| pmatulis | NAME OWNER STATUS LAST CONNECTION | 00:26 |
|---|---|---|
| pmatulis | admin* admin@local available 2016-04-28 | 00:26 |
| pmatulis | default admin@local available 2016-04-28 | 00:26 |
| admcleod1 | is it possible to get model and controller name from inside a unit? | 01:36 |
| stub | tvansteenburgh: Others have seen that too. Looks like there is a race condition buried in there that I can't see. I'll need a set of logs to trawl through to track it down. | 02:49 |
| rick_h_ | admcleod1: no, you can from the client, but things like controller name are client defined and it's all UUIDs in the other end. | 02:49 |
| bwallis | Hey, anyone noticing a massive slowdown on launchpad/most canonical hosted sites? | 05:37 |
| bwallis | Messing around with a juju deployment, and grabbing the tools for the initial bootstrap is taking a crazy amount of time | 05:38 |
| bwallis | Doing manual wgets is really slow too, 15-20KB/s | 05:39 |
| blr_ | bwallis: well, glad I'm not the only one. Looking into it. | 05:40 |
| bwallis | yea I've been going nuts trying to figure this out all afternoon, never thought slow responses from the tools host was causing it | 05:42 |
| bwallis | if there's a mirror somewhere let me know :), I don't think there is though | 05:43 |
| blr_ | bwallis: out of interest, what country are you in? | 05:59 |
| bwallis | US | 06:00 |
| bwallis | CA specifically | 06:00 |
| bwallis | I got around apt issues by just using other mirrors, but as far as I know there's no mirror of streams.canonical.com or launchpad | 06:01 |
| bwallis | Which sucks, bootstraps just sit here all day: | 06:01 |
| bwallis | 2016-05-01 22:59:59 DEBUG juju.environs.simplestreams simplestreams.go:674 using default candidate for content id "com.ubuntu.juju:devel:tools" are {20160220 mirrors:1.0 content-download streams/v1/cpc-mirrors.sjson []} | 06:01 |
| bwallis | Wow, something just happened? | 06:05 |
| bwallis | A bootstrap completed | 06:05 |
| === blr_ is now known as blr | ||
| jose | \o/ let us know if you need any more help | 06:29 |
| bwallis | will do, still seems to be slow, but it sped up enough to deploy one machine | 06:44 |
| bwallis | going to see how it goes with others | 06:44 |
| bwallis | spoke too soon I think :( failed to download the agent tools | 06:53 |
| Sharan | i have created one dummy charm and deployed but this charm is going in a error state | 06:55 |
| Sharan | its showing "Waiting for agent initialization to finish" | 06:56 |
| Sharan | model: default machines: "0": juju-status: current: error message: no matching tools available since: 02 May 2016 11:41:21+05:30 instance-id: pending machine-status: current: pending since: 02 May 2016 11:41:07+05:30 series: trusty services: testcharm: charm: local:trusty/testcharm-0 exposed: false service-status: current: unknown message: Waiting for agent initia | 06:57 |
| bwallis | is there a reason the juju "controller" doesn't appear as a machine to deploy services on in a MaaS deployment now? | 08:18 |
| bwallis | this is with beta6 | 08:18 |
| sharan | juju1.25 version, we used to get the log files in the path "/var/log/juju/unit-testcharm-0.log", but in juju2.0 version where do we find these log files? | 10:29 |
| magicaltrout | same place sharan | 10:30 |
| sharan | i didn't get, i have only "/var/log" after that there is no "juju" folder instead i found "lxd" folder | 10:31 |
| magicaltrout | dunno but all my charms log to the same place in v2 as v | 10:32 |
| magicaltrout | 1 | 10:32 |
| sharan | ok i have installed juju2.0 on Z-machine | 10:32 |
| sharan | so i was trying to find the log files | 10:32 |
| sharan | if i get into the "/var/log/lxd/juju-a938c2eb-4141-4a2d-89b6-71a20fa0d296-machine-3" i will get "forkstart.log, lxc.conf, lxc.log" files | 10:33 |
| icey | is it possible to get the postgresql charm to install postgres 9.5? | 12:51 |
| marcoceppi | icey: it might be, stub would know | 12:53 |
| marcoceppi | icey: if you deploy on xenial | 12:54 |
| icey | marcoceppi: I was poking around with it, but it looks like it's explicitly setting supported as <= 9.4 | 12:54 |
| icey | and marcoceppi, I just raised a bug about it not deploying on xenial :) | 12:54 |
