[00:23]  * redir is going EoD RSN
[00:23] <mup> Bug #1577550 changed: juju fails to provision machine and will not retry <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577550>
[00:23] <mup> Bug #1577569 changed: 1.25.5: failed to retrieve the template to clone -  error executing  "lxc-start" <oil> <juju-core:Invalid> <juju-core 1.25:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577569>
[00:57] <mup> Bug #1576805 changed: Juju controllers set the rsyslog NetstreamDriver affecting all subsequent rsyslog configuration <juju-core:Invalid> <juju-core 1.25:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1576805>
[01:48] <mup> Bug #1577606 opened: StatusInfo has a time.Time pointer, shoult not be a pointer. <tech-debt> <juju-core:New for hduran-8> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577606>
[02:08] <natefinch> oh weird.... bootstrapping on gce, I get a log message saying "Creating Juju controller "local.google" on google/us-east1" but it's actually created in us-central1
[02:12] <mup> Bug #1577609 opened: juju switch to non-existent controller gives wrong error <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577609>
[02:36] <mup> Bug #1577614 opened: Bootstrapping GCE lies about the availability zone of the controller <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577614>
[02:42] <thumper> axw_: ping
[03:04] <axw_> thumper: pong
[03:04] <axw_> sorry, missed message
[03:04] <thumper> axw: np, was wanting to talk to you about storage entities ...
[03:04] <thumper> however I need to take my daughter to BJJ shortly
[03:04] <thumper> but I could drop and come straight back to chat if you can
[03:05] <axw> thumper: sure, I can chat
[03:05] <thumper> in about 25 minutes?
[03:06]  * thumper wonders if Maia has remembered
[03:06] <axw> thumper: no worries, prod me when you're back
[03:06] <thumper> kk
[03:35] <thumper> axw: back
[03:36] <axw> thumper: ok, gotta make a hangout
[03:36] <axw> thumper: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/canonical.com/juju-storage?authuser=1
[04:09] <mup> Bug #1577638 opened: Can't juju ssh to lxd-placed container <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577638>
[07:45] <dimitern> morning
[07:45]  * dimitern thinks it might be time to change my ISP :/
[07:46] <anastasiamac> dimitern: o/
[07:47] <dimitern> anastasiamac: \o
[07:47] <anastasiamac> dimitern: how was easter?
[07:47] <dimitern> anastasiamac: as usual :) I got too much to eat
[07:48] <anastasiamac> dimitern: and isn't it a great feeling? \o/
[07:49] <dimitern> anastasiamac: ahh it is :)
[08:07] <dimitern> frobware: ping
[08:25] <babbageclunk> dimitern: stink about the internet bro - hope you get it sorted out soon!
[08:25] <dimitern> babbageclunk: well, they did fix it, but kept me on hold for 20m
[08:26] <babbageclunk> dimitern: grrr, but yay!
[08:26] <dimitern> their support is a joke, it's good I rarely had to contact them
[08:46] <TheMue> morning
[08:55] <dimitern> axw: hey, are you still around?
[08:55] <axw> dimitern: sure am
[08:56] <dimitern> axw: I've noticed you've landed the changes in provider/ec2 re filtering instances purely based on tags
[08:56] <dimitern> axw: I'm trying to integrate that into my fix for allowing non-default VPC to be used
[08:56] <axw> dimitern: apart from AllInstances, which filters on security groups
[08:57] <dimitern> axw: ah, so I'll merge the changes there
[08:58] <axw> dimitern: yep, should just be in one place now
[08:58] <dimitern> axw: how did you get around the non-idempotent nature of adding tags at start instance time?
[08:59] <axw> dimitern: which non-idempotency issue would that be?
[08:59] <axw> dimitern: the one we talked about last was to do with using ClientToken, but I didn't end up using that
[08:59] <voidspace> do you mean non-atomic?
[08:59] <dimitern> voidspace: that's it :)
[09:00] <axw> dimitern voidspace: it's still non-atomic, which is why I'm using security groups in that one spot
[09:00] <dimitern> axw: ok, makes sense
[09:00] <axw> dimitern: we only *need* it in AllInstances, because that's where we need to list instances to be cleaned up by the provisioner
[09:00] <voidspace> dimitern: babbageclunk: frobware: doorbell - will be standup shortly
[09:00] <axw> dimitern: if we didn't tag it, it's busted anyway, so no point returning it from anything else
[09:01] <dimitern> axw: right
[09:01] <dimitern> axw: ok, thanks I'll take it from here :)
[09:07] <thumper> babbageclunk: are you in the standup?
