[20:16] wxl: ping [21:14] tsimonq2: you about? [21:14] phillw: yep [21:14] what's up? [21:14] actually, it's more a case of what's down ☺ [21:16] hahahahah [21:16] so what do you need? [21:17] just to let you know that things have calmed down in the LXQt area.... Xenial will be added in as per the one jorn wrote and Yakkety will also still be allowed on the page. [21:19] huh? [21:20] he was thinking that there were two versions for xenial, he now knows that this is not the case. [21:35] what do you mean? [21:42] he thought jorn's version wasn't based on the debian-lxqt meta-package. Which it is, as will will lubuntu's LXQt flavour. [21:44] I still don't get what you are saying [21:45] I'll be updating the wiki page tomorrow :) [21:46] do you know if wxl is due on in next hour ? [21:50] nope [21:50] phillw: what do you plan on updating? [21:51] the LXQt wiki page?... [21:51] what do you plan on changing, just out of curiosity? [21:53] Add in xenial [21:54] I can do that right now [21:54] and some background on how debian-lxqt, lxde and lubuntu-lxqt are sharing resources with RazorQt etc..... [21:54] tsimonq2: you can't because there are some edits that need to be made from bug hunting today. [21:55] phillw: then tell me and while I have the spare time today I can handle it :) [21:57] it's easier to do it :) [21:57] I can add in Xenial right now, my metapackage covers that [21:58] it will not be using that one. [21:58] well we can't practically use a daily PPA [21:58] or recommend it [21:59] where do you get the idea that it's using daily, or landing ? [22:00] because it's more than a simple metapackage that only specifies depends [22:00] well Julien's is a daily PPA for sure [22:01] I test a lot of alpha software and I wouldn't trust myself with that [22:01] and that has got what to do with LXQt ? [22:02] because it has LXQt packages that have a newer delta that like to screw with things [22:05] even if they don't now, I can't trust it, it's hurt me one too many times [22:07] there is no need to modify the page as it is already accurate [22:08] tsimonq2: there is and it will be corrected as per Julien's agreement. [22:08] * agaida hands tsimonq2 some hansplast http://www.hansaplast.com/ [22:08] phillw: what did he say? [22:08] hansaplast is good if playing with bleeding edge [22:09] agaida: what are you implying? [22:09] that we use Jorn's instructions with one correction for fonts that was discussed earlier with agaida [22:09] when? [22:09] and what instructions? [22:09] on #phillw and in email between myself and Julien [22:09] fonts-droid are gone for god and are replaced by noto [22:10] agaida: and Jorn is 100% happy with the edit [22:10] phillw: #phillw is NOT a Lubuntu channel and you can not expect people to join to keep in the loop about this [22:11] tsimonq2: and #lubuntu-devel is not a debian channel... as I'm standing in both camps, it is neutral territory :) the same named channel is also on oftc if needed :) [22:11] phillw: well it wasn't in that channel either [22:12] it's not in the middle, it's a third-party channel that you both happen to be in [22:12] indeed not, as it was tying up debian lxqt and what lubuntu is doing. [23:02] !info task-lxqt-desktop [23:02] !info task-lxqt-desktop yakkety [23:02] Package task-lxqt-desktop does not exist in yakkety [23:05] you should look in the right places [23:05] agaida: how so? [23:06] https://tracker.debian.org/tasksel would be a fine start [23:06] #814923 [n|+| ] [tasksel] tasksel: Please add task-lxqt-desktop to tasksel [23:07] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814923 [23:07] Debian bug 814923 in tasksel "tasksel: Please add task-lxqt-desktop to tasksel" [Normal,Open] [23:07] !info task-lxde-desktop yakkety [23:07] Package task-lxde-desktop does not exist in yakkety [23:07] \o/ [23:08] how can it - if the patch is not applied in debian yet [23:08] you need some patience [23:10] agaida: but I just checked if the LXDE package is in Yakkety [23:15] hey - lxqt is and will be bleeding edge - and it will take a lot time and efforts to change that [23:16] what do you mean? [23:18] to have released software someone has to release the software - oh, and someone has to develop it before a possible release [23:18] and if it is released one could make packages [23:19] and that process takes time and patience [23:19] I meant in what context? [23:19] why are you telling me this? [23:20] you should understand that we talk about a timespan of a year or two to have things sorted [23:22] so why can't I be prepared for that?