| marcoceppi | oic | 12:54 |
| === cmars` is now known as cmars | ||
| shruthima | hi all, I have pushed the IBM-IM charm to the store, with a new charm publish commands, but how to attach the bug .....?!!!! | 14:13 |
| shruthima | Before pushing in this new way i have pushed into lanchpad and raised a bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1575746) and linked to trunk branch. Do i need to change it ? | 14:14 |
| mup | Bug #1575746: New Charm: IBM Installation Manager <Juju Charms Collection:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1575746> | 14:14 |
| shruthima | yes 1575746 is the bug i have created for IBM-IM ,but that bug i have linked to trunk branch ..!!!do i need to link it to cs:~ibmcharmers/trusty/ibm-im-0...?? | 14:20 |
| shruthima | I have done some alignment changes to Readme to IBM-IM ...Now what is the process to merge this changes in to IBM-IM charm in charm store??? | 14:26 |
| shruthima | please can anyone suggest on the same?? | 14:29 |
| === thedac is now known as dames | ||
| shruthima | hi kwmonroe/Mbruzek, I have done some alignment changes to Readme in IBM-IM ...Now what is the process to merge this changes in to IBM-IM charm in charm store??? | 14:50 |
| mbruzek | Hello shruthima you can follow these instructions: https://jujucharms.com/docs/stable/authors-charm-store#submitting-a-fix-to-an-existing-charm | 14:52 |
| magicaltrout | not enough question marks shruthima! ;) | 14:53 |
| mbruzek | Basically fix this readme in a branch and submit a merge proposal to get it added to the review queue. | 14:53 |
| shruthima | ok and I have pushed the IBM_IM charm to the store, with a new charm publish commands, but how to attach the bug here.....!!!! Before pushing in this new way i have pushed into lanchpad and raised a bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1575746) and linked to trunk branch. Do i need to change it ? | 14:55 |
| mup | Bug #1575746: New Charm: IBM Installation Manager <Juju Charms Collection:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1575746> | 14:55 |
| mbruzek | Oh I see you are using the new process | 14:56 |
| mbruzek | That is great, let me check this link out | 14:57 |
| shruthima | ok | 14:57 |
| mbruzek | shruthima: So you have some changes to the README.md file you would like to make? | 15:03 |
| shruthima | yes i have some alignment changes | 15:04 |
| mbruzek | shruthima: I didn't know you were using the new way before, so I gave you the wrong link: https://jujucharms.com/docs/devel/authors-charm-store#submitting-a-new-charm | 15:04 |
| mbruzek | You should be able to `charm push` those changes into the ibm-im charm in the store. | 15:05 |
| mbruzek | the result from that command will likely be ibm-im-1 rather than zero. I already see the ibm-im charm in the review queue, because you filed a bug. So everything seems correct. You can change the charm code as much as you like before the review. | 15:06 |
| shruthima | hmm thats fine ,actually i had a doubt if we push again with charm push command will it merge with the old one.. | 15:07 |
| mbruzek | After you push another version up, you should update the bug with something like this: "please review ibm-im-#" where # is the revision you want reviewed. | 15:08 |
| shruthima | ok u mean bug description? | 15:09 |
| shruthima | mbruzek: ok u mean to update bug description ? | 15:15 |
| mbruzek | Or just add a comment, which ever is easier | 15:15 |
| shruthima | mbruzek : ok so new process is only to reflect in charm store ...next to raise a bug and link to trunk branch we need to follow the same old process is it ..? | 15:18 |
| mbruzek | shruthima: Yes, we have been working hard on the new process and review queue, but those changes have not been released. | 15:21 |
| === CyberJacob_ is now known as CyberJacob | ||
| mbruzek | shruthima: so for now we need to use the bug to track this change so it can be reviewed. | 15:22 |
| === CyberJacob is now known as Guest29413 | ||
| shruthima | mbruzek : ok thank you for the information :) | 15:22 |
| === marlinc_ is now known as marlinc | ||