[10:00] <babbageclunk> thumper: oops, didn't notice that because I was in the standup
[11:54] <babbageclunk> voidspace, dimitern: review please? https://github.com/juju/gomaasapi/pull/54
[11:55] <babbageclunk> voidspace, dimitern: I'm going to go through the MAAS provider and make sure we can deal with machine.BootInterface() or interface.VLAN() being nil.
[11:55] <dimitern> babbageclunk: looking
[11:58]  * babbageclunk is out - meeting someone for lunch
[12:26] <jcastro> http://askubuntu.com/questions/766851/how-do-i-use-a-feature-flag/76685
[12:26] <jcastro> can someone peer review my answer please?
[12:30] <dimitern> jcastro: looks correct
[12:59] <babbageclunk> dimitern: is the maas networking interlock happening?
[13:00] <babbageclunk> dimitern: Thanks for the review, by the way!
[13:00] <dimitern> babbageclunk: oops, I forgot - joining now
[13:03] <voidspace> babbageclunk: cool
[13:20] <mup> Bug #1577776 opened: 2.0b6: asks for domain-name, then doesn't know what it is <landscape> <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577776>
[13:32] <mup> Bug #1577776 changed: 2.0b6: asks for domain-name, then doesn't know what it is <landscape> <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577776>
[13:41] <mup> Bug #1577776 opened: 2.0b6: asks for domain-name, then doesn't know what it is <landscape> <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577776>
[13:50] <mup> Bug #1576704 changed: MigrationExportSuite.TestUnits unequal results <blocker> <ci> <go1.6> <regression> <test-failure> <unit-tests> <windows> <juju-core:Fix Released by ericsnowcurrently> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1576704>
[13:50] <mup> Bug #1576913 changed: StatusHistorySuite.TestPruneStatusHistory <blocker> <ci> <go1.6> <regression> <test-failure> <unit-tests> <windows> <juju-core:Fix Released by ericsnowcurrently> <juju-core 1.25:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1576913>
[13:50] <voidspace> anyone seen this?
[13:50] <voidspace> mongo/open.go:116: undefined: tls.TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
[13:50] <voidspace> ah, wrong version of go probably
[14:05] <babbageclunk> voidspace, dimitern: If iface.VLAN() is nil at https://github.com/juju/juju/blob/master/provider/maas/interfaces.go#L249
[14:06] <dimitern> babbageclunk: then VLANTag should be 0
[14:06] <babbageclunk> what should happen? Skip this interface in the loop? Use 0 as the tag? Error out?
[14:06] <babbageclunk> dimitern: ok, awesome, thanks!
[14:07] <voidspace> babbageclunk: how can machine.InterfaceSet() return a nil interface?
[14:07] <voidspace> babbageclunk: I'm pretty sure it can't
[14:07] <babbageclunk> voidspace: It can return an interface for which the VLAN is null (or will be able to in the near future).
[14:07] <voidspace> babbageclunk: ah, VLAN is nil
[14:08] <voidspace> babbageclunk: sure
[14:08] <voidspace> I misread
[14:08] <babbageclunk> voidspace: :)
[14:29] <mup> Bug #1577568 changed: juju 1.25.5 problems with bonded nics <landscape> <juju-core:Invalid> <juju-core 1.25:Invalid> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577568>
[14:29] <mup> Bug #1577798 opened: azure 400 bad request creating networks <azure-provider> <blocker> <bootstrap> <ci> <juju-core:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577798>
[14:35] <babbageclunk> voidspace, dimitern: review for the Juju side of the nullable/optional fields work? http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/4759/
[14:36] <dimitern> babbageclunk: LGTM
[14:37] <babbageclunk> dimitern: ta!
[14:41] <voidspace> babbageclunk: \o/
[14:42] <dooferlad> dimitern / voidspace / babbageclunk: Please take a look: http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/4758
[14:43] <dooferlad> it is mostly a forward port. The only change vs 1.25 is https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/5333/commits/4fe1310661e8256164ab5039a0079fc049060d84
[14:43] <dooferlad> so just take a look at that.
[14:46] <babbageclunk> dooferlad: Ha ha, took me moment to click that I was reading Python not Go.
