20:28] <mikedep333> It looks like the current xenial approach is to only install the vboxsf & vboxguest kernel modules without installing the rest of the guest additions. Based on my research, that cannot work.
[20:28] <Simon-> it seems that /etc/systemd/network/50-virtio-kernel-names.link is created on upgrade and disables unpredictable network device names
[22:41] <bort> hi, i've got fluxbox running on a vnc server on a headless ubuntu 16.04 server but can't get everything to work.
[22:43] <bort> for example, thunar is no showing icons (i installed all kind of *-icon-theme packages). in addition, firefox crashes when i want save a file or go to file->open. i guess because thunar is not registered as the default file manager.
[22:44] <bort> i get "(firefox:13867): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: No GSettings schemas are installed on the system"
[22:46] <mikedep333> bort, I've run firefox on 14.04 on icewm on X2Go. X2Go does have more session handling logic than VNC does, but I doubt you need to start anything to start firefox.
[22:46] <mikedep333> I think that error is a red herring.
[22:46] <mikedep333> or its representative of gsettings not being installed, which means you need to install some packages.
[22:46] <bort> firefox is running fine, it's just when i trigger a file-dialog
[22:47] <bort> something is not working correctly with gtk and thunar
[22:47] <mikedep333> oh, I hear you
[22:47] <bort> i've got gsettings-desktop-schemas installed
[22:47] <mikedep333> thunar isn't invoked for the file -> open dialog
[22:47] <mikedep333> it's just GTK
[22:48] <bort> yeah, but also update-alternatives doesn't mention thunar what so ever. no entry for file-manager or anything like it like x-www-browser for firefox
[22:48] <mikedep333> the file manager is an XDG association I think.
[22:50] <mikedep333> For example set Thunar as the default file browser just run:
[22:50] <mikedep333> xdg-mime default Thunar.desktop inode/directory
[22:54] <bort> thanks. i ran that command but it didn't help. i'm not familiar with this xdg stuff, only used it once to rename my user dirs. when i run xdg-settings --list , i only get default-url-scheme-handler and default-web-browser. i guess something is not working
[22:57] <jvwjgames> Does anyone know how to fix a kernel panic
[23:06] <bort> i'll give it a go tomorrow. thanks mikedep333
[23:12] <mikedep333> np
[23:33] <rstarmer> stokachu: tried conjure-up on a larger machine (well, larger VM) running on KVM.  it just sits in allocating mode.