| mbruzek | shruthima: Yes and thanks for asking these questions in #juju, I am sure the questions are useful for other people in this room | 15:23 |
| === cargonza_ is now known as cargonza | ||
| === arosales_ is now known as arosales | ||
| shruthima | hmmm :) | 15:24 |
| === hazmat_ is now known as hazmat | ||
| mbruzek | Does anyone know how to get to the controller machine in juju 2.0.beta ? | 15:37 |
| mbruzek | One of my machines failed to provision and has no ip address. I want to get the logs from the controller to add to the bug. | 15:37 |
| mbruzek | but I don't know how to refer to the controller with juju commands. | 15:38 |
| aisrael | mbruzek: Also wondering about that. I've only found logs once a machine has been created. Before that, debug-log has nothing. | 15:39 |
| mbruzek | aisrael: Yeah this machine is *not* being created and I don't know why. | 15:40 |
| LiftedKilt | mbruzek: juju switch admin; juju ssh 0 ? | 15:41 |
| mbruzek | LiftedKilt: yes that works, thank you for the information. | 15:43 |
| mbruzek | We should add that to a document somewhere. aisrael do you have a suggested location? | 15:43 |
| aisrael | Ohh, good find LiftedKilt. | 15:45 |
| aisrael | mbruzek: https://jujucharms.com/docs/master/developer-debugging | 15:45 |
| aisrael | mbruzek: Do you want to open a bug against docs, or should I? | 15:45 |
| mbruzek | aisrael: I will do that, and create the text which you can review | 15:45 |
| LiftedKilt | mbruzek: yeah it's a little obtuse that machine 0 is hidden in the admin model - you intuitively expect juju machine to show all the machines, but it shows the machines in the selected model. | 15:45 |
| aisrael | mbruzek: ack | 15:45 |
| mbruzek | LiftedKilt: It makes sense to me now you explained it to me. | 15:46 |
| mbruzek | LiftedKilt: thank you for sharing that information with me | 15:46 |
| LiftedKilt | mbruzek: for sure | 15:46 |
| jcastro | http://askubuntu.com/questions/755885/is-there-a-way-to-adjust-the-interval-for-the-update-status-hook | 15:54 |
| jcastro | any help on this one? | 15:54 |
| mbruzek | aisrael: Please review my addition: https://github.com/juju/docs/pull/1061 | 16:24 |
| DavidRama | oue omw | 16:25 |
| DavidRama | oups sorry | 16:25 |
| jcastro | bdx: any word from the devopsdays pdx people on if your talk was accepted? | 16:45 |
| natefinch | anyone online who knows about the deployer code? Seems there's an incompatibility with some TLS changes I made in core last week | 16:53 |
| tvansteenburgh | natefinch: are you talking about the juju-deployer python project, or the new golang deployer code? | 17:09 |
| natefinch | tvansteenburgh: python | 17:10 |
| tvansteenburgh | natefinch: i'm one of the maintainers | 17:11 |
| natefinch | tvansteenburgh: I changed juju-core to only support TLS 1.2 last week... looks like CI found an incompatibility with deployer: http://reports.vapour.ws/releases/3938/job/maas-1_9-deployer-2x/attempt/49#highlight | 17:12 |
| tvansteenburgh | natefinch: okay, i'll take a look soonish | 17:14 |
| tvansteenburgh | dpb: fyi ^ | 17:14 |
| natefinch | tvansteenburgh: thanks, let me know if there's anything I can do to help... the bug is here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1576695 | 17:15 |
| mup | Bug #1576695: Deployer cannot talk to Juju2 (on maas2) because :tlsv1 alert protocol version <ci> <deployer> <maas-provider> <regression> <juju-core:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1576695> | 17:15 |
| tvansteenburgh | dpb1_: ^ | 17:15 |
| tvansteenburgh | natefinch: cool, thanks | 17:15 |
| === natefinch is now known as natefinch-lunch | ||
| lazyPower | tvansteenburgh - do we have a shorter method to determine which unit is a leader in an amulet test, than sentry.run() in a loop? | 17:32 |
| tvansteenburgh | lazyPower: nope | 17:32 |
| lazyPower | cool, should i add that under some "common use cases" for the amulet docs? | 17:33 |
| tvansteenburgh | lazyPower: either that, or file a bug and we can add a get_leader(service) or something | 17:34 |
| lazyPower | sounds good to me | 17:34 |
| lazyPower | https://github.com/juju/amulet/issues/131 | 17:36 |