[14:46] <dooferlad> babbageclunk: :-)
[14:49] <dimitern> dooferlad: LGTM - I'm happy the bridge script shows routes once more btw - it was a pain to debug without it
[14:49] <dooferlad> dimitern: thanks
[15:29] <mup> Bug #1577816 opened: Deploy of cs:trusty/ubuntu gives me xenial <landscape> <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577816>
[15:53] <mup> Bug #1577556 opened: mysql charm is failing to get unit-get private-address in the install hook <juju-core:New> <mysql (Juju Charms Collection):Fix Released> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577556>
[16:11] <babbageclunk> dimitern: If I want to install juju-mongodb3.2 do I have to have xenial installed?
[16:12] <dimitern> babbageclunk: I suspect so, but I don't know for sure
[16:13] <babbageclunk> dimitern: :/ I guess upgrading might be the thing to do now anyway.
[16:14] <dimitern> babbageclunk: +1
[16:15] <perrito666> babbageclunk: yes, iirc there is no mongo 3.2 package for earlier versions of ubuntu
[16:16] <babbageclunk> ok, thanks perrito666.
[16:19] <ejat> hi .. is there any inside the documentation brieft how to get MS Azure credential
[16:19] <ejat> brief*
[16:23] <natefinch> uh, wow, we just let you set whatever values you want in the model config? There's no check if something is a valid configuration value?
[16:39] <ejat> natefinch: u mean in credentials.yaml ?
[16:41] <xnox> frobware, hi
[17:12] <mup> Bug #1577816 changed: Deploy of cs:trusty/ubuntu gives me xenial <landscape> <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577816>
[17:17] <alexisb> katco, looks like this bug just got a lot easier :) see urulama latest comment: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1576509
[17:17] <mup> Bug #1576509: Race in macaroon-bakery <blocker> <ci> <race-condition> <regression> <test-failure> <juju-core:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1576509>
[17:17]  * katco looks
[17:18] <katco> alexisb: nice! :) should be a small update to dependencies.tsv :D
[17:19] <alexisb> whoo hoo for an easy win thanks to rogpeppe1 !
[17:19] <rogpeppe1> alexisb: :)
[17:43] <ejat> marcoceppi: ERROR autorest:WithErrorUnlessStatusCode POST https://login.microsoftonline.com/fb30bf07-xxxx-xxxx-b9a8-02ef08680fb9/oauth2/token?api-version=1.0 failed with 400 Bad Request
[18:10] <natefinch> juju status doesn't show containers?
[18:10] <natefinch> boggle
[18:11] <natefinch> (tabular that is, they're shown in yaml)
[19:03] <mup> Bug #1577900 opened: juju set-model-config's UX is very confusing <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577900>
[19:08] <tych0> frobware: hi
[19:09] <frobware> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1242783
[19:09] <mup> Bug #1242783: containers should use constraints to configure cgroups/kvm values <constraints> <local-provider> <lxd> <juju-core:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1242783>
[19:09] <frobware> tych0: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1242783
[19:12] <tych0> frobware: ah
[19:12] <tych0> so this has been around for a while :)
[19:24] <mup> Bug #1577900 changed: juju set-model-config's UX is very confusing <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577900>
[19:58] <natefinch> am I crazy... didn't juju ssh used to work for lxc containers juju creates?
[19:58] <natefinch> ericsnow, katco, cherylj ^
[19:58] <perrito666> dont remember, but it should
[19:59] <katco> natefinch: i think it did
[19:59] <perrito666> you should be able to ssh into an lxc container
[19:59] <natefinch> well, you can't
[19:59] <natefinch> $ juju ssh 1/lxc/0
[19:59] <natefinch> ssh: connect to host 10.0.3.88 port 22: No route to host
[19:59] <perrito666> bug?
[19:59] <natefinch> tried on aws and gce
[19:59] <perrito666> natefinch: pastrebin your ifconfig
[19:59] <perrito666> ah that not on your machine?
[20:00] <perrito666> actually I changed my mind, paste ifconfig and lxc list
[20:00]  * perrito666 smells something fishy there
[20:00] <natefinch> perrito666:  yeah, not lxd provider, lxc containers on real cloud machines
[20:00] <perrito666> ohh, I see what is going on there
[20:00] <perrito666> that IS a bug
[20:00] <natefinch> reporting
[20:01] <perrito666> voidspace: any input on that?
