[02:59] <pyrite> Could someone add a Xenial task for these two gnome-software bugs
[02:59] <pyrite> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1573408
[02:59] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1573408 in gnome-software (Ubuntu) "GNOME Software does not install third-party .deb packages" [High,Fix released]
[02:59] <pyrite> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1559284
[02:59] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1559284 in GNOME Software "Increase the number of displayed reviews" [Medium,In progress]
[04:03] <rhansen> would someone mind nominating bug #1574058 for xenial?
[04:03] <ubot5> bug 1574058 in phpseclib (Ubuntu) "php-seclib: Call to undefined method Crypt_Base::Crypt_Base()" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1574058
[04:35] <mwhudson> rhansen: done
[04:36] <rhansen> @mwhudson: thanks!
[04:36] <meetingology> rhansen: Error: "mwhudson:" is not a valid command.
[04:37] <mwhudson> rhansen: np
[04:37] <mwhudson> (silly bot)
[04:37] <rhansen> :)
=== hikiko is now known as hikiko|off
=== ogra_` is now known as ogra_
[11:56] <yofel> where do translation bug reports go again these days?
=== Pici` is now known as Pici
[13:45] <Fixo> Hello, thi bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-filters/+bug/1573893 seems to be a duplicate of Bug #1536353, can anyone halp me with this? Should I mark it as a duplicate?
[13:45] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1573893 in cups-filters (Ubuntu) "Can't use Epson XP-310 printer with 16.04 no lsb" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[13:45] <ubot5> bug 1536353 in lsb (Ubuntu) "[regression] Printer drivers install is broken as lsb package is not available anymore" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1536353
[13:46] <teward> Fixo: are you absolutely certain it's a duplicate?
[13:47] <teward> it looks like one to me so I"m going to mark it as such...
[13:49] <Fixo> both bugs are about epson printers and its drivers, that do not install on ubuntu 16.04 with this error message: "Depends: lsb (>= 3.2) but it is not ". Thats why I'm asking here, I want to be 100% shure :)
[13:50] <teward> Fixo: they look like duplicates to me, so i've marked it as a dupe - that can be undone later if they're not.
[13:50] <Fixo> ok Thank you !
[13:50] <teward> but keep in mind if you are runnign third party .deb files for the drivers, that's not something that I would consider a bug here - that's a failure in Epson to provide correct dependency lists
[13:51] <teward> it's up to those upstream providers to keep uptodate with the dependency lists ;P
[13:54] <Fixo> but until 15.10 ubuntu had lsb 4.1, and that was removed from 16.04, is this a third party problem?  (just want to learn more)
[13:55] <Fixo> (and sorry if I cannot make myself clear, sisnce I'm not a native english speaker)
[13:56] <teward> Fixo: there's two consideration points:
[13:56] <teward> (1) Ubuntu removed 'lsb' or similar
[13:57] <teward> (2) Any .deb installer files from a third party NOT in the repositories is considered 'third party software', and is not supported officially by Ubuntu.  To that end, it is up to the third party provider to make sure their installers have the correct dependency lists to prevent install conflicts.
[13:57] <teward> so yes, while `lsb` may be gone in 16.04, it's also up to Epson to provide drivers that work without lsb, where possible
[13:57] <teward> and given 16.04 is extremely recent, they may not have had time to address that
[13:57] <teward> yet
[14:00] <ogra_> https://lwn.net/Articles/658809/ btw ...
[14:00] <ogra_> lsb is gone and dead for debian based systems
[14:02] <Pici> is /usr/bin/lsb_release gone on 16.04?
[14:02] <teward> Pici: no
[14:03] <Pici> teward: thanks.
[14:03] <teward> lsb (9.20150826) unstable; urgency=low
[14:03] <teward>   * Drop all the LSB compatibility packages besides lsb-release and lsb-base
[14:03] <teward> Pici: ^
[14:03] <Pici> teward: perfect. thanks.
[14:03] <teward> ogra_: as I said, this is likely going to end up a "We can't fix this, talk to Epson" situation
[14:03] <teward> Fixo: ^
[14:03] <Fixo>  so this bug report can be never solved by ubuntu team? :( I'm sorry for that, since I have sent an e-mail for Epson support and they have - very unpolitely -  told me they don't offer linux support cause linux is not a standardized OS
[14:05] <teward> possibly
[14:07] <Fixo> that was a Brazilian's epson support, maybe  I can have more lucky with the international team (one that made the actual linux driver)
[14:09] <Fixo> well, thank you for your help, have a nice day !
[14:37] <bdmurray> rbasak: I've looked at the bugpattern and think it might have been simpler if you had used SourcePackage instead of Package.  Otherwise it looks good.
=== cargonza_ is now known as cargonza
=== Trevinho_ is now known as Trevinho
[16:01] <teward> so i'm pretty certain https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apticron/+bug/1577427 is not a bug and in fact something that the admin needs to configure in apt to 'turn off' those warnings
[16:01] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1577427 in apticron (Ubuntu) "apticron won't stop complaining about weak digest algorithm" [Undecided,New]
[16:01] <teward> but before I go and mark it as such, I wanted a second opinion.
[18:33] <frostie> hello.  i think there is a theme bug in Ubuntu 16.04,  if search for calendar in dash and then open calendar there is little white borders at both borders when use Ambiance theme and when change to Radiance theme or community created theme the white borders are not there?
=== alex_johnson_ is now known as alex_johnson
=== FourDollars_ is now known as FourDollars