| bwallis | anyone still experiencing really slow speeds to launchpad/most US hosted ubuntu sites? | 17:41 |
| bwallis | was happening last night as well | 17:41 |
| === natefinch-lunch is now known as natefinch | ||
| suchvenu | Hi | 18:39 |
| suchvenu | I am getting the following error when I did, juju destroy-environment local | 18:40 |
| suchvenu | ERROR cannot connect to API: unable to connect to "wss://10.0.3.1:17070/environment/c9759ee0-88cc-403d-8b6c-aa4e628bf17d/api" | 18:40 |
| suchvenu | Any idea on thsi error ? | 18:40 |
| LiftedKilt | the openstack-lxd bundle on xenial leaves ceph broken - all the pgs are stuck in creation | 18:42 |
| LiftedKilt | has anyone worked with that or found a fix? It works on trusty, so it must be a xenial quirk | 18:42 |
| lazyPower | suchvenu - which juju version? | 18:55 |
| suchvenu | 1.25 | 18:57 |
| suchvenu | Ubuntu Trusty version | 18:58 |
| lazyPower | suchvenu - sudo lxc-ls --fancy, do you see any lxc containers listed? | 18:58 |
| lazyPower | oo local provider, hang on there's a service you should have running not a container | 18:59 |
| suchvenu | charm@islrpbeixv665:~/charms/trusty/ibm-db2$ sudo lxc-ls --fancy [sudo] password for charm: NAME STATE IPV4 IPV6 AUTOSTART --------------------------------------------------------- juju-precise-lxc-template STOPPED - - NO juju-trusty-lxc-template STOPPED - - NO charm@islrpbeixv665:~/charms/trusty/ibm-db2$ | 19:01 |
| lazyPower | suchvenu - sorry that was a redherring. Its been a moment since i've used the local provider on 1.25 | 19:05 |
| lazyPower | suchvenu - can you pastebin the output of initctl list for me? | 19:06 |
| suchvenu | http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/16194903/ | 19:09 |
| === bsod90 is now known as pacavaca | ||
| lazyPower | suchvenu - juju destroy-environment -y --force local | 19:17 |
| lazyPower | suchvenu - as you were trying ot remove it, this will clean up the stale configuration files, and you can re-bootstrap afterwords | 19:18 |
| lazyPower | i didn't see the upstart job listed for the local environment, so i think it just didn't complete the job of cleaning up after itself from a prior juju destroy-environment. | 19:18 |
| suchvenu | ok | 19:19 |
| tvansteenburgh | stub: https://bugs.launchpad.net/postgresql-charm/+bug/1577544 fyi | 19:37 |
| mup | Bug #1577544: Connection info published on relation before pg_hba.conf updated/reloaded <PostgreSQL Charm:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577544> | 19:37 |
| === FourDollars_ is now known as FourDollars | ||
| === Tribaal_ is now known as Tribaal | ||
| === blr_ is now known as blr | ||
| thedac | gnuoy: See my last comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/308070/ and consider a +2 | 20:51 |
| === natefinch is now known as natefinch-afk | ||
| pacavaca | hey guys! when I'm doploying something (openstack) using juju, each machine gets several lxc containers and one called juju-xenial-template (smth like this). I noticed that this template container already has some predefined configuration for my NICs (eth0 and eth1). In particular, it assigns static IPs on one of them and I don't want that. How do I change this template (for all nodes), so that IPs are | 21:32 |
| pacavaca | always assigned by DHCP? | 21:33 |
| cory_fu | kwmonroe: You got a PR for that layer-basic change? | 22:11 |
| kwmonroe | i do not cory_fu. i'm not sure it's good. http://paste.ubuntu.com/16196042/ do i need to pip install requirements.txt? should i activate vs including PATH extensions? is there potential conflict with .venv for other charms (ie, should i call it .venv-newer-tox)? | 22:13 |
| magicaltrout | kwmonroe: you in for the full conference or just flying in and out? | 22:14 |
| kwmonroe | magicaltrout: i'm in it for the long haul. Sun-Thu. | 22:14 |
| cory_fu | You don't need to pip install requirements, because tox will handle that. However, since it's currently doing a sudo pip install, why not just stick with that? | 22:14 |
| magicaltrout | nice | 22:14 |
| magicaltrout | they speak funny in canada | 22:14 |
| kwmonroe | i'll learn 'em | 22:15 |
| magicaltrout | hehe | 22:15 |
| kwmonroe | cory_fu: not sure what you mean by "why not just stick with that". | 22:18 |
| cory_fu | kwmonroe: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/16196470/ | 22:21 |
| cory_fu | kwmonroe: https://github.com/juju-solutions/layer-basic/pull/66 | 22:24 |
| * magicaltrout writes some slides | 22:33 | |
| magicaltrout | better late than never | 22:33 |
| kwmonroe | cory_fu: marcoceppi: quick tox fix for charmbox: https://github.com/juju-solutions/charmbox/pull/33/files | 22:41 |
| kwmonroe | this moves the tox fix to cb instead of layer-basic's Makefile since you guys are in such violent disagreement over cory's pull 66 | 22:42 |
| marcoceppi | kwmonroe cory_fu I'd prefer this, I've honestly put tox in a venv that I activate when i do charm testing stuff, this fixes it where you need it, but we still need to consolidate charm test for charm 2.2 to be docker/lxd ootb | 22:42 |
| cory_fu | marcoceppi: Why isn't it using charmbox? That's what we've standardized on for all of our CI infra | 22:43 |
| marcoceppi | cory_fu: because, time. | 22:43 |
| marcoceppi | cory_fu: also, the openstack engeineers depend on the old test runner | 22:43 |
| marcoceppi | we need to get them onto bundletester, then get charm test to just boot the charmbox container and run tests | 22:44 |
| admcleod1 | is there any way to get info about a unit, from within another unit, without a relation to it | 22:50 |
| marcoceppi | admcleod1: no, not really | 22:51 |
| marcoceppi | admcleod1: charms only know about what they are connected to, implicit querying of other services would lead to a disaster of having toplogies that require other services but without an explicit relation for the operator to know they're logically connected | 22:51 |
| cory_fu | admcleod1: juju run service/0 'unit-get private-address' | 22:52 |
| admcleod1 | cory_fu: from with another unit though | 22:53 |
| admcleod1 | marcoceppi: right | 22:53 |
| cory_fu | admcleod1: But what you really want to do is make sure you expose the namenode and make sure that the namenode is listening on all addresses and then it should work | 22:53 |
| cory_fu | admcleod1: With a relation. For the dfs-copy action, we should make it work with the public address | 22:54 |
| admcleod1 | cory_fu: there is that, but will trying to copy data over the public address be an issue with some installations? | 22:54 |
| admcleod1 | s/address/interface | 22:54 |
| cory_fu | It should work, too, we're probably just missing one of: listen on all addresses (0.0.0.0), open-port on the correct port, juju expose namenode | 22:54 |
| cory_fu | Yes, it's not ideal, but you don't really have any choice if one of the namenodes is not juju deployed. For two juju deployed services, we'd want the relation, like we discussed | 22:55 |
| admcleod1 | yeah true | 22:55 |
| cory_fu | Anyway, I have to EOD | 22:56 |
| admcleod1 | cya | 22:56 |
| magicaltrout | cory_fu's mrs has him tied around her little finger..... | 22:57 |
| magicaltrout | oh no, he's just sensible and doesn't work 18 hour days | 22:57 |
| kwmonroe | admcleod1: if you're going to adjust apache-hadoop-namenode to listen on all interfaces, you can do something like i did for bigtop recently: https://github.com/juju-solutions/layer-apache-bigtop-namenode/commit/ac0c472707e1f48ccbf416f1c1eb2e189b6bd8e9 | 22:59 |
| admcleod1 | kwmonroe: i guess ill have to, seems a bit dodgy though | 23:01 |
| admcleod1 | kwmonroe: maybe an action to do it temporarily? | 23:03 |
| kwmonroe | admcleod1: make it less dodge by creating a new dist.yaml port called "dfs-copy" that's "exposed_on: totally_dodgie", then make the action expose "totally_dodgie", do the copy, then unexpose it. | 23:04 |
| admcleod1 | heh | 23:07 |
| admcleod1 | kwmoroe: yeah but more because its listening on all interfaces | 23:07 |
| admcleod1 | kwmonroe: ^ | 23:07 |
| kwmonroe | oh, i don't think it's too spookie to listen on all interfaces. any when we migrate services to hosts with different IPs, it's nice to not have to reconfigure. | 23:10 |
| admcleod1 | kwmonroe: i know a few network admins who might disagree.. but ok lets do it! :} | 23:20 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!