[20:01] <cherylj> natefinch: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1577638/comments/3
[20:01] <mup> Bug #1577638: Can't juju ssh to lxd-placed container <juju-core:Incomplete> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577638>
[20:01] <perrito666> ah I see
[20:02] <perrito666> well that is poor ux, juju ssh should know how to jump through the hoops
[20:02] <natefinch> yeah, that's half the reason juju ssh exists, is to jump through hoops for you
[20:03] <cherylj> natefinch: this was a security concern - allowing users who don't have access to the admin model
[20:03] <perrito666> cherylj: interesting
[20:03] <natefinch> man we're bad at UX
[20:04] <perrito666> cherylj: actually you could ssh into the container by going through the host
[20:04] <perrito666> or you could actually do proper port binding there and get the 22 exposed
[20:09] <natefinch> cherylj: can we set the status to something other than incomplete? the bug seems well-enough specified.  I'd prefer we raised this up as a fairly major UX problem, and regression from 1.x
[21:02] <alexisb> katco, ericsnow, one of you guys available for technical back up  on an sts q?
[21:02] <ericsnow> alexisb: sure
[21:02] <alexisb> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/canonical.com/juju-core-sts
[21:02] <alexisb> ericsnow, ^^
[21:15] <mup> Bug #1577939 opened: Backup-restore failed on xenial because service "juju-db": No such file or directory <backup-restore> <blocker> <ci> <xenial> <juju-core:Incomplete> <juju-core 1.25:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577939>
[21:18] <mup> Bug #1577939 changed: Backup-restore failed on xenial because service "juju-db": No such file or directory <backup-restore> <blocker> <ci> <xenial> <juju-core:Incomplete> <juju-core 1.25:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577939>
[21:21] <mup> Bug #1577939 opened: Backup-restore failed on xenial because service "juju-db": No such file or directory <backup-restore> <blocker> <ci> <xenial> <juju-core:Incomplete> <juju-core 1.25:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577939>
[21:45] <mup> Bug #1577945 opened: Bootstrap failed: DNS/routing misconfigured on maas 1.8 <blocker> <bootstrap> <ci> <maas-provider> <network> <regression> <juju-core:Incomplete> <juju-core 1.25:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577945>
[21:45] <mup> Bug #1577949 opened: windows services cannot upgrade to 1.25.6 <blocker> <ci> <regression> <upgrade-juju> <windows> <juju-core:Incomplete> <juju-core 1.25:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1577949>
[23:04] <perrito666> wallyworld: is standup happening anyway?
[23:05] <wallyworld> perrito666: sure, why not
[23:06] <anastasiamac> wallyworld: perrito666: why would standup not b happening?
[23:06] <perrito666> well we had another meeting happening at that time and then we changed it
[23:07] <anastasiamac> wallyworld: perrito666: oh i have release/bug updates for standup :D
[23:12] <perrito666> I dont think we can push it back 20 mins or so?
[23:14]  * perrito666 looks at wallyworld anastasiamac and axw 
[23:14] <wallyworld> perrito666: you want to delay? fine with me
[23:14]  * axw looks back
[23:14] <axw> I can delay a bit
[23:15] <perrito666> k bbh
[23:17] <wallyworld> perrito666: axw: there's 3 in the call as the others didn't see the backscroll; axw want to jump in and perrito666 can join us when ready
[23:17] <axw> wallyworld: okey dokey
[23:23] <perrito666> I am here
[23:36] <redir> ericsnow: yst?
[23:38] <perrito666> wallyworld: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1576313
[23:38] <mup> Bug #1576313: windows: uniter tests fail because logs get dumped to stderr <blocker> <ci> <regression> <test-failure> <windows> <juju-core:In Progress by hduran-8> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1576313>
[23:40] <axw> redir: wallyworld: to juju-core actually, maybe reed's not on it
[23:45]  * redir looks
[23:49] <anastasiamac> redir: i forwarded it to u directly \o/
[23:50] <redir> axw: wallyworld I don't appear to be on a juju-core list.
[23:50] <redir> anastasiamac: tx:)
[23:50] <anastasiamac> redir: and i think that u r on the mailing list (i can see u)
[23:50] <anastasiamac> :D
[23:50] <redir> hmmm
[23:51] <anastasiamac> it's going to ur namesurname.com
[23:53] <redir> anastasiamac: I think it is a bug:)
[23:54] <anastasiamac> bug = user error?
[23:54] <redir> I have recieved no emails from that from address...
[23:54] <anastasiamac> redir: taking